You don't need any other Cisco security products in order to use it. That's what makes it easy.
Normally, people use it for multi-factor authentication. It's an easy-to-install multi-factor authentication platform.
You don't need any other Cisco security products in order to use it. That's what makes it easy.
Normally, people use it for multi-factor authentication. It's an easy-to-install multi-factor authentication platform.
Regarding the valuable features, I would say that Duo Security is easy to use, has speed, and is dependable.
It would be nice if there was a biometric option rather where you could accept with a fingerprint. Like, in an iPhone, they have fingerprint authentication and face ID. It would be nice if there was a biometric acceptance as opposed to just clicking and accepting.
I have been using Duo Security for thirteen years. I am a distributor of the solution.
Regarding stability, I don't know if that comes into question. With my clients, I haven't seen them facing stability issues.
I have seen it deployed in an organization with 50 people and another with 5,000 people.
I love the solution's technical support. Regarding the adjectives I would use to describe the support, I would say that the support was professional and accommodating. I wish that the support would be a little bit more prompt and a little bit more flexible because there are certain things that they will do and certain things they won't do. Then they push what they won't do back down to the distributor.
I also wish that they consider us as distributors because we're not the traditional partner. It's almost like we are Cisco. I wish that we could share more resources behind Cisco Firewall and behind Cisco's resources. I rate the support an eight out of ten.
Positive
The reason we chose Duo Security over its competitors is because it's a freebie that you can try and see how it goes. There is also the ease of integration with Duo Security. I don't really know of any other MFA that is as simple. With Duo Security, it's like, here's your authorization, and you need to click on the yes or no options.
I would say that the solution does increase security because it does require MFA, and as long as the company enforces it installed on a specific device, it works.
It does not secure my infrastructure from end to end and detect or remediate threats. It's not the function of the product.
Regarding my assessment of Duo Security for establishing trust for every access request, no matter where it comes from, I would say that it is absolutely dependent on how the company deploys it. If the company says just deploy Duo Security on an old device, then it's kind of a hope.
The whole point of having Duo Security is that it considers all resources to be external.
Multi-factor authentication in general helped my organization improve its cybersecurity resilience. Any MFA will do that.
I would tell those considering having Duo Security in their organization that it's easy. You don't need to have every other Cisco product out there since I know that, for a fact, you can do it with Sophos and Fortinet. You can do it with other products, not just Cisco.
I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.
We use it for user logins for Windows workstations and Office 365. We have certain requirements for doing two-factor authentication.
Duo Security has improved our cybersecurity resilience with two-factor authentication.
Duo Security secures our infrastructure from end to end, especially in terms of what our end users are using. We get an alert if there's something unusual, which doesn't happen often, but it allows us to look at and remediate any issues. Fortunately, we haven't had any attacks that I know of, so it has been good.
Duo Security does its job in terms of user authentication and device verification for helping to prevent identity-based attacks.
Duo Security reduces the risk of breaches. I haven't seen anything that I would switch to.
Duo Security seems to work for establishing trust for every access request, no matter where it comes from. That's something that we ask of such solutions. I don't want to have to interact with it very much.
It's pretty easy for users to figure it out. We've largely non-technical people where I am. At first, there was a little bit of a speed bump trying to get everybody to understand why we were using it, but it wasn't too bad. Everybody pretty much embraced it. Its adoption happened over a course of a couple of weeks. It was fairly smooth.
We also use Cisco Secure Email and Cisco Umbrella. It integrates pretty well with them. We haven't had any issues.
From an administrative standpoint, I'd love to see it be a little better at remembering a device and location so that I don't have to continually authenticate. That's pretty much it.
We've been using it in our company for two years.
Its stability is good. We haven't had any outages.
Its scalability is also good. We haven't had any issues expanding it to everything.
When I've had to engage with them, which is occasionally, their support has been good for me. I know our network engineer has run into an issue here and there, but I don't specifically know why. Personally, I haven't had any problems. I'd rate them a ten out of ten. They have solved everything so far.
Positive
I was not involved in its implementation, but I know it was smooth. I didn't hear of any issues, so it was pretty simple for us.
