Our company uses the solution to track abnormalities and check connections for critical applications.
We had the solution on-premises but recently moved it to the SaaS platform.
Our company uses the solution to track abnormalities and check connections for critical applications.
We had the solution on-premises but recently moved it to the SaaS platform.
The solution offers great visibility that allows you to track where errors originated.
The solution's features could be more mobile friendly.
I have been using the solution for four years.
The solution is stable.
The solution is very scalable.
I have used technical support and rate it an eight out of ten.
The setup was easy.
It is difficult to quantify the amount of time needed for setup because ours depended on the development team's plans.
We implemented the solution in-house.
Although the solution is expensive, the ROI makes it more cost effective.
The solution has a high cost.
I recommend the solution because it is good for observability and drilling down to find the cause of issues.
I rate the solution an eight out of ten. My rating would go up if the solution were more mobile friendly and cost effective.
We are using many business applications, and the backend databases are very critical for them. So, everybody's using AppDynamics Database Monitoring.
The good thing with AppDynamics Databases is that it will give you a pretty good overview of the data, all the database-like tables, long-running queries, jobs running on the databases, and the queries that are taking more time. So, it's at a deeper level with all the database functionalities, and you will get that information. So, it's a pretty good tool in that sense.
It could be more user-friendly for beginners.
I have been using AppDynamics Database Monitoring for six months.
AppDynamics Database Monitoring is relatively stable.
AppDynamics Database Monitoring is a scalable solution. We are monitoring over 200 applications.
Technical support is okay.
On a scale from one to five, I would give technical support a four.
Positive
The initial setup is straightforward. The thing is, it has some prerequisites. That means you need to get some prerequisite access. Once the database team is done, it's pretty easy to configure. You can deploy this solution within an hour or two.
We have a license-based solution. That means you need a license for each server you monitor.
I would tell potential users that AppDynamics Database Monitoring is not just for database monitoring. If you need to monitor your entire application stack, for example, you need to monitor how that website is performing at the backend or how applications are performing. Infrastructure monitoring means everything has to be monitored and is offered in the bundles.
That's what AppDynamics does. It's like an application performance monitoring solution. If you need to monitor all this and use all these capabilities, then AppDynamics is a very good solution.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give AppDynamics Database Monitoring an eight.
The main uses of this solution are dependent on our clients needs. They are mainly in the banking sector, and use the product to measure user experience, or for analytical, business IQ purposes.
The feature we find most valuable, is that the solution creates a unified platform making it really easy to pinpoint a problem, and then drill down into a transaction to resolve the issue.
We would like to be able to easily use this solution to monitor our Java script based browsers, which are currently blocked by the security settings.
We have been working with this solution for more than 10 years.
We have found this to be a very stable solution.
This solution is very easily scalable.
The global technical support for this solution is really good. They have two different service types; standard and premier. The premier level of support has a higher cost, but better SLA's for fixing issues. We have found both of them to be good quality, and customer focused.
Positive
We found the initial setup of this solution to be very easy, and the deployment only took 10 minutes. The deployment can be carried out automatically as long as it is suitable for your client's application.
We implemented the solution using our in-house team.
We have two different licensing models for this solution. One of them is the agent based model, which requires payment per agent. The other is an infrastructure based model, where the price is based on the CPU core. For the infrastructure model wholesale level pricing applies. All of the up to date licensing prices for this product are available on the manufacturers website.
We would recommend that organizations looking at this solution ensure that the hosting version meets their countries regulations. The product is available as both cloud-based and on-premises, but this choice may be geographically limited.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Application Analytics is mainly used to get full visibility into the SAP stack in order to detect performance problems.
Application Analytics reduces the average time it takes to repair performance problems and improves cooperation between different IT departments.
Application Analytics' most valuable features are the real-user monitoring and the agents installed in the software stack on the application server.
Application Analytics' performance in pure and native cloud environments could be improved. It could also be more intuitive to use, especially regarding business IQ functionality, and the dashboard programming needs some manual intrusion. In the next release, I would like to see better integration with OpenTelemetry.
