Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
reviewer1476927 - PeerSpot reviewer
Owner at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Stable, scalable, good speed, and fast support
Pros and Cons
  • "I like its speed. It has all the features that I need."
  • "Its price needs improvement. Its price is almost double than any other flash storage solution."

What is our primary use case?

We are basically using it for the department of space and online education purposes. We are using its latest version.

What is most valuable?

I like its speed. It has all the features that I need.

What needs improvement?

Its price needs improvement. Its price is almost double than any other flash storage solution.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for a year and a half.

Buyer's Guide
Pure Storage FlashArray
June 2025
Learn what your peers think about Pure Storage FlashArray. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is scalable. We have about 81 users.

How are customer service and support?

I have interacted with them. They respond very fast to our queries.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I was using a Sun Microsystems product. Basically, the Sun Microsystems product is nothing but Hitachi Storage. They buy Hitachi Storage and label it as Sun Microsystems.

How was the initial setup?

We tried it on our own and almost reached the final stage, but then we had some doubts. After that, Pure people came and helped us. It took about three to four hours to complete the whole installation.

What about the implementation team?

We did it on our own. We had only two Admins for its deployment.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Its price is almost double than any other flash storage solution.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution. I am satisfied with this solution, and we plan to keep using this solution.

I would rate Pure Storage FlashArray a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1273299 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology and Architecture Deputy Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Has good data replication and continuous snapshots
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features are the replication of data and the continuous snapshot that we can take from the disc."
  • "The problem is that we can only make a few groups, around five or six groups. I like groups and we need a lot of them. We had to put all the information in only a few groups and cannot make a more detailed separation of them."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case is to keep the disc for all the critical systems in the company.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are the replication of data and the continuous snapshot that we can take from the disc.

What needs improvement?

The problem is that we can only make a few groups, around five or six groups. I like groups and we need a lot of them. We had to put all the information in only a few groups and cannot make a more detailed separation of them.

This is the only problem that we have in the two years of working with Pure Storage and it is not an important problem. The interface that this solution has is really good. It senses all the errors. We get good support from the vendor. 

The price doesn't really matter. It's very expensive, it can be cheaper.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Pure Storage FlashArray for around two years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability is very good. We haven't had any problems.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have around 4,000 users. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was very easy. It took around two weeks. 

What other advice do I have?

I would highly recommend this solution. 

I would rate it a ten out of ten. It has all the features we need. It tests all the software solutions that are currently available and that will be available in the future. You do not have to pay for any additional solutions that they purchase.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Pure Storage FlashArray
June 2025
Learn what your peers think about Pure Storage FlashArray. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Solutions Architect at SC PROSERVICECORP SRL
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Simple to use, good performance, resilient, and good technical support
Pros and Cons
  • "The speed of the Pure FlashArray is very, very fast and nothing in the market can compare to it."
  • "It is not possible to create a cluster on top of multiple arrays."

What is most valuable?

What I like most about this solution is the simplicity of the array.

The speed of the Pure FlashArray is very, very fast and nothing in the market can compare to it.

The education, compression, and the speed to perform these are astonishing.

The array is really resilient.

What needs improvement?

The price of this solution is high and should be lowered.

It is not possible to create a cluster on top of multiple arrays.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Pure Storage for about three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability of the Pure FlashArray is 100%.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

With respect to scalability, it would be nice to create a LAN or a cluster on top of multiple arrays.

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support is 100% and they respond really quickly. Their Evergreen support plan is astonishing. They are a leader in this regard.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have worked with similar solutions from IBM and NetApp. The advantage to those solutions is that you can create a LAN on top of multiple arrays.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price of this solution is high.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

With respect to comparing other solutions, when you put all of the features in a box, leverage them and migrate your application to one of these arrays, it will give you a lot of benefits. Some people have compared benchmark performance tests against other arrays and from my point of view, overall as a whole package when you sum everything up, Pure Storage is the winner.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, this is a very good solution and my main complaint is about the price. Out of all of the arrays that I have worked with, Pure Storage is one of the better ones.

I highly recommend both the solution and the company. My suggestion to anybody who is considering this product is to do the mathematics regarding the budget and the price really well because the rate can be expensive when it comes to upgrading in the future, either scaling it up or out.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Directorf1b0 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Information Security at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Has reliable infrastructure and white glove customer service

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for Pure Storage is for disaster recovery.

