No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Twinkle - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Development Executive at Digital Track Solution pvt ltd
Real User
Top 5
Apr 20, 2026
Centralized controls have improved privileged access security and audit visibility
Pros and Cons
  • "One Identity Safeguard has had a very positive impact on our organization, especially in terms of security, efficiency, and visibility."
  • "One key area is performance and resource usage, especially when advanced features like session recording or OCR are enabled."

What is our primary use case?

In our organization, the primary use of One Identity Safeguard is managing and securing privileged access, and we mainly use it to store and protect sensitive credentials like admin passwords, ensuring that they are not exposed or misused. It also helps in monitoring privileged sessions, allowing us to track and audit activities performed by administrators or high-level users. This adds a stronger layer of security and compliance, as all credential access is controlled, recorded, and reviewed when needed. Overall, it plays a key role in protecting sensitive systems and reducing the risk of insider or outsider threats.

A common example of how we use One Identity Safeguard to secure privileged access is when a system administrator needs access to a production server. Instead of sharing or knowing the actual admin password, they request access through One Identity Safeguard, which securely provides a temporary credential for a session without exposing the password. This system automatically records an entire session, including actions performed on the server. If anything unusual happens, such as an unauthorized change or risky commands, the session logs and recording can be viewed by a security team, ensuring that privileged access is tightly controlled, fully monitored, and auditable at all times.

One additional point about our main use case is that we use One Identity Safeguard not just for securing access but also for enforcing strict governance and accountability across teams. For example, we apply role-based access control and approval workflows, so any privileged access request must be approved before it is granted.

What is most valuable?

The best features of One Identity Safeguard mainly revolve around strong security, visibility, and control over privileged access. One of the most valuable features is its password management, where sensitive credentials are securely stored, automatically rotated, and accessed only through a controlled workflow, reducing the risk of misuse. Another standout feature is session monitoring and recording, which captures every action taken during privileged sessions.

The session monitoring and recording feature in One Identity Safeguard has been extremely valuable for our team, especially from a security and compliance perspective. We use it quite regularly whenever an administrator accesses critical systems. Every privileged session is recorded in detail, covering screen activity, commands executed, and user behavior, so we have a complete audit trail. This has helped us quickly investigate incidents, verify actions taken on sensitive systems, and ensure that all activities follow internal policies.

One Identity Safeguard has had a very positive impact on our organization, especially in terms of security, efficiency, and visibility. It has helped us centralize and control privileged access and provided a structured secure approach. As a result, we now have much better visibility into accessing credentialed systems and the actions performed, which has improved accountability and compliance.

One Identity Safeguard has significantly improved accountability and compliance by giving us complete visibility of all privileged activities. Every access requires approval, and a session is logged and recorded, which means we always have a great audit trail of who accessed what and when. This has made internal and external audits much smoother, as we can quickly provide evidence without manually tracking.

What needs improvement?

One Identity Safeguard is a strong PAM solution, but there are definitely a few areas where it could be improved based on practical experience and known limitations. One key area is performance and resource usage, especially when advanced features like session recording or OCR are enabled. These features consume significant CPU and storage, and in some cases, may slow down connections or processing time if not optimized properly. Improving efficiency here would make the platform smoother and more scalable.

One additional improvement that would be helpful in One Identity Safeguard is better integration flexibility with modern cloud and DevOps tools. While it supports many systems, connecting with newer platforms for automation workflows in dynamic environments can sometimes require extra effort or customization.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using One Identity Safeguard for two years.

Buyer's Guide
One Identity Safeguard
April 2026
Learn what your peers think about One Identity Safeguard. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.
889,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

One Identity Safeguard is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

One Identity Safeguard is highly scalable, and that is a core strength in enterprise environments. It is designed for scale through clustering and a distributed architecture, allowing multiple appliances to work together as a single system. For example, organizations can add multiple One Identity Safeguard appliances to handle an increasing number of users, privileged accounts, and session traffic without impacting performance.

How are customer service and support?

Customer support for One Identity Safeguard has been generally reliable based on our experience. On the positive side, the customer team is knowledgeable and technically strong, especially when dealing with configuration issues, session monitoring, or password-related queries. For standard or well-defined issues, responses are usually helpful and resolve problems efficiently.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We evaluated a few other privileged access management (PAM) solutions before implementing One Identity Safeguard, including CyberArk and other enterprise PAM tools in the same space.

