Intercept X Endpoint Reviews

My company uses Active Directory to manage users and track whether they have installed any third-party applications or any malicious applications that need to be blocked before allowing for the installation of the application. My company informs users whether the tools they use have any malicious activities or products.

In terms of protection, Intercept X Endpoint is very good as it detects and identifies issues at a very early stage, so it is up to date. In terms of usability, it consumes a lot of RAM space, which causes work machines in our company's environment to be very slow. In my company, we have to wait and allow for the tool to complete the scanning of all the files and other aspects, or else the machines get slow.

The machines get too heavy because of the background applications that run when the tool is used. The performance offered by the product needs improvement.

I have been using Intercept X Endpoint for more than two years.

It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

In terms of scalability, you have to pay for every user that uses the product. If you pay more, you can get more users to use the product.

Around 500 people in my company use the product.

The product is extensively used in my company, and we plan to increase the number of uses of the solution. As the number of users of the solution in our company increases, we have to implement the product in every employee machine in our organization. My company uses the product on Windows and Linux.

I have no idea about the other products in the market since I directly started to use Intercept X Endpoint.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

A representative or set of executives from Sophos' team is involved in the product's installation process and guides the use cases of the application.

The return on investment from the use of the solution is very good since it helps my company to keep our network secure and protected.

On a per-user basis, my company has to pay a certain amount of money.

The solution improves our company's endpoint protection strategy as it helps to protect our network from getting affected by any worm or malware.

It is a very good tool to use for stopping threats. The tool is also useful to manage the activities of users in our company.

The tool is very good to use and is always up to date. The product can identify malware and worms at an early stage. Additionally, the tool also helps identify crypto miners.

Our company's system performance was getting slow because of the product.

I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for antivirus threat detection and response.

The solution's most valuable feature is threat protection.

The solution's pricing could be better.

We have been using the solution for four years.

It is a stable solution. I rate its stability as a ten.

We have 1400 solution users in our organization. It is very scalable, and I rate its scalability a ten.

The solution's customer service is helpful.

Positive

We used ESET before. Later, we switched to Sophos for better features.

The solution gets maintained automatically.

I recommend the solution to others and rate it as a nine.

We're a Sophos partner and generally use Intercept X software.

In my experience, it is a good product. Sophos family has many offerings, and the selling model is interesting for us as an MSP or Flex partner.

For end customers, you have a centralized controller providing access to every aspect of the deployment. While the platform isn't the easiest to use, if you properly set up the policies, it's very efficient. Sometimes, the platform itself can prevent security risks due to the product's capabilities.

It works very well against ransomware and similar threats.

I appreciate the ability to use the latest endpoint protection features in case of an infection or cyber threat. This is especially true when using the product with a Sophos firewall solution, like the XG series. They collaborate effectively in the event of a cyber threat.

Its ability to continuously query the data lake is beneficial. So, the deep learning technology in Intercept X Endpoint enhances threat detection capability.

However, the automated threat response for incident response times can be better if the user subscribes to Sophos service called EDR... I think it's called Managed Threat Response (MTR). There is a higher layer of support available.  For big customers, this could a good option.

The price could always be better. 

I have experience with this solution. I have been using it for a lot of years. 

It is a stable product.

It is a scalable product. It covers laptops and essentially any Windows platform – servers, clients, and even home users. So, it protects a huge number of potential platforms.

There are around 300 endpoints. 

The customer service and support could be improved in regards to response time. It could be faster.

The complexity of the setup depends on the environment. 

For single deployments, it's quite easy to set up. You can organize customers using separate payments and policies for each through the centralized console. Integrating the product with other Sophos offerings makes it very efficient. 

Customers mostly use the cloud solution. On-premises is probably less common among Sophos users.

It's difficult to have major issues with deployment. Problems usually arise due to the age of the platform. If you have older systems, support can be more expensive. Sophos might support older platforms for a while, but you'll likely have to pay additional subscriptions.

We have seen an ROI. We consider it a strategic product for our organization.

We operate as an MSP, so we pay yearly. However, if the end customer is part of the Sophos Flex program, they have more flexibility and can adopt a monthly payment process.

I suggest investing in training. It's a good product, but unlocking its full potential requires some training time.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Since it's cloud-managed, the solution is easy to administer, especially if the person using it is in a different geophysical location. I can access the cloud portal and allow or disallow it. I like the fact that the solution also has the ability to provide filtering for an end user.

The solution is expensive, and it could be made cheaper.

