We performed a comparison between Appian, Bizagi, and IBM WebSphere BPMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."Even with an on-premise implementation, the scalability is still high, so it is easy to scale up."
"Appian has many valuable features, the first being the ease of development—rapid development. Second, the process of learning the product and tool is faster when compared to its peers in the market. It's closer to low-code, and while it's still not very easy, it's more low-code than other products in the industry. Appian has a good user interface, a seamless model user interface, which comes without additional coding. It can also integrate with multiple systems."
"The most valuable features of Appian are workflow management and the ease with which you can build the UI."
"Appian also has very flexible local integration."
"I find the BPM the most valuable feature."
"The process models provide self-documenting systems."
"Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed."
"The low code functionality and being able to get applications faster to customers or to the market are valuable."
"I very much like the reusable rules and forms, and the way Bizagi controls the process flow. I also like the document generating system to generate PDFs and then .doc files with information gathered from a flow. At the end of a process, you can generate a document that can be printed."
"Agility is most valuable because we can develop so much faster than other tools. We can make requirements, develop, and go out to production much faster. So, agility in the software cycle is most valuable."
"The most beneficial features of Bizagi for our business processes are its seamless connectivity between process elements and its ability to automate tasks and perform simulations."
"Very, very stable."
"Great software for managing my business. I think this is the best business process management software."
"I like the business process management engine. It's very detailed, and you can probably map any of the corporate workflow processes you come across in it compared to some of the other solutions out there. I can probably say that it has very good support to work in tandem with other RP solutions in the market. The software is still very user-friendly and integral, and they have pretty good online resources. The automation feature is pretty good, so is the integration feature."
"Very user friendly and a professional solution."
"The most valuable feature is the organizational modeling capability."
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"The performance is pretty good, but the distortions need to be optimized in order for it to work well."
"I would like to see more features for enterprises. They would also benefit from adding documentation and training on their site."
"I would like to see more complete university tools. For example, with UiPath, I have had a good experience related to a free course in order to provide some users some different levels of knowledge. This extra training helps users not only use the solution but to develop further within the tool."
"It has it's own built-in UI components and doesn't provide much flexibility to customize or extend those components."
"Appian is easy to set up, but JBoss is complex. JBoss is the application server for running Appian."
"The solution needs more features. For example, a way to connect to our viewing database, to record, and more interface and component design."
"Architecture of product and scalabiility issues."
"We'd like improved functionality for testing new devices."
"In business process mapping, you have pools and dark pools. I don't see that Bizagi differentiates between a regular pool and a dark pool."
"I would like to see more in terms of analytics and better reporting."
"The open source version lacks the option to publish."
"One part of the university has changed its regular desktops to Linux. This is a weak point because Bizagi doesn't run on Linux. I would like the opportunity to run the software inside of Linux."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the costs can be lowered."
"It needs an easier setup for the Bizagi Engine."
"I would like to see simulation as a free feature again. In version 3.3 it was free, but in 4.0 it isn't."
"It would be helpful if they added some extra features in the next update."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
Earn 20 points
