Workato Reviews

We predominantly work for enterprise clients across various sectors like manufacturing, FMCG, and finance. Most of our clients are at the enterprise level, and they use Workato to automate their existing business processes and consolidate their legacy IT landscape into a modern iPaaS system. Specific use cases include supply chain, contract management, human capital management, and complete integration of business processes.

Workato allows us to streamline our operations by replacing multiple legacy systems with a single integrated platform. The event-driven architecture, API management, and secure on-prem facilities are highly beneficial for large enterprises. With Workato, organizations can automate end-to-end processes, such as employee onboarding and offboarding, using AI agents. The return on investment is quick, and Workato significantly reduces manual work.

From a technical standpoint, the security features at the data orchestration level could be more organized, and improvements in certificate management are necessary. Also, logging capabilities present some limitations, and enhancements are being discussed with the product team. There is also room for improvement in B2B integration features.

I have used it for more than four years now.

We closely worked with the Workato product team from the blueprint phase, ensuring a smooth and tailored setup process. Clients are not left out once the application is subscribed, as the platform is securely configured according to client needs.

In four years of use, we have experienced no downtime with Workato. Its stability is commendable, requiring hardly any maintenance.

Scalability with Workato is seamless. Even when clients overutilize the product, Workato allows them to continue without interruption, charging accordingly rather than limiting usage.

Workato's support is exceptional, with direct access to a product Spock for immediate solutions and updates on product enhancements. This transparency and responsiveness greatly benefit our operations.

The initial setup was facilitated by transparent collaboration with the Workato team, ensuring that the platform was appropriately configured to our security and operational needs. Clients are well-supported and not left behind after subscribing.

Our implementation involved close collaboration with the product team to tailor the platform setup to security features required by clients.

The return on investment with Workato is notable. By replacing multiple legacy systems and teams with a single automated platform, organizations see significant cost savings and improved business operations.

Workato's pay-as-you-use model is competitive when compared with other iPaaS providers, making it cost-effective for organizations looking to integrate multiple functionalities under one platform.

Before implementing Workato, organizations should clearly understand their business problems and challenges to maximize the benefits. Workato is designed for enterprise-level integration, providing a comprehensive solution to address revenue and operational leakages. I rate Workato at a nine out of ten, acknowledging its strong features while keeping room for improvement in B2B integrations.

On-premises

I am working as an integration lead, and we had a project where we implemented an integration for one of our clients. The use case in our project was to bring data from a source system, Shopify, where we transfer all dimensions and fact data to Snowflake. This integration was achieved through Workato.

The most valuable features of Workato include event streams that enable loosely coupled APIs and maintain reusable flows in the platform. We can bind multiple subscribers to them and have the same data supplied across multiple channels and multiple subscribers.

Another valuable capability I am currently exploring is Intelligent Document Processing, which allows us to read PDFs and images and extract those details. This is especially useful for invoices and purchase order receipts.

The recipe-driven automation in Workato is very impressive. For the same client project, we extracted purchase orders from emails and pushed them into the file system. The automation worked as expected, and we didn't face any issues with the Workato email connector.

Regarding connectors, I have used approximately 20 to 30 connectors. The most useful was the Ruby connector, which allows us to run Ruby scripts and get the required output. This was particularly helpful during our integration when we extracted and implemented business logic for multiple complex transformation scenarios. Similarly, we can run Python scripts and JavaScript as well, making these useful tools for data transformation.

There are storage limitations in Workato. The event streams come with a limitation of only 512 KB. If the payload size is huge, those payloads cannot be published into the event stream. We have to use storage and split the data. It would be beneficial if Workato could improve these size limits on event streams.

The Ruby connectors also come with a memory size limitation of around 45 MB, which could be increased to around 100 MB.

Regarding stability improvements, the memory capabilities need enhancement. Additionally, there was an action missing for inserting data into Snowflake tables. It would be advantageous to have the ability to insert records in batches. This is a missing point and an area for enhancement.

I have been working with Workato for the last six to eight months on a project for one of my clients, Sempra.

We haven't moved our APIs to production yet, but it has been stable across all the connectors and versions we are using. I don't see any major issues at all, so whatever versions we are using are stable.

For the stability rating, I would rate it a 7.

Workato demonstrates good scalability. We can scale as much as possible according to our plan, whether it involves recipes or connections.

I would rate the scalability of Workato an 8.

I interacted with technical support regarding an issue where we needed help with a memory limitation. We reached out, and they informed us about the maximum memory limit for our connector. We were looking to increase the memory size, but that wasn't possible. I'm looking forward to how they can improve this size limitation for higher volume integration.

