OneLogin Reviews

In the banking sector, we face issues from the different products used, so after trying OneLogin, the customer is very satisfied with the support and how things are working with them; it is easy to use with a user-friendly interface.

In banking sector projects, I see good features in OneLogin, such as deploying with firewalls and Cisco switches, which our previous product could not do, making this a significant advantage.

OneLogin is deployed in my organization using a public cloud only, AWS.

OneLogin creates an easy environment for me where I do not have to remember each and every user's password all the time, as we can use a single password for multiple applications and it syncs with AD.

OneLogin's best features, in my experience, include its ability to sync up with multiple products such as firewalls, switches, and servers, enhancing password security.

After implementing OneLogin, my daily workflow improves since I no longer need to save passwords in Excel; OneLogin provides mail with usernames and passwords automatically.

OneLogin positively impacts my organization, making the work of HR and IT teams much easier by streamlining user data management and authentication methods.

Since implementing OneLogin, the HR and IT teams save a significant amount of time, completing projects in one day that used to take one to two days.

Regarding OneLogin's improvement, I would suggest making the interface more user-friendly and enhancing security features through implementing DLP.

Regarding needed improvements for OneLogin, I believe adding product details for sync capabilities with third-party products would allow for easier pitching to customers.

I have been using OneLogin for the past one to two years.

In my experience, OneLogin is stable.

The scalability of OneLogin is very good.

My experience with customer support has been very good.

I would rate customer support a nine.

I previously used a cross-identity management solution for authentication, but switched to OneLogin due to many glitches and delays in the former solution.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust enhances our authentication processes with a two-layer security factor via WAF and OneLogin.

The user experience for signing in and authenticating with OneLogin is very useful, as users can easily access what they need without facing issues.

The user identity synchronization across directories in OneLogin takes a bit of time initially, but once synchronized, it works amazingly.

We have a business relationship with this vendor as we are a reseller.

There has been a return on investment since implementing OneLogin, particularly in saved time and reduced stress for IT staff, especially those working remotely.

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for OneLogin are high, requiring more technically knowledgeable persons for implementation.

I evaluated other options such as Cisco ISE and Zscaler before choosing OneLogin, running demos with these two products.

I rate OneLogin a nine on a scale of one to ten.

I give it a nine because a few improvements are still needed, but I appreciate the features OneLogin provides.

For those considering OneLogin, I recommend it for banking and BFSI sectors or small businesses facing issues, as it offers features that competitors such as Zscaler and Cisco ISE do not support.

I believe providing on-premises boxes for trial purposes would be helpful for small businesses to test the product.

SmartFactor Authentication impresses me with its ability to balance security and usability effectively.

I have assessed SmartFactor Authentication and found it advantageous.

Our main use case for OneLogin is managing secure and centralized access across our HealthTech and FinTech platforms, primarily in real-life scenarios when team members need access to tools like the patient management system, financial dashboard, or different admin panels. OneLogin allows us to help them log in and securely access everything they need, and it also helps us enforce role-based security access controls, ensuring sensitive data points are protected.

OneLogin helps us manage role-based security controls by allowing us to define and enforce different access policies based on various user roles, scopes, and attributes, with a primary focus on security. In practice, we generally map users, such as clinicians and support staff or the finance team, to specific roles, with a focus on the HealthTech workflow. For example, whenever a clinician needs to access patient records at the treatment tool, the finance team should not have access to that data, while the finance team would have access to financial data. These are straightforward scenarios, and OneLogin also supports automated user provisioning and de-provisioning, which is really helpful. Whenever a user role changes or they leave the organization, their access is updated or revoked instantly, depending on the workflow.

The primary feature that we value about OneLogin is the security access control, and apart from that, there are many management features. First is Single Sign-On, or SSO, which allows users to access multiple platforms and applications with a single login. Then there is MFA, including risk detection, where the smart factor for risk-based authentication is very helpful for us. User provisioning and lifecycle management are also crucial, as they automate the onboarding and offboarding process, creating, updating, and removing access based on role changes. This reduces manual errors and ensures compliance, particularly in regulated environments like healthcare.

