VP Product at PeerSpot
Gartner found that Cognos users are concerned with difficulty of use. Do you agree?
In the February 2013 Magic Quadrant report, Gartner says that some of the top reasons why customers choose Cognos are IBM's road map and future vision. However, a high percentage of users are concerned with poor performance and difficulty of use.
What are some of the reasons you chose Cognos? What are your main concerns with IBM's product?
If you are a user or are evaluating IBM Cognos, add your comment below or write your own review. Share your opinion with our community!
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Senior Manager of IT at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
We previously used Hyperion and SQL Reporting Services however we moved to Cognos because we need an integrated solution
For how long have you used this product?
- 12 Years
Which features of this product are most valuable to you?
- Quick query ability
Can you give an example of how this product has improved the way your organization functions?
- We use it against our enterprise data warehouse for enterprise views of data and material flow
What areas of this product have room for improvement?
- Visualization
Did you encounter any issues with deployment, stability or scalability?
- Scalability only due to source data issues
Did you previously use a different solution and if so, why did you switch?
- Hyperion and SQL Reporting Services. We need an integrated solution.
Before choosing this product, did you evaluate other options? If so, which ones?
- Essbase, Oracle, SAP
How would you rate the level of customer service and technical support?
- Very Good
Was the initial setup straightforward or complex? In what ways?
- Setup for such a complex tool is always difficult
Did you implement through a vendor team or an in-house one? If through a vendor team, how would you rate their level of expertise?
- We used an outside vendor. Good, but needed some more technical understanding
What is your ROI on this product?
- 3-5 years
What was your original setup cost for this product and what is your day-to-day cost of using this product?
- 2 Million to implement. Not sure
What advice would you give to others looking into implementing this product?
- Do your homework on configuration and server architecture
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Carlos Mardinotto JuniorBI Expert at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Top 5Real User
The IBM Cognos Suite, its very corporative tools, web and clould , therfore you get easily to reach your goals.
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cognos
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about IBM Cognos. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.
BI Expert at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Comparison of Business Objects & Cognos
Most of my experience is with Business Objects. I have done a little with Cognos Elite also. Comparatively I find Business Objects much easier to work with when it comes to customizing the presentation of the data. Neither of the two products does a drill-down as well as you can in Crystal Reports, but they both allow you to create multiple views of the data on one page. Business Object WEBI reports allow you to use multiple universes and multiple report pages in one WEBI document.
Both system will force you to use another layer between the presentation and data layers. In Cognos it is called Framework Manager. In WEBI it is called Universes. Both Universes and Framework Manager define the structure and connections the are usable to the presentation layer. Both middle layers can connect to any kind of database or even spreadsheets on an accessible drive.
Both products will force you to use their WEB portals as an interface into the presentation layer. Both allow you to schedule and deliver reports in multiple formats and in a variety of means. Links to reports, send the reports via e-mail, only send reports with data the user can see, and send alerts when reports fail are just a few of the common things that can be done.
When it comes to ease of use, Business Objects is a lot more intuitive and straight forward. Cognos seems to make you take a lot more steps to get the same results. Some of those steps are tough to figure out. The term "clunky" comes to mind when I think of working in Cognos.
Both products offer very similar concepts and tools to summarize and chart the data in a report.
Licensing costs and how you want to architect your server infrastructure are going to be the key driver to which product fits your organization better. Business Objects offers the advantage of another more static reporting tool with Crystal Reports.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Business Analyst at a transportation company with 501-1,000 employees
Very powerful toolset with many options. But complex to learn and use
Pros and Cons
- "Very powerful toolset with many products and options."
- "Complex to learn and use. Need technical team to build solutions."
Valuable Features:
Very powerful toolset with many products and options. Has various ways to present data to meet requirements.
Room for Improvement:
Complex to learn and use. Need technical team to build solutions.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
This is not a program for use by just anybody. Therefore, one must have some technical knowledge and skills background in order to learn how to use this.
VP of IT at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Great support with broad set of analytic capabilities, but needs improvement with integration of Data Discovery capabilities
Pros and Cons
- "IBM support, a suite of tools covering a broad set of analytic capabilities, and the ability to integrate with a multitude of platforms make it a powerful solution."
- "Need to integrate Data Discovery capabilities"
Valuable Features:
IBM support, suite of tools covering broad set of analytic capabilities, and ability to integrate with multitude of platforms
Room for Improvement:
Need to integrate Data Discovery capabilities
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Precise but to the point. Program support is very important to businesses because they are bound to encounter bugs from time to time. This makes Cognos Enterprise very viable and appealing to its users. Various businesses across the globe utilize different operating platforms. Some even use more than one platform within the same company. This makes the integration feature a perfect choice for Cognos Enterprise to its customers.
Director of IT at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Can do most things we need it do and we like the scheduler. But visualization is poor.
Pros and Cons
- "Can do most things we need it do."
- "Visualization is not as good as some others."
Valuable Features:
Can do most things we need it do. We like the scheduler.
