Cynet Reviews

It is like an EDR tool. We have its latest version.

It provides good protection from ransomware and malware attacks. It is very good as compared to other products.

If any threat is there, their support is very good. They immediately respond to the users and do a follow-up. They call us and also provide email support.

Its dashboard is not so good. On the dashboard, they don't show the count for client endpoints, which is a failure of this product. This count should be shown on the dashboard. I have 1,000 clients, but I can't see it anywhere on the dashboard.

I have been using this solution for more than a year.

It is stable.

It is scalable. We have more than 1,000 users.

If any threat is there, their support is very good. 

Their regular support is just okay. Their support people are not very technical.

It is pretty easy to install. It took less than 30 seconds.

We do it ourselves. Any person with package and admin rights can do it.

Its licensing is on a monthly basis.

I would recommend this solution. I would rate Cynet a seven out of ten.

Our primary use case would be incident response.

Cynet has mostly helped with endpoint protection.

Its ability to revert back from a previous state is quite notable. This feature is particularly valuable because, for maintaining integrity, it can inspect the socket for any firewall modifications. In practice, it allows us to return to a previous configuration when everything was functioning correctly.

I like the integrity of the tool. 

There is room for improvement in terms of support. The support should be faster to respond. 

I have been using Cynet over a year.

I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