How was the initial setup?

The deployment of One Identity Safeguard was relatively quick compared to many other IAM and PAM solutions because it is delivered as a pre-configured appliance, either physical or virtual. The initial setup can be done quite fast, which helps to reduce the time to value.

What about the implementation team?

The deployment of One Identity Safeguard was fairly smooth overall with minimal disruption for privileged users. During the initial rollout, there was a short adjustment period where users had to request access through the system instead of directly using credentials, which slightly changed their workflow. However, once they became familiar with the process, it actually improved their experience by simplifying access and removing the need to remember or manage sensitive passwords.

The training required for One Identity Safeguard was quite manageable and varied by role. For end-users and privileged users, training was minimal, and basic guidance was enough for them to understand how to request access and start sessions since the interface is fairly straightforward for daily use.

What was our ROI?

We have seen a clear return on investment with One Identity Safeguard, mainly driven by time savings, reduced manual effort, and fewer security-related incidents. One of the biggest measurable improvements has been in IT workload reduction. After implementing One Identity Safeguard, we saw a significant drop in manual tasks including password handling, privileged access approvals, and incident troubleshooting.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to others looking into using One Identity Safeguard is that we have seen a clear return on investment, mainly derived from saved operational efficiency and reduced security overhead. A simple way to explain it is time saved, faster administration, fewer security incidents, and efficiency gained.

Overall, One Identity Safeguard stands out as a strong and well-built privileged access management solution, especially for organizations that want tighter control over admin activity without slowing down operations. I would rate this product a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
Last updated: Apr 20, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Nikhil Jethwa - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Consultant at ProTechmanize Solutions (P) Ltd.
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Dec 15, 2025
Privileged access has become fully audited and password management now saves significant time
Pros and Cons
  • "We have saved approximately thirty to forty percent of our time, and our team is spending more time on critical issues rather than managing passwords."
  • "They should provide a faster user interface, as we have noticed that the user interface acts slow when there are a large number of accounts or concurrent sessions going on."

What is our primary use case?

One Identity Safeguard is used to secure privileged access management, credential vaulting, and session monitoring because we are an IT-based company that handles the IT infrastructure of our clients, making it very important to keep everything secure.

One Identity Safeguard vaults privileged service accounts and provides time-bound access, ensuring that all administrative actions are tracked, reviewed, and easily monitored. We also use One Identity Safeguard to securely check admin credentials for customer servers. All access is automatically recorded and monitored through session auditing, which helps us comply with our customers' requirements.

We centrally manage privileged credentials, enforce secure access workflows, and record privileged sessions to maintain compliance and strengthen the IT security we deliver to our customers.

What is most valuable?

The best feature for us is the secure password vaulting, session recording, and automated approval workflows, because this gives us strong control over privileged access and helps us stay compliant both within our organization and with respect to customer compliance. The second feature that stands out is the real-time session monitoring and automatic credential rotation.

Automatic credential rotation helps our team by removing the need for manual changes to privileged passwords, reducing the risk of stale or shared credentials and ensuring that every access is controlled and compliant. It saves time and reduces risk since passwords are rotated after every use, so no one keeps passwords for long-term access. This prevents misuse and limits the impact of credential leaks.

We have found that we are able to comply with all security standards through the password rotation, which has helped us improve our security posture by centrally managing all privileged action accounts and enforcing strict access control to these accounts. Since the session monitoring feature and audit trail are available, we can see what changes were made by the user, who used this, how many times, and what was done in this session. We have also seen a reduction in IT operations because of password credential rotation and password management, which has reduced our manual work and increased our efficiency and security.

Our manual intervention has decreased because of the time we were taking for password management, and we have increased security with roughly a twenty to thirty percent decrease in IT calls, allowing the IT team to do other jobs because the load of password management has decreased. We have increased accountability since every privileged action is now traceable, which significantly strengthens our internal security control, and we have been able to get the compliance checks done much faster.

