CrowdStrike Falcon is our platform for IT security, encompassing endpoint security, cloud security, and EDR capabilities.
Chief Technology Officer at GM Modular
The integration is flexible, helps identify required patches, and excels in external media control
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable aspects of CrowdStrike Falcon for me are its device observability, identification, and software and OS recognition."
- "If CrowdStrike can further expand its support for XDR compatibility, that would give it an edge over all the other competing new products."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
CrowdStrike protected us from a cyberattack. That's why I believe it's a very effective product. It's already prevented attacks on 2 occasions. It successfully quarantined suspicious files, essentially making our organization much safer.
We also leverage CrowdStrike Falcon Overwatch, a managed threat-hunting service offered by CrowdStrike. This service complements CrowdStrike's EDR functionality, which provides automated detection and response capabilities against external attacks. In our case, CrowdStrike successfully identified and automatically contained a cyberattack launched against our organization.
Our CrowdStrike Falcon integration with our SIEM is proving to be flexible.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable aspects of CrowdStrike Falcon for me are its device observability, identification, and software and OS recognition. It also excels in external media control, particularly USB access. The ability to disable USB access to flash drives significantly improves security.
Furthermore, Falcon helps identify patches needed for Windows, Mac, and other operating systems. This provides valuable reports and insights into our system vulnerabilities, allowing us to proactively address them.
What needs improvement?
If CrowdStrike can further expand its support for XDR compatibility, that would give it an edge over all the other competing new products.
Buyer's Guide
CrowdStrike Falcon
July 2025

Learn what your peers think about CrowdStrike Falcon. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2025.
860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for 2 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of CrowdStrike Falcon 8 out of 10.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We've deployed CrowdStrike Falcon across all 3,000 of our endpoints, and it has demonstrated excellent scalability. Therefore, scalability is not a concern for CrowdStrike in terms of performance or its ability to handle growth.
I would rate the scalability a 9 out of 10.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment was straightforward, taking 2 months for 3,000 endpoints. We implemented it directly where needed. The process was simple and easy. We believe this approach offers advantages due to its lower complexity compared to other methods. Careful planning was essential, and with a clear plan for sensor installation, we were able to execute the deployment successfully.
What about the implementation team?
While a third party handled the implementation, the OEM provided us with direct training on Falcon alongside CrowdStrike.
What was our ROI?
CrowdStrike Falcon has demonstrably provided a positive return on investment. We've already encountered two specific instances where, without CrowdStrike, the company would have faced millions in damages. In one case, we would have likely lost our entire SAP system.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing of CrowdStrike Falcon is competitive.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
After evaluating SentinelOne, we found CrowdStrike to be a superior solution. CrowdStrike offers advantages in dashboard compatibility and a feature called Overwatch, which gives it a competitive edge.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon 8 out of 10.
CrowdStrike Falcon is deployed in multiple branches across India.
No maintenance is required from our end.
I recommend CrowdStrike Falcon. It is not a solution we need to think twice about using.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

IT Network Infrastructure Manager at HENSOLDT
Is a flexible, fully managed service, and provides peace of mind
Pros and Cons
- "The anomaly detection is the most valuable feature."
- "The portal can be clunky to navigate at times and has room for improvement."
What is our primary use case?
We use CrowdStrike Falcon as a managed SOC for intrusion detection on our endpoints.
How has it helped my organization?
Being a cloud-native solution, CrowdStrike Falcon provides flexibility and always-on protection. This is extremely important to have the best protection available.
It is a fully managed service, so they provide all the necessary updates for us which is helpful.
While CrowdStrike Falcon provides us with better peace of mind in terms of protection, it also generates alerts for potential threats, requiring our investigation. However, the platform further alleviates our anxiety by automatically reviewing unaddressed alerts, offering an additional layer of security. This coverage fosters a heightened sense of security.
CrowdStrike Falcon has been instrumental in preventing breaches, allowing us to operate with significantly increased security compared to the past. This has provided us with much greater peace of mind. While no security solution is foolproof, Falcon has brought us remarkably close.
What is most valuable?
The anomaly detection is the most valuable feature.
What needs improvement?
The portal can be clunky to navigate at times and has room for improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of CrowdStrike Falcon a nine out of ten. The only issue I have had is with an old version of the endpoint that was installed and has proven to be problematic.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
CrowdStrike Falcon is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is good and they provide prompt responses to all of our questions.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We implemented CrowdStrike Falcon in response to a security incident. It was the first endpoint detection and response service we had ever used, and we've been utilizing it since 2021.
How was the initial setup?