Based on my experience with the technical support, I would rate them a 9.

Positive

The initial setup of Workato was straightforward, and I didn't face any challenges. This was due to the training materials shared by the Workato team, which were really helpful.

I work with the client through conference calls, so our architect handled the purchase. I haven't utilized real-time data synchronization in my project.

For metrics and KPIs regarding AI-driven insights, I check dashboards where I monitor task usage and dependency graphs.

I haven't utilized any AI capabilities in my project yet.

I cannot comment on Workato's compliance with industry standards.

I haven't been working with anything else other than Workato in the last 12 months. I can confirm my availability over call or email.

Overall rating for Workato: 8 out of 10.

We primarily use Workato to extend functionality to legacy systems. We employ Workato to orchestrate processes, gather information via other interfaces like Teams, and push it into our core systems. We also utilize Workato for onboarding processes, contractor management, and timesheets entries through Teams. Additionally, it is used for resource forecasting with Excel and Power BI, integration between our K2 system and Azure AD for identity management, and interfacing with external solutions for employee and project lists. Workato orchestrates Power BI for managing refreshes and notifications.

A key value of Workato is the democratization of its use. We've enabled more junior users to create and work with processes, extending usage beyond IT to non-technical staff. Workato is also highly reliable, and migrations require minimal effort. Noteworthy features include its drag and drop UI, numerous integrations, ease of creating new integrations via SDK, and the Copilot model. Workato's reliability and the ease of volume processing are invaluable, positioning it above alternatives like Microsoft Power Automate.

More features related to the application side would be handy. A larger library of community recipes and connectors around common but complex applications, such as Microsoft, could be beneficial, as they are often complicated to handle.

I have been using Workato for a little over two years.

The initial setup of Workato was straightforward. The environment wasn't new to us, and we partnered with a third party to quickly overcome the learning curve. The setup process was efficient, allowing us to deploy recipes within a week.

Workato is very stable. Once deployed, solutions do not break, making it more reliable than other solutions like Microsoft Power Automate that often disconnect.

I believe Workato is very scalable, as we have not encountered any limitations. It easily handles our volume requirements.

Workato's technical support is excellent. They are available online for chat support and typically find solutions promptly. In cases needing escalation, responses are usually received within hours. The community around Workato is also influential, offering support and monthly meetings to address questions and share information.

Positive

We were using Microsoft Power Automate and custom automations. However, Power Automate was frequently disconnected, and relying on a single developer for custom solutions was complex. Workato proved to be a superior solution, offering greater reliability and ease of use.

The initial setup was facilitated by a partner who helped us to quickly learn and implement Workato. We focused on specific tasks while some development was carried out by the partner and later handed over to us.

We engaged a partner who assisted us in navigating the learning curve efficiently and built initial processes, which were then handed over for us to learn.

We know that we've improved processes, replacing formerly manual tasks. Workato provided spreadsheets for ROI calculations, but we haven't taken the time to assess it.

Workato provided good value for money. We managed to negotiate a flexible deal that suited our needs, adjusting the initial offer for viability.

We evaluated Microsoft Power Automate and custom automations before choosing Workato.

Based on my experience, I definitely recommend Workato to others. It is the best product in our technology stack, allowing us to integrate legacy systems and address diverse requirements. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Workato a nine out of ten.

Public Cloud

Other

Our primary use case for Workato involves aged care and scenarios with multiple global instances. It's particularly useful for integrating operations across several countries or regions where complex integrations aren't necessary.

Workato offers a built-in lookup table for storing data, unlike earlier middleware technologies, which required an external database. It can store up to ten thousand records. Additionally, the platform's ease of use for connecting to different integrations, like Salesforce and NetSuite, is very beneficial because development isn't necessary, and everything is readily available.

Workato could be improved by adding a proper debugging feature. Currently, there's no way to set breakpoints to stop the process and debug an error as you can in other tools like webMethods.

I have used the solution for a year now.

I did not experience any issues with the deployment of Workato. It's straightforward to set up.

I would rate the stability of Workato as an eight out of ten. As a cloud-based tool, it provides stable performance without downtime.

Workato is scalable, rated at eight out of ten. It supports multi-region operations well, allows dynamic connection switching at runtime, and can manage multiple databases within one integration service, called a recipe.

I rate the customer service support as seven. The support is not available 24/7, and having more support options could be beneficial.

Neutral

The initial setup was very easy. I would rate it ten out of ten. It's a plug-and-play setup, taking only a few seconds.

Compared to other iPaaS solutions like Boomi, Workato’s pricing model charges per connection step, which increases the cost. I would rate the pricing at seven, indicating it leans towards being more expensive.