We have saved time since we do not have to manually manage passwords because One Identity Safeguard has automated that process. We have saved approximately thirty to forty percent of our time, and our team is spending more time on critical issues rather than managing passwords. This has reduced repetitive IT tasks and allowed our team to focus on more significant projects, and it has also reduced the risk of breaches and costly security penalties.

We have always received positive feedback from our team. The password rotation feature of this product is appreciated by all users, and they like this because they have saved time using this product, since they were previously wasting time on password management and manual interventions.

What needs improvement?

One Identity Safeguard should provide more documentation and training to the team. They can also provide better integration flexibility with more built-in connectors, and easy API workflows would help integrate more with our custom tools. They should provide a faster user interface, as we have noticed that the user interface acts slow when there are a large number of accounts or concurrent sessions going on.

Not every product can be perfect. For example, some parts of the user interface can feel a bit slow when there is a large number of concurrent sessions going on, and the integration with certain third-party tools requires more extensive implementation and configuration. These reasons made me give it an eight instead of a ten, but these are not major issues and just keep it from being completely flawless.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using One Identity Safeguard for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

One Identity Safeguard is currently stable, and we have not found any issues. Since its implementation, we have not faced any major issues, and there has been no downtime.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

One Identity Safeguard is scalable. We are implementing it globally, starting from one line of business, and now we are expanding, so it is scalable without any issues.

How are customer service and support?

I cannot speak much about the pricing because I am from the technical team and pricing is looked at by the sales team in our organization. However, I can speak about the support, which is very good with faster response times, and the team helps us every time with minimal downtime if we face any issues.

We are satisfied with customer support. The support team is technically very strong and responsive.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We were using CyberArk, but we switched to One Identity Safeguard because it was costly. Everything was good with CyberArk, but we needed to scale, and the licensing costs were high.

How was the initial setup?

We have deployed One Identity Safeguard in a phased manner. We deployed it for one line of business first, then for the second line, and we are planning to deploy it for other lines of business as well. The deployment for one line of business took approximately one month.

The privileged users adapted easily, and the deployment was done without disturbing our existing environment and setup, so there was no disruption, and the work went smoothly alongside the deployment.

What about the implementation team?

We did not face any significant challenges because the vendor team helped us with the integration, so the ease of integration was quite simple. We only had basic use cases like creating tickets for access requests, which are relatively straightforward, and there were not many complex integrations done. It was easy to integrate and the vendor team helped us with a step-by-step checklist for the integration with our existing SIEM and ITSM tools.

What was our ROI?

The pricing, costing, and licensing type is quite low compared to other products, so One Identity Safeguard is cheaper than other products, and the functions it has are worth the cost.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I was not part of the evaluation team, but the evaluation team must have evaluated other products. One example of an option that I personally evaluated was BeyondTrust Privileged Access Management.

What other advice do I have?

One thing other organizations should know about One Identity Safeguard is that it integrates well with the existing identity system, which is a very great point for other organizations to know before purchasing it because it makes it easier to deploy in their environment without changing the current workflow or existing network.

One Identity Safeguard provides heterogeneous integration with our existing products or legacy products, and the API integration is very helpful because it allows us to automate the onboarding of privileged accounts and integrate it with our existing ITSM tools, which is a really good thing about this product.

I would advise others looking into using One Identity Safeguard to choose this product because it is cheaper but provides great outcomes, and the security features are robust. I have given this product an overall rating of nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Dec 15, 2025
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
One Identity Safeguard
April 2026
Learn what your peers think about One Identity Safeguard. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.
889,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Abhinandan Yadav - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Security Engineer at Arrow PC Network Pvt Ltd
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Apr 16, 2026
Privileged accounts have been secured and audits are now faster with automated controls
Pros and Cons
  • "One Identity Safeguard has had a very positive impact on our organization."
  • "The UI can be more user-friendly."

What is our primary use case?

My main use case of One Identity Safeguard is to manage and secure privileged access in our IT environment. We use it for password vaulting, automatic credential rotation, and monitoring administrator sessions on servers, network devices, and critical systems.

What is most valuable?

The best features of One Identity Safeguard are password vaulting and automatic rotation, session monitoring and recording, real-time alerting and threat detection, just-in-time and least privilege access, and centralized management and reporting.