Deploying the sensors to our endpoints is straightforward. We do have a manual process for deploying the sensors to our endpoints. There are also options to do it through a group policy. It doesn't seem overly complex.
We rolled the solution out to our entire estate which took just over one week. We had up to 300 endpoints and required a team of five people to complete the deployment.
What was our ROI?
CrowdStrike Falcon enables us to save on resources which in turn provides a 20 percent return on investment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
CrowdStrike Falcon offers excellent value for the money for our organization, particularly given our lean IT team. We lack the resources to replicate the full security services they provide without hiring additional personnel. The cost of Falcon is likely comparable to, or even less than, the salary and benefits we'd need for an extra employee. Furthermore, their on-call experts have more expertise, further enhancing the value proposition.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
After a year, we reevaluated our endpoint security solution. We considered several options, including Arctic Wolf, SentinelOne, and Darktrace, alongside our existing Fortinet solutions. We participated in demos and ultimately determined that CrowdStrike's offering, both current and future, remained the best fit. While we hadn't initially explored other options before choosing CrowdStrike, external factors subsequently forced our hand. However, after a year of use and further evaluation, we reaffirmed our decision, concluding that CrowdStrike was still the most suitable solution for our needs.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon a nine out of ten.
We have around 300 endpoints and three people who have access to the solution.
Three people are required for maintenance.
CrowdStrike Falcon was recommended by our head office in Germany.
I recommend CrowdStrike Falcon.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Buyer's Guide
CrowdStrike Falcon
July 2025

Learn what your peers think about CrowdStrike Falcon. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2025.
860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Manager, Security Operations Centre at Phillips Consulting Limited
Robust and detects almost every malicious activity that occurs within the endpoint
Pros and Cons
- "The solution's most valuable feature is that it is robust and can detect almost every malicious activity that occurs within the endpoint."
- "I would like a centralized deployment where I could roll out or push it to all endpoints."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution for endpoint security. We use the tool to ensure the endpoints are protected from abnormal activities, people don't run different scripts, and people don't compromise endpoints and use them to get into the network.
What is most valuable?
The solution's most valuable feature is that it is robust and can detect almost every malicious activity that occurs within the endpoint.
What needs improvement?
I would like a centralized deployment where I could roll out or push it to all endpoints.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon Surface for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
CrowdStrike Falcon Surface is a very stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
CrowdStrike Falcon Surface is a very scalable solution. A lot of customers are using CrowdStrike Falcon Surface. One of our customers for the solution has 12,000 endpoints.
How are customer service and support?
The solution's technical support is handled centrally by CrowdStrike, and the support was also good and knowledgeable.
How was the initial setup?
I didn't deploy the solution, but I supported customers that use it. I think it took them up to six months to deploy the CrowdStrike Falcon Surface.
What was our ROI?
The solution somehow doesn't allow intrusion and minimizes fraud or cyber-attacks. Within the time we're using it, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface detected a lot of intrusion from malicious individuals. It was able to prevent a lot of insider threats where people internally will want to run some malicious scripts within the environment.
It detects those malicious attacks quickly, and we can prevent them. It minimized a lot of cyber and fraud-related activities that could have cost the bank a lot of money.
What other advice do I have?
CrowdStrike Falcon Surface is a cloud-based solution. In light of the recent global IT outage that affected CrowdStrike, they should do proper change management.
Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
NTT at Sonda S.A.
Easy to deploy and manage with many helpful features
Pros and Cons
- "I haven't had any issues with bugs or glitches. I haven't had a problem with stability so far."
- "The solution isn't known in my market. The brand isn't as recognizable. Their shortcomings are more on the marketing side."
What is our primary use case?
We use the product for cloud security. We use it for prevention, to watch for gaps in security. We work with customers seeking prevention for advanced apps.
How has it helped my organization?
Sometimes a customer has multiple solutions that come at a higher cost. They have to pay for all of these other security features. With CrowdStrike, customers get one agent for all system operations. It offers more security for remote work and clients gain access to the latest protections.
What is most valuable?
The solution offers good features. The prevention and device control are useful. It offers helpful firewall management and identity protection.
They've reduced the complexity and provide better security outcomes. Customers tend to prefer CrowdStrike.
It's easy to deploy and manage.
What needs improvement?