I have done some work in Boomi and consider its pricing to be more competitive.

For someone evaluating Workato, it matters whether the requirements and budget align with the platform. Workato is a reasonable choice for medium to small companies. I rate the overall solution as a seven.

Public Cloud

Other

I am using Workato for integrating and automating solutions for finance, HR, and IT. Specific use cases include onboarding and offboarding for HR, handling invoices for finance, and creating tickets for customers.

When compared to other tools, Workato is a low-code solution with a user-friendly drag-and-drop UI. It comes with pre-built connectors, eliminating the need to write APIs. Workato ensures data encryption in transit and at rest, and offers built-in error monitoring with alerting capabilities through Slack, email, or external monitoring tools. It also facilitates role-based access.

One area for improvement is the CI/CD pipeline, which lacks a version control system similar to GitHub for easier deployment. Though it has a recipe life cycle management, it does not automatically integrate with a GitHub-like facility. Additionally, the cost for high volume integrations could be reduced, as Workato uses task-based pricing, which can become expensive with higher usage.

I have been using Workato for more than four years.

Deployment is straightforward, requiring the creation of a manifest that contains all the necessary logic and files. This manifest is then migrated to higher environments.

Workato is generally stable, although there are some limitations, such as a hard limit of 50,000 records for CSV file processing. To handle more than 50,000 records, I use scripting actions like Python or JavaScript to process large data in chunks.

Workato's support is robust, featuring first and second-level support. Minor issues can be addressed through the chat feature in the UI. For complex issues, the response may take a day, and tickets can be opened for follow-up. Customer Success Managers help expedite issue resolution.

Neutral

While the upfront cost is high due to task-based pricing, the cost is relatively low in terms of development because Workato provides necessary connectors for integration use cases.

I would recommend Workato because everyone is moving away from writing extensive code. In the current trend of AI, tools that integrate systems easily are valuable. Overall, I would rate the solution a 9.5 out of 10.

Other

I am an integration consultant, and I use Workato for integration. Recently, one of my clients wanted to migrate from using Workato to another platform, so I started exploring Workato to understand why it's attracting big clients. The focus has been on cost efficiency since the cost of other platforms is quite high. I noticed Workato is less expensive and offers similar integration capabilities.

I appreciate Workato's job reporting feature, which consolidates recipes and jobs for easy management. I also like the control over performance, cores, etc., and the simplicity of creating recipes. Workato has around 100 connectors, allowing anyone, even without an IT background, to work with them. Additionally, the platform resembles Salesforce in presenting both solutions and their benefits.

Currently, Workato is a low-code platform without native programming capabilities. I would appreciate having a dedicated programming language for tasks like transformations and functional programming. Although the drag-and-drop framework is easy, incorporating a coding language could enhance functionality.

I have been using Workato for at least three months.

Deploying Workato was easy and clear. Although the components are good, I would like an IDE or similar tool to test recipes locally. Considering AI integration with agents in future releases would also be beneficial.

I have not observed any stability issues, but it should be tested with large files or data sets to determine its latency performance.

Workato lacks manual control over scalability. Their cluster management automatically calculates the necessary resources like VCores.

I have used other solutions previously but explored Workato when my client wanted to switch due to the high cost of those solutions.

The initial setup was straightforward and fast. Connecting components took some time depending on the authentication method, such as OAuth 2.0 or JWT, but overall, it was easy.

Compared to integrators like Boomi or MuleSoft, Workato is priced reasonably. While Workato was a target for acquisition by Salesforce, its CEO declined the sale, but Salesforce is one of its investors.

Solutions evaluated include Boomi, MuleSoft, and Workato.

For new users, having an IT background simplifies using Workato, especially regarding aspects like schedulers and connections. Those without an IT background should acquire basic IT knowledge. My overall ratings are eight for user experience and courses, ten for simplicity, and eight in terms of cost. I suggest creating academic projects or exercises for better learning. Although Workato is new in Europe, it shows potential for being cost-effective and time-saving. I rate the overall solution as eight.

Public Cloud

Other

I use Workato as middleware for cloud integration within my organization. It is employed to integrate systems such as ERP and customer planning systems. The automation capabilities are particularly useful for onboarding a new employee, allowing for their access to be automatically set up across approximately twenty systems such as payroll, training portals, Salesforce, and SAP ERP.

The main benefits of Workato for me are that everything is cloud-based, eliminating the need for installation or maintenance. It allows app-to-app and real-time integrations, which significantly enhance process efficiency. When an employee joins, accounts are automatically created. Moreover, AI automation simplifies integration development by understanding requirements from prompts and creating the necessary automation.

The Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) capabilities could be improved.

I have been working with Workato for about five years.

I find Workato stable.

In my experience, it is scalable.

I reach out to the professional services team or customer success team for technical support, and they provide immediate responses.

Positive

I am working with a Boomi solution alongside Workato.

The initial setup process is straightforward for me as there is no need for extensive setup, allowing direct development.

In my experience, we have seen a return on investment, with results visible within a week.

Workato is a SaaS product, and its pricing depends on usage.

I also work with a Boomi solution.

I recommend Workato for even small customers who may not have a large IT firm, as it can be used as an integration product to automate business processes. Overall, I rate it nine out of ten.

Public Cloud

Other

When I was at HighRadius, I was leading the integration team, and we were using Workato to integrate customer data from their systems to our systems. We needed to integrate data from various data points and bring it into HighRadius systems for client projects. This was the main use case for Workato.

Workato reduces total development time as it generates code seamlessly and integrates with SQL databases or APIs through configuration. This automation facilitates efficient integration of customer data from their systems into our systems. It effectively handles real-time data integration with moderate volumes, and development time is significantly reduced by its automation capabilities, which are beneficial for both SQL databases and APIs.

The data flow and debugging processes need improvement, especially for tracing issues. Additionally, Workato struggles with scalability when handling high volumes of data, such as terabytes, requiring chunking for initial data loads. While it works well with moderate volumes, it requires enhancements to handle larger data volumes more efficiently.

I have been working with Workato for about one and a half years recently. However, I had used it previously when I was at Saeronlabs.

For daily runs, Workato is stable and there is no latency issue. However, during the initial data loads with large volumes, Workato was unable to handle the data effectively, which indicates stability issues under high loads.

There are scalability limitations with Workato. The solution could not handle high data volumes during initial loads for one of our clients, which required us to break the data into smaller chunks for processing.

The customer service and technical support from Workato were good. Whenever we faced issues with data volume, the support team helped us by suggesting solutions like breaking the data into chunks.

Positive

Overall, I would rate Workato an eight out of ten. 

While it has a lot of potential, there are areas like scalability and debugging that require improvement.

I have used Workato for almost six months in my company to integrate different platforms using this Workato tool.

The main use case of using Workato is that Workato is an integration platform, whereby if I want to integrate one platform with another, such as integrating SAP with Freshworks, I have to use Workato as a tool to integrate these two platforms with each other.

The process of integrating SAP with Freshworks using Workato is pretty straightforward, and I really appreciate Workato in terms of integration because it is very simple and user-friendly when it comes to coding, and most of the part is a non-coding part. When there is complexity in functionality for one system, we have to do the coding on Ruby, which is also a fun part. I have used many integration tools other than Workato, and I find Workato quite easy to understand and fast compared to Integration Hub of ServiceNow, which is quite detailed and a little complex. Therefore, I found Workato easy and the speed is quite good.

The best feature of Workato is the ability to create a flow, and the majority of the things are already available in the module, which I find valuable. Additionally, if we have a demand for a specific tool, we can connect with the support team, and they can provide us what we need. Another valuable aspect is that there are many things publicly present in their library to use, and if I need to create an integration for a particular system to another, there might already be something available created by other users in public repositories.

The public repository helps me significantly because when I know the PRD document of the customer and understand their use case, I can look first in the public repository for something similar instead of creating everything myself, thereby saving my time. If I find something similar, I can take it as an example, utilize it in my personal flow, reduce my work on that particular task, and incorporate that chunk of flow into my own flow. Hence, the presence of numerous flows in public repositories is quite helpful.

Workato has positively impacted my organization, depending upon the customer's preference for which tool to use. While some customers prefer Workato due to its good customer support, it's ultimately based on the customer's needs, and we can perform integration using various tools available in the market. Personally, I enjoy using Workato, and my company feels that it results in significant time savings since it is easy to understand and allows new team members to onboard quickly. My superiors appreciate it as it enhances speed and accuracy, allowing QEs to understand and test completed tasks easily.

The positive impact on my team's speed and accuracy is evident whenever we start a new project, as new team members face challenges understanding how we use Workato. However, the best thing about Workato is the amazing and detailed documentation available on their website, which makes understanding and using the tool easy and fast. Even individuals without a coding background can contribute to projects quickly, as we have had freshers join with limited exposure to coding who can still catch up and integrate with projects swiftly.

Regarding improvements for Workato, there was an incident when we wanted a specific feature implemented, and the process was quite lengthy as we had to raise a ticket, track the ticket, and wait for the team to address it. Given the millions of users of Workato, when a customer has a specific requirement, it reflects a possible shortcoming in team resources. However, it's understandable given the high volume of tickets, and I believe Workato may be working on this aspect by leveraging AI tools in the future, which points to this being more of a manpower issue than a critical flaw.