We have a hybrid deployment.
I'm pretty sure we do most of the things through Zones. They are good. I'd recommend them.
We've seen an ROI. We had to have it. It meets our needs.
We evaluated Microsoft's two-factor authentication. Other than that, we pretty much went straight for Duo just because we were in that ecosystem already. We didn't want to embrace Microsoft stuff. This was a better fit for what we needed. We were already in the Cisco ecosystem.
The Microsoft solution was also a bit limited. We were less likely to wire other devices. It was for Microsoft products at that time, but I don't know if it's changed.
Duo Security considers all resources to be external. That was a part of the reason we adopted it. That was the main difference between the Microsoft solution and this one. We've integrated it with single sign-on. It's good.
It's a good product. We've been pleased with it. There are no complaints.
I'd rate it a ten out of ten because I don't know what's better than this.
Duo is part of a complete security package that Cisco provides. Initially, we only used Duo to secure Microsoft 365, but we now use it for other applications like VPN, terminal server access, etc.
A couple of months ago, our colleagues got phishing emails from real accounts because other companies got hacked. The scammers write emails from a hacked account because they see an employee on the contact list. They seem real because the images are authentic. That leads to a portal where you have to insert your credentials.
Like any MFA, Cisco Duo sends a message when someone tries to access your account. That's the part that helped us because a person always falls for it. Unauthorized access is a serious problem, even if it doesn't affect your files. It's a potential risk to our reputation because it doesn't look good if a hacker is using your company email address to send spam.
I'm not sure if Duo saved us time. Any security measure inevitably makes things more complicated. If you eliminate security solutions, it's easier on your users, but you have no security. It's like wearing a helmet on a motorcycle. You don't need it until you fall.
Our security posture is getting better, but we still have room for improvement. We're implementing several security packages currently and hope to be where we want to be by the end of this year.
Most of my colleagues from other companies use the Microsoft MFA solution because it's included in Office 365. Few people are considering Cisco Duo. That's the primary problem in our area. It's a solution mostly adopted by Cisco users.
We are new users and only started transitioning to Cisco last year.
We haven't experienced any issues so far, and I hope it stays that way. Nothing is 100 percent, but it's close to that.
Our company isn't too big. Cisco is the perfect product for our current size, and I don't think we'll have problems with scalability as we grow.
We rely on our partner for technical support, so we've never contacted Cisco for that.
We used HP networking and security products but transitioned to Cisco last year. In the food manufacturing industry, Cisco has some advantages over others. For example, Cisco switches are made for heavy industry and are designed for devices in the mills. Cisco is certified to integrate with Siemens microprocessors.
What is critical for me isn't the product itself, it's your partner. If you have a great partner, you can also work with HP or other competitors. Having a partner to implement everything and suggest best practices is essential. Our partner NTS works exclusively with Cisco, so we switched from the competitor to Cisco when we switched partners.
The deployment was straightforward with the help of our partner. I can't do it all alone, but our partner has 450 Cisco-certified technicians.
Cisco has the most expensive products because market leaders tend to charge a lot.
I rate Cisco Duo Security a nine out of ten. I would give the solution a perfect score if it were a little cheaper. Cisco is expensive.
We use it for security in general. We were looking for something that would integrate with what we already had and that would give us an extra layer of security on top of what we were doing. Since a lot of people were starting to use a lot of handheld devices and equipment at home, we wanted another layer in there.
It hasn't done as much in terms of remediation as it has just flat-out in prevention. Duo has done a very good job in making sure that a problem doesn't become a bigger problem. It's done that very well.
We like the different ways that it allows you to push notifications to people. It can do text, a phone call, and email. We liked the versatility for all of our different end-users, regardless of their level of understanding of the technology.
It does a very good job of helping workers feel safe and secure and supported. Some people view it as just another layer of things that they have to go through, but the simplicity of use, such as being able to call in if they need to, or receive a text, takes into account all levels of end-users and what it takes to get that authentication from them.