The solution isn't known in my market. The brand isn't as recognizable. Their shortcomings are more on the marketing side. Everyone knows Microsoft Defender. Customers need to hear more about CrowdStrike and all the advantages and features on offer.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've used the solution for three to four months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I haven't had any issues with bugs or glitches. I haven't had a problem with stability so far.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The capability to scale so far has been good.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I'm also familiar with Microsoft Defender. However, Defender works best with Microsoft and not necessarily other legacy applications. With CrowdStrike, you can secure all system operations and versions. It's easier to deploy and operate.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment is seamless and users get immediate protection. It's lightweight. There's one agent deployed to endpoints in minutes. The product offers consistent coverage. There's no complex integrations and it doesn't need fine-tuning. In comparison, Defender can be more complex.
CrowdStrike can be deployed on any operating system, not just Microsoft.
There isn't really maintenance, it's set and forget. The agent updates automatically and receives continuous security updates, enabling immediate enforcement across endpoints.
What was our ROI?
The solution is well worth the cost.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The costs are predictable. There are no surprises.
In Chile, there are not a lot of CrowdStrike partners of the managed service; therefore, it's a little more expensive than Microsoft, as there are so many more managed partners for Microsoft. That said, if you look at the total cost of ownership, CrowStrike is better than Microsoft.
What other advice do I have?
We're a reseller. We're still new to CrowdStrike.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. The cost is good and they offer better tech support. Also, the protection is wonderful.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
CIO & Information manager at Home Benelux
Works with Office 365 and helps to manage threats
Pros and Cons
- "The main feature we rely on is the product's intelligence. We appreciate the advice from the team during implementation. One of the main reasons we chose this product is its compatibility with Office 365."
- "Improvement is always possible. It's challenging to gauge how much future mitigation is provided, especially since we've only been using the product for about one and a half years. Every product faces this challenge because nothing is ever completely foolproof. So, besides relying on technology, we also focus on increasing our staff's awareness of security issues. Feedback from my colleagues suggests that the reporting and dashboarding of incidents could be improved."
What is our primary use case?
The tool helps to increase security because the threats we face keep changing, so we need better protection. In the past, we've faced some attacks on our network, and while we managed to deal with them, we realized we needed even stronger protection. That's why we decided to implement CrowdStrike Identity Protection.
What is most valuable?
The main feature we rely on is the product's intelligence. We appreciate the advice from the team during implementation. One of the main reasons we chose this product is its compatibility with Office 365.
What needs improvement?
Improvement is always possible. It's challenging to gauge how much future mitigation is provided, especially since we've only been using the product for about one and a half years. Every product faces this challenge because nothing is ever completely foolproof. So, besides relying on technology, we also focus on increasing our staff's awareness of security issues. Feedback from my colleagues suggests that the reporting and dashboarding of incidents could be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with the product for one and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate the tool's stability an eight out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability isn't a problem for us. Many big multinational companies use CrowdStrike Identity Protection, so it's designed to handle environments like ours without any issues. My company has 500 users.
How was the initial setup?
The tool's deployment is easy. Thanks to the installation scripting we utilized, the technical rollout took about two weeks. Then, there was some additional time, around two to four weeks, for customization and configuration. After that, the systems were up and running. So, all in all, it took about three months to have our mitigation strategies in place. We have one engineer for maintenance.
What other advice do I have?
I rate the overall product an eight out of ten. I would recommend it to others. However, it's crucial to understand areas where the product might not provide coverage and how to mitigate those gaps. For example, it covers endpoints, networks, and Office 365 environments, but are there other areas in the attack surface that it doesn't address well? It's essential to be aware of any potential gaps upfront.
The solution helps in preventing incidents. However, it's challenging to quantify the exact impact because we don't know what would have happened without it. It's similar to having insurance for your house.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Group IT Director - Technical Operations at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
Automatically takes immediate action whenever it detects suspicious activity
Pros and Cons
- "The managed services are distinguished, responsive, dynamic, flexible, and assertive when taking action."
- "CrowdStrike Falcon could be enhanced by extending its security capabilities to include NDR and XDR."
What is our primary use case?
We use CrowdStrike Falcon for both our server and endpoint security, including our users' laptops and PCs.
How has it helped my organization?
CrowdStrike Falcon has made a significant difference for us, especially in mitigating ransomware and zero-day attacks. Its proactive and defensive response approach effectively isolates threats, setting it apart from other endpoint solutions.
Integrating CrowdStrike Falcon into our environment was seamless. Once we set the policy the software was activated immediately and distributed on all our endpoints.
The real-time response is highly effective. It automatically takes immediate action whenever it detects suspicious activity, alerting us to the problem and providing clear mitigation steps. In some cases, it even pushes through updates to resolve the issue proactively.
The usability and interface of CrowdStrike Falcon for daily operations are good.
What is most valuable?
