No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Matias Casas - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Quality Assurance Engineer at Equifax Inc.
Reseller
May 11, 2024
Easy to learn and used for automation testing and monitoring
Pros and Cons
  • "We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring."
  • "Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved."

What is most valuable?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring. With LambdaTest, we can use multiple browsers or operating systems to do testing.

What needs improvement?

Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using LambdaTest for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have faced bugs with the solution.

Buyer's Guide
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
May 2026
Learn what your peers think about TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
899,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Around 100 users are using the solution in our organization.

How are customer service and support?

The solution's technical support was bad. The support team took a lot of time to respond and closed my ticket without solving my problem.

How was the initial setup?

The solution’s initial setup is very easy.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

LambdaTest's pricing is cheaper than that of other similar platforms.

What other advice do I have?

LambdaTest is deployed on the cloud in our organization. I would recommend LambdaTest to other users because it's very useful and easy to learn. It is very easy for somebody to learn to use LambdaTest for the first time. I have used the AI feature in LambdaTest.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
QA Automation Analyst at Ernst & Young
Real User
Feb 15, 2021
Cost-effective, good integration, and parallel testing leads to good performance
Pros and Cons
  • "The slow nature of a cloud platform was compensated with parallel testing, and now we are able to finish our testing job faster than it was before COVID."
  • "It provides 2000+ browser-OS-resolution combinations to work with, which is perfect for our consulting firm, as we don't know what our clients may need."
  • "I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes."

What is our primary use case?

At EY, South Africa, my team is tasked with functional testing of any IT solution we are consulting or providing to the clients. As a AQ analyst in functional testing, the majority of my time is devoted to testing the cross-browser compatibility of the website or web app that I am testing. For my cross-browser testing, I am using LambdaTest for automating the testing process, mainly with the help of the parallel testing feature.

It provides 2000+ browser-OS-resolution combinations to work with, which is perfect for our consulting firm, as we don't know what our clients may need. 

How has it helped my organization?

We have a Testing lab in our office but with COVID, we were not able to access that. This is why we needed a cloud solution. I was not very confident about having a cloud solution, as they are notorious for being slow and unstable. But, I think LambdaTest is a pleasant surprise. 

It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing. The slow nature of a cloud platform was compensated with parallel testing, and now we are able to finish our testing job faster than it was before COVID.

Additionally, is it integrated well with Favor, MS teams, and Jenkins, so it's easier to communicate within the team than it was before.

What is most valuable?

Mainly, we used it to serve the needs of remote cross browser testing during COVID.

Additionally, it helped to make our deployment faster with parallel testing.

While it is simple to use, LambdaTest is also integrated with our existing tools Jenkins, Microsoft Teams, and Favor.

For responsive testing, they have LT Browsers with a side by side view. It is helpful software for quick fixes around responsiveness.

We are impressed with the stability of the platform and the promptness of the support team. Even during COVID, they were available 24*7.

What needs improvement?

I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes.

Though the stability is good, cloud platforms are a bit slower.

The platform provides good emulators and simulators but in the future, there will be a need for testing on real devices. This would be a good addition to future rollouts.

Though the dashboard is clean, there is room for test analytics to get a qualitative glance at results.

Some suggestions on testing will definitely help a newbie working with the platform.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using LambdaTest since April 2020.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used CrossBrowserTesting but there were stability issues.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated CrossBrowserTesting and BrowserStack.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, this is a good product. My advice is to talk to the support team before you buy.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
May 2026
Learn what your peers think about TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
899,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Senior Test Automation Engineer at BlackRock
Real User
Dec 28, 2020
Geolocation testing and other features help us attain uniformity across browsers, operating systems, and locales
Pros and Cons
  • "Geolocation testing is as straightforward as ticking checkboxes of browsers, operating systems, and countries."
  • "Using LambdaTest, we could run all our functionality tests across various browsers, OS, and resolutions."
  • "LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case of the LambdaTest platform is to help us scale our testing efforts. We are consistent with our product updates; however, the remote working gave us a backseat in terms of test execution speed.

Our second biggest concern was to attain uniformity and functionality across all of the browsers that our target audiences use. Using LambdaTest, it was easier to scale our testing efforts, plus the team was getting better with writing quality code.

How has it helped my organization?