It is also important that the solution considers all resources to be external. When you already have certain pieces of security in place, it's really difficult to just rip everything out and replace them. You need something that can start as a standalone solution and then slowly work its way into the rest of your corporate network. When we changed buildings, we had a lot of people working at home for the first time and suddenly using different devices to do their day-to-day jobs, so that aspect became very important.
When it comes to supporting an organization across a distributed network it becomes very important, again, because the traditional method of backhauling security solutions to a central point gets very dicey. It starts to generate a lot of traffic across a wide area. And what happens if some of that can't get back to you? Or what happens if you're dealing with low bandwidth or other scenarios? Plus, depending on where you're at, they may view that as some kind of encrypted back tunnel and not let that happen. Whereas Duo, because it's more distributed and it's trusted out there, allows you to drop something in on a footprint on a very large scale. Before, it would've been a nightmare to get all that configured properly and working.
In addition, the single pane of glass management is very important because security is an extremely complex issue. If you have all these different windows to look at, you're not sure if somebody was looking at this window at this particular time, or if they were over there at that window and missed something. The single pane of glass is very important because the biggest enemy of security is complexity. If you miss something because somebody is not watching the right dashboard, it can blow right by you.
The single pane of glass management does a pretty good job of helping to optimize the user experience, in my particular role. And from what I hear from my team, they're very happy with it. They feel it does a good job for the clients and they love the simplicity.
There could be improvements made to the dashboards and more integration with the rest of the Cisco ecosystem. Duo was clearly purchased, and Cisco has a lot of other panels for their Firepower products, et cetera. They need to continue bringing it, Umbrella, and the endpoint pieces even more together and make the integration a little more seamless among all of them.
Our company has been using Duo Security for about two years.
It's very stable. I don't think we would have gotten it if it wasn't stable. It obviously had set quite a reputation before Cisco acquired it, and that has continued.
The scalability has worked great for us. We've not had any issues with it.
My team gives demonstrations of Duo regularly. The number-one piece of feedback that we get from people is that they like the simplicity. They like the windows, that it's easy to set up, and the features. There are different features and you don't have to turn them all on right away. You can turn on the basic features and get the authentication piece. They like the ability to then drill down and turn on some of those extra features because they don't have to ramp up straight away. They can turn on the basics and be in good shape. Then, if they want to keep tweaking it and turn on all the other pieces, it scales really nicely that way.
End user-wise, we're probably up to about 600 to 700. Our central office is out of Harrisburg, PA and we have a couple of warehouses across the U.S. where I believe they use it too. It's a bit of a distributed model, but it's not a massive distributed model.
I have not personally had to deal with tech support, but my engineers who have had to deal with them have said that they've been very on the ball with quick responses. There have been no major issues.
We did not use a solution for authentication.
It was a little interesting in the beginning when we first put Duo out there because everybody was concerned about text messages on their personal cell phones, and use of their cell phones, and who actually owns their cell phones. We dealt with a lot of what was more along the lines of company policy issues, back and forth.
But after we got past the initial rollout, everybody seemed to calm right down and we don't get any complaints or negativity about it now. It's just part of normal life. Before Duo was pushed out, there were a lot of other companies that were starting to do the same type of thing. That helped ease the release of the Duo product in our organization because people were already starting to get somewhat used to having that kind of stuff happening.
Licensing and pricing are a little bit out of the area that I play in, but I think the pricing is in pretty good shape.
One of the issues that we used to have is that Umbrella, Duo, and Cisco Secure Endpoint all had different license quantities that you had to buy. That made it really difficult to buy a complete solution with all the other pieces. I had to buy 25 of this one at a time, and 10 of that at a time, and 15 of another one at a time. They seem to have fixed that and the number of seats that you buy now matches across all the different products.
We shopped around for other layers of security but I don't think we specifically shopped around for the authentication piece. When we looked at everything, and the dust settled, this was the easiest piece to put on top of what we had and to give us another layer of security.
Duo hasn't eliminated trust, but it has certainly been a piece of what has helped build our whole hierarchy. We're moving forward and starting to put other pieces in place too on top of that, things that sync a little better with it.
