SentinelOne Singularity Complete Reviews

The use case varies based on the customers' requirements and specific needs.

The solution's Ranger functionality offers network visibility and a defined set of capabilities, particularly in terms of discovering and understanding network structures. 

The fact that Ranger doesn't necessitate new agents, hardware, or network modifications is a crucial aspect for us. It stands out as one of the primary selling points, especially considering the intermittent nature of changes like those affecting CPO. 

With the increasing prevalence of remote processes and a shift towards cloud architectures like SASE or SSE, moving towards a single vendor for security purposes could simplify the overall process. It aided in minimizing alerts, primarily due to the behavioral analytics component, which reduces a significant amount of noise. 

It contributed to time savings for our team, particularly for the projects and tasks I predominantly handled on my own.

The solution contributed to a decrease in our organization's time to detect incidents and respond to incidents. It aided the organization in cost savings and it contributed to a reduction in our organizational risk.

One of the most valuable features resides on the endpoint, with the rollback functionality standing out as particularly noteworthy. It seamlessly integrates with other solutions, providing a high level of compatibility and effectiveness. 

The capability to ingest and correlate data across our security solutions stands out as one of the strongest features. It excels in connecting incidents to create a coherent storyline.

Improvement seems necessary, especially with the focus on enhanced support. This is particularly crucial in the analytics domain, where the existing agent falls short in comprehensive performance. Additionally, there's room for enhancement in the mobile element. Although it's in their pipeline, the current state is not optimal, especially when considering the need to install it on people's phones.

I have been using it for a year.

The stability is straightforward and solid. It's notably uncomplicated and easily manageable.

The scalability is excellent, with a high degree of flexibility and ease.

Mostly, we handled the support aspect for our clients. However, among the vendors, it's notable for being quite strong in terms of support. I would rate it eight out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup was straightforward.

When it comes to deploying the agent across machines within the environment, it's a relatively straightforward process, akin to pushing it through the system's processor. The implementation strategy is contingent on the specific cluster, taking into account factors like the proof of concept and the desired objectives. In our case, we managed the implementation independently, involving only a few people. The deployment model is highly variable and depends on the customer's preferences. They typically communicate their preferences to us, and we adapt accordingly. Some opt for in-house hosting, while others prefer a cloud-based approach. It doesn't require maintenance. 

The pricing is on the higher end, making it less suitable for small or medium-sized businesses and perhaps not the ideal fit for the public sector where budget constraints may be more pronounced. I would recommend it more as an enterprise-level product.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete was selected from a range of different providers, evaluated against other companies, and then analyzed to be the chosen product for our managed service. The capacity for innovation, ease of deployment, and streamlined management set it apart from other solutions. Additionally, its leading capability to correlate incidents into a cohesive storyline is a noteworthy aspect.

As a partner, I find them to be highly effective, especially since they are increasingly focusing on the enterprise market. Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.

Every five years, we research tools that could replace our old software. We combine our AV and intrusion detection. We were trying to find out if there’s an agent for the whole nine-yard, and we came across SentinelOne.

The product has an automated process where we find security issues. It’s a 24/7 behavior analytical tool to execute certain actions. The tool deletes the problem-causing process and prevents issues. It discovers, kills, and protects. The software is good. I don't see much of an issue with it.

They should train their own people so that they can train us better. The theory is good. If the product is good, but we cannot rely on it or pass it along to the customer, it's useless. When we purchased the solution, we were told that certain functions could be done. I understand it is part of sales, but I feel like I'm being fooled. We couldn't test it because it was in production. We first had a proof of concept but didn't connect it to our Azure portion.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Complete since February.

The product's stability is okay.

The tool's scalability is average.

The support people of SentinelOne do not know the different products offered by SentinelOne. How can they support their customer if one person knows one thing and the other doesn't? They tell us the issue does not come under them and point us to a different team.

There is a SentinelOne support team and a Singularity support team. SentinelOne's support team is okay. Once, the technical support and help desk director got involved with all our issues. However, the director got involved after we strongly complained about the issues. That's not the way it's supposed to be.

Neutral

I have used Arctic Wolf.

