Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Khushru_Mistry - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Technology Officer at GM Modular
Real User
Top 5
The integration is flexible, helps identify required patches, and excels in external media control
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable aspects of CrowdStrike Falcon for me are its device observability, identification, and software and OS recognition."
  • "If CrowdStrike can further expand its support for XDR compatibility, that would give it an edge over all the other competing new products."

What is our primary use case?

CrowdStrike Falcon is our platform for IT security, encompassing endpoint security, cloud security, and EDR capabilities.

How has it helped my organization?

CrowdStrike protected us from a cyberattack. That's why I believe it's a very effective product. It's already prevented attacks on 2 occasions. It successfully quarantined suspicious files, essentially making our organization much safer.

We also leverage CrowdStrike Falcon Overwatch, a managed threat-hunting service offered by CrowdStrike. This service complements CrowdStrike's EDR functionality, which provides automated detection and response capabilities against external attacks. In our case, CrowdStrike successfully identified and automatically contained a cyberattack launched against our organization.

Our CrowdStrike Falcon integration with our SIEM is proving to be flexible.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable aspects of CrowdStrike Falcon for me are its device observability, identification, and software and OS recognition. It also excels in external media control, particularly USB access. The ability to disable USB access to flash drives significantly improves security.

Furthermore, Falcon helps identify patches needed for Windows, Mac, and other operating systems. This provides valuable reports and insights into our system vulnerabilities, allowing us to proactively address them.

What needs improvement?

If CrowdStrike can further expand its support for XDR compatibility, that would give it an edge over all the other competing new products.

Buyer's Guide
CrowdStrike Falcon
July 2025
Learn what your peers think about CrowdStrike Falcon. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2025.
862,514 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for 2 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would rate the stability of CrowdStrike Falcon 8 out of 10.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We've deployed CrowdStrike Falcon across all 3,000 of our endpoints, and it has demonstrated excellent scalability. Therefore, scalability is not a concern for CrowdStrike in terms of performance or its ability to handle growth.

I would rate the scalability a 9 out of 10.

How was the initial setup?

The deployment was straightforward, taking 2 months for 3,000 endpoints. We implemented it directly where needed. The process was simple and easy. We believe this approach offers advantages due to its lower complexity compared to other methods. Careful planning was essential, and with a clear plan for sensor installation, we were able to execute the deployment successfully.

What about the implementation team?

While a third party handled the implementation, the OEM provided us with direct training on Falcon alongside CrowdStrike.

What was our ROI?

CrowdStrike Falcon has demonstrably provided a positive return on investment. We've already encountered two specific instances where, without CrowdStrike, the company would have faced millions in damages. In one case, we would have likely lost our entire SAP system.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing of CrowdStrike Falcon is competitive.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

After evaluating SentinelOne, we found CrowdStrike to be a superior solution. CrowdStrike offers advantages in dashboard compatibility and a feature called Overwatch, which gives it a competitive edge.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon 8 out of 10.

CrowdStrike Falcon is deployed in multiple branches across India.

No maintenance is required from our end.

I recommend CrowdStrike Falcon. It is not a solution we need to think twice about using.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
IT Network Infrastructure Manager at HENSOLDT
Real User
Top 10
Is a flexible, fully managed service, and provides peace of mind
Pros and Cons
  • "The anomaly detection is the most valuable feature."
  • "The portal can be clunky to navigate at times and has room for improvement."

What is our primary use case?

We use CrowdStrike Falcon as a managed SOC for intrusion detection on our endpoints.

How has it helped my organization?

Being a cloud-native solution, CrowdStrike Falcon provides flexibility and always-on protection. This is extremely important to have the best protection available.

It is a fully managed service, so they provide all the necessary updates for us which is helpful.

While CrowdStrike Falcon provides us with better peace of mind in terms of protection, it also generates alerts for potential threats, requiring our investigation. However, the platform further alleviates our anxiety by automatically reviewing unaddressed alerts, offering an additional layer of security. This coverage fosters a heightened sense of security.

CrowdStrike Falcon has been instrumental in preventing breaches, allowing us to operate with significantly increased security compared to the past. This has provided us with much greater peace of mind. While no security solution is foolproof, Falcon has brought us remarkably close. 

What is most valuable?

The anomaly detection is the most valuable feature.

What needs improvement?