Duo is beneficial to the overall connectivity. It doesn't cause any issues. It doesn't cause an excessive amount of delay, from what we have seen. The nice thing about it is that it just sits on top of whatever else is already in place and it doesn't cause disruption to whatever else you're using.
I rate it highly because it's something that can grow with you, whether you have very little security or a lot of security, whether it's already Cisco or not, and whether you have a mixed mess that you're trying to put into some kind of order. It will go in any direction with you and grow. It will get better as you improve the stuff around it and it will start to integrate with Cisco solutions. It's one of the best products because you have the ability to go with or without Cisco, and it gets better as you add more.
We use Duo Security for authentication for all of our SaaS applications. We also use it for RADIUS authentication.
Duo Security makes logging into all our applications easy with one stop for all our activity there. We use Cisco across the board for networking, and we love Cisco.
Since Duo Security provides a single place to log in for our SaaS applications, we don't have to manage user accounts and remember passwords for each specific application.
Duo Security should better organize its tile feature to organize applications better.
We have been using Duo Security for about three years.
Duo Security's stability is good, and we haven't had any issues.
Duo Security's scalability is good. We are a fairly large organization but haven't had any scalability issues.
Duo Security's technical support is great. They do a better job on the Duo side than on the networking side for support.
Positive
We've used Okta in the past. Okta has a really good auto-login feature. Duo Security can do the same thing, but Okta might do it a little bit better. It just automatically logs in if it's part of your profile.
We switched to Duo Security because of our relationship with our account reps.
We have seen a return on investment using Duo Security because it saves time.
Duo Security's pricing is good, fair, and very comparable to today's market.
Duo Security Self-Service Portal has significantly helped free up our IT staff for other projects. Instead of managing thousands of accounts across hundreds of SaaS applications, it's all in one spot now. Duo Security has probably saved us four or five hours at least.
I think Duo Security does a great job of establishing trust for every access request, no matter where it comes from.
It is very important for our organization that the solution considers all resources to be external because it frames the activity as zero trust, and that's how we run our network to zero trust across the board. So when you treat all resources as external, we want to lock them down every time and not just have random passwords floating everywhere.
Duo Security will significantly simplify the life of someone who wants to improve cybersecurity in their organization, and they should definitely try it.
Overall, I rate Duo Security ten out of ten.
We use it for MFA to secure our Outlook webmail and some other applications as well. We use Duo for pretty much anything that uses MFA.
We were looking for increased security. We wanted to make sure that the person who is trying to log in to our services is actually who they claim to be. We wanted to lock down our applications more and provide extra security.
We have some on-prem servers for the gateways and it's in the cloud as well.
It has definitely made our company more secure. It's pretty easy to incorporate into any sort of application you want to. We also use it for single sign-on for certain applications and that has been nice. People hate passwords.
It's really great for remote workers and a hybrid workforce nowadays, for people who are trying to access their VPN or any applications from outside of the company. It helps us make sure it's someone who should be accessing those things. It does a good job.
It's definitely a factor in achieving that Zero Trust.
In a way, it helps us remediate threats more quickly. If someone is trying a brute-force attack, trying all the passwords they can, and they're not getting a response through Duo, you can see certain security threats that are happening and remediate them.
Duo has also had a big impact on employee morale. People like it. They feel that their data is more secure. Resiliency is very key to keeping people doing their jobs. Cyber security resilience has been very important for us. It used to be that security was not to be the main focus, but it's extremely important now. There are a lot of ransomware attacks and people need to be very cognizant of that. It's important to have redundant and resilient systems in place to support that.
It's nice to have that push notification with the app and it's pretty easy to use. Our users are usually pretty open to it, and it's pretty easy to onboard people.
It also seems like it's accurate, and you can add multiple devices to your account.
In addition, typically, if it detects that you're on an internal network, you can bypass the Duo portion of it. That way, people don't have to do MFA when they're on campus.
Another feature is the single pane of glass management. That's important for analytics and also for troubleshooting. It means there's one place that you go to at least start the troubleshooting process. It also helps with the user experience because you can manage all the user accounts from that one spot, including setting up new users, making adjustments, editing their preferences, et cetera.