The initial deployment was good. The solution is cloud-based.

We took help from SentinelOne to deploy the solution. We paid for it, but it was not worth the money we paid for. Two people from our company are required for the deployment. The solution requires maintenance.

The licensing is okay. I don't see any issues with it.

We evaluated other options. We were trying to have one solution for everything. We heard that SentinelOne purchased another company. Other products like Rapid7 provide multiple solutions and products for our needs. We saw that SentinelOne provided us with one product and one support system. However, even while using SentinelOne, I have to contact different teams.

When we purchased the solution, it did not do what we expected. We didn't use all of the features. It has quite a few options. There are a bunch of more add-on modules. Other products from SentinelOne are not good. I am really disappointed with them. The user must understand the solution by just reading the training documents. The team claims it is professional, but it lacks a lot of functions.

The integration is fine, but the feature is not how they market it. It looks good on paper, but it's not what we think it is. It's not a ready product in marketing. I am disappointed with it. The interoperability is still under development. Not many people know or understand it, including people from SentinelOne. When we call and try to figure out what's going on with the solution, not many understand what it is. There is a lack of training on their products and services.

The Ranger functionality is fine. It’s only been six months since we started using it. We're still learning as it goes. I think Ranger is probably better than Singularity. Sometimes, they send false positives. It's not really a big feature for us. It's good. They're trying to prevent any networking attack, but I don't think it’s there yet. They're just trying to discover what is on the network, but we already have other tools for that.

It is important for us that Ranger requires no new agents, hardware, or network changes. Ranger is just trying to discover whatever issues we have. I don't think it can prevent it. I don't think it can block issues or protect our devices.

Overall, I rate the product a seven out of ten.

Our primary use case would be for active XDR protection. We wanted an innovative XDR to keep up with the rising dangers of malware, ransomware, et cetera.

Our visibility and response to a lot of the things that come with an enterprise network have improved. We have users doing multiple things across different platforms. There are applications, servers, endpoints, and certain things that fit in the wild, and it does a really good job protecting all of them.

It has saved time for my team because of what we can do in terms of device control that it provides externally. We have total control.

When it comes to detection, we have email alerts when a threat comes across, so it's pretty quick. And if we have predefined responses to certain threats, then obviously, our response is instantaneous. But in a lot of cases, we like to have our administrators take a look at it and make sure it gets remediated as quickly as possible.

As for security, SentinelOne Singularity puts us in a better place than most solutions. We can look at platform reviews that keep us in the loop regarding what's not considered a good solution.

The visibility and, obviously, the protection aspects are second to none when it comes to speed. Another thing we fall back on is the option to roll back an endpoint if it is infected. There is a shadow copy so that if a PC downloads malicious content, we can roll it back to the state it was in before that package was imported.

It also has a lot of flexibility with its ability to ingest things.

And the AI feature of the solution is prompt in how it learns a certain network and how it responds to certain things. If you do come across false positives, it's relatively easy to get around them.

There are some obstacles you have to overcome when it comes to whitelisting and the like, but that's true of every XDR platform.

Their documentation could afford to be a little bit better communicated. A lot of times we have to look at things in the knowledge base, and much of that could be communicated better, but that would probably be the only thing that needs to be improved.

We've been using SentinelOne Singularity Complete for about three years.

I would give it an A-plus in stability. A lot of times, when you download a new endpoint protection agent or an AV agent, you might run into a lot of compatibility issues or programs kind of freezing up.

I would give it an A-plus for scalability as well.

Our experience with their technical support has been straightforward and good. We got good, timely responses.

As a strategic partner, they're "the new guy on the block." There is some talk of them being bought out. I have heard some rumors like that. But from what I've seen, SentinelOne is just as good as, or better than, any other security partner out there.

Positive

We did use an endpoint protection platform, but I can't comment on which one we used.

I was involved in the whole process of deployment. One thing that wasn't SentinelOne's forte was compatibility with a script for an on-premises software distribution tool. Most of what we did was homegrown to deploy the agents to the machines.

We did it in-house. There were a handful of us involved, probably 10 at least.

I don't deal with the cost side of things, but the licensing, as far as endpoints go, is a pretty straightforward and simple process.