Room for Improvement:
Visualization is not as good as some others.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Senior Manager of IT at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Excellent new functionality. Trying to connect to SAP Function Modules is tricky.
Pros and Cons
- "Excellent new functionality."
- "Replacement for VVM is still giving us issues."
Valuable Features:
Excellent new functionality.
Room for Improvement:
Replacement for VVM is still giving us issues. Trying to connect to SAP Function Modules is tricky.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Hello FLPylot
Can you be precise and tell us more about the new found functionality of VVM and let us know?
Senior Manager of IT at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Provides us with "a single version of the truth."
Human Resources Management (HRM) plays an essential role in developing a company's strategy as well as handling the employee-centered activities and the strategic management of the employees, who individually and collectively contribute to the achievement of the strategic objectives of the
organization.
IBM Cognos is a flexible, database-driven Human Resources Management, forecasting and project planning tool, which is fully integrated with all core IBM Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) modules - replacing the use of multiple, diverse, unlinked spreadsheets.
Cognos provides invaluable support for all participants in the HR and project planning cycles, of even the largest, most complex or fast-changing businesses. It supports a rich Web enabled planning and modeling framework that supports driver based planning to help connect HR assumptions to operational outcomes.
I’ve used Cognos for more than 10 years, from multiple global locations and platforms and it has allowed me to bring together information from across the organization and key systems to provide a "single version of the truth", from which to plan and make decisions. For example, it:
• Provides the core platform services of centerpiece capabilities (Talent Profiles, Employee Records, Competencies, Job Profiles, and Reports) enables planning departments to create forecasts and perform "what-if" analysis
• With Cognos’s combination of self-service facilities (allowing access from disparate locations) and workflow (to tightly control the data flow into the budgeting process), you can easily move from centralized to devolved project planning.
Cognos automatically generates supporting transactions that contains all employee records, giving you easy access to the information you need to reduce errors, enforce policies consistently, and build your business, to support more complete day-to-day operational reporting. So, for instance, a management entry may trigger an automatic compensation entry, which gives rise to changes in the employee's future compensation and reward decisions.
Cognos can integrate data: from existing spreadsheets (thanks to dynamic links into Excel); from external programs; or from end users (via user-defined, web-based input screens). This enables several business divisions or data sources to contribute to the planning and forecasting process, while keeping track of the changes and control over all the data inputs.
Sharing core ERP system administration and security infrastructure ensures that Cognos user permissions, audit controls, validation and security features are tightly managed and consistent throughout.
• Controlled user access, even when data is entered via Excel, to ensure accuracy and security of the underlying database. Complete audit trail for all data changes, user name and time of the change.
• Ultimately, IBM’s Cognos Enterprise offers a unique architecture, which delivers true "Post- Implementation Agility", allows changes to your system long after initial installation - in response to changing requirements, and without depending on expensive external consultants or constrained IT resources. This makes Cognos the ideal choice for service-based organizations that are affected by frequent and dynamic business change.
Underpinned by IBM technology, Cognos is the only planning tool that can efficiently adapt to major business change without re-implementation. You can start with native integrations from HR Management to other core talent management processes in order to support a holistic, end-to-end cloud talent management strategy.
IBM Cognos Enterprise Software offers customers the industry’s most flexible delivery and deployment options, including IBM smarter cloud solutions.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free IBM Cognos Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2026
Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Power BI
Tableau Enterprise
Teradata
Amazon QuickSight
SAP Analytics Cloud
SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform
Oracle OBIEE
MicroStrategy
QlikView
ThoughtSpot
TIBCO Spotfire
Oracle Analytics Cloud
Sisense
Board
Buyer's Guide
Download our free IBM Cognos Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What are the main differences between IBM Cognos and Anaplan for small businesses to perform budget and forecast cycles?
- When evaluating Business Intelligence Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- BI Tool Replacements, What Do You Recommend?
- Which one is best for ETL - Pentaho or Jaspersoft?
- Seeking advise on going with Birst, BOARD or Pentaho as an OEM platform solution where we could end up with 1,000's of users over time.
- BI Tool Evaluation Criteria Rating Matrix -- anyone have one they've used in making a tool selection?
- QlikView or Tableau - Which is better?
- BI tools for tactical decision-making?
- What is a good BI tool in the Oracle world?
- I currently use Panorama Necto as a viewer on SQL Analysis services cube--what other solutions are out there?
















Yes, Cognos does make it very easy for someone who is given access to too powerful of a tool suite without training to get in over their heads. Certainly, assisting users with their issues is one of the primary things I have to do as a Cognos Developer/Administrator. However, the solution is to spend some analytic time to figure out what tools the users need, and deliver those to them. It's not complex to lock users out of functionality they don't need, and ultimately, it's more cost effective for the company to only buy "Analytics" licences for the Analysts. Most users really just want their reports, for their particular area, and to be told what they are getting done, and what they need to get done in the near future...if they need more information, they rely on the Analysts in their company to do that for them...that's the paradigm that has worked for large companies for decades, and despite the current rash of "do it yourself" tools....it's the paradigm that is surviving.