The portal can be clunky to navigate at times and has room for improvement.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would rate the stability of CrowdStrike Falcon a nine out of ten. The only issue I have had is with an old version of the endpoint that was installed and has proven to be problematic. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

CrowdStrike Falcon is scalable.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is good and they provide prompt responses to all of our questions.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We implemented CrowdStrike Falcon in response to a security incident. It was the first endpoint detection and response service we had ever used, and we've been utilizing it since 2021.

How was the initial setup?

Deploying the sensors to our endpoints is straightforward. We do have a manual process for deploying the sensors to our endpoints. There are also options to do it through a group policy. It doesn't seem overly complex.

We rolled the solution out to our entire estate which took just over one week. We had up to 300 endpoints and required a team of five people to complete the deployment.

What was our ROI?

CrowdStrike Falcon enables us to save on resources which in turn provides a 20 percent return on investment.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

CrowdStrike Falcon offers excellent value for the money for our organization, particularly given our lean IT team. We lack the resources to replicate the full security services they provide without hiring additional personnel. The cost of Falcon is likely comparable to, or even less than, the salary and benefits we'd need for an extra employee. Furthermore, their on-call experts have more expertise, further enhancing the value proposition.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

After a year, we reevaluated our endpoint security solution. We considered several options, including Arctic Wolf, SentinelOne, and Darktrace, alongside our existing Fortinet solutions. We participated in demos and ultimately determined that CrowdStrike's offering, both current and future, remained the best fit. While we hadn't initially explored other options before choosing CrowdStrike, external factors subsequently forced our hand. However, after a year of use and further evaluation, we reaffirmed our decision, concluding that CrowdStrike was still the most suitable solution for our needs.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon a nine out of ten.

We have around 300 endpoints and three people who have access to the solution.

Three people are required for maintenance.

CrowdStrike Falcon was recommended by our head office in Germany.

I recommend CrowdStrike Falcon. 

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
CrowdStrike Falcon
July 2025
Learn what your peers think about CrowdStrike Falcon. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2025.
862,514 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ben Nnatuanya - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager, Security Operations Centre at Phillips Consulting Limited
Real User
Top 5
Robust and detects almost every malicious activity that occurs within the endpoint
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution's most valuable feature is that it is robust and can detect almost every malicious activity that occurs within the endpoint."
  • "I would like a centralized deployment where I could roll out or push it to all endpoints."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution for endpoint security. We use the tool to ensure the endpoints are protected from abnormal activities, people don't run different scripts, and people don't compromise endpoints and use them to get into the network.

What is most valuable?

The solution's most valuable feature is that it is robust and can detect almost every malicious activity that occurs within the endpoint.

What needs improvement?

I would like a centralized deployment where I could roll out or push it to all endpoints.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon Surface for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

CrowdStrike Falcon Surface is a very stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

CrowdStrike Falcon Surface is a very scalable solution. A lot of customers are using CrowdStrike Falcon Surface. One of our customers for the solution has 12,000 endpoints.

How are customer service and support?

The solution's technical support is handled centrally by CrowdStrike, and the support was also good and knowledgeable.

How was the initial setup?

I didn't deploy the solution, but I supported customers that use it. I think it took them up to six months to deploy the CrowdStrike Falcon Surface.

What was our ROI?

The solution somehow doesn't allow intrusion and minimizes fraud or cyber-attacks. Within the time we're using it, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface detected a lot of intrusion from malicious individuals. It was able to prevent a lot of insider threats where people internally will want to run some malicious scripts within the environment.

It detects those malicious attacks quickly, and we can prevent them. It minimized a lot of cyber and fraud-related activities that could have cost the bank a lot of money.

What other advice do I have?

CrowdStrike Falcon Surface is a cloud-based solution. In light of the recent global IT outage that affected CrowdStrike, they should do proper change management.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Edith Ibacache - PeerSpot reviewer
NTT at Sonda S.A.
MSP
Top 10
Easy to deploy and manage with many helpful features
Pros and Cons
  • "I haven't had any issues with bugs or glitches. I haven't had a problem with stability so far."
  • "The solution isn't known in my market. The brand isn't as recognizable. Their shortcomings are more on the marketing side."

What is our primary use case?

We use the product for cloud security. We use it for prevention, to watch for gaps in security. We work with customers seeking prevention for advanced apps. 