I have been using Intercept X Endpoint for three years.

I rate Intercept X Endpoint an eight out of ten for stability.

I rate Intercept X Endpoint an eight out of ten for scalability.

The solution’s initial setup is easy.

I rate Intercept X Endpoint ten out of ten for the ease of its initial setup.

The solution's deployment time depends on whether you're setting up a room full of computers or you're setting up one-off computers. It usually doesn't take very long. As part of installing the solution for a room full of computers, you might get someone to create the installed media, and then you'd enter each computer and install it.

Around one to five people are needed to install the solution.

Intercept X Endpoint is an expensive solution.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing ten out of ten.

I am working with the latest version of Intercept X Endpoint. Intercept X Endpoint has to be installed on end-user devices, but it is managed in the cloud.

Overall, I rate Intercept X Endpoint an eight out of ten.

When Intercept X came out, the primary use case was stopping ransomware. It was one of the first products to claim that capability. When I was evaluating them back then, it was the only one I considered effective at analyzing and identifying where the infection started. 

The synchronized security also helped because the firewall could isolate workstations that had the infection or were in the path of infection.

The most valuable feature of Intercept X its ability to stay ahead of the infection. By the time the ransomware spreads to the next machine in line, the data has already been encrypted on that workstation. It didn't matter what the ransomware did because could go in and get it back. 

Sophos made such good headway with it because it wasn't traditional endpoint protection. It has a lot of additional capabilities, including web content filtering. It also has the ability to understand the traffic it was seeing at the endpoint, 

It's sitting on the endpoint, so you don't have to worry about encryption messing up the intelligence that it could get out of the traffic. It was able to pinpoint where the infection was able to get ahead of Intercept X. It was called Intercept X because it can get ahead of the ransomware attack and encrypt the data on clients in the path of the infection.

It's hard to say what could be improved because we're in the middle of an endpoint protection arms race, and there are constant improvements on all fronts in Fortinet, Sophos, and products.

They should keep doing what they're doing. Both of them have entered the EDR/MDR space, and they're keeping up with their competitors. I have a hard time understanding why their capabilities aren't garnering more attention.

I have been using Intercept X since it came out. It hasn't been out that long. Sophos has always had an endpoint client, but Intercept X added new technology. The whole idea of being able to drill down to do a root cause analysis was a novel approach to the endpoint game. 

Intercept X is highly stable

Sophos has the flexibility to scale from one user to a data center, but I've primarily used Sophos for small to medium-sized businesses.

I was impressed the last time I called Sophos support. They have a "follow the sun" philosophy with coverage from tech support centers from around the world. Sophos began as a British company, and Fortinet is a Canadian company. 

Sophos and Fortinet have a firewall solution that can work in small business or home office situations, where you might have only one or two people protected by the techn. Still, yout you can look at it through a single pane of glass and see all of the different work sites you're protecting. 

Sophos goes one step further with what it calls its RED product, which basically is a hardware firewall that travels with somebody. Say you have an executive in your company and you want to zero in to protect his or her workstation from infection and have control over it to manage its defenses. RED is a great product to do that. Fortinet and Sophos both have strong management capabilities for remote offices and offer centralized management through a cloud application.

The basic setup is decent by itself. I have not had to do a lot of tweaking with either one of these products.

I rate Sophos Intercept X nine out of 10. Its reporting, alterts, and configuration capabilities make it a formidable product. It's a great product that works as advertised. I haven't seen any serious conflicts between it and other products, whereas I wouldn't put some endpoint protection products on the same endpoint.

You have to do some work there, but generally speaking, there's always been a case where I've been able to have more than one product. It's probably the best of all the products that I work with because I've had Malwarebytes installed together with Sophos and FortiClient without undue pain. There are some others that I won't mention without that same track record.

We are not only using Sophos Endpoint with this solution, we are also using Sophos Email Security and firewall. It is a completely synchronized security package.

The solution is overall quite good, the services are performing well. It is very good for those who are using standard PC configurations. It does not block their system up by taking up a lot of resources. 

This solution is not in the high ratings on many of the top review sites. This solution has to be near the top for me to continue using it. I do not think a lot of companies know about this solution, it could be a lack of marketing that is the reason why it is not at the top.

I have been using the solution for two years.

The solution is very good for small-sized businesses.

The technical support sometimes is a bit delayed, but sometimes they are responding very fast. Overall they are good but could improve on the times they are having delays.

