What is our primary use case?
It is basically going to be our main back-end storage for critical applications; for all critical applications in the organization. HPE Alletra Storage is basically a good solution for critical business applications such as Oracle databases and Oracle EBS type workloads. But if it should be implemented with the most advanced protocols and most advanced OS layers, then one can get a true benefit from this storage system.
What is most valuable?
The functionality we need was available in that storage and this is very good and excellent storage. We basically have all the latest features, and it meets the workload. We have done some initial testing on that product and it was very good; the results were very good. Basically, we need high-performance storage, NVMe all-flash storage with NVMe over FC protocol. We not only look for the NVMe in the storage, we also want the NVMe protocol, which is very essential to get the real performance of NVMe drives for applications. We are quite happy that we got that option and have implemented this option till the last level of our VMs, and our testing and our requirements were met successfully in this storage. It provides us the best performance without data integrity trade-offs.
What needs improvement?
It is an effective solution for critical business applications, such as Oracle databases and Oracle EBS workloads. To fully leverage the benefits of this storage system, it is essential to implement it with the most advanced protocols and operating system layers.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been working with HPE Alletra Storage for more than eight months in our organization.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a good thing because IT environments are always expanding with new applications. The new applications are extensively IO-intensive, and HPE Alletra Storage basically fulfills that requirement.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support and technical support of HPE are good. There are no issues. If there is any issue regarding firmware or any configuration, it is resolved immediately by HP support. I would rate the support 10 out of 10.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
In our previous architecture, we were facing capacity issues, and a lot of capacity was wasted due to different silos. We have basically put a centralized storage in the environment, and this storage comes with deduplication and a lot of other features. Overall achievement is very good.
We basically did all the work before procuring this solution. Once we finalized the solution, we observed that it met the requirement.
How was the initial setup?
It is easy; it is not too complex. We did not face any particular challenge. It was implemented successfully.
It is very good storage and there is an excellent feature in it. It was implemented basically very easily. It was not very complicated, and sometimes we face compatibility issues with the server side or on drivers, firmware-type things. We did not observe such issues with this storage deployment in our organization.
What about the implementation team?
We basically involved a partner; HPE deployed it with their own engineer.
What was our ROI?
Previously we had two to three people managing, but now a single person can manage the whole environment with respect to storage operations.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Cost-wise, it is a bit expensive compared to other vendors and competitors. However, if we technically evaluate, then it is the right solution for key requirements. For example, if we require very low latency for very high-demanding applications, then it fulfills the requirement. But cost-wise, it is a bit expensive compared to its other competitors.
The issue is that it is a block storage system, whereas other competitors try to compare it with unified storage systems. This is not a true comparison. This is the cost which sometimes people cannot understand, but it must be analyzed with respect to its true characteristics. It is a block storage system and must be compared with a pure block storage system, not with unified storage systems or other options that people try to compare with HPE Alletra Storage.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We went through all other storage options such as Huawei OceanStor. We also analyzed the Dell storage systems, PowerScale Store, and PowerMax. We had an open competition with all the products, but the functionality and other features, such as HPE Alletra Storage being a true block storage system, whereas others offer a unified storage system, made us decide on HPE Alletra Storage. Unified storage systems mostly do not commit to the low latency that is essentially required for high workload RDBMS in the environment.
What other advice do I have?
Although this option is available with HPE Alletra Storage, since our environment is on-prem, we are not connected very easily or very frequently with the internet. GreenLake is an internet feature, and we are not basically focused on that area.
It provides a very good cloud-based infrastructure to manage the storage, but we are not using that option. Although we go through the options and the functionality of that module, we are not using it, but it is a very powerful and good option in HPE Alletra Storage.
I would recommend that it is a pure block storage system. First, everybody must understand its basic characteristics. It is very ideal for critical workloads such as Oracle databases or any data RDBMS, ERP, or billing system type workloads.
I would overall rate it a ten out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.