One Identity Safeguard's real-time alerting helps us quickly identify any unusual or unauthorized activity, such as failed login attempts or access outside of business hours. For example, if someone attempts to access a privileged account unexpectedly, we get an alert immediately and can take action.

One Identity Safeguard has had a very positive impact on our organization. It has significantly improved our security by protecting privileged accounts, which are a main target for attacks. With features such as password vaulting and session monitoring, we now have full control and visibility over admin activities. It also helps with compliance and auditing. All user actions are recorded and easily available for review. This makes audits much faster and more efficient.

What needs improvement?

The UI can be more user-friendly. The initial setup is slightly complex. Integration with some tools can be improved.

A few additional improvements could make One Identity Safeguard even better. Along with the UI, the reporting could be more customizable to filter for specific reporting needs. Sometimes it takes extra steps to get the exact report we want.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using One Identity Safeguard for the last two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

One Identity Safeguard is now stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of One Identity Safeguard is very good. The solution supports clustering and load distribution, so as demand increases, we can expand the environment without major changes.

How are customer service and support?

Customer support for One Identity Safeguard is generally good. In our experience, the support team is knowledgeable and able to resolve most issues.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We were using a basic manual approach and some native tools for managing privileged access. However, they lacked centralized control, proper auditing, and security features. We switched to One Identity Safeguard to get a more secure and centralized solution with features such as password vaulting, session monitoring, and automated credential management.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was quick, but additional time was needed for configuration. There was minimal disruption because we implemented it in phases. Initially, a small group of users was onboarded for testing, and once everything was stable, we gradually rolled it out to other users.

The integration process for One Identity Safeguard was moderate. Basic integrations, such as Active Directory and standard systems, were relatively straightforward and well-documented. However, the more advanced integrations required some custom setup, additional configuration, and some troubleshooting. Overall, it is not very difficult, but it does require some technical knowledge and planning to implement smoothly.

What was our ROI?

We can see a good return on investment with One Identity Safeguard. It has saved a lot of time by automating tasks such as password management and access approvals, which were earlier done manually. It has reduced the workload on our IT team. We have also reduced security risk, which is very important. Additionally, audit preparation time has decreased from hours or days of manual log collection to just a few minutes using the built-in reports.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Our experience with the pricing and licensing of One Identity Safeguard was moderate. The solution is not the cheapest, but it offers strong security features, so the cost is justified. Licensing is usually based on the number of users or accounts, which is straightforward to understand.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing One Identity Safeguard, we evaluated a few other PAM solutions, such as CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and BeyondTrust Privileged Access Management. We compared them based on features, ease of deployment, flexibility, and cost. We selected One Identity Safeguard because it provided a good balance of security features.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to others considering One Identity Safeguard would be to plan the deployment properly and start with a clear understanding of your privileged access requirements.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
Last updated: Apr 16, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Data Manager at Gitarattan International Business School
Real User
Top 10
Jan 4, 2026
Privileged access has become more controlled and auditable but the interface still needs simplification
Pros and Cons
  • "One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted my organization by improving our security posture, eliminating shared privileged credentials, increasing visibility into admin activity, and making compliance audits faster and more reliable."
  • "One Identity Safeguard could be improved by simplifying the user interface and initial configuration process, especially for first-time users."

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is for privileged access management to control, monitor, and secure access to critical systems, servers, and applications used by administrators and IT teams.

A quick specific example of how I use it for privileged access management in my environment is that when an administrator needs access to a critical server, they request access through One Identity Safeguard instead of using shared credentials. The system grants time-bound, approved access, rotates the password automatically after the session, and records the entire activity.

What is most valuable?

The best features One Identity Safeguard offers include Privileged Password Vaulting as the first one. The strongest features are Session Recording and Password Vaulting with rotation and Just-in-Time Access, which together give strong control and visibility and audit readiness.

The Session Recording feature specifically helps my team and makes things easier for audits or investigations by giving a clear, time-stamped playback of privileged activities. It removes guesswork, speeds up audits, and ensures full accountability for admin actions.

One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted my organization by improving our security posture, eliminating shared privileged credentials, increasing visibility into admin activity, and making compliance audits faster and more reliable.

What needs improvement?