The managed services are distinguished, responsive, dynamic, flexible, and assertive when taking action.
What needs improvement?
CrowdStrike Falcon could be enhanced by extending its security capabilities to include NDR and XDR.
The pricing has room for improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
In the three years of using CrowdStrike Falcon, we have not encountered any stability issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
CrowdStrike Falcon scales well. We are using it in a large environment with no problems.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is responsive.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used both Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response but found that they lacked the 24/7/365 monitoring and response offered by CrowdStrike Falcon. Additionally, their detection capabilities, particularly for ransomware and zero-day attacks, were not as effective.
How was the initial setup?
The initial deployment was straightforward and non-disruptive. The deployment took one week to complete.
We required two people from our organization for the deployment on-site and the CrowdStrike team worked remotely.
What about the implementation team?
The CrowdStrike team helped with the implementation.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
CrowdStrike Falcon is one of the more expensive endpoint solutions on the market.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon an eight out of ten.
We deployed CrowdStrike Falcon across all our locations, including subsidiaries and remote sites in various regions.
Maintaining CrowdStrike Falcon is simple because it only requires a client agent to be installed on the machine at the kernel level, below the operating system.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Senior Data Hosting and Security Special at Two aquate
Offers good centralization and access to remote sites with an easy setup
Pros and Cons
- "The initial setup is a very fast process."
- "We'd like to see more integration capabilities."
What is our primary use case?
We're installing the solution on some of our external servers. It has a cloud portal, and we can control everything through the cloud. It's good for remote sites.
What is most valuable?
I like that it has a centralized cloud, and all the agents provide visibility on our remote sites. It offers good central management. It can be accessed through external networks.
The management is taken care of. It's a complete solution that's taken care of by CrowdStrike. We don't have to do anything.
What needs improvement?
We'd like to see more integration capabilities.
We need more log storage as CrowdStrike will dump all logs to the centralized server.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable enough. We have not had any downtime. The only issue is if we have issues with the internet connectivity.
How are customer service and support?
We get support from their local vendors. We have a lot of local support. If they cannot handle the case, they directly forward the issue to CrowdStrike. The downside is that support asks for too many logs. We, of course, have to investigate first and try to solve the problem ourselves.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I've worked with Kaspersky. They are a similar solution. I've also used Microsoft Defender, which is also very similar. We do use a lot of Microsoft products, and Defender is readily available everywhere. They are the market leaders right now. Their software has very good integration across the whole Microsoft product offering. CrowdStrike, however, we have high trust with, as they are focused specifically on security, unlike Microsoft. CrowdStrike offers updates quicker than Microsoft or other services.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is a very fast process. Cloud solutions are fast to set up. They just give you access to their cloud and they have an API integration. It will be up and running within a few minutes.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The tool is very expensive. It's similar to Microsoft Defender. That said, it's not overpriced. It's worth it for the level of security. We need it for our company.
What other advice do I have?
I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Head of Cyber Defense & Offensive Security at Habib Bank Limited
Good lateral movement and overwatch detections but requires improvements in the Mac environment
Pros and Cons
- "The CS falcon agent is a lightweight agent compared with other agents of EDR products."
- "CS Falcon sensing capabilities for non-domain machines should be enhanced since the agent doesn't detect the neighbor's IP Address and/or any anomaly which was identified in the network for the non-domain machine."
What is our primary use case?
The following is a list of use cases that were tested and evaluated against Crowd Strike along with different competitors.
1 - Execution of Fileless Ransomware - The test was conducted using PowerShell script execution, the script was executed using privileges rights and it was successful. Although all the preventive controls were enabled in the CS falcon dashboard, CS falcon had raised a red flag regarding fileless execution, however, the moment it let us know our system got encrypted.
2 - Uploading large volume of Data over the cloud - Using customized script in the USB, a test was conducted to copy (.docx, .xlsx, .pptx, .png, .jpg, .pdf, .txt, .rtf) files from the system. It performs a copy operation from the whole disk and creates a password-protected .zip file in APPDATA of the complete files, once the protected file is created it then checks the internet connectivity. As soon as the script finds connectivity with 8.8.8.8, 8.8.4.4. it starts sending the protected .ZIP file over its CnC cloud.
3 - Disabling of CS Falcon Agent - I have conducted a test to disable the Falcon agent from the Windows-based OS. The agent was successfully disabled by booting up another OS and renaming of agent files from the system.
4 - Perform Privilege Task in Crowd strike - CS roles have some additional privileges. While performing host containment, it has the ability to perform the following operations without informing the user:
* Host Containment
* Isolating the host from the network;
* Copying data from the host machine into the CS cloud;
Considering the above situation it may cause a breach of user privacy due to which user can file a complaint against InfoSec team.
