Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
PeerSpot user
Manager IT at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
Mar 31, 2015
The proxy filtering is valuable except for blocking HTTPS which it can't do.

What is most valuable?

  • MAC Filtered DHCP and DNS
  • Captive Portal
  • VPN
  • Proxy Server
  • Proxy Filter

How has it helped my organization?

It has provided us with secure internet browsing and a strong monitoring ability.

What needs improvement?

Proxy filters are not supported for the blocking of HTTPS sites.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used it for two to three years.

Buyer's Guide
Netgate pfSense
December 2025
Learn what your peers think about Netgate pfSense. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.
879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No issues encountered yet.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No issues encountered yet.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues encountered yet.

How are customer service and support?

Customer Service:

I have not gotten any support from the customer service center because I can get all the solutions on their web blogs.

Technical Support:

I think it is perfect.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I was using another product, but it didn't have a bandwidth controller and monitoring tool like this product does. I switched because I can find everything in one window.

How was the initial setup?

Its installation setup & procedure is so simple that a layman could install it.

What about the implementation team?

I installed it by myself and used Google for assistance.

What was our ROI?

It's positive.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I just downloaded the program from the website free of chard. The best thing is, this product can be installed on any machine.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

No other options were evaluated.

What other advice do I have?

It is recommended, as it is a stable product.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user221874 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user221874Manager IT at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor

Can any one have experienced to deploy Pfsense on Hyper-V ... I am planning to deploy this scenario.

See all 2 comments
PeerSpot user
Network Admin at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
Jan 20, 2014
The product is missing a graphic report implementation tool but performance, scalability and customization are valuable

What is most valuable?

Performance, cost effective, scalable, customizable

How has it helped my organization?

After switching from Cisco, Juniper, Astaro and Microsoft network response improved and more control of packet (for me, pfpacket technology is better than packet filter.)

What needs improvement?

Graphic report implementation tool (now possible with extra software)

For how long have I used the solution?

5+ years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No, perfect scalability from 20 to 500 users

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Cisco, Microsoft and when TMG progressively died it was necessary to switch to unix technology, many corporations require low budget and high performance.

How was the initial setup?

The initial approach is very complex because of the multiple functions, but after a short learning curve it is able to handle the standard functions.

What about the implementation team?

In my case, I buy network appliance from Lanner Inc. ltd (watchguard supplier) and deploy the image depending on the desired size and functionality required by the customer.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Identify the most suitable hardware for the required size.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Yes, Astaro and PaloAlto plus Juniper, but the renewal planes (AV, UTM, etc.) are very expensive.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Netgate pfSense
December 2025
Learn what your peers think about Netgate pfSense. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.
879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer868524 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT consultant at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Consultant
Nov 15, 2021
Reliable, scalable, simple installation
Pros and Cons
  • "I have found pfSense to be stable."
  • "The solution could improve by having centralized management and API support online."

What is most valuable?

pfSense is very good because it allows us to do what we want.

What needs improvement?

The solution could improve by having centralized management and API support online.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using pfSense for a long time.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I have found pfSense to be stable.

How are customer service and support?

We are providing support for our customers here in Sweden.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of pfSense is simple.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price of pfSense is reasonable. However, there is a free version available.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to those wanting to implement pfSense is to start out with the free version before going with the appliance.

I rate pfSense a ten out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Netgate pfSense Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: December 2025
Product Categories
Firewalls
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Netgate pfSense Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.