OneLogin has positively impacted our organization by improving security efficiency and access control. Implementing MFA and role-based access control has significantly reduced the risk of unauthorized access, especially with sensitive health records or FinTech data. We have seen improvements in our user lifecycle management; for example, onboarding and offboarding are much faster and more consistent. The system provides visibility and control, allowing us to manage access effectively and stay compliant with internal policies.

There are a couple of areas for improvement in OneLogin. While it is strong overall, the key areas that could be worked on include the ease of configuration for advanced workflows, as setting up complex role-based policies or integration across different systems in the HealthTech market requires considerable technical effort. A more intuitive setup process or guided configuration would be beneficial.

Visibility is another area that could improve, as determining where problems lie with OneLogin is not always straightforward. Additional logs, clearer error messaging, and better debugging tools would help. Additionally, UI and UX could be streamlined. The integration flexibility with niche platforms can also be improved, but the three key areas I have mentioned are focusing on visibility during troubleshooting and making debugging easier.

I have been using OneLogin for almost four years.

OneLogin is a highly scalable system.

Customer support is pretty good.

Before OneLogin, we relied on Microsoft Active Directory, managing multiple credentials across systems. We also evaluated Okta but ultimately chose OneLogin for the balance of features, ease of deployment, and competitive cost, allowing us to centralize identity management and automate workflows effectively. I previously used Microsoft Active Directory and evaluated Okta, but chose OneLogin for centralized identity management, which supports faster processing for user onboarding, offboarding, and role provisioning.

When analyzing our investment return, there is a clear return regarding measurable time savings and reduced operational overhead, despite any concerns about cost. The comparison of previous manual tasks, which used to take one to two hours, is now reduced to ten to fifteen minutes. From a security standpoint, ROI is also significant, as security breaches cost companies billions each year.

My advice for those looking into OneLogin is to research other options like Okta or Microsoft Entra. Make use of features like SSO, MFA, and SmartFactor, but configure them thoughtfully to balance security and user experience. It is crucial to plan your identity architecture carefully to avoid disruption during rollout or operation. Invest the time upfront in planning, as this will be very beneficial.

I would rate customer support a seven out of ten, which I think is pretty good. My overall review rating for OneLogin is seven out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

Microsoft Azure

OneLogin is used for signing protocol, signing applications, and single sign-on for multiple users across Office 365, Salesforce, and some AWS users.

The best feature of OneLogin is that it is easy to integrate. We found that it integrated seamlessly with our Office 365 and Salesforce, making it the best feature.

Beyond integration, we receive monitoring, but I feel that integration is significantly better than other identity tools when compared to Okta and Azure AD.

My impression of OneLogin is that it is smooth when providing a seamless user experience for signing in and authenticating applications. We do not have to use multiple user IDs and passwords, as we have created one set of users, making it very smooth and efficient to manage user privileges.

My impressions of the Identity Synchronization across directories functionality in OneLogin is that it is seamless and syncs every identity seamlessly.

The areas for improvement in OneLogin include better analytics since we do not have very end-to-end visualization of user access logs. Additionally, policy customization needs improvement as we cannot assign specific policies to specific customers. The admin dashboard is cleaner but can be improved, and from my point of view, it is not as user-friendly compared to others such as Okta and Azure AD.

In my comparison of OneLogin with other solutions and vendors, I state that it provides us smooth integration, as it integrates easily, but it lacks deeper end-to-end analytics and broader integration support, which Okta previously provided. Okta also offers deeper analytics and its admin dashboard is cleaner, but the user-friendliness and integration are smoother with OneLogin.

I do not rate it a ten because from the policy perspective, there needs to be improvement. We cannot give fine-grained access to users, and the policy is not mature enough.

We have recently moved from Okta to OneLogin by One Identity approximately eight to nine months ago.

I give OneLogin a stability rating of eight point five.

I rate scalability for OneLogin as a ten.

For support, I give it a ten because we have not had to initiate any support beyond the initial integration. Once again, I rate support a ten.

Positive

The advantages of customer identity and access management in OneLogin for external clients include cutting costs since we were using Okta before, along with providing a seamless user experience. When deploying Okta, we faced multiple issues with logging and user synchronization as users did not sync to multiple identities.

OneLogin is easy to maintain, and since it has not been that long since it was deployed, approximately nine months, we have not had to perform any maintenance on OneLogin.

We are the customers of OneLogin, and we have integrated this product.