How has it helped my organization?
The solution fits well in the organization and took out valuable output as expected from Endpoint Detection and Response solution.
This solution supersedes the requirement of an Endpoint Protection solution. The cost of EPP can be saved while using EDR.
One good thing is the active association of the Crowd Strike team in terms of support and coordination.
Features that require further evaluation include:
Let's take an example of ten machines that require CS falcon agent installation. Apart from agent compatibility and ease of installation, one of the most important areas is the network bandwidth which would require whenever an agent updates the server through the cloud.
An estimated network bandwidth utilization takes 0.4 MB/hour for a single machine to update its probes over the cloud. If we estimate the total working hours in our case it is eight hours, the formula would be 0.4 X 8 = 3.2 MB per host per day is the data uploading requirement on the cloud. It is highly recommended to assess a number of agents and the network bandwidth requirements.
What is most valuable?
The CS falcon agent is a lightweight agent compared with other agents of EDR products. Moreover, the following is the list of valuable features which I found very useful:
1 - Lateral Movement
2 - Overwatch detections
3 - Custom IOC blocking
4 - Suspicious Process and Registry operations
5 - Azure/AWS agent installation and easy integration with SIEM
6 - Triage of the complete incident is well created in the CS dashboard. It helps to show complete details about the incident.
7 - It is an agent-based license not machine-based, so once the machine gets outdated/old, installation of the same agent license in another machine is possible.
What needs improvement?
Area of Improvement
The products still require improvement in the Apple environment (Mac). Currently, this solution (as of July 2022) is not compatible with MAC OS (X), Catalina, or Big Sur.
Similarly, the product is also not compatible with Unix-based systems including AIX, Darwin, and FreeBSD.
CS Falcon sensing capabilities for non-domain machines should be enhanced since the agent doesn't detect the neighbor's IP Address and/or any anomaly which was identified in the network for the non-domain machine.
Additional Features required in the Next release:
The product requires an add-on feature which should be a turnkey feature if it requires to be turned on to XDR no changes should be required to be made on the user end as the agent is already installed.
For how long have I used the solution?
The solution has been used for around two years, including the demo version with full features and final version with specific features.
This solution has been used without any compatibility issue and/or technical failure due to anti-virus installation.
When we procured Crowd Strike as an EDR it was on the Gartner top ranking as well.
The agent was being utilized in Windows Servers (2016, 2019), Linux Servers (Fedora, Red hat, Cent OS), Windows Endpoints (10, 11), and Mac.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable and we have used it for more than 2500+ hosts.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a cloud-based solution - so scalability is not an issue.
How are customer service and support?
When it comes to customer service and support is that the principal engages whenever required.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
This was the first product that we evaluated out of 6 (six) products.
How was the initial setup?
The setup was straightforward and it's easy to use.
What about the implementation team?
A vendor team was engaged in the installation of the complete solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Licensing is relatively low than other EDR solutions.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated Carbon Black and FireEye.
What other advice do I have?
Crowd Strike is a good solution. However, it requires you to build more features in protecting Endpoint agents for example:
DOM Improvement
DLL's Injections
Detection of CNC in Network Neighbors
Detection of similar attack surfaces in the network.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free CrowdStrike Falcon Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: July 2025
Product Categories
Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Threat Intelligence Platforms Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Attack Surface Management (ASM) Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) AI-Powered Cybersecurity PlatformsPopular Comparisons
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Fortinet FortiEDR
Microsoft Sentinel
Splunk Enterprise Security
Darktrace
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
Microsoft Defender XDR
IBM Security QRadar
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
Fortinet FortiClient
HP Wolf Security
Elastic Security
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Symantec Endpoint Security
Buyer's Guide
Download our free CrowdStrike Falcon Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- I would like to compare CrowdStrike and Carbon Black. On what basis should I decide?
- What is the biggest difference between Carbon Black CB Defense, CrowdStrike, and SentinelOne?
- What do you recommend to choose when replacing Symantec EDR: SentinelOne or CrowdStirke Falcon?
- What is the biggest difference between CrowdStrike and Cylance?
- CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Defender ATP: Comparison of features and performance
- Is Crowdstrike Falcon better than Trend Micro Deep Security?
- What are the pros and cons of Darktrace vs CrowdStrike Falcon vs alternative EPP solutions?
- Which solution do you prefer: CrowdStrike Falcon or SentinelOne Singularity Complete?
- How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?
- How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?