UiPath Orchestrator Reviews

The logs are the best feature of the solution. It was very, very important for me to be able to follow the logs. We had to view the different steps of a project when it was run. UiPath Orchestrator made our lives easier. We could choose between areas and factors. The interface is good. The webinars are very useful.

The solution needs more visibility in the market. The product must conduct more promotional activities and webinars.

I have been using the solution for two years.

The tool is stable.

The tool is scalable. I would recommend the solution for both small and large organizations.

The support is good. The support team has a good experience with the product. We received the solution to questions in a short time.

Positive

Before using UiPath, I was using direct coding in Python. Using UiPath was less difficult and more practical. I didn't have to convert to deploy and reinstall different versions.

The solution was easy to deploy. The deployment takes less than five minutes, depending on the project size. The solution can be deployed on the cloud and on-premises.

Overall, I rate the product a ten out of ten.

We use UiPath Orchestrator daily to view logs and configure machines. We employ a modern folder structure and have developed a dashboard based on the logs we get to the database.

The solution has improved workflow efficiency by helping us better manage transactions and queues. However, recent increases in licensing costs have been a concern.

The platform's modern folder structure has been valuable because it helps organize and manage automation processes effectively.

The product could improve by migrating more functionalities from the cloud to the on-premises version sooner. Additionally, scalability could be enhanced.

Future releases should include more AI-related features to automate configurations and management tasks to reduce manual effort.

I have more than seven years of experience with UiPath Orchestrator.

I rate the product stability as eight or nine out of ten. 

I rate the product scalability a six out of ten. It could be improved to handle larger and more complex environments better.

We used Blue Prism more than a year ago. We switched to UiPath due to its different features and capabilities.

The initial setup was straightforward. 

Our technical team handled the implementation in-house.

The product is expensive. 

I rate UiPath Orchestrator a seven out of ten. 

UiPath Orchestrator is a stable solution.

UiPath Orchestrator should improve its UI and make it more user-friendly. The solution's governing policies feature could also be improved.

I have been testing UiPath Orchestrator for a few months.

UiPath Orchestrator is a scalable solution, but it would require a lot more configuration compared to other products to be able to scale effectively.

I have previously worked with Aiwozo, Power Automate, and Automation Anywhere.

Aiwozo has a multi-tenanted architecture. So I like that about the product. The simple Kibana-style structure of moving processes from one environment to another and the rule-based password control policy are useful features of Aiwozo.

Multi-culture automation is something that quite a few of our international clients demand, and the ease with which I can switch from one language to another is also important to me. That is why I've recommended Aiwozo to most of my clients.

UiPath Orchestrator has the capabilities. Compared to other programs, UiPath Orchestrator has some nuances that can be improved upon. The new-age automation tools, like Aiwozo, are a little easier to use than UiPath Orchestrator.

I would ask users to look at their automation use case and see if there is a need for certain functions. Often, people load different functions into a simple automation project, making it more complex.

Overall, I rate UiPath Orchestrator a seven out of ten.