When considering the pricing of OneLogin, I find it to be cost-efficient, especially when comparing it heavily with Okta, which is much more expensive.

OneLogin was purchased through a direct purchase via the marketplace, rather than through the AWS Marketplace.

OneLogin has not had Vigilance AI or adaptive login flows enabled because of compliance audits. I do not have complete knowledge of HR's role in managing employee identities. As a technical engineer, I have deployed and maintained the solution, but regarding HR, I do not have the complete picture of how they integrate since it is a separate HR team.

My advice to others looking into OneLogin is that if they want a solution that can easily integrate with their current infrastructure, then I would advise them to consider OneLogin because it integrates easily with multiple solutions and logins. My overall review rating for OneLogin is nine out of ten.

My use case for OneLogin is centralized identity and access management, particularly for secure single sign-on and user authentication across enterprise applications.

In my experience, some of the best features OneLogin offers are Single Sign-On, SSO, Multi-Factor Authentication that is MFA, centralized identity management, and automated user provisioning.

The feature that stands out the most for us is Single Sign-On, SSO. It has made a significant difference by simplifying access management for employees who use multiple enterprise applications daily. Before implementing SSO, users had to manage separate credentials for different systems, which often resulted in password-related issues, login delays, and increased support requests.

One feature that became more valuable over time was the automated user provisioning and de-provisioning capability. Initially, I focused mainly on SSO for authentication improvements, but later I realized how automated lifecycle management could improve operational efficiency and security. It helps streamline onboarding based on user role and position changes.

OneLogin has positively impacted our organization by improving security, productivity, and access management efficiency. Employees can securely access multiple enterprise applications with a single authentication process, which reduces login friction and minimizes password-related issues.

OneLogin is a strong identity and access management platform overall, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. One challenge is that some advanced integration and configuration settings can become complex, especially in large enterprise environments with multiple applications and custom authentication requirements.

The administrative interface could also be improved further to make navigation, reporting, and policy management more intuitive for new users. While the platform is feature-rich, certain configuration and troubleshooting activities can take time to understand. Another area for improvement is reporting and analytics. More customizable dashboards for visibility into authentication trends, access activity, and security events could help administrators monitor its efficiency.

I have been working with OneLogin for around two years.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin is scalable with good uptime and reliable performance, especially for standard authentication and user access management activities. Its cloud-based architecture also helps support scalability and availability for distributed and hybrid work environments.

Customer support is good.

I have seen a positive return on investment from using OneLogin, mainly through improved operational efficiency, reduced support overhead, and strong centralized access management. I also saw time savings through automated user provisioning and de-provisioning workflows. New employees get access faster because access permissions are assigned automatically.

My advice to organizations considering OneLogin would be to spend time planning their identity management architecture, application integration, and access policies before deployment. I would also recommend involving security, infrastructure, and application teams early in the implementation process, especially in enterprise environments with multi-cloud applications. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Microsoft Azure

My main use case for OneLogin is to secure applications, especially when logging into multiple applications as the most secure platform for accessing confidential data.

One area where I have been using OneLogin is when I am working on an application that secures employee data, such as payroll. I usually access that data through OneLogin, which is the main secure database that I regularly use OneLogin to access.

Regarding my main use case with OneLogin, it is clear that when I am working on various applications from my screen, it saves me time by allowing me to log in to multiple applications at once from OneLogin as the main security entry. The other factor is that it is safe and provides a more secure user experience.

OneLogin positively impacts my organization as it serves as the main password management tool, preventing unauthorized access from malware attacks and cyber attacks. That is one of my main uses now.

One of the best features OneLogin offers is two-factor authentication, which is safe and relatively straightforward.

What I appreciate most about the authentication feature is that it is easy to use and also secure. The most important aspect for me is the security it provides.

OneLogin has significantly impacted our organization, saving costs by reducing the number of employees needed to monitor application performance since you can access many applications from one entity. Working as a single user from anywhere is very beneficial for our enterprise as it promotes efficient growth through saved costs.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust has made things easier and more secure for users, as it can detect malware attacks and prevent any unauthorized data attacks from fraudulent activities.

I have used Vigilance AI from the login flows, and it is very efficient when it comes to risk behavior detection. It is more secure than manual data connection entries and can detect threats easily compared to human capabilities.

