We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Identity and Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."The ability to block and erase remote devices is valuable to us, especially when those devices are lost."
"We are a remote company, and the product helps us manage the global endpoints. It helps us natively manage the endpoints in the cloud from anywhere."
"Conditional access has helped us tailor and enforce our security policies in the mobile space."
"The central administration con dashboard is very easy to use and provides very good oversight on all that needs to be monitored."
"It's easy to manage and easy to configure."
"The technical support of Microsoft Intune is good."
"Its protection policies are most valuable. It protects mobile devices as well as individual apps. It is pretty scalable, and its documentation is also pretty good. It is also pretty straightforward to deploy."
"It is very easy to use. It has a very easy interface."
"It is a very stable solution. I would rate it a ten out of ten."
"Cloud Identity is scalable enough for our needs. It's serving more than 3,000 users in our organization."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"It's easy to set up."
"The tool provides a free service that you can integrate for laptop authentication. You also don’t need a separate Active Directory."
"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Identity is group access. You are able to assign policies to groups instead of users individually."
"Google is always on its own. Google Cloud Identity is pretty good on every point."
"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Identity is its stability."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management offers on-premises deployment."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to assign a package to a user on a system If you have your software packages set up via SCCM. It automates the process, which is very convenient, especially since most of our people are remote. Additionally, the overall functionality is good."
"The documentation about the custom image setup could be better. Although Microsoft provides the steps to configure Intune or set up or deploy Intune, it doesn't have much information related to custom images. If you ask, "how can we deploy the custom image?" There is no information. The steps they mention ask you to connect to your on-premises environment or create your own image on the cloud itself once there is connectivity. But I needed to go to multiple websites to get all this information. I had to figure out how to upload the custom image if you want to use the on-premise custom image for Cloud PC. If you have the proper subscription, you must have the right access, like global admin or owner. Then you can add your custom image to that. There are no steps mentioned over there. Microsoft Intune doesn't have Chrome browser support. I would like to have that support because they will want it if we pitch the product to clients."
"The installation could be improved to be simplified."
"Integrating certain group policies can be challenging and may necessitate using on-premises systems to integrate them with Microsoft Intune."
"An area for improvement is the absence of seamless integration, particularly with external dashboards."
"Microsoft Intune needs to improve the initial login process."
"We faced issues with macOS support. The product should have better inventory and asset management."
"Intune's areas for improvement revolve around security and certificate management."
"I would like some integration with the Microsoft reporting platform Power BI."
"The integration should be made easier."
"Technical support is slow."
"I would like to see more integration in future releases."
"Google Cloud Identify could make the technology used easier to understand as a layman making it more user-friendly."
"There is room for improvement in the configuration of their security policies. It seems quite basic."
"The solution's storage capacity could be increased."
"The interface could be more user-friendly."
"The pricing for this solution is a little bit higher than AWS and others, which is something that should be improved."
"In terms of integration, there is still room for improvement in Matrix42."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management could improve the user interface, it is not very intuitive."
More Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Cloud Identity is ranked 7th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 21 reviews while Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is ranked 12th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 2 reviews. Google Cloud Identity is rated 7.6, while Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Identity writes "A stable and scalable cloud solution easily compatible with Google office Suite". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management writes "It is a complete and competitive solution with excellent OEM support". Google Cloud Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, JumpCloud, VMware Workspace ONE and ManageEngine Endpoint Central, whereas Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is most compared with Ivanti Neurons for MDM and ManageEngine Endpoint Central.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.