We looked at a couple of other solutions but, again, I can't disclose more about those.

The speed and user friendliness that this platform offers break down some complex aspects of the security industry, and the solution lays them out in a way that a general user can understand.

Definitely compare and contrast Singularity with other solutions. It depends on what fits best for you, what industry you're in, how mobile your network is.

Our primary use case for the solution was covering all the endpoints, including servers. We also added the Kubernetes nodes with the CI/CD platform, which covered end-to-end features that we need to fill the required security controls.

The solution has benefited us by monitoring most of the activities to endpoints that we control over the USB and the browser monitoring. Activity monitoring was also done through the XDR platform. We had a couple of incidents where there was zero-day malware planted inside the Lenovo firmware upgrade, which we were able to capture through the auto-detection feature. 

The autonomous platform is valuable because we can separate false positives and negatives and update the database during certain types of automation.

The solution can be improved by ensuring threats are being mitigated on the platform autonomously and by considering introducing an on-premises solution with affordable pricing for government institutions.

There is not much focus on the on-premise solution as the license cap is so huge for small and medium-sized institutions.

We have been using the solution for approximately one year.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable and can use the facility to do the same license, which could be used for Kubernetes. So it is the same license but different scales which we have utilized. Approximately 1,000 users are using the solution.

Our team has had a good experience with customer service and support.

Neutral

The initial setup was straightforward. Our team has also done an equally simple upgrade. It took approximately 24-48 hours.

I would say that there could be better ROI if we tend to use more than 500 licenses under a multi-cloud solution. But it would not be the same for an on-premise solution. 

The license for the solution is quite expensive, but it is cheaper than CrowdStrike. However, if you consider specific organization requirements, it has covered them all, so we might move to CrowdStrike after evaluating three years. Then, we assess the kind of tool in line with our requirements and implement the latest and the best tool in the quadrant, and currently, in Cambodia, CrowdStrike and TrendMicro are more popular.

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by ensuring threats are being mitigated on the platform and considering reducing the license cap for an on-premises solution.

Our company serves as resellers and solution engineers for our enterprise customers. We deploy and support the solution in customer environments. 

The XDR capability is quite good and offers advantages such as its real-time detection that is superior to CrowdStrike. I hear that face detection capabilities have also been added. 

The dashboard should include troubleshooting because it can have problems. 

Sometimes, the XDR does not configure its policies for data security on time. 

The XDR should include ECI compliance, multiple data securities, and the load balancer for network firewalls under one umbrella. It would be beneficial to buy a salient solution that does everything. 

The cloud side could be improved to include security, advanced integrations with other products, storage accounts, monitoring, and support. 

The solution should include USB blocking for specific machines. 

I have been using the solution for one year. 

The solution is stable with no issues. 

The solution is scalable. 

The technical support is half and half. They offer good support but response time is slow. Sometimes, you have to contact multiple engineers to get good information and that is a challenge. 

Neutral

We deploy the solution for customers. 

The solution's XDR is superior to CrowdStrike. 

I am satisfied with the solution and rate it an eight out of ten. 

We outsourced the operation to a partner, a supplier, and they have managed those services. If the product does identify some abnormal behavior, our supplier is informed, and our main IT division or group IT division is informed. They correct the machine, and they do whatever they need to do.

Nowadays, there is a lot of malware and various other malicious threats. Our system is an internal system. There might be a firewall there, however, malware can still get through an email. However, this solution is very good at detecting abnormal behavior. They act very fast and quarantine machines well. 

We find that having an endpoint protection solution allows us to adapt and react faster. 

I can put something on my pen drive and get the solution to scan it and see if there are any issues. They can identify and block without affecting any core sections. 

The solution is easy to set up.

It's stable.

The solution works quite well and I don't have many notes for improvement. 

The solution can use up a lot of resources when scanning. It would be ideal if it was lighter. 

We find the initial setup does take some time, as you have to do a lot of whitelisting. We'd like the process to be faster. 

I've used the solution for a while. It's been more than two years. 

The solution is pretty stable. I'd rate it seven out of ten. It's pretty reliable. 

