Symantec Endpoint Security Reviews

It is easy to implement and very stable. The AV device control and HIPS are very impressive. Just implement it and it's done. No troubleshooting efforts are required to make the policies work.

No overhead of troubleshooting after installation makes it my favourite.

It's a nice product. I think Symantec should work more precisely on minimizing database size and the live update size.

We have been recommending this product to our clients for about five years already.

No deployment is very simple.

Stability issues are very rare. It's a very stable product.

We have not encountered any issues with scalability.

Customer Service is the best.

I would give technical support a rating of 10/10. I love the way they support clients.

We do system integration and we have expertise in most products, but there is nothing like Symantec.

It was very simple to implement and very easy to use as well.

We have in-house team.

Yes,I would not name any :)

Just go through the implementation guide or some YouTube videos and the IT team can do it.

It's a single-agent installation with many features including

• wireless protection
• application control
• antivirus control.

Previously scans were taking a long time, hours or even a day. But nowadays, when the product scans, the time taken is only 15 to 20 minutes for a full scan. This is the main improvement, because it no longer affects the day-to-day work of users.

There was an administrative feature, which was available in the previous version, which has been removed. We would like that feature to be added again, because it helps the customer in many ways, and it's a very user-friendly feature.

Eight-plus years.

Stability is dependent on environment. It may not always be stable, because of environment. For example, there could be an issue in some environment, but in another environment there would not be an issue.

There are no limitations.

Eight out of 10.

From the start we have been using the same product.

It was straightforward.

We were evaluating other products, but according to this product's technology and the support, in these areas we thought that Symantec would be the right product.

One piece of advice I can give is, because in some environments it could behave properly, and in some environments it may not behave, you need to test it first, and then purchase.

I think that this product is very user-friendly. It has many technologies which can be easily accessed and available. There are many features. And there is a complete knowledge base article which is published to the public, so everyone has access to it.

• Fast deployment, even for highly distributed companies with centralized IT management using a distributed architecture.
• Intuitive management GUI, and very easy to learn.
• Excellent intrusion prevention features.

It has been a time saver for operational and reporting tasks related to Key Security Controls.

SEP provides visibility into threats and security incidents.

SEP can improve on virus detection, especially on zero-day threats.

Five years.

No. After finishing the product customizations, it worked as expected.

Not at all. Actually, it is far more scalable than other similar products.

The technical support is acceptable.

No.

It was a very fast deployment using the client detection features and a transparent Active Directory integration.

Trend Micro and Kaspersky.

I would advise to choose this product because it is very easy to deploy, has a performant host IPS and antivirus engine, and it provides a key source for security metrics.

This handles not just anti-virus, but a wide collection of other protective features including device and application control, network-based intrusions, and phishing attacks. It can also scan virtual machines too.

The reputation system relies on having a constant Internet connection for its operations.

There are three versions, include a cloud-based one, that are very flexible and easy to install and manage.

All the features are valuable.

Not applicable.

Administration, agent stability, and health.

I've used this solution for three years.

The client agent is not stable. I have to keep fixing it on four to five percent.

There were no scalability issues.

Technical support is average.

We evaluated Sophos Endpoint Security and Control. We switched due to the scalability and feature set.

The installation was straightforward.

I don't have any idea about pricing and licensing, as they are related to another functional role.

We evaluated McAfee.

it's up to them what they want to go for and what is the objective and scope they have.

Detection in real time, because it's really good.

• Machine Learning
• Reports
• Linux updates

I've used the solution for 15 years.

No.

No.

Excellent.

Straightforward.

Not applicable.

Yes, Kaspersky Enterprise.

Implementation and configuration with cloud services.

Confidence and stability are the most valuable features. For years, it has been top in this area.

It has been very useful against the day-to-day viruses and security threats.

The custom reporting and real-time monitoring (the customizable dashboard) need improvement.

I have used this solution for more than 10 years.

We have experienced a few stability issues in 10 years.

There were no scalability issues. I work in medium-sized organizations.

The few times that I contacted technical support, it was very good.

I was using McAfee. Ten years ago, the central administration was a lot better than Symantec.

The installation is really intuitive.

Symantec is a little more expensive, but it works!

Read the best practice guidelines so as to configure/tune up your environment nice and easy.

• Fast deployment, even for highly distributed companies with centralized IT management using a distributed architecture.
• Intuitive management GUI and very easy to learn.
• Excellent intrusion prevention features.

It has been a time saver for operational and reporting tasks related to key security controls.

SEP provided visibility on threats and security incidents.

SEP could improve on virus detection, specially on Zero-Day threats.

I have used this for five years.

We haven’t had stability issues. After finishing the product, customizing it worked as expected.

We have had no scalability issues at all. Actually, it is far more scalable than other similar products.

The technical support is acceptable.

We didn’t have a previous solution.

It was a very fast deployment using the client detection features and a transparent Active Directory integration.

We evaluated Trend Micro and Kaspersky.

I would advice choosing this product because it is very easy to deploy, has a performance host IPS and antivirus engine, and it provides a key source for security metrics.