One Identity Safeguard could be improved by simplifying the user interface and initial configuration process, especially for first-time users. More customizable reporting and clear in-app guidance would also help teams onboard faster and get deeper insights without additional effort.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using One Identity Safeguard for about one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

One Identity Safeguard is very stable and can handle the workload easily; I have not seen any downtime.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

One Identity Safeguard scales well as the environment grows. It handles increasing numbers of privileged accounts, sessions, and cloud targets without performance issues, making it suitable for expanding and hybrid infrastructure.

How are customer service and support?

Customer support has been responsive and knowledgeable, being effective at resolving technical issues.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Negative

How was the initial setup?

The integration with my cloud environment and infrastructure systems was moderately easy. Core cloud and infrastructure integrations were straightforward with proper documentation, while fine-tuning policies and access workflows required some initial effort. Once configured, the integrations have been stable and reliable.

Administrators required moderate training to understand configuration, policies, and workflows, while end users needed minimal training since access requests and approvals are straightforward. Overall, onboarding was manageable with some initial guidance.

What was our ROI?

I have seen a return on investment through reduced audit effort and fewer security incidents related to privileged access, along with significant time savings for IT and security teams by automating access control and password management.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that pricing is on the higher side, but aligns with the security and compliance value it provides. Setup costs were mainly related to initial configuration and training, and licensing was straightforward.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I evaluated other options such as CyberArk and BeyondTrust before choosing One Identity Safeguard.

What other advice do I have?

User feedback has been generally positive around the solution's security and session recording and access control capabilities. However, some users have mentioned that the interface and initial learning curve could be more intuitive, especially for new or non-specialist users.

My advice for others looking into using One Identity Safeguard is to clearly define your privileged access use cases and policies before implementation. It gives stronger security and audit capabilities, but investing time in proper planning, setup, and training will help you get the most value from the solution. I would rate this review a 7.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Jan 4, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Senior Technical Support Executive at DigitalTrack Solutions Pvt Ltd
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Apr 2, 2026
Secure access has protected critical systems and now tracks all privileged activities
Pros and Cons
  • "One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted our organization by increasing visibility into privileged user activities, allowing us to track and audit all actions easily, which helps in compliance and security."

    What is our primary use case?

    One Identity Safeguard has been used by our organization for more than three years. The primary use case for One Identity Safeguard is to secure admin access to the servers and the network devices, which helps us to ensure only authorized users can access our critical systems and devices, and it also monitors all the privileged sessions.

    What is most valuable?

    One Identity Safeguard offers secure password vaulting, which ensures passwords are not shared or exposed, significantly improving security, and session monitoring and recording, allowing us to track all the admin activities easily.

    These features help our team day-to-day by eliminating password sharing among the admins and ensuring secure access to critical systems, which reduces security risks, while tracking and controlling privileged access prevents misuse of admin accounts and improves overall system security.

    One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted our organization by increasing visibility into privileged user activities, allowing us to track and audit all actions easily, which helps in compliance and security.

    What needs improvement?

    One Identity Safeguard provides great features with a smooth process and a very good amount of stability, so there is no need to improve as of now, but it might be required in the future.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been working in my current field for more than eight years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    One Identity Safeguard is stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    One Identity Safeguard's scalability matches our organization's growth over time with no issues.

    How are customer service and support?

    Customer support has a very helpful nature and is very responsive to our technical team when they require technical support, providing 24/7 assistance based on the given timeline.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We have not evaluated any other options, as we had confirmed from day one that we were going to procure One Identity Safeguard.

    How was the initial setup?

    The deployment of the solution has taken less than one month, and it was a great experience. Regarding deployment, we have not faced any disruptive issues; it was very smooth for our privileged users, and after a short initial adjustment, they were able to access the system through One Identity Safeguard without issues, thanks to training and clear communication that minimized disruptions.

    What about the implementation team?

    The training requirement was very minimal, taking less than one week for training the employees, and once they had a good amount of knowledge about One Identity Safeguard, they were ready to go.

    What was our ROI?

    We have seen a good amount of return on investment, saving our employees time and money while providing security; it has helped us reduce manual efforts by around 30 to 40 percent.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing was straightforward, and the sales team was very helpful during the procurement and implementation of the solution, making it a great experience.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    One Identity Safeguard has been the only solution used since day one.

