SentinelOne Singularity Complete Reviews

We use it for antivirus.

In the past, we were not able to identify a few viruses, but now we are able to identify them because of the machine learning feature.

The machine learning module is the most valuable feature. 

The reporting needs improvement and I would like to see a more granular level of administrative privileges.

The initial setup was straightforward. It wasn't a long project, it took six months.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. 

We don't have a plan to increase the usage, it is purely based on our business requirements.

This product is nothing but different from a traditional anti-virus. We were very apprehensive to try it. Once we tried it, it gave us a good impression.

We primarily use it for identifying and mitigating zero data.

The remediation and rollback features are pretty impressive.

I would like to see category-based web filtering.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity for about three years now.

The stability is excellent.

There is high scalability currently. We have around two hundred individuals in the organization.

Technical support is on point and very good.

Positive

We previously used Kaspersky but it lacked visibility onto zero. That was the main reason that we switched SentinelOne Singularity.

The initial setup was very straightforward and convenient and it took a couple of minutes to deploy.

We are certified and our engineers can do the deployment in-house.

The pricing appears to be pretty affordable.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity a nine out of ten.

SentinelOne is for users wanting an enhanced level of endpoint security.

What I like about SentinelOne is that it sparks your curiosity. I also like its rollback feature.

The stability of SentinelOne should be improved.

I've been using SentinelOne for three years.

We're using SentinelOne through one of our partners, and we have had some stability issues with it due to Windows 10 features updates. It should be more stable.

SentinelOne is a scalable solution.

Technical support for SentinelOne is fine.

The initial setup for SentinelOne is straightforward. Setting up the solution doesn't take long, e.g. on a per-device basis, it would take just 30 seconds.

We did the implementation of this solution ourselves.

Our customers pay for monthly for the license of SentinelOne.

We're an MSP, so we deploy SentinelOne for customers, e.g. 70 to 80 endpoints.

We've had some stability issues with the solution, and that's definitely a concern. I'm still pushing forward with SentinelOne, because it's the only kind of option we have in this space.

In terms of recommending SentinelOne, I'd give it a six out of ten.

We are a system integrator. We provide this solution to the end-users.

Most of the features are valuable. As a system integrator, agent deployment is valuable. It also fits the requirements of most of the clients.

They can improve the administrative interface. They can make it more user-friendly.

Its price can be lower.

I have been using this solution for three years.

It is stable.

It is scalable.

Its setup is of medium complexity. It is not complex, and it is also not straightforward.

Its price can be lower because I'm seeing competition from another vendor who beats it on commercials.

I would advise others to go for it. It is a good product, and it fits the requirements of most of the clients. It is very flexible.

I would rate it an eight out of 10.

We are using SentinelOne within our company in servers and endpoints and we have deployed it for some of our clients.

The most valuable feature of SentinelOne is the EDR functionality. We are protected against threats, such as ransomware.

SentinelOne could improve by reducing the price.

I have been using SentinelOne for approximately one year.

The stability of SentinelOne was fine.

SentinelOne is scalable.

We have approximately 300 users using this solution.

The initial setup of SentinelOne was straightforward.

The price of SentinelOne is on the higher side compared to other solutions, such as Symantec.

We have one person who maintains the solution.

I rate SentinelOne a seven out of ten.

We have been protecting more than 100 companies (with no infections) since the product was installed.

• The rollback functionality.
• Its capacity to prevent new threats.

The management console.

No.

No.

Very fast and accurate.

Yes, Kaspersky Lab. They don't have a good next gen endpoint in order to protect against new threats.

Very easy. You can start your deploy with a single executable file or a massive deployment (GPO, etc.) with a MSI.

The price is competitive, if you compare it with other solutions on the market.

Sophos Intercept X, Cylance, Traps and a few more.

It's very important to understand how industry-wide endpoint security solutions work to avoid possible issues.

The solution offers very rich details surrounding threats or attacks.

The price is a bit high. They should make their pricing model more affordable.

The solution needs better reporting on new threats and malware. The reporting is present, but I can't find the information easily.

The solution is stable.

It's hard to give an impression on the stability at this time. We haven't used it on a large scale yet. We're still testing.

We haven't needed to contact technical support yet.

We are currently using Webhook as we test this new solution.

We are using the public cloud deployment model.

I would rate the solution nine out of ten.

I use it for policy fine-tuning.

SentinelOne uses behavioral analysis and artificial intelligence to detect unknown malware. That is what all enterprises require today. They don't want to go with some normal anti-malware tool, which has less sophisticated detection. Even if something suspicious or a Zero-day enters the environment, SentinelOne will be able to identify it.

It has good visibility features and it's straightforward. It's not so complex.

There is not much flexibility in terms of policy fine-tuning. We can turn it off or turn it on, but there's nothing much else to do. Everything is predefined. It's good in a way, but you don't get much flexibility if you want to do something particular.

We do not have any issues with stability at the moment. Before I joined the company, I heard that there were some issues with the agent, that they were having some performance issues, a portlet application was crashing. There were minor issues which are fine now.

In my organization, we are planning to deploy some 30,000 agents. I would say that it's scalable. I don't see any problem with scalability.

I just had a conversation with a colleague who has bought McAfee ePO. He was saying that he was able to do much more in that tool than in SentinelOne. For example, he mentioned that he was able to see traffic on a particular port on a particular system, using ePO. We cannot do that using SentinelOne. In this tool, everything is already in place and there's not much that we can do.