CrowdStrike Falcon Reviews

We use CrowdStrike Falcon for endpoint protection and cybersecurity.

We implemented CrowdStrike Falcon to ensure our systems were secure and there were no infiltrations to our system.

We deploy CrowdStrike Falcon across a variety of platforms, including cloud and edge environments. We ensure it meets rigorous security standards, is properly certified, and adheres to our data management policy.

We integrated CrowdStrike Falcon with our end-user systems and servers.

Since implementing CrowdStrike Falcon, we haven't experienced any serious threats, and we've seen a decrease in phishing and ransomware emails. This suggests it's been very effective in mitigating those threats.

The UI is easy to use and comprehensive.

CrowdStrike Falcon's performance has improved our user productivity.

CrowdStrike Falcon offers a comprehensive dashboard that is highly effective in protecting against and blocking external infiltration attempts.

The pricing structure should allow for some flexibility.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for almost 3 years.

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable.

I would rate the scalability of CrowdStrike Falcon 8 out of 10.

The technical support is good. We have not had any issues with them.

Positive

The initial deployment was straightforward. The deployment doesn't take more than one day. Those involved with the deployment are system engineers, IT analysts, and software engineers.

The implementation was completed in-house.

The price is fixed with no room for negotiation.

I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon 8 out of 10.

We have deployed CrowdStrike Falcon in multiple departments, locations, and satellite offices.

CrowdStrike Falcon doesn't require maintenance from our end other than the updates.

I recommend CrowdStrike Falcon to others.

We use CrowdStrike Falcon for intrusion prevention management.

CrowdStrike Falcon proactively blocks threats and provides us with insights.

CrowdStrike Falcon integration is seamless.

The endpoint and server management are the most valuable features of CrowdStrike Falcon.

CrowdStrike Falcon's GUI requires improvement for user-friendliness. The console's available options are unclear, making it difficult to understand and extract details. Additionally, correlating information within the console and reports proves challenging.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for two years.

CrowdStrike Falcon had some initial stability issues in our environment, likely due to its new integration. However, it appears to have matured and is now functioning reliably.

Being cloud-based, CrowdStrike Falcon offers easy scalability. Adding licenses through procurement increases resources without the need for additional hardware, making scaling straightforward.

While the technical support meets all response time commitments outlined in our Service Level Agreement, some users believe they should strive for a higher standard – a Security Level Target. This means responding to security incidents immediately, not just within SLA windows. Security tools are crucial for our environment's protection, and their use shouldn't be limited by SLA constraints.

Positive

After using Symantec, Trend Micro, McAfee, and VMware Carbon Black, we migrated to CrowdStrike Falcon due to a lack of support from the previous vendors and their shortcomings in comprehensive threat detection.

I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon eight out of ten.

The maintenance required is reasonable.

We have 6,000 endpoints in our environment.

CrowdStrike Falcon shines with its user-friendliness, providing clear insights into the endpoint environment. Proactive features are a major plus, offering actionable items and valuable attack path simulations that empower better decision-making.

A popular choice for Data Loss Prevention is CrowdStrike Falcon. This is the primary function our clients leverage it for, as it offers industry-leading DLP capabilities.

CrowdStrike Falcon has helped our customers secure their confidential data.

The DLP is the most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon. Additionally, the scanning is good and the deployment is easy.

The console is not user-friendly or visually appealing and has room for improvement. I would like a single pane of glass dashboard.

I have been an integrator of CrowdStrike Falcon for one day. 

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable.

I have also worked with Trend Micro and Panda.

The initial deployment is straightforward. I would rate the ease of setup nine out of ten.

Two people are required for the deployment.

I need to upgrade the software occasionally but it doesn't require continuous maintenance.

While the specific deployment time varies depending on each client's individual environment, on average the process can be completed in a couple of days.

I only deploy the solution for clients, I don't calculate their ROI.

CrowdStrike Falcon's pricing is reasonable. We can customize features and that affects the pricing.

We pay 40,000 dirhams per 100 users.

I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon nine out of ten.

Our clientele ranges from small to enterprise-level businesses.

I recommend CrowdStrike Falcon as it provides all the features of an EDR.

We use CrowdStrike Falcon mostly for EDR.

We implemented CrowdStrike Falcon to gain better control over our endpoints, servers, and work sessions. Unlike traditional antivirus programs, Falcon's sophisticated features allow us to comprehensively manage and enhance security, providing a more robust solution for our specific needs.

In the past year, Falcon has significantly improved our organization's security by consolidating endpoint management. With a single call to Falcon, we can oversee all endpoints, eliminating the need for multiple platforms and streamlining our security operations for better efficiency and awareness.

The most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon for me is its unified sensor, applicable across all models. This consistency simplifies operations, and while the analytics and server capabilities are significant, having a single sensor for all models stands out as the key advantage in managing security effectively.

There is room for improvement in managing multiple customer IDs. Enhancements in the console web for better control and customization of sensor features would be valuable to ensure a smoother experience in handling various customer IDs and installations.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for about a year.

I have not had any stability issues with CrowdStrike Falcon.

I would rate the scalability of CrowdStrike Falcon as a ten out of ten.

The technical support is not very good. I would rate it as an eight out of ten. One improvement could be reducing the response time for cases, as waiting two or three days, even for less critical issues, can be a bit long. Additionally, a better feedback loop on submitted ideas would enhance the efficiency of communication with the product group, providing more clarity on whether proposed features or versions will be considered.