I've been working with Application Analytics for three years.
Application Analytics is really stable.
Application Analytics is scalable.
AppDynamics' technical support is okay, though there's quite a lot of self-service.
Positive
The initial setup was pretty straightforward and took a couple of days, though installing the SAP agent takes a little longer in SAP environments.
We used an in-house team and an AppDynamics team.
The license fee for Application Analytics is in the range of 2.5 million over three years, with extra fees for service contingencies.
I would recommend Application Analytics to others as a professional tool and rate it eight out of ten.
I use AppDynamics Database Monitoring to monitor application performance.
AppDynamics Database Monitoring's dashboarding is its best feature.
AppDynamics Database Monitoring would be improved with more support for microservices architecture.
I've been working with AppDynamics Database Monitoring for one year.
AppDynamics Database Monitoring is less stable than Dynatrace.
AppDynamics Database Monitoring is scalable.
The initial setup was easy, and deployment took around two days.
We used an in-house team.
AppDynamics Database Monitoring is widely used, so it's given us some ROI.
I recommend choosing Dynatrace over AppDynamics Database Monitoring as it's easier to use. I would rate AppDynamics Database Monitoring seven out of ten.
I primarily use AppDynamics for application performance monitoring.
AppDynamics provides visibility on slowness or problems in production and processes in revenue-related products or software, as well as generating performance and availability metrics. This enables understanding of users' end-to-end experience and provides information on user behavior.
AppDynamics' most valuable feature is Business iQ, which is based on analytics.
The Log Analytics feature is a bit complicated. There are also some bugs in the solution that need to be fixed.
I've been using AppDynamics for five to six years.
AppDynamics is stable and reliable.
AppDynamics's technical support is great.
Previously, I used Micro Focus OpsBridge but switched as it wasn't keeping up with the latest market trends in monitoring.
The initial setup for the SaaS solution requires little to no effort, but the on-prem version is more complex
AppDynamics is one of the most expensive solutions on the market. The typical licensing fee for a small customer would be $500k plus, with additional fees for professional services. The price also varies depending on whether the customer goes for the on-prem or SaaS solution, with the on-prem version potentially extremely expensive because of the hardware requirements.
We evaluated Moogsoft and Dynatrace.
I would rate AppDynamics nine out of ten.
I primarily use AppDynamics for my servers.
AppDynamics' best feature is automation - for example, when I add a note, it can understand the data automatically.
AppDynamics' modules and hardware resources are very high.
I've been using AppDynamics for a year.
AppDynamics is stable and reliable.
AppDynamics' scalability is good.
I didn't have a good experience with AppDynamics' technical support. Its knowledge base is locked up and unavailable.
I also work with Zabbix, which has better education and hardware specification, though AppDynamics is more user-friendly.
The initial setup was complex because we had to configure every agent and module, use a specific server for every module, and manage every visual and virtual machine.
I used an outsourced company.
AppDynamics is really pricey as it requires licenses for every feature.
AppDynamics forces you to depend on the company to do what you want, which may be a negative if you prefer to work independently. I would rate AppDynamics as seven out of ten.
I mainly use AppDynamics to detect issues and bugs and monitor our enterprise database module.
AppDynamics' most valuable features are the response time of the business transaction modules, the ability to monitor multiple services, and testing and developing environments.
AppDynamics's agent management could be improved. They could also manage their licenses by host count rather than CPU core counts and on independent container count instead of for five containers. In the next release, AppDynamics should include AI modules in the on-prem environment.
I've been using AppDynamics for five years.
AppDynamics is stable.
Generally, the initial setup is easy, but it's harder for Java applications because you have to do some manual customization in agent configuration. Deployment took around a month.
We used a partner team.
AppDynamics' licensing scheme is confusing because all of its domains require different licenses. AppDynamics is priced on the higher side.
I would recommend AppDynamics to other users and would rate it eight out of ten.
