We are using this solution to filter communication to and from the website or our site.
We also use it to create a VPN connection for all of our sites in the world.
We are using this solution to filter communication to and from the website or our site.
We also use it to create a VPN connection for all of our sites in the world.
I like that they have given me a solution at a fair price.
The user interface could be improved.
I have been working with FortiGate for more than ten years.
It's a stable solution, we have not had any issues. It works.
It's a scalable product. We have 600 users in our organization.
We have not contacted technical support. We have been fortunate in that we did not have any issues that needed it.
I am working as a manager, and I am not doing any of the configurations.
We only require one person for the maintenance of this solution.
The pricing is fair.
I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it. That said, nothing is perfect and there is always room for improvement.
I would rate Fortinet FortiGate an eight out of ten.
I use the solution primarily for the VPN connections in local area. In some cases, I use it at universities in order to secure the local network in the university, such as servers and backup devices.
I have also used the solution as a load balancer and the EMS functionality, which I use as a controller for wireless devices.
The PPPoE server protocol with a connection to a Radius server is used a lot by ISPs and not so much by the end user. I think it would be great to see this solution with the protocol developed for ISPs.
I have been using the solution for more than two or three years.
The solution is scalable.
There are some problems that support cannot give you a logical reason as to why it happened. For example, I had a case where I was dealing with a WhatsApp application that was giving issues. Technical support gave more than one reason it could be giving issues, but none of them solved the problem. Eventually I solved the problem, but it was far from the solutions that support had given.
Before choosing Fortigate, I was using Cisco and pfSense.
The initial setup was very easy and straightforward.
The time it takes to setup the solution depends on the case. It may take less than a day or more than two months, it depends on the technology that is being used. For example, a hospital I am working with has 20 switches with two firewalls, but there are issues in the physical place and not in Fortinet. In this case, the environment limits the speed of setup.
I would rate FortiGate a nine out of ten.
The typical next-generation firewall use case is to restrict access to the users by using a firewall.
It is very flexible to use.
It is stable, but its stability can be improved.
I have been using this solution for maybe four or five years.
Its stability is just okay. It should be better.
The scalability of the device is limited.
Technical support is okay. They could be more knowledgeable and faster.
I was using Sophos. We switched because it was very unstable in terms of both software and hardware. I found a lot of vulnerabilities. Even though they provide a lot of features for a minimum cost, these features don't do what they are supposed to do.
The initial setup was easy. The deployment duration depends on the situation. I have done the installation in one to three days.
I installed it myself. You just need one technical guy to maintain and manage the firewall. It is a small product for 200 to 500 users.
It has a competitive price.
I would recommend this solution. We plan to continue using it. Even though it has a few stability issues, its price is competitive.
I would rate Fortinet FortiGate an eight out of ten.
We use it for our paralegal security, our internet operations, and network zone segmentation.
It could be more stable and secure. They can improve the ability to make changes, change requests, and provide more rounded monitoring in terms of security and potential threats.
My team has been using Fortinet FortiGate for a few years.
Fortinet FortiGate appears to be stable.
Fortinet FortiGate appears to be scalable.
We previously used Palo Alto.
The setup is pretty complex and not easy to implement.
Implemented by our in-house team.
I would give Fortinet FortiGate a seven out of ten.
Our primary use case of this solution is for the UTM it offers and the access to VPN. We have branches in Rio, Singapore and the UK. I'm an information security manager and we are customers of Fortinet.
The most valuable features for me are the web tutor and the automated rules by schedule - the VPN itself.
Fortinet is huge in today's market and they've become quite expensive. I think there are products at the same level as Fortinet, but with better prices. They've changed their subscription plan and are now forcing companies to subscribe 24/7.
I've been using the solution for around five years.
We never had any issues or problems related to stability.
There are other products on the market that are a little better than FortiGate in terms of scalability, but in general it's a good solution. We have about 200 users in the company.
We didn't need to contact technical support very much. We had a local partner and if there were problems we contacted them directly.
The initial setup was straightforward. We were implementing on a large project and it took a weekend to completely deploy with all the features, connections and everything.
They have very good documentation and if you've had experience with other products I'm pretty sure that you'd be able to deploy just by reading the documentation.
I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.
The primary use case of this solution is for the integral firewall, monitoring, and all types of security.
The most valuable features are security and vision, and all of the UTM functionality.
The user interface needs a bit of upgrading.
Pricing could be better.
Customers are looking for 24/7 protection, but it's not as critical in the end. The pricing is preventing them for adopting it so they should be competitive.
I have been using this solution for approximately six years
I am working on the most up-to-date version.
It's very stable, it can take a lot.
It's scalable and we have not had any problems at all.
Technical support is very good. I have no issues with them.
Previously, we were using another solution. Fortinet FortiGate IPS, was recommended to us, and once we tried it we liked it and we stuck with it.
I am not happy with WatchGuard.
For me, after using it for six years, the initial setup is easy.
They are more expensive than others.
If you are looking for a lifestyle solution, then FortiGate is my choice.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
We use it to protect our or our customers' full environment by using features such as IPS signatures, VPN, endpoint protection, and antivirus.
The application control features, such as Facebook blocking and Spotify blocking, are the most valuable.
The license renewal process, annual renewal price, and the web application firewall features should be improved.
I have been using this solution for two years.
It has been very stable and reliable. We are comfortable with its stability.
It is good enough for us. We have about 15 employees who use this solution.
I would rate them a nine out of ten.
The set up was a little complex, but the interface and the process are user friendly.
The license is too expensive to renew. The license renewal process is also complex.
I would advise others to use the documentation. The official documentation is very comprehensive and complete. I use the Cookbook Reference Guide.
I would rate Fortinet FortiGate an eight out of ten.
We use this firewall as part of our security solution.
The most valuable feature is the ease of configuration.
There are a lot of known issues in some newer versions of the FortiGate operating system, so there is room for improvement with that. One of the problems I was having was with user mapping, and it is an issue for which I have escalated tickets with Fortinet support.
Having the newer features work in the older, more stable versions of the product would be great. Some of the new features might really help a lot, but there are problems with stability.
I have been working with FortiGate for approximately two years.
There are a lot of new features built into newer releases, but there are not very stable.
The Fortinet technical support is awesome. They're handling my problem quickly and doing it well.
The price is okay.
I have compared solutions from other vendors including Palo Alto.
This is a good product, however, there is always room for improvement.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

How are these are unbiased reviews? It's Fortinet Fortinet Fortinet. There is very little concrete details. I distrust user reviews in general because they can easily be coaxed / paid. Most of these supposed reviewers demonstrate they aren't actively involved in using / managing the device. In the "Sonicwall vs Fortinet" under the guy who chose Sonicwall after looking at Fortinet talks more about what is good about Fortinet than he does about Sonicwall! It will be interesting to see if my comments here stick.
@Jeff-S Thanks for commenting. Reviews on IT Central Station are written by users with a varying range of experience, ranging from those who have daily hands-on experience to those that interact with the solution on a less regular basis. We have a strict policy whereby we do not offer gift cards or incentives in return for providing reviews.
Ensuring reviews are only written by real users is a core value of ours. We only publish reviews from users who have used the solution in the past 12 months. We prefer to err on the side of caution and not publish reviews that are suspected of being bogus unless we can confirm that the reviewer has experience with the solution.
You can learn more about our guidelines here:
www.itcentralstation.com/guidelines