We use AWS for our cloud provider.

How has it helped my organization?

It's fast because it's Flash storage so the IT team doesn't have to worry about it.

Besides virtualization and the benefits associated with that, we're a Workspace ONE customer, we're going to be starting that deployment Q4 of this year and we're looking forward to improving the patient experience with the doctors and the rest of the medical staff.

We are delivering a better experience for doctors and the other staff that deliver desirable outcomes. Again, it's easy on the IT staff. It's important to have infrastructure that you can rely on and not have to worry about failing.

We use SRM for VMware integration. The failovers with SRM are fantastic. It's fast and reliable. It just works, which is sometimes difficult to achieve.

What is most valuable?

The white glove customer service that I get is their greatest value. They even do the firmware upgrades for me. I don't have to worry about it.

What needs improvement?

The capability from Pure as far as sharing out files and things of that nature is a little bit lacking. However, I know it's coming so I'm not upset that it doesn't exist yet.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Their stability is second to none.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I'm confident it will grow as the hospital grows.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

When I started at my current employer, our SAN was eight years old and out of support. It was very urgent that we replaced it immediately.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. Plug it in, then they show up to do the firmware upgrade. We connected the fiber channel, we put it on the network and within two hours we were moving workloads over.

What about the implementation team?

We bought it from a reseller but we did the installation and design ourselves in-house.

What was our ROI?

We have received a return on our investment.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I have used NetApp, IBM, and EMC XtremIO in the past. We selected Pure because of its reputation. We also considered vSAN, but we ultimately went with Pure because of the ability to do things that vSAN couldn't do at the time. It has since changed. I don't know if that would change my mind about going with Pure, but I don't regret the decision.

What other advice do I have?

Depending on their EMR, Pure is certified to work with many vendors including EPIC and MEDITECH, and they're a fantastic partner. Even from pre-sale to post-sales, I'm always in contact with the folks at VMware and Pure. They address any issues, problems, or questions I have. Their ability to help is endless.

I would rate this solution as nine out of ten. When the file services are available on Pure, it will absolutely be a ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
SystemEne60c - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Good performance, high speed, and it's easier for administrators to manage
Pros and Cons
  • "The performance is very good."
  • "Storage. There could be better storage."

What is our primary use case?

We use the on-premise deployment model of this solution for the bank. We use AWS as our cloud provider. 

How has it helped my organization?

High speed has been an improvement for our organization.

We are using the private cloud version. I run it on vSphere, vCenter, and vRealize. 

It benefits our IT organization in the way that it's easier for the administrators to manage. 

What is most valuable?

The performance is the most valuable feature. 

What needs improvement?

There could be better storage.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I like this storage because it is very easy.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability is good. 

How are customer service and technical support?

I haven't needed to use support. My employees say their support very good.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was easy and straightforward.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I don't know the exact cost but it's around $1,000.

What other advice do I have?

The team that worked with this program say it's a very good program, so I'd recommend it.

My coworkers say it's very good, so I would give this a nine out of ten. For me, no product ever gets a ten, because nothing is perfect.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
CloudAdm1d74 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Administrator at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Enables us to deploy a 3:1 ratio for storage and has good deduplication and compression
Pros and Cons
  • "For us, the most valuable feature is the compression and deduplication. Being able to deploy a three to one ratio for storage is absolutely critical in today's world with the growing need for storage and the growing need for more space."
  • "The scalability of the solution is not as good as it probably could be."

What is our primary use case?

We use the private deployment model of this solution and VMware for our storage provider. Our primary use case of this solution revolves around our clients. We have different tiers of storage. We use the Pure Storage FlashArray for our tier-one storage, our higher-level storage to support not only multi-tenant clients but also our private cloud clients, and to provide them with an all-flash storage solution.

How has it helped my organization?

We used to use a product called XtremIO which was a pretty significant improvement on the old way of deploying storage which was through standalone SANDS and we also used EMC VMAX. That was really expensive. We saw a vast improvement when we switched over to using the Pure Storage model over the XtremIO. It just made us that much more competitive. We were able to offer those workloads to our clients, we sold more, and we keep selling it.