    What other advice do I have?

    For any organization, whether mid-size or large, looking into using One Identity Safeguard, it will be a really good solution for managing accessibility to critical devices with great security features and automation. Planning deployment carefully and understanding access requirements is essential, so start with the most critical systems first and then go for the less critical ones. This review has been rated 9 out of 10.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Other
    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
    Last updated: Apr 2, 2026
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    reviewer2814237 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Network Engineer at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Real User
    Top 5
    Apr 17, 2026
    Privileged access has become controlled and monitoring now supports security and compliance
    Pros and Cons
    • "One Identity Safeguard has improved security a lot by controlling privileged access, and it also reduced risks since all sensitive activities are monitored and logged."
    • "I think One Identity Safeguard could be improved by making the UI more user-friendly and simplifying some configurations, as it can feel a bit complex at times."

    What is our primary use case?

    I use One Identity Safeguard mainly for managing and securing privileged access like controlling admin accounts and monitoring sensitive sessions.

    For example, I use One Identity Safeguard to grant temporary admin access to users and track their sessions to make sure everything is secure.

    One Identity Safeguard also helps with password vaulting and automatic rotation.

    This means we don't have to share or manually manage sensitive credentials.

    We are using One Identity Safeguard in a hybrid setup, partly on-premises for sensitive access control and partly integrated with cloud services.

    We have integrated One Identity Safeguard with our cloud environment on Microsoft Azure and also with some internal DevOps workflows so privileged access can be controlled during the deployments and automation tasks.

    It was moderately easy overall to integrate One Identity Safeguard with our DevOps workflows and Microsoft Azure environment.

    Microsoft Azure integration was pretty smooth, but the DevOps workflow setup took a bit more effort to configure and test properly.

    What is most valuable?

    I think the best features One Identity Safeguard offers are strong password vaulting with auto-rotation, session monitoring and recording, and real-time alerts that help catch suspicious activity quickly.

    The real-time alerts from One Identity Safeguard are pretty reliable.

    Alerts come in quickly, and they have helped us respond faster to suspicious activity before it becomes a bigger issue.

    The session recording and audit logs from One Identity Safeguard really stand out.

    They make tracking and reviewing activity easy.

    But it would be even better if the UI was a bit more user-friendly.

    One Identity Safeguard has improved security a lot by controlling privileged access, and it also reduced risks since all sensitive activities are monitored and logged.

    We have seen fewer security risks since access is controlled and monitored by One Identity Safeguard, and it definitely helped with compliance because all actions are logged and easy to audit.

    What needs improvement?

    I think One Identity Safeguard could be improved by making the UI more user-friendly and simplifying some configurations, as it can feel a bit complex at times.

    Reporting with One Identity Safeguard could be more detailed and easier to customize, and better integration with other tools would make the overall experience smoother.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using One Identity Safeguard for around one and a half years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    One Identity Safeguard is generally stable and reliable in day-to-day use.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    One Identity Safeguard is generally considered highly scalable and enterprise-ready.

    How are customer service and support?

    Customer support for One Identity Safeguard is generally good and knowledgeable, especially when it comes to technical issues and enterprise deployments.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Earlier we were using a mix of manual access management and some basic PAM tools, but we switched to One Identity Safeguard for better automation, strong security controls, and easier auditing.

    How was the initial setup?

    Admins needed a bit of training for One Identity Safeguard, maybe a few days to get comfortable with policies and setup.

    But for end-users, it was pretty minimal since most of it runs in the background.

    It was mostly seamless for privileged users after deploying One Identity Safeguard.

    They just had to follow the new access request process, and after a short adjustment period, it didn't really disturb their daily work.

    What about the implementation team?

    We didn't purchase One Identity Safeguard through the Microsoft Azure Marketplace.

    We went through a direct vendor licensing process.

    What was our ROI?

    We have seen ROI with One Identity Safeguard mainly in reduced manual efforts and faster access handling.

    Roughly around 40 percent less time spent on managing privileged accounts, and also fewer security incidents that need manual intervention, which saved both time and operational costs.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Pricing for One Identity Safeguard was on the higher side but justified by the security features.