How has it helped my organization?

Sometimes a customer has multiple solutions that come at a higher cost. They have to pay for all of these other security features. With CrowdStrike, customers get one agent for all system operations. It offers more security for remote work and clients gain access to the latest protections.

What is most valuable?

The solution offers good features. The prevention and device control are useful. It offers helpful firewall management and identity protection.

They've reduced the complexity and provide better security outcomes. Customers tend to prefer CrowdStrike. 

It's easy to deploy and manage.

What needs improvement?

The solution isn't known in my market. The brand isn't as recognizable. Their shortcomings are more on the marketing side. Everyone knows Microsoft Defender. Customers need to hear more about CrowdStrike and all the advantages and features on offer. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We've used the solution for three to four months. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I haven't had any issues with bugs or glitches. I haven't had a problem with stability so far. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The capability to scale so far has been good. 

How are customer service and support?

Technical support is good. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I'm also familiar with Microsoft Defender. However, Defender works best with Microsoft and not necessarily other legacy applications. With CrowdStrike, you can secure all system operations and versions. It's easier to deploy and operate. 

How was the initial setup?

The deployment is seamless and users get immediate protection. It's lightweight. There's one agent deployed to endpoints in minutes. The product offers consistent coverage. There's no complex integrations and it doesn't need fine-tuning. In comparison, Defender can be more complex.

CrowdStrike can be deployed on any operating system, not just Microsoft. 

There isn't really maintenance, it's set and forget. The agent updates automatically and receives continuous security updates, enabling immediate enforcement across endpoints. 

What was our ROI?

The solution is well worth the cost.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The costs are predictable. There are no surprises. 

In Chile, there are not a lot of CrowdStrike partners of the managed service; therefore, it's a little more expensive than Microsoft, as there are so many more managed partners for Microsoft. That said, if you look at the total cost of ownership, CrowStrike is better than Microsoft.

What other advice do I have?

We're a reseller. We're still new to CrowdStrike. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. The cost is good and they offer better tech support. Also, the protection is wonderful. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
PeerSpot user
Ali Minissi - PeerSpot reviewer
Group IT Director - Technical Operations at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
Automatically takes immediate action whenever it detects suspicious activity
Pros and Cons
  • "The managed services are distinguished, responsive, dynamic, flexible, and assertive when taking action."
  • "CrowdStrike Falcon could be enhanced by extending its security capabilities to include NDR and XDR."

What is our primary use case?

We use CrowdStrike Falcon for both our server and endpoint security, including our users' laptops and PCs.

How has it helped my organization?

CrowdStrike Falcon has made a significant difference for us, especially in mitigating ransomware and zero-day attacks. Its proactive and defensive response approach effectively isolates threats, setting it apart from other endpoint solutions.

Integrating CrowdStrike Falcon into our environment was seamless. Once we set the policy the software was activated immediately and distributed on all our endpoints.

The real-time response is highly effective. It automatically takes immediate action whenever it detects suspicious activity, alerting us to the problem and providing clear mitigation steps. In some cases, it even pushes through updates to resolve the issue proactively.

The usability and interface of CrowdStrike Falcon for daily operations are good. 

What is most valuable?

The managed services are distinguished, responsive, dynamic, flexible, and assertive when taking action.

What needs improvement?

CrowdStrike Falcon could be enhanced by extending its security capabilities to include NDR and XDR.

The pricing has room for improvement.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In the three years of using CrowdStrike Falcon, we have not encountered any stability issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

CrowdStrike Falcon scales well. We are using it in a large environment with no problems.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is responsive.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used both Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response but found that they lacked the 24/7/365 monitoring and response offered by CrowdStrike Falcon. Additionally, their detection capabilities, particularly for ransomware and zero-day attacks, were not as effective.

How was the initial setup?

The initial deployment was straightforward and non-disruptive. The deployment took one week to complete.

We required two people from our organization for the deployment on-site and the CrowdStrike team worked remotely.

What about the implementation team?

The CrowdStrike team helped with the implementation.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

CrowdStrike Falcon is one of the more expensive endpoint solutions on the market.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon an eight out of ten.

We deployed CrowdStrike Falcon across all our locations, including subsidiaries and remote sites in various regions.