It could be a little bit more intuitive when it comes to the sign-up process. I know they send out an email, but sometimes our users get a little confused. It could be an end-user problem, but Cisco could work on that a little.
I've been using Duo Security for about two years.
It seems very stable. I don't think there has been any point at which people have tried to use it and it has failed.
The scalability seems fine. As long as you get the licensing to support it, you can add as many users as you'd like.
We have five or six offices locally, and a few more in different states in the US. We also have one in Shanghai, but they're doing their own thing there. But everyone in our US offices uses it, they all get enrolled. Typically, people will install the app on their phones although they don't have to.
I don't think we've had to use technical support too often, which is a good thing about the product itself.
We didn't use an MFA before Duo.
When the solution was rolled out, I wasn't with the company, but we then expanded it in different ways and I have been involved in that. In terms of the initial deployment, from what I can tell, it was relatively straightforward. And from what I've seen since, it hasn't been too hard to expand it to other services.
It's definitely a valuable product to have.
We may have evaluated other options at a surface level, but we didn't really go too deeply into them. We pretty much went with Duo out the gate.
I would tell leaders who want to build more resilience within their organization to do it right now. It's definitely important and there are a lot of resources out there that can help them on that path. Duo helps with that.
It does what it's marketed to do.
Our web developers use Duo Security as a WordPress plugin to provide security for our websites.
Duo offers dual-factor authentication for our logins. I put in my credentials and hit go. Then I get an alert on my Apple watch, and I approve it. That part is just phenomenal.
Duo has some issues that we're trying to work through. For example, if I install it on a WordPress site and another admin needs to log in, they can't because Duo hasn't been set up for them. It doesn't appear that I can add permissions on a user-by-user basis. It's not obvious.
I would also like to see password-free login. There used to be a password-free product where you used your phone and looked at the screen. I can't remember what it's called now, but it was great. It used blue wavy lines that constantly changed, so nobody could ever screen capture and use them to log in. That was by far the best solution.
Duo bought them out and did away with them. They probably saw it as a threat because it was a better solution. And a couple of companies have tried to mimic that, but they have never come close. If Duo were to go back to something like that, I would be ecstatic. Passwords are supposed to be a thing of the past.
I've used Duo Security for about two years.
Duo Security is stable.
I don't know how Duo would scale. If I've got a hundred websites and I install it on several of them, scalability just means adding it to a new website. It would be as easy as adding it to the first.
That's not an issue, but I still haven't figured out how to add new users to a site that already has it installed. I checked their online documentation and haven't found an answer yet, so we temporarily took it off on that particular site.
We tried several authentication solutions before, but I liked the way Duo works better.
I rate Duo Security eight out of 10 for ease of deployment. It takes a minute or two to download and install the plugin.
Duo Security is free.
I rate Duo Security nine out of 10. Duo is a solid solution, but it still has some minor issues with adding users.
We utilize Duo Security to mitigate phishing and other similar attack vectors in general.
Our phishing attacks have significantly decreased. The number of compromises is almost nonexistent due to the implementation of Duo Security.
Duo Security's self-service portal has definitely helped us save a couple of hours per month.
Duo Security's ability for establishing trust is great.
The anti-phishing feature is the most valuable.
Previously, we encountered an issue with utilizing the passcode as part of the second factor; however, that has now been transformed into a feature.
I would appreciate it if Duo Security could improve its integrations with Windows Hello.
I have been using Duo Security for five years.
Duo Security is stable.
After Cisco purchased Duo Security, I was uncertain about its scalability. However, it appears that Cisco has granted them the freedom to pursue their own initiatives and has provided the necessary resources for them to achieve their goals.
The technical support is excellent.
Positive
The initial deployment took place five years ago, but during that time, we experienced some growing pains before reaching a satisfactory point.
I was not involved in the implementation, but we did seek external assistance, which proved beneficial.
We have observed a return on investment with Duo Security in terms of anti-phishing and breach prevention.
I rate Duo Security a ten out of ten.
We do not use Duo Security for end-to-end detection and remediation of threats.
Duo Security may not be the only solution available, but it is a fantastic choice.