Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
PeerSpot user
IT Administrator at a university with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
System Center Operations Manager 2012 SP1 Mini-test

I decided to do a mini-test of System Center Operations Manager 2012 SP1. We are already using Nagios for monitoring but it doesn’t hurt to look at the competitors :)

Installation

Normally I would test in a virtual environment, but this time I happened to have my trusty old bastard (Fujitsu Siemens Primergy RX200 S2) ready with a plain installation of Windows Server 2012 so I decided to use that one instead.

Nothing special with the installation, just a plain installation of Windows Server 2012 as base and SCOM 2012 SP1 on top of that. I then joined the server to the domain as this is a requirement. After that I started the installation of Operations Manager. The installation program itself has a prerequisite check so every component will be installed perfectly. I chose to install “everything”. There were many components missing at the check and the following was required for me:

This was only a small test, as the whole system is a bit over the top (to say the least) for our needs. Anyways, seems to be working just fine. Screenshot below.

Fig 1. System Center Operations Manager 2012 SP1

I’ve tested SCOM 2007 before so I knew what to expect. SCOM 2012 is indeed a very advanced monitoring system with all the bells and whistles. However, Nagios is our main monitoring software and it’s already set up to monitor all Linux servers, printers, switches (and more) at the Department. I’ll put my energy into configuring Nagios instead, as we don’t need all the advanced features of SCOM. We’re not monitoring hundreds of servers either. I’ve now added a script to Nagios which checks for Windows Updates. Of course there’s also standard checks like ping and so on. We don’t need anything fancier than that, at least for now. More about the Nagios script in another post.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user96294 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user96294IT Administrator at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Consultant

Thank you very much. This was a good preview to the installation process for SCOM 2012.

it_user4851 - PeerSpot reviewer
Infrastructure Expert at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
Good for Microsoft-centric environments.

Valuable Features:

Does a great job with Microsoft technologies. Decent with other technologies (Unix/Java).

Room for Improvement:

Very expensive now that you are forced to buy entire System Center suite, although comparable to other monitoring solutions that include basic APM. Dashboards are pretty weak.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user4851 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user4851Infrastructure Expert at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor

With 2007R2 we've done some basic monitoring: The out of the box disk and service monitoring, some text log monitoring and remote port monitoring for service availability of databases, WebSphere, etc. We're moving to 2012 soon and will expand on what we've currently done. Text log monitoring is supposed to be a little better (Monitors instead of just Rules via the MP templates), plus 3 state (green, yellow, red) disk instead of 2 state (green, red). Plus we're going to use the JMX monitoring. Today we're using Quest Management Extensions for WebSphere "monitoring" (mostly just perf stats collection).

See all 2 comments
Buyer's Guide
SCOM
June 2025
Learn what your peers think about SCOM. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user657 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager of Operations at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
Expensive, but delivers what we need

Valuable Features:

Well suited to handle MS Apps! Good community to get support from Good reporting. Lots of features in the "package"

Room for Improvement:

Need work to minimize the amount of events transferred to Incident systems. High License cost for the 2007 version. Super High cost for the 2012 version due to change to a CPU based. Need lots of HW to handle 1000 servers application operations

Other Advice:

The good reporting capabilities was one of the major functions which made us choose SCOM as the tool for handling MS application operations (only used for that, not the OS platforms).
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user4851 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user4851Infrastructure Expert at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor

We don't do any desktop monitoring with SCOM, with the exception of a few mission-critical workstations that have legacy processes. The large majority of our monitoring is for server based applications.

See all 2 comments
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SCOM Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: June 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SCOM Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.