I occasionally face some connectivity outages and glitches with OneLogin, which sometimes delay the login process when I am trying to access my data from various applications.

I am open to the needed improvements. If they can work on the network part to ensure that it is more stable throughout, that would be sufficient for me.

I have been using OneLogin for one and a half years.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin's scalability is highly effective. It is easy to use and can be accessed easily when you have the product in your enterprise.

The customer support is proactive. They are experts who respond quickly when you call them and provide the support needed.

I have not used a different solution recently comparable to OneLogin.

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing were formal, and they are scaled according to user capability. They provide you with the price, and then you decide which package suits you based on how you plan to use OneLogin for enterprise purposes. If it is for multiple applications, the cost should be higher.

Our enterprise did not evaluate most applications that could work as OneLogin. When we identified OneLogin, we settled on it to see if we could check for other relevant applications.

I am impressed with OneLogin as the main data entry point for accessing most websites from a secure login entity, which is why I could really recommend it to other enterprises.

I advise others looking into using OneLogin that it is a more secure entry point that can secure your data and password. It simplifies everything regarding security and can lead to cost savings while being very efficient.

I am satisfied at this time and can say that OneLogin is the best when it comes to enterprise security solutions, and I recommend it fully. I gave this review a rating of eight out of ten.

On-premises

My main use case for OneLogin is for single sign-on, MFA enforcement, and centralized user access management for most SaaS applications.

I use OneLogin to give employees one secure login for applications like Microsoft 365, VPN access, and internal SaaS tools, while enforcing MFA policies based on user roles and access location.

OneLogin made a significant difference for my organization during remote work expansion because it centralized employee authentication and MFA policies across cloud apps without adding too much complexity for users.

The best features OneLogin offers include the single sign-on experience, adaptive MFA, centralized access management, and the large number of pre-built integrations with SaaS applications. SmartFactor, the adaptive authentication feature, is especially useful because it adjusts security requirements based on login risk and user behavior.

SmartFactor has worked well because it adds extra verification only when a login behavior appears risky, so users are not constantly dealing with MFA prompts during normal day-to-day access.

OneLogin has positively impacted my organization by improving user access management, simplifying the login experience for employees, and strengthening MFA enforcement across cloud applications without adding too much administrative overhead.

The integration library is definitely one of the strongest parts of OneLogin platform, but more granular reporting and customization options would make administration even better.

OneLogin can be improved by enhancing the reporting and the dashboard customization for more flexibility, and troubleshooting federation or integration issues can sometimes take more effort than expected.

The UI is generally easy to use, but some advanced sections feel a bit outdated, and more detailed troubleshooting documentation would help during complex integration.

Better granular policy control and more advanced analytics for authentication activity would be useful, especially for larger enterprise environments.

I have been using OneLogin for over one year.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin scales effectively for enterprise environments, especially for organizations managing large numbers of users and cloud applications, and the centralized SaaS integration model makes expansion fairly straightforward.

Customer support for OneLogin is very good and solid.

Before OneLogin, I primarily used native application logins and some Microsoft AD Federation Services, but I switched to OneLogin to obtain simpler cloud-based SSO, stronger MFA capabilities, and easier SaaS integration management.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that the pricing is competitive compared to other enterprise IAM platforms, and the setup was relatively straightforward for standard SSO deployments, although more advanced integrations and policies required additional planning and configuration effort.

I have seen a good return on investment, mainly through reduced password-related support tickets, faster onboarding, and less time spent managing user access across multiple SaaS applications. The centralized SSO and MFA management also reduced a lot of repetitive admin work for the IT team.

I evaluated other options including Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, and Ping Identity before choosing OneLogin.

My advice for others looking into using OneLogin is to plan your application integrations and MFA policies carefully from the beginning because OneLogin works best when access management and authentication workflows are standardized early on.

OneLogin has been a reliable and user-friendly IAM platform that can simplify access with SSO and strengthen MFA adoption without creating too much complexity for users or administrators. I would rate my overall experience with OneLogin as an eight out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

Microsoft Azure

OneLogin is primarily used to provide users with a single login for all applications and to manage user access centrally, which helps avoid handling multiple credentials and simplifies access control.