    Setup cost was manageable and licensing is typically subscription-based per appliance or capacity, which makes it easier to scale but can add up in larger environments.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We did evaluate a few options before finalizing One Identity Safeguard. The main ones we looked at were CyberArk, BeyondTrust, and several others.

    CyberArk was very strong but felt a bit complex and costly, and BeyondTrust was solid for remote access and monitoring.

    In the end, we chose One Identity Safeguard because it fit better with our hybrid setup and integration needs.

    What other advice do I have?

    One Identity Safeguard is a solid and reliable PAM solution in my experience.

    My advice would be to start with a clear access model before you deploy One Identity Safeguard. I would rate this review an 8 out of 10.

    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    Last updated: Apr 17, 2026
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Business Development Executive at Digitaltrack
    Real User
    Top 5
    Apr 19, 2026
    Privileged sessions have gained full visibility and audits now complete investigations faster
    Pros and Cons
    • "One Identity Safeguard has improved privileged access security and accountability, eliminating shared admin passwords, implementing time-bound access with approvals, and providing session recording for audits that lead to better visibility, faster investigation, and reduced standing privilege access."
    • "I did not give a higher rating for the following reasons: initial deployment can take time, the UI feels slightly dated in some areas, and reporting customization can be limited."

    What is our primary use case?

    I have been using One Identity Safeguard for almost a year. The main use case of One Identity Safeguard is privileged access management, specifically controlling and monitoring administrator access. In my organization, I typically use it for privileged password management, secure admin access, session recording and monitoring, approval workflows, and privileged account discovery.

    A common day-to-day example involves accessing a production server. An admin needs to troubleshoot a service issue. Instead of sharing the local administrative password, they submit an access request in One Identity Safeguard, provide a reason, and select a time duration, for example, one hour. A manager or security team approves the request. The admin launches the RDP session directly from One Identity Safeguard. One Identity Safeguard injects the credential automatically. The password is not visible. The entire session is recorded for audit purposes. When the session ends, access expires, and the password is automatically rotated. This makes a difference because there is no shared admin password, temporary least privileged access is implemented, full session recording is available for audits, and automatic password rotation occurs after use.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features of One Identity Safeguard revolve around password security, session control, and governance. Some of the features I can mention are privileged password vault and automatic rotation, session recording and playback, real-time monitoring and threat blocking, just-in-time privileged access, and privileged session search.

    The session recording feature is straightforward in day-to-day use. When an admin launches the RDP session or SSH session through One Identity Safeguard, the system automatically records everything in the background with no extra steps needed. It captures screen activity, commands executed, keystrokes, login-logout times, and target systems accessed. After the session, I can search by username, server name, date, time, and request ID. Real-time monitoring is also useful, especially for high-risk systems. Security or privileged access administrators can watch the session live and receive alerts on suspicious activity to determine if the session should be terminated if needed. I do not use live monitoring constantly, but it is very valuable for domain controller access, production database access, and emergency admin access. Overall, these features are valuable because they provide full visibility into privileged activity without slowing down the administrator.

    One Identity Safeguard has improved privileged access security and accountability. I have eliminated shared admin passwords, implemented time-bound access with approvals, and gained session recording for audits. This has led to better visibility, faster investigation, and reduced standing privilege access. Investigations are much faster and more accurate, and audits are quicker with fewer findings, thanks to full session visibility and traceability. Regarding relevant metrics for any IAM solution or monitoring solution like One Identity Safeguard, previously it took two to three days to complete investigations. Now, after recording the session, investigations can be completed in under an hour.

    What needs improvement?

    I gave a rating of eight because of the strong privileged password vault and automatic rotation, reliable session recording and replay, just-in-time access with approval workflows, good audit and compliance visibility, and ease of administration. I did not give a higher rating for the following reasons: initial deployment can take time, the UI feels slightly dated in some areas, and reporting customization can be limited.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using One Identity Safeguard for almost a year.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    One Identity Safeguard is very stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    One Identity Safeguard definitely scales.

    How are customer service and support?