Maintaining CrowdStrike Falcon is simple because it only requires a client agent to be installed on the machine at the kernel level, below the operating system.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Senior Data Hosting and Security Special at Two aquate
Real User
Top 5
Offers good centralization and access to remote sites with an easy setup
Pros and Cons
  • "The initial setup is a very fast process."
  • "We'd like to see more integration capabilities."

What is our primary use case?

We're installing the solution on some of our external servers. It has a cloud portal, and we can control everything through the cloud. It's good for remote sites.

What is most valuable?

I like that it has a centralized cloud, and all the agents provide visibility on our remote sites. It offers good central management. It can be accessed through external networks.

The management is taken care of. It's a complete solution that's taken care of by CrowdStrike. We don't have to do anything. 

What needs improvement?

We'd like to see more integration capabilities. 

We need more log storage as CrowdStrike will dump all logs to the centralized server. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for five years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable enough. We have not had any downtime. The only issue is if we have issues with the internet connectivity. 

How are customer service and support?

We get support from their local vendors. We have a lot of local support. If they cannot handle the case, they directly forward the issue to CrowdStrike. The downside is that support asks for too many logs. We, of course, have to investigate first and try to solve the problem ourselves. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I've worked with Kaspersky. They are a similar solution. I've also used Microsoft Defender, which is also very similar. We do use a lot of Microsoft products, and Defender is readily available everywhere. They are the market leaders right now. Their software has very good integration across the whole Microsoft product offering. CrowdStrike, however, we have high trust with, as they are focused specifically on security, unlike Microsoft. CrowdStrike offers updates quicker than Microsoft or other services. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is a very fast process. Cloud solutions are fast to set up. They just give you access to their cloud and they have an API integration. It will be up and running within a few minutes. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The tool is very expensive. It's similar to Microsoft Defender. That said, it's not overpriced. It's worth it for the level of security. We need it for our company. 

What other advice do I have?

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Marco-VIVALDELLI - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO at MARVIV SRLS
Real User
Top 10
It works with all devices and operating systems easily to provide integrated security
Pros and Cons
  • "Falcon has the capacity to identify potential problems quickly. The administrator can deploy the agent, and the users cannot change it. This assures you that the agent remains on this device. Also, the agent can act preemptively to provide alerts about potential problems."
  • "I want more ability to customize how you summarize the data. The default views are fine, but it would be interesting to be able to customize them based on the kind of data you want to see immediately. This can help the administrator gain an immediate overview and reduce the investigation time."

What is our primary use case?

We use Falcon to investigate threats and reduce risks in our environment. It covers multiple departments within the same building and company. All units are attached to one controller, so we can manage them from one point. 

We can implement different kinds of policies on sensitive data for various departments. For example, I can limit how data can be changed if I'm dealing with financial data. It's the same for production or logistics. We can set rules for data sharing and access because some departments need to share data with customers.

How has it helped my organization?

CrowdStrike's AI-driven analytics have improved our security considerably. It's sharing information from across the infrastructure and applying machine learning to prevent issues. This is a powerful, proactive approach to cybersecurity. It takes action in time to prevent the problem, so we don't need to remedy it after the fact. Sometimes, by the time you take action, it's already too late. 

Before deploying Falcon, I would avoid taking action due to potential risks. With CrowdStrike, I don't worry about recovering data, so I can focus on preventing situations. In two years, I have never had that problem. When I look at the platform, I can see all the notifications and the actions taken. I can see how potential attacks can possibly reach the server and create a significant incident. Thus, I can directly measure the quality of the service.

Falcon is easy to integrate with our infrastructure because we can control the entire network through our fiber router and switch. CrowdStrike can interface with all devices easily and provide integrated security. Falcon gives you greater control without any problems.

The agent will recognize issues immediately, and we can follow up to create a plan for if this problem reappears or is still present on the infrastructure. Falcon enables instant remediation. It doesn't take two or three days. It's in real-time.

What is most valuable?

Falcon has the capacity to identify potential problems quickly. The administrator can deploy the agent, and the users cannot change it. This assures you that the agent remains on this device. Also, the agent can act preemptively to provide alerts about potential problems. 

When there's a problem, you can follow the rules. For example, you can put a file that might be infected into quarantine or lock the device, preventing it from propagating the threat to other devices or networks. The agents are collecting information and feeding that back into the CrowdStrike platform, so you have 24/7 control and visibility. 