Using LambdaTest, we could run all our functionality tests across various browsers, OS, and resolutions. We have a significantly large user base with some users accessing the product through obsolete browsers like Internet Explorer.

LambdaTest was a big help to test over those rare combinations of browsers and OS. In addition, Lambdatest helped us find UI misalignments and browser compatibility issues faster than before.

A big plus to the automation suite that helped us bring down the time, effort, and cost of our deployment. Thanks to the support team for being available 24*7, and solving rare hiccups, then and there.

What is most valuable?

The availability of legacy browsers and OS have helped us test rare combinations.

Geolocation testing is as straightforward as ticking checkboxes of browsers, operating systems, and countries. We can ensure that our content is localized and see how it is reflecting on our preferred locations.

The scalability of the testing process helped us deploy faster.

It provides free access to LT Browser to perform responsiveness testing. This is a super intuitive tool for responsivity testing.

Integrations with CI/CD tools like Jenkins and CircleCI discounted a lot of operational load.

What needs improvement?

LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team. We have requested this feature from the support team but it's yet to be implemented.

We would also like to see more devices for screenshot testing.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using LambdaTest for one year.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used Sauce Labs.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Senior QA Engineer at PaperCut Software
Real User
Dec 22, 2020
Easy to set up, good support, and we now find critical bugs easier with less effort than before
Pros and Cons
  • "LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
  • "LambdaTest is brilliant."
  • "Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."

What is our primary use case?

Using LambdaTest Selenium Grid, we have radically reduced the manual testing effort while ensuring our web application's cross-browser compatibility. It's crucial for us, as a healthcare provider, to make sure that there are no errors.

We had to incorporate a lot of changes due to COVID-19 and our in-house infrastructure plateaued the testing cycles, delaying our go-to-market. That’s where LambdaTest came to pull us through.

How has it helped my organization?

LambdaTest is brilliant.

The ease of testing locally hosted URLs over hundreds of browsers & operating systems without worrying about infrastructure issues has led us to deliver better software, faster!

Leveraging LambdaTest cloud infrastructure, we could scale our automation test cycles without much of a struggle. Our automation team could execute Selenium scripts in their preferred language, and the ability to test parallelly helped us optimize our continuous deployment.

Thanks to LambdaTest, we can find more critical bugs with less manual testing efforts.

What is most valuable?

LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing! You can select browsers, timezone, and country, then run the capability to start testing instantly.

We could scale up with parallel testing in local environments without any maintenance cost.

Support documentations are of good help to run tests parallelly.

Also, it offers integration with project management tools like JIRA, CI/CD tools like Jenkins, and Gitlab, which makes our cycle easier.                                             

What needs improvement?

Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon.

I would also like to test on real devices, and we have communicated the same to their support team.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with LambdaTest for one year.

How are customer service and technical support?

The support team is highly responsive, so they will guide you better.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used Sauce Labs, and we switched for better pricing.

How was the initial setup?

The setup is super easy.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Software Engineer/Software Lead at Boeing
Real User
Dec 2, 2020
Saves us time by running many tests in parallel, and there is good communication from the support team
Pros and Cons
  • "The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."
  • "LambdaTest made a great fit here when considering the latest browsers on the product."
  • "You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."

What is our primary use case?

The industry we function in, e-commerce, has a broad category of audience. We need to make sure that our website is accessible to everyone irrespective of the browser or operating system they use.

Of course, a responsive web design check is a major bullet point over our testing checklist as well. As a B2C, it's crucial for us to stay ahead of the customers and we wanted a solution that could help us ensure our changes would work seamlessly when shipped to production.

How has it helped my organization?

LambdaTest made a great fit here when considering the latest browsers on the product. The ability to test local pages, along with complimentary access to the LT browser, is an absolute delight for our developers and testers.

It helps us save a considerable effort on responsive testing, plus the native developer tools allow us to dig deep into any UI mismatch! As mentioned, we can achieve wider test coverage in the same amount of time by running multiple combinations of browsers in parallel with the LambdaTest automation suite.

What is most valuable?

The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily.

The Underpass app provides a one-click launch to test on development environments.

The LT browser offers a comparison view with pre-set mobile devices. Plus, we can add custom devices to it.

The location-based tests helped us provide a unified experience to our customers.

Integration with Bamboo CI was an added benefit.

What needs improvement?

