Worksoft Certify Reviews

It has ability to execute the scripts without any manual intervention. It has ability to run scripts overnight without any human intervention (lights-out testing), which proves to be vital in providing wider coverage in a short time.

We are able to scale up the testing and to address more business-driven projects using Worksoft, which would not be possible with any other tools. The testing organization can cut short its budget, as it is not required to hire more testers for regression testing.

Upgrading Certify takes a lot of time and effort, which is like a small project by itself.

I have used it for two years.

We have not encountered any deployment issues.

We have not encountered any stability issues.

We have not encountered any scalability issues.

Customer service is 4.5 out of 5.

Technical support is 4.5 out of 5.

We used to use QTP, but the ability of Worksoft in the SAP automation space compelled us to make the transition.

Most important feature is the ability to automatically perform test without the need of a manual script, it's very fast and can perform overnight testing without human intervention (Lights-out testing). It can perform automated end-to-end validation across application landscapes.

Organizations does not need to hire numerous resources to perform regression testing, therefore, cutting overhead cost at a substantial level.

It uses a sizeable space for its database, therefore requires a regular cleanup in the server's space. Secondly, upgrading of its version requires enormous time and effort, that it's like a mini project. It could impact testing phase if not managed well. Technical support sometimes requires access to client's server, which is not allowed for some clients.

Three years.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

9 out of 10

8.5 out of 10, it is quick to respond, but takes time to resolve on some issues (related to #6).

There was no established solution and testing was being done manually.

It supports Siebel, SAP, Web based, and Terminal-based applications.

It is good for automating SAP applications.

Scripts with a large number of lines have performance issues. As it is script-less, understanding loops in script is a bit hard. It also needs improvement to the UI.

Four years.

Installation is straight forward.

Quite stable.

Able to handle large volumes.

Haven't contacted customer service so far.

Good.

We replaced our existing tool, QTP. Jenkins has script-less automation, and is easy for non-technical people to use.

Installation is straight forward.

In-house installation was done.

It was an organizational decision and we were replacing QTP.

I would recommend it, though it's a costlier solution, but the script-less automation is very useful.

• Certify Data
• Layout
• Remote Control

It allows us to do end to end script executions.

Fetching data from CSV files

For 2.5+ years,

None encountered.

We have issues with database response during execution.

7/10

7/10

We used QTP on BPT framework. We switched because Worksoft Certify gives us a better regression execution & better results for SAP business. Additionally, it ha the Certify Data feature.

We used a vendor, I would rate them 7/10.

Its best for SAP automation. Questions on its web automation.