VMware absolutely benefited our IT organization. VMware has always been just above the rest in terms of virtualization. I was not part of the organization prior to VMware being a prevalent powerhouse like it is today. But I know that back in the day of our organization, we used to have every server in a single box. Now, we've trimmed down so much of our infrastructure as well as some of our other client's that we've moved to VMware and it's been a significant improvement.

We are and we aren't running VMware on Pure. We have our ESXi hosts are not running on Pure Storage but we use Pure Storage for the back-end data stores that we run. We don't necessarily run the Hypervisor on Pure, but we run a lot of our client's virtual machines on Pure Storage.

The main driver of running VMware on Pure is for more IOPS. It's a growing trend in the industry that we have to have more clients that have more IOPS and low latency. It's an ongoing battle with the industry. When it comes down to it there's going to be a higher demand for even lower latency; even more speed, and more IOPS. We haven't hit that quite yet, but it will happen. It's just the nature of the business.

The joint solution has benefited our organization. It's with the ability to have the tier-one storage from Pure Storage that's allowed us to not only sell more at a higher cost but also it's allowed us to separate certain workloads from others. We have the tier-one storage, then we have tier-two storage on a different provider that allows us to have more storage, but also to really just give Pure Storage to those that really need it. This provides better performance for those VMs.

What is most valuable?

For us, the most valuable feature is the compression and deduplication. Being able to deploy a three to one ratio for storage is absolutely critical in today's world with the growing need for storage and the growing need for more space. Everything needs more space. For us to have a solution that allows deduplication and that lets us deploy more on less.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's a very stable solution. Even going through maintenances we can individually bring down certain nodes without any disruption in performance. It works really seamlessly with our current implementation.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of the solution is not as good as it probably could be. In regards to storage and SANDS, it's very difficult to have a scalable solution when you're talking about hardware stores. It's just really difficult to do that. Overall, I think Pure does a good job with scalability.

How are customer service and technical support?

I don't interface with technical support too much. Overall whenever I've had to interface with technical support it's always been a very positive experience.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used XtremIO. We knew we needed to switch because of the trends in the industry. It's always going be a battle for consumer-based demands. Consumers are always going to demand more, and more; now. What that means is that you need to build apps that are quicker, faster; or have a more sleek run without as much code, or they're more highly available. That's what it really comes down to.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. 

What about the implementation team?

Pure Storage did the deployment for us. 

What was our ROI?

We have seen ROI. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Pure was on our shortlist. There are not a whole lot of other competitors that do what Pure does. They architected their own SAND right from scratch and it's a versatile product.

What other advice do I have?

It's a pretty simple and pretty straightforward solution. There's a lot of one pane of glass type of things that we have with Pure and I don't see much in terms of improvement.

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten. My advice to someone considering this solution is to just get it. 

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
DBA0bbf - PeerSpot reviewer
DBA at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
A high-performance solution for our SQL Server, but automated copy data management is needed
Pros and Cons
  • "The amount of throughput that we're getting is really nice."
  • "In the next release of this solution, we would like to see automated copy data management for SQL Server."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use this solution for our SQL server in an on-premises deployment.

Having a dedicated array for our SQL server is very nice.

We are running VMware on Pure, and the main driver for that is because it is all-flash. Also, we wanted a dedicated solution for our SQL environment. Running on Pure has given us the ability to scale out our SQL environments. We tripled our environment in the past three years since implementing this solution, and we have not had any issues with the storage keeping up with the workloads.

We are making use of some of the VMware integrations that have been developed by Pure, but we are really waiting for the copy data management part.

What is most valuable?

We are really enjoying the speed of this solution. The amount of throughput that we're getting is really nice.

What needs improvement?

In the next release of this solution, we would like to see automated copy data management for SQL Server.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have had zero issues with stability once it is in. However, we have had issues with migrations to different cabinets or different arrays. We had one instance with an eight-hour outage in our primary data center because the upgrade to the controller failed, and the controller redundancy didn't work. It was an odd issue that we now have under control.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This solution scales well. The issue we had with stability is now under control, so we are able to scale out fine. We can just drop in new disks when we need them.

How are customer service and technical support?