Positive

Before Falcon, we used Trellix. We switched to Falcon for enhanced security, moving beyond just antivirus protection. Falcon provides more advanced features and a comprehensive security solution.

The deployment of Falcon was relatively easy, with no major issues except occasional misconfigurations on the filter. The process for individual work sessions is fast, taking around a few minutes, but for servers, it requires more time due to the need for antivirus removal and sensor replacement, involving server restarts. Overall, the deployment time depends on the scope, ranging from minutes for work sessions to more extended periods for servers.

At the moment, we have around twenty thousand users in our environment. Our setup spans multiple locations, mainly in Portugal, and we operate on various operating systems, including Mac, Linux, and Windows.

Falcon, being a SaaS product, doesn't require maintenance on our end. Updates are needed for servers, but they can be easily managed through the web interface without causing any inconvenience for us.

I would recommend conducting a proof of concept with CrowdStrike Falcon before making a decision. While the product has strengths, I would advise new users to address questions and doubts directly with the product team, especially when seeking new features or improvements. Ensure there is a clear communication channel for feedback and inquiries. Overall, I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon as a nine out of ten.

We use the EDR feature.

This is unlike any other EDR solution that I am familiar with. It provides very good protection and the ability to crosscheck environments. It's really helpful in investigating any alerts and is easy to use. You can use some of the Splunk language to search. 

We've tried some integrations with solutions, closing off false positives and things like that. Falcon could include more features in that area. In addition, some features are modularized and we're unable to buy them as we're in the healthcare field and limited in the amount we can invest. 

I've been using this product for close to 18 months. 

We haven't had any stability issues. 

The solution is very scalable but we had issues with some groups, that manage their own devices and wanted to have access to self-manage them. We weren't able to do that, unfortunately.

My team has interacted with tech support and I believe the issues were resolved in a timely manner.

Positive

We previously used other solutions such as Setinel One.

The initial setup was very straightforward and smooth.

Falcon is more expensive than every other solution on the market. That said, they do have a better product than anyone else.

Some of the default settings are set to 'easy' which isn't sufficient. We had some conversations around this and the recommendation was to change some of these settings to more aggressive ones on the policy side. I know some organizations have had issues automatically updating CrowdStrike to the latest version. I recommend going through the change process but saving it at minus one for a while to avoid all the negative downtimes where you might need to roll back to the previous update.

When we switched to CrowdStrike, we didn't expect it to find anything that was already on the computer because the primary reason we swapped was because of EDR. But it did find things that were dormant as well as other things.

I rate this solution nine out of 10. 

Falcon helps my client improve productivity. About 5,000 users at the client company are using the product. 

CrowdStrike enables the infrastructure managers to visualize all the events and get information about the network.

It's important for the customer to have surety that all the workstations are protected. 

There are some areas where some customers would prefer a different service.

About four months ago, I and my other partners started preparing a presentation to propose CrowdStrike to a client.

Falcon is a highly stable product.

I rate CrowdStrike's support 10 out of 10. 

Positive

We worked with other solutions, like Trend Micro. CrowdStrike's advantage is that the agent is light, so it doesn't require many resources on the machines. It's easy to install, and the results are useful to the organization.

I'm not directly involved with the setup. I prepare a proposal, and another department deploys the solution. Falcon doesn't require maintenance because the product runs in a cloud environment.

We use a reseller and an integrator.

I rate CrowdStrike Falcon 10 out of 10 for ROI.

My customers pay for yearly licenses. I rate CrowdStrike Falcon 10 out of 10 for affordability.

I rate CrowdStrike Falcon 10 out of 10.

We are a CrowdStrike Falcon distributor that helps clients monitor their environments for malicious activity coming from the internet.

Both users and administrators find CrowdStrike Falcon easy to use.

I like the vulnerability assessment and proactive hunting features of CrowdStrike Falcon.

To simplify the budgeting process for our clients, CrowdStrike should consider offering bundled packages that include essential features. The separate model pricing structure can make it challenging for clients to gain approval for their security needs.

CrowdStrike could consider regional pricing models to better reflect the economic realities of different markets.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for 2 years.

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable.

CrowdStrike Falcon is scalable.

We have also used Sophos. CrowdStrike Falcon is a better solution but Sophos is more affordable.

The deployment is straightforward.

The cost of CrowdStrike Falcon in Latin America seems high relative to the economic conditions in the region.

I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon 9 out of 10.

To realize the benefits of CrowdStrike Falcon, it's recommended to conduct a proof of concept first. You should then start to see the advantages within a few months.

No maintenance is required from our end.

To ensure the successful implementation of CrowdStrike Falcon, it's essential to have a complete network map and inventory of all resources and devices.

Our organization relies on CrowdStrike, a standalone endpoint security solution, to safeguard our bare-metal machines. CrowdStrike continuously monitors for threats on all endpoints. If it detects any suspicious activity, such as malware or malicious processes, it immediately alerts us for investigation. 

The malware protection is the most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon.

The current database schema presents challenges and has potential for improvement.

The technical support response time can be improved.

There are a lot of false positives reported.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for almost four years.

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable. 

CrowdStrike Falcon is scalable.

The technical support is good but the response time can be improved.

Positive

We previously used VMware Carbon Black Endpoint. CrowdStrike Falcon is more of an EDR solution.

I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon a seven out of ten.

The maintenance is straightforward.

CrowdStrike Falcon is deployed independently in our environment and we have 30 users.

While CrowdStrike Falcon offers valuable security tools for larger organizations with extensive infrastructure, its complexity might not be ideal for smaller businesses with limited IT resources.