You can scale the solution. However, you do have to pay more to expand as you need to purchase more licenses. At this point, we get additional blocks of licenses when we need them. We do not upgrade one license at a time. 

We have about 5,000 clients on the solution currently.

I do not have much experience with technical support.

We also have Microsoft Defender. They are two different products. We use Defender on our machines and workstations, however, not for endpoint security reasons. 

IT installed the solution on my machine. 

That said, my understanding is the initial setup is not overly complex. At first, however, we had to do some whitelisting. You need to perform a few operations, and we had to reinstall the OS, install a backup, and handle whitelisting. While it takes time, it's not hard. 

I'm not sure of the exact pricing of the solution. That's handled by a different team.

We have an IT department that may look at other options, depending on the use case. They've looked at, for example, Sophos, however, they found SentinelOne to be more suitable for us. 

I'm an end-user and not very technical.

While the solution is cloud-based, there's an on-prem server, and that is for the administration of our nodes. Mainly, the subscription is controlled by the cloud.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. Depending on the use case and if it makes sense for the company, I'd recommend the product.

The primary use case is as an endpoint detection and response software. Basically, it is an enhanced antivirus, anti-malware, and anti-ransomware solution. It protects from ransomware attacks and other types of cyber attacks. It protects the endpoint from malicious actions.

Protection from cyber attacks is the feature we find the most valuable.

It's a stable product.

We find the solution to be scalable.

Technical support is good. 

The pricing is not too high.

It has a pretty simple user interface and is user-friendly.

They need to improve how we install the software. For the agent of SentinelOne in the endpoint, it's not an automated process. We have to download it and then upload it on the endpoint. That is something that can be made simple. The uploading of the software in the endpoint, if that can be done publicly, would be great. The setup should be available publicly. The agent installation should all be done in the cloud.

I've been using the solution for more than a year.

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution scales well. You can expand it as needed. 

We are a small organization and have around 200 to 250 people on the solution. 

The management is outsourced, and I find they are doing a very good job. We are satisfied with how we are able to get help if we need it. 

This is the first EDR solution we used. We did not have another solution in place beforehand. We only used basic antivirus software previously.

The initial setup is annoying since you have to download the agent and then upload it to the endpoint. 

For maintenance, basically, I'm the admin for SentinelOne. Also, there is a different organization altogether to whom we have outsourced the management of SentinelOne. They have their own employees. Their particular team would be working for our organization. They are an SoC organization, and they work 24/7 for various clients. We are one of their clients.

The pricing is reasonable. 

I'm not sure of the exact costs, as those are managed by a different team.

I'm a client and end-user. 

The solution is pretty easy to implement and administrate. We have not tried to integrate it with other solutions. While the pricing is reasonable, it's a bit more than typical antivirus software. That said, it has advanced functionalities that make the price worthwhile. Therefore, I would rate it nine out of ten. 

We primarily use the solution at our endpoints. We use it for security.

It's catching a lot of malicious and suspicious threats. That's good for us. 

We are able to write some custom rules on SentinelOne.

The setup is simple. 

Right now, the solution meets our needs. We do not need anything added to it. 

Maybe they can develop some firewall aspects for it to better protect us. If they did that, we can write a lot of rules for the firewall and custom rules.

I've been using the solution for about two years. 

The solution is stable and reliable. It catches a lot of malicious and suspicious threats. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution scales well and can work across platforms. We can use it with MacOS, Linux, and Windows Servers. You can use it with everything.

We have 600 people on the solution right now. It is used throughout the company.

We may increase usage in our company. 

Technical support is great. They are very responsive. For example, today, if I open a ticket, they will likely give me an answer in 24 hours.

Positive

I used FireEye and Symantec. However, SentinelOne is better than them. It's more flexible and catches more threats. 

We found the initial setup to be very simple. You just click through, and you're up and running. 

I'd rate it five out of five in terms of ease of deployment.

We're deploying it every month. SentinelOne sends updates every month and we action them. 

Licensing is paid on a yearly basis. I can't speak to the exact pricing. 

I'm not sure which version number we are currently on. 

If a company has a lot of people and needs to protect its many endpoints, this is a great option.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.