    I have not used customer support. If I do use it, I will definitely connect back and update my feedback on this.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I have not used any kind of solution previously.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup typically took four weeks and sometimes more than four weeks as well, depending on the customer's environment and production environment. The setup was fairly minimal for end-users, but for an administrator, it requires a lot of work. The process is very straightforward and negotiable as well.

    What about the implementation team?

    I am a reseller.

    What was our ROI?

    Time is definitely saved. Regarding money, money is also saved because I maintain the compliance part. However, fewer employees are not needed; I need to hire more employees to monitor these things.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    I have not evaluated any alternate options previously.

    What other advice do I have?

    I am currently happy with One Identity Safeguard, so there is no point to implement changes. I gave this solution a rating of eight. There was a short learning curve, but overall adoption was smooth and users now find it very easy and more secure to use. I recommend this solution if you want proper security for your infrastructure and want to improve your budget. If you have a limited budget, then please do not go for this solution. I am asking for better security.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Hybrid Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
    Last updated: Apr 19, 2026
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    reviewer2803014 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Assistant IT Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
    MSP
    Top 20
    Mar 30, 2026
    Secure access has reduced password risks and now needs better support and fairer pricing
    Pros and Cons
    • "One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted us because the fear of theft of passwords or IDs has been reduced to almost zero, significantly enhancing our security."
    • "The customer support for One Identity Safeguard was not very good and definitely needs to be improved."

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is to safeguard my password as well as my login IDs when I'm working from home, as it provides better safety for my passwords and for my login IDs.

    When we log in, we get two-factor authentication, which I use for safeguarding my passwords or login IDs while working from home, and that makes it safer compared to other software.

    One Identity Safeguard helps in keeping my login IDs and passwords safe, and that is very important to me.

    What is most valuable?

    The best feature that One Identity Safeguard provides is its flexibility, as well as the fact that it integrates well with other software like Salesforce, which I really appreciate.

    The integration part of One Identity Safeguard has been quite beneficial for my workflow, especially with tools like Salesforce.

    One Identity Safeguard is flexible and provides out-of-the-box integrations that have been very helpful for me, and the installation process was quite easy and smooth, which I would also rate as a feature.

    One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted us because the fear of theft of passwords or IDs has been reduced to almost zero, significantly enhancing our security.

    The reduction in password or ID theft risk with One Identity Safeguard has led to measurable changes as security incidents have been reduced, positively impacting us and increasing our efficiency.

    What needs improvement?

    In terms of improvement for One Identity Safeguard, I would like to say that the customer support needs to be improved and the pricing needs to be a bit more reasonable, as these are the two factors that require attention.

    Regarding customer support for One Identity Safeguard specifically, there has been lag and they are not very responsive, which needs to be improved immediately.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using One Identity Safeguard for the past eight months.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    One Identity Safeguard is stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    One Identity Safeguard's scalability is quite good, as it is scalable according to the needs of the enterprise.

    How are customer service and support?

    The customer support for One Identity Safeguard was not very good and definitely needs to be improved.

    How was the initial setup?

    The deployment of One Identity Safeguard took around three months.

    The deployment of One Identity Safeguard affected our privileged users seamlessly, without disruption.

    What about the implementation team?

    We use the on-demand version of One Identity Safeguard because it provides us flexibility, which was the main reason for choosing that version.

    What was our ROI?

    I can say we have seen a return on investment with One Identity Safeguard as we have saved a lot of time and manpower, although I cannot give a specific number for that.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    My experience with pricing for One Identity Safeguard indicated that the pricing was a bit high, while the setup cost was manageable and the licensing was acceptable; overall, the cost aspect was on the higher side.

    What other advice do I have?

    The feedback I have received from users regarding One Identity Safeguard's usability and functionality has been positive, as the usability aspect has been quite good and it is easy to learn and user-friendly.

    The training required to start using One Identity Safeguard was not very extensive, but a bit of training was needed, and it was a smooth process.

    If you are looking into using One Identity Safeguard, I would advise that if you are looking for user-friendly software that integrates well with other software, and if you do not mind spending a bit of extra money for that, then One Identity Safeguard is the go-to solution for you. I would rate this product a 7 out of 10.

    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    Last updated: Mar 30, 2026
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free One Identity Safeguard Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
    Updated: April 2026
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free One Identity Safeguard Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.