Falcon's deep learning capabilities are flexible and work across multiple operating systems. You can control everything from the same place, whether you're dealing with a Windows, Linux, or Mac device. You can define your policies precisely and decide how you want the platform to respond in any situation. 

CrowdStrike's AI approach is interesting because it improves the capacity to correlate information based on all the deployments on devices worldwide. It analyzes this data to identify something anomalous that could potentially be a problem in your environment. Falcon can isolate the issue to determine if it's a real threat. You will get an email saying the platform has identified a potential problem they are investigating. 

Falcon explains the steps they are taking. After the issue has been resolved, you will get another message showing CrowdStrike's analysis and evidence that the problem is now under control. I get about 20 emails from CrowdStrike daily. 

What needs improvement?

I want more ability to customize how you summarize the data. The default views are fine, but it would be interesting to be able to customize them based on the kind of data you want to see immediately. This can help the administrator gain an immediate overview and reduce the investigation time.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have used Falcon for two years.

How are customer service and support?

I rate CrowdStrike support 10 out of 10. They have one of the best teams that I've worked with. They're very fast and professional, with a high level of skill and knowledge. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I previously used Sophos. It's a good solution that works well with other Sophos infrastructure, like firewalls, etc. For example, if the firewall is from Sophos, it can interact with the software to identify a problem. However, CrowdStrike is more powerful when using hardware from different vendors. It doesn't rely on specific hardware because it works with an agent, so you're more flexible and less constrained. 

Overall, Falcon is more powerful than other solutions. It is light on resource consumption. It has a minimal effect on the client when you have installed the system because everything is controlled by our cloud platform where you can see the portfolio of devices.

How was the initial setup?

The installation was quite easy. The platform is based in the cloud, but you need to download agents based on your operating system. After you install the agents, you only need to configure the various devices on the cloud platform. CrowdStrike's platform is managed by the vendor. You can log in and manage your portfolio of devices and define your policy or apply profiles to groups of users and devices. 

What was our ROI?

We feel like Falcon is worth what we pay.  The cost of the solution is minimal compared to restoring data from a potential attack. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Falcon's price is accessible, and it's a good value for the level of quality we get. We don't have any objections based on the cost, and we understand that you will pay more for an enterprise solution. There is no objection to the cost. It's appropriately priced for the service that we receive.

What other advice do I have?

I rate CrowdStrike Falcon 10 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer2520240 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Security Operations Security Specialist at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Good reporting capabilities and helps track machines much better
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution's reporting console is phenomenal, and I can get a lot of data out of it."
  • "The solution should have included remote wipe capability out of the box."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution for end-user devices.

What is most valuable?

The reporting console is phenomenal, and I can get a lot of data out of it. The reporting capabilities are much better than anything I've used before. With CrowdStrike Falcon, we can track machines much better.

What needs improvement?

One of the things that we built and used quite regularly is a remote wipe capability within CrowdStrike Falcon. The solution should have included remote wipe capability out of the box.

If we have a compromised or stolen machine, we can quarantine it within the CrowdStrike console. However, it doesn't include a feature that enables you to remotely wipe that machine via the console. We had to build that in separately.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We haven’t faced any issues with the solution’s stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution's scalability has been amazing. We started by deploying it to 30 users, and over three months, we expanded to 5,000 users with no issues.

How are customer service and support?

For technical support, I open a ticket with the MSP, and they deal with it. Our MSP is excellent at resolving support tickets.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used Symantec Endpoint Protection. We switched to CrowdStrike Falcon because it was a new vendor with new technology.

How was the initial setup?

The solution's initial setup was very easy because we did an SCCM push for deployment.

What about the implementation team?

Our MSP did a lot of the deployment work for us. The solution was deployed by a small team in three months. It took four of us to deploy the tool to 5,000 users.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution's pricing is great for us.

What other advice do I have?

It took us about three months to adjust to the new client and switch from a file-level scanner to an AI-based CrowdStrike scanner to see where we felt the differences. CrowdStrike Falcon is deployed on the cloud in our organization. From an end-user perspective, the solution does not require any maintenance after deployment.

New users should be prepared for unexpected alerts. CrowdStrike Falcon views things very differently than many conventional antivirus tools.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free CrowdStrike Falcon Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: July 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free CrowdStrike Falcon Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.