When a new employee joins, a user is created in Active Directory and OneLogin automatically grants them access to the required applications, allowing a user to log in once and access whatever they require. When someone leaves, disabling their account removes access to everything.

The best feature is single sign-on, which is very easy for users, followed by Smart Factor, which is a risk-based multifactor authentication, and automatic user provisioning.

OneLogin has improved usability and navigation in our organization, leading to fewer password-related issues, and users do not forget passwords. The IT team spends less time on support and more on important tasks.

Support tickets have been reduced by 60 to 70 percent since using OneLogin.

Phishing-resistant Device Trust solves the authentication process, which is helping us in a real-time environment and has improved security significantly, even if users click on links, it secures the application.

OneLogin provides a seamless end-user experience, and we are receiving very good and positive responses from end-users. There are no issues with this, as the end-user experience is very smooth, allowing users to log in once and access everything easily without multiple passwords.

Vigilance AI is used to detect unusual user login behavior and automatically apply extra security based on the requirement.

Currently, there is nothing to improve with OneLogin.

OneLogin has been used for more than two years.

OneLogin is a stable solution.

OneLogin is scalable and very easy since it is cloud-based, allowing for adding users and applications without worrying about infrastructure, so there are no issues.

Support for OneLogin is good, and the people are knowledgeable.

I would rate customer support nine out of ten.

The return on investment from OneLogin can be explained through three things: users can be onboarded 70 to 80 percent faster, there are around 50 percent fewer support tickets for the IT team, and there is less manual work for the IT team.

OneLogin is highly recommended, and my advice would be to start with single sign-on and multifactor authentication, plan user roles properly, and then expand. I would rate this review ten out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

My main use case for OneLogin is single sign-on and MFA enforcement with centralized user access management across SaaS applications.

A specific example of how I use OneLogin for single sign-on and user access management in my daily work is that we use it for new employees to provide one secure login for applications like Microsoft 365, VPN access, and internal SaaS tools while enforcing MFA policies based on user roles and access location.

OneLogin made a difference for us during the remote work expansion because it centralized authentication and MFA policies across cloud apps without adding too much complexity for users.

The best features that OneLogin offers for my team are the single sign-on experience, adaptive MFA, centralized access management, and the large number of pre-built integrations with SaaS applications. The Smart Factor adaptive authentication feature is especially useful because it adjusts security management based on login risk and user behavior.

The adaptive authentication feature makes things easier or more secure for my team because Smart Factor adds extra verification only when login behavior looks risky, so users are not constantly dealing with MFA prompts during normal day-to-day access.

The integration library is definitely one of the strongest parts of the platform, but more granular reporting and customization options would make administration even better.

Based on my experience, improvements needed for OneLogin include better granular policy controls and more advanced analytics for authentication activity, which would be especially useful for larger enterprise environments.

I have been using OneLogin for two years.

OneLogin is stable in my experience.

OneLogin scales well for enterprise environments, especially for organizations managing large numbers of users and cloud applications, and the centralized SaaS integration module makes expansion fairly straightforward.

Customer support is excellent.

Before OneLogin, we mainly used native application logins and some Microsoft ADFS, but we switched to get simpler cloud-based SSO, stronger MFA capabilities, and easier SaaS integration management.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing is competitive compared to other enterprise IAM platforms, and the setup was relatively straightforward for standard SSO deployments, although more advanced integration and policies required additional planning and configuration effort.

I have seen a return on investment as the adaptive login features with Vigilance AI have been useful for identifying unusual login patterns and automatically applying stronger authentication when the risk level increases. We have seen good results mainly through reduced password-related support tickets, faster onboarding, and less time spent managing user access across multiple SaaS applications. The centralized SSO and MFA management also reduced a lot of repetitive admin work for my IT team.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing is competitive compared to other enterprise IAM platforms, and the setup was relatively straightforward for standard SSO deployments, although more advanced integration and policies required additional planning and configuration effort.

We evaluated Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, and Ping Identity before choosing OneLogin.

The advice I would give to others looking into using OneLogin is to plan your application integrations and MFA policies carefully from the beginning because OneLogin works best when access management and authentication workflows are standardized early on.

Overall, OneLogin has been a reliable and user-friendly IAM platform that helps simplify SSO and strengthen MFA adoption without creating too much complexity for users or administration. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

Microsoft Azure