You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only. However, from what I have heard, they are promising to go live with it shortly.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using LambdaTest for six months.

How are customer service and technical support?

We are happy with the communication from the support team.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing for LambdaTest is affordable, and one of the reasons we implemented it.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Our decision to purchase the subscription was due to their affordable pricing for the parallel tests and the communication from the support team!

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
QA Analyst at Tabcorp
Real User
Oct 21, 2020
Reduces manual testing effort, facilitates quick troubleshooting, and the support is responsive
Pros and Cons
  • "In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."
  • "LambdaTest Selenium Grid has helped us radically reduce the manual testing effort and ensure browser compatibility."
  • "The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."

What is our primary use case?

As a Fintech company, other than Chrome and Safari, we need to test our website regularly on IE and Edge as well. This is because our customers are dependent on legacy OS to use our web-application.

LambdaTest Selenium Grid has helped us radically reduce the manual testing effort and ensure browser compatibility. Our automation engineers are able to execute Selenium scripts in their preferred language, and the cloud infrastructure has allowed us to scale our automation test cycles effortlessly. A majority of our regression suites are now automated, and thanks to LambdaTest, we are now able to find more critical bugs with less manual testing efforts.

How has it helped my organization?

What really helped us improve our delivery cycle was live debugging while you automate the tests. We could break the script execution at any point and take it over from there by interactive live for the remaining test steps.

LambdaTest also provides video recording and screenshots of all your tests in their test logs, which makes tracking easier. It offers integrations with Jira and Jenkins, which ensures us better collaboration and a robust CI/CD pipeline respectively, which is an additional plus for us.

What is most valuable?

Test statuses such as Lambda Error and VM allocation allowed us to quickly troubleshoot any build that failed while executing, as we were able to identify whether the script is failing or is it something wrong from LambdaTest end.

In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues. They even helped us shift easily from our local instances to their cloud platform.                                              

What needs improvement?

The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive. The good part is that we have relayed some of our suggestions to the support and as per their support team, those suggestions are to be considered as a part of their upcoming sprint, so we look forward to seeing them onboard soon.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using LambdaTest for one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Up to now, we have never had any issues with stability!

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated Sauce Labs and CrossBrowserTesting.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Kerolos Emad - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Tester Engineer at ShopBrain
Real User
Top 20
Jun 3, 2024
Has efficient planning features and good technical support services
Pros and Cons
  • "The technical support services are excellent."

    What is most valuable?

    The platform is easy to use and has a valuable planning feature. 

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using LambdaTest for one month.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    I never encountered system breakdown issues. 

    How are customer service and support?

    The technical support services are excellent. 

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Positive

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I have worked with different solutions before. I chose LambdaTest because it helps with the planning.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    I used the product for free because I subscribed to LinkedIn Premium.

    What other advice do I have?

    The product supports Java programming needs specifically. I recommend it to others and rate it a ten. 

    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    PeerSpot user
    Aniket Bhosale - PeerSpot reviewer
    Software Test Engineer at QualiTest Group
    Real User
    Jun 2, 2024
    Provides a single platform to manage multiple devices and has a user-friendly user interface
    Pros and Cons
    • "The solution is very easy to understand and has a user-friendly UI."
    • "We get logged out of the devices if there is some inactivity."

    What is our primary use case?

    We are testing a website on the desktop. Our clients need to see how the website looks on different mobile devices. So, we use the solution to test the UI for different mobile devices and see how it looks.

    What is most valuable?

    The product provides a single platform to manage multiple devices simultaneously. It is easy to learn the product as a beginner. The solution is very easy to understand and has a user-friendly UI. The integration process is good. We can get a real-time view of different devices without any glitches.

    What needs improvement?

    We get logged out of the devices if there is some inactivity. It causes some problems. Automatic logging out is the only issue we faced. We need time to check the requirements and specifications, but LambdaTest logs us out of the device.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using the solution for three months.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    The tool is stable. We faced some slowness in the website because we tested it in different environments. However, it was not an issue with LambdaTest.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    We have four credentials to access the solution in our organization. Our clients also have credentials. We access the tool from different time zones.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial installation is easy.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The tool is not cheap, but it is not expensive. It is moderately priced.

    What other advice do I have?

    Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    PeerSpot user
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
    Updated: May 2026
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.