When we've had issues, technical support has been really good about resolving them quickly. I was on the call with them when we had the issue with the controller, and they were very, very helpful.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Our older solution was not very good. Pure increased our speed a lot. We needed to increase our storage because we were filling up the array. Our SQL footprint has greatly increased over the past three years.

This solution was chosen because we happened to be doing a POC when our previous solution failed horribly, and we moved our production to Pure. It was able to pick it up, which was the selling point.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of this solution was pretty straightforward. It was a vanilla, out-of-the-box setup with nothing out of the ordinary. 

What about the implementation team?

We used an integrator to assist us with the implementation and deployment of this solution. We were hands-off, but it seems that all went well because everybody is happy with it.

What was our ROI?

We have seen a good return on investment, mainly because we took our SQL Server workload out of the general population and we're able to get it separated, which is a huge advantage to us. The biggest boost is getting separation of duty.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I have used InfiniBand in the past. We are now looking at building a new data center, and the vendors on our shortlist are Pure and InfiniBand.

What other advice do I have?

We are now starting to look at some of the copy data management tools that come with the new array.

This is now my go-to product, and I was an InfiniBand guy before. I like how there are database integrators on the Pure team that are actually there to help you tune your database workloads with their solution. I don't see that in a lot of other vendors.

This is a good product and the overall day-to-day workflow within it is great, but some of the issues that we've had with migrations bump it down slightly. The product is good, but it could be better.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
SrITAnal8af3 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr IT Analyst at a local government
Real User
increases the overall speed of our systems and because all of our servers are virtual it helps keep our footprint small
Pros and Cons
  • "Pure is simple to set up and manage on a day-to-day basis."
  • "I had to contact customer support when a drive failed as I was doing a couple of OS upgrades."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case of this solution is to manage our virtual environment and storage so our entire VMware environment runs on Pure. 

How has it helped my organization?

The solution increases the overall speed of our systems. We run our virtual desktops off of them and there was a noticeable improvement once we moved from our old sand to this new sand. One could tell, the minute we switched to this program, everything ran a lot faster.

VMware benefits our IT board because all our servers are virtual, so it helps keep our footprint small. We spend less on hardware because all our servers are virtual. 

What is most valuable?

I find the speed of the solution its most valuable feature. It is really fast and it is also very easy to use. You can basically set it up and forget about it. You don't have to manage it on a day-to-day basis. I also like the plugins that go into beta where you can see there. For instance, if I need to extend a datastore I can go straight to the plugin and extend the data store, refresh the VAs, and see the new store. I don't have to log in and use my credentials, so I save time and it is easy.

What needs improvement?

We only want to manage our virtual environment so this program has all the features we need. We're pretty straightforward customers. I don't see anything that needs to improve as we only use the standard features. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using the solution for two and a half years now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Once we've set everything up and running, we haven't really had an issue with it. So it's really stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Pure is our primary enterprise storage. We have a smaller one with about a 120 servers and a little over 400 virtual desktops. We have one 20 terabyte model and a 10 terabyte model. I believe it is scalable.

How are customer service and technical support?

I had to contact customer support when a drive failed as I was doing a couple of OS upgrades. The service was pretty good. They knew what the problem was and they were able to remove in by enabling remote features. They shipped out a replacement and we swapped it out and shipped it back. I am satisfied with the technical support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used an older program, but it was too slow. The main reason for switching over to run our VMware on Pure was the speed and, after several meetings with other vendors, we decided to go with the all-flash model. We replace our programs every five years because we want the best performance.

How was the initial setup?

It was pretty easy to set everything up. We used an integrator from Pure and we had to fill in a worksheet beforehand, so we gave them all the information they needed, like IP addresses and ports. It took less than an hour. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We looked at Pure, NetApp and Nimble. Pure is simple to set up and manage on a day-to-day basis. If you want to upgrade, you can simply call in and they do everything on their side. NetApp, for instance, requires you to be on top of firmware, drivers and updating. You must initiate the upgrades, do the upgrades, follow all the steps. With NetApp, you need a lot of insight to manage it and it's difficult if you have only one person dedicated to that. 

What other advice do I have?

I am a firm believer that everything has room for improvement, so I rate this nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Pure Storage FlashArray Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: June 2025
Product Categories
All-Flash Storage
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Pure Storage FlashArray Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.