Kiuwan Reviews

Lifecycle features, because they permit us to show non-technical people the risk and costs hidden into the code due to bad programming practices.

It is the most effective tool for IT procurement managers and directors. Technical debt metrics and action plans oriented to rejected deliveries.

Kiuwan was used internally at Optimyth. We had no surprises derivated from security, performance, or maintainability issues.

DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on.

I've used this solution for three years.

No.

No.

An eight out of 10.

In other companies I have worked for, we moved to Kiuwan/Optimyth because of the accuracy and easiness of use and setup.

Also, most of my partners and customers have moved to Kiuwan due to the metrics and programming languages supported.

Not complex. I am a salesperson without tech training and I was able to use it

Nothing special. It's a very fair model.

CAST, Sonar, and Clarify.

If they need a tool to be used across your organization (technicians, managers, and directors), this is the tool.

Have highly qualified staff or consultancy provider (code quality and governance) to define the risk model to be used and measured with Kiuwan, this increases the ROI.

• Easy, intuitive UI loaded with information about the software quality
• Automated lifecycle management
• Application portfolio governance support
• Technology coverage from COBOL to JS through ABAP: ideal for large organizations with legacy core systems trying to leverage new digital capabilities

• Monitor outsourced development and maintenance to assert each € spent has adequate return in quality and security.
• Helped outsourcers to increase the capacity to deliver acceptable code.

• Identification of OSS usage and multiple versions in use throughout portfolio

I have used it for one year.

We have not encountered any deployment issues whatsoever; pretty straightforward analysis both on-premises or in the cloud.

We have not encountered any stability issues.

We have not encountered any scalability issues; applied it both for small portfolios and millions-of-lines portfolios.

Customer service is excellent; extremely helpful and knowledgeable about the subject matter.

Technical support is excellent; only needed to revert to customer support once, and I got immediate support and resolution on my request.

We previously used several tools. We switched because Kiuwan covers the entire SDLC; provides direct information to act upon, for the developer, architects, QA, CIO and CISO, in a few seconds; automatically, fully integrated in any CI/CD setup.

It is extremely simple to setup, either to run on-site or in the cloud; and plenty of hooks to integrate with any automation engine.

It was implemented by an in-house team with direct support from Kiuwan.

• Loads of bang for the buck.

Before choosing this product, we evaluated other options.

I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance.

In our digital marketing efforts, our app is in continuous integration and having introduced this tool ensures we are always delivering safe code.

Perhaps more languages supported.

Six months.

None.

None.

None.

Haven't had any trouble.

So far, we've opened a couple of tickets and we got a prompt reply from their tech support team.

No.

It is very easy to deploy.

We did it ourselves.

Faster development of our app.

Nothing to add.

We looked at Sonar.

• We use Kiuwan to locate the source of application vulnerabilities.
• Saving time and money by automatically identifying problems is unbelievable.

We analyze the application code before the testing phase. We correct the most serious problems encountered and the applications are then more stable and safe when passed onto the testing phase.

The development-to-delivery phase.

We have been using Kiuwan for six months.

As a cloud solution, it was working from the first day, without any configuration necessary.

No, I did not.

No, I did not.

The customer service is always ready, using the live chat integration.

10 out of 10.

No, I did not.

No, it was automatic.

No, it wasn't necessary

I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did.

• Constant evolution
• Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP
• Excellent feedback
• Integration with SDLC tools
• API

SAP and no-SAP static source code analysis, including security integrated in the continuous delivery process of our SDLC.

I would like to see additional languages supported.

We have been using this solution for one and a half years.

There were no stability issues.

There were no scalability issues.

I would give technical support a rating of 9/10.

We used Sonar and we switches due to costs with ABAP and the iOS modules.

The initial setup could not be simpler. It is a SaaS solution. Integration with Jenkins and the local analyzer is a great solution.

Check with your account manager.

Integrate it with your SDLC.

The solution gave us a KPI regarding risk and quality in the development process.

I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable. I test code to pass PCI DSS requirements. I have improved my QA acceptance process with risk evaluation.

The QA developer and security could be improved.

I have not encountered any issues with stability.

I have not encountered any issues with scalability.

I would give technical support a rating of 10 out of 10.

I did not use a different solution in the past.

The initial setup was easy.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing this one.

Try the solution and you will likely want to implement it into your organization. The solution will measure your development team, give a KPI for the CISO, reduce the time it takes to find and correct coding errors, and more.

I'm currently working at a FinTech company, and we normally use Kiuwan for code analysis. This helps us ensure that our product complies with proper codes.

I like that it provides a detailed report that lets you know the risk index and the vulnerability.

The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report.

I have been using Kiuwan since 2019.

I'm not sure if it's stable, but it's working fine.

I don't know if it's scalable, but we have about 30 to 60 users. It all depends on the scope of the project. If they have made the last point of implementation, then we can perform the code analysis.

It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle. 

I would recommend this solution to new users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Kiuwan an eight.