Previously we used McAfee for our endpoint protection for our company. It was very problematic, it was using up a lot of resources and delaying the work of users. Users were not able to do multitasking in the system. It is blocking all access to our server at the time of scanning. We decided to move to some other good antivirus. After analyzing the market, we found Sophos. Sophos is best for the standard configuration PC.

Due to some circumstances, we are going to switch from this solution to Symantec. Additionally, we have evaluated Kaspersky before choosing Symantec as the replacement for this solution. Kaspersky has had a very good rating amongst review sites along with Symantec.

I rate Sophos Intercept X a nine out of ten.

I find the security heartbeat feature with synchronized security very useful. It's a very nice feature that allows you to basically switch off an endpoint. When an endpoint has got a virus or something like that, or it's infected or compromised, you can isolate it from the network, but only if you've got an XG Firewall as well. 

It also provides ease of use. It is the only antivirus that can recognize 25 out of the 36 ransomware and virus techniques that have been often used in terms of the behavior base using heuristics. It's beautiful, utterly amazing. No other antivirus can do that. 

The pricing could be a bit lower to match the normal retail pricing.

I have been using this solution for the last four months. Currently, I am using the latest version.

It's really scalable. We easily did 5,000 installations in six hours. It's good at scalability.

Some of our SMB clients have 20 users, and some have around 200 to 300 users. A big enterprise client has around 5,000 users.

I don't set these products up, but they look pretty straightforward and simple to set up. The deployment of 5,000 users happened in around six hours. The deployment was obviously automated a little bit.

When you start going to the EDR technologies and the MTR, it is a little bit expensive. It's a very good technology, and obviously, you're going to pay for it, but the pricing could do a little bit of work.

I would definitely recommend Sophos Intercept X. It's the number one product in my go-to-market strategy. 

I haven't used it so much, but from what I've seen and played around with, it's a brilliant product. It has already got everything. It does what it's supposed to do and does it better than anyone else out there. If you look at Gartner Quadrants, they are at number three in terms of leaders. The Microsoft Defender ATP is number one.

I would rate Sophos Intercept X a nine out of ten. It is a beautiful product, and I love it.

We use Sophos Intercept X to protect the endpoint devices in our organization, such as PCs and MacBooks.

Sophos Intercept X is a full package. It's more than only an antivirus solution to find the malicious code. We also use it to filter malicious websites and detect applications that have been outlined in our corporate policy.

The most valuable feature of Sophos Intercept X is a web filtering and URL sanity checks. Overall the solution is well balanced with all its features.

The majority of our systems are MacBooks and their solution release cycle is slow to endorsing or support the MacBook's latest OS or hardware platform. For example, when Sophos macOS Big Sur version 11 was released, it took them a while to support this version of OS. A similar situation occurred when the MacBook M1 hardware CPU was released. They have not fully supported the native M1 CPU to this day. They need to speed up the solutions release cycle.

The majority of our systems are Apple-based, this issue is more noticeable on the Apple platforms.

I have been using Sophos Intercept X for approximately two years.

The stability or performance of Sophos Intercept X is good. However, sometimes users have needed to have their configuration fine-tuned to allow better performance.

We have approximately 50 users using this solution.

We use Sophos Intercept X extensively and we use everything the solutions offer.

The support I have experienced from Sophos Intercept X was great.

I would rate the support from Sophos Intercept X a five out of five.

I have used other solutions other than Sophos Intercept X in other organizations but it has been over two years ago.

I have been using Sophos Intercept X for over two years, in the beginning, the initial setup was straightforward but because they do not fully support the Apple platform, or they're pretty slow at supporting the Apple platform, the latest version supporting Apple is a little bit cumbersome to use. You need to walk the user through the process with some specific instructions or help the user directly. It's not as easy as it used to be.

I would rate the implementation process of Sophos Intercept X a four out of five.

We did the implementation of Sophos Intercept X in-house.

I do the maintenance of the solution. We are a smaller company and I am sufficient for the maintenance of the solution.

I have found the price of Sophos Intercept X to be reasonable.

I would advise others that they have to look at their environment to determine if this solution would be best suited. Sophos Intercept X for a small business that has a mix of PCs, MacBooks, and has the need for multiple security controls, this tool fits us well. For different environments, the organization might need other or additional tools. For example, if they may need threat protection. There are different vendors that may have an edge in certain areas than Sophos Intercept X has. For us, we need a balanced, multi-pronged approach for securing in our environment, Sophos Intercept X works well.

I rate Sophos Intercept X an eight out of ten.