I believe the process is already efficient, and I don't think I'm in a place to suggest improvements since I find Workato very amazing and well-kept.

I have been working in my current field for over one year and nine months, approximately.

We have never faced reliability or downtime issues with Workato; it is very stable.

Workato is very scalable, and we can scale any project using it, so scalability is not an issue.

I would say customer support is good, but I cannot classify it as very good as my personal experience varies.

Neutral

I have used multiple tools for the same integration before Workato, but it was not a personal choice; it was driven by my organization's requirements based on customer needs. I prefer using Workato because it's user-friendly while other tools tend to have much complexity due to being very detailed integration tools suited for large systems Oracle and SAP. Each tool has its own strengths and weaknesses, depending on the customer's requirements and our development needs.

I have definitely seen a return on investment from using Workato, notably in time saved and the reduced need for employees since it requires less time to understand and a handful of people can manage much larger integrations with this tool compared to others.

My advice for others looking into using Workato is to thoroughly review the Workato documentation, as it is very detailed, good, and easy to understand.

I think we have covered almost everything regarding Workato.

On a scale of 1-10, I rate Workato a 9.

Public Cloud

Other

There are workflows available to integrate with other systems and automate the process. One of the typical use cases is on order processing. It's an eCommerce-based system connecting with the VTEX as the eCommerce platform and the backend as SAP. The solution is integrated with Slack, and some approvals are required through Slack. Once you receive an order from the portal or the mobile app, it goes for approval directly on the Slack channel. It then goes to the next level for an SAP check for quality or approvals, and then it moves to the actual processing and submission for delivery to the customer. This workflow is nice, and we worked with it recently.

The automation in Workato is very good. Their automation and workflows are very strong, and you can build the workflows very easily and quickly. You can still have your complete workflow defined, and they call it a recipe. You can build a recipe very quickly and easily.

However, their API management is not very good, and their EDI pieces are not strong. The API Management needs to be matured. They have the major connectors available, but they still need to improve them.

A limitation is that their cloud presence is only in North America and Europe. They don't have anything in the Middle East or India. So they need to expand their base for companies that don't want to leave their country or region.

We have been using this solution for one year, and we are using the latest version. It is a pure iPad solution, and it is deployed on cloud.

We haven't faced any issues with stability.

It has good elasticity and is scalable. I am unsure how the solution performs during the festive seasons when our orders are multi-fold. We only need about two people for maintenance once it is in production. It will also depend on the business hours and what the business needs.

We get good support from Workato, and they help with the initial setup. As soon as you purchase the Workato licenses, you get a credit based on your requirements and the package you purchase. You can get 80 or even 120 hours of professional service support from Workato, which is helpful. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup is quite straightforward. When connecting Workato with your on-premises system, you have to install the Workato agent on your network. It was not complex but a long process to configure and settle. Workato has not gone live for us yet, so only the developers are currently using it. But in terms of users, we will have close to 250 and maybe 30 additional direct users.

We are seeing a lot of different use cases where we can add new recipes because we started small, and there are many different areas where we can implement Workato for automation.

We have seen a return on investment.

It's recipe-based pricing. You have base pricing, and then you have recipe-based pricing. They sometimes have different kinds of pricing for commercial enterprises.

If you are going with a commercial price, it is cheap at around 50K per year. However, if you go with enterprise pricing, the price will be more at about 120k-130K. And for every recipe you add, it makes a price difference.

We evaluated MuleSoft because of the use cases at the time that MuleSoft did not have. The first feature we wanted was workflows, and we found that developing workflows in a Workato recipe was easier than in MuleSoft. Secondly, the price of MuleSoft was high, and Workato was cheaper. Thirdly, because we had a limited number of use cases, there was time sensitivity in choosing a solution. But now, if I had to choose between MuleSoft and Workato, I would choose MuleSoft.

I rate this solution an eight out of ten. Regarding advice, before proceeding with Workato, evaluate the product and understand your use cases. If you want to do batch processing or workflows that aren't heavy, Workato is good. However, Workato is not the best choice if you have heavy EDI.

In the next release, we would like to see more connectors. They are still evolving on many connectors, and EDI support is needed. In addition, many customers may not want to use Workato because they are on AWS Cloud, and those who use Azure Shop or GCP Shop may feel the transaction has a cost. They have to go with a cloud-agnostic platform. Workato plans to provide its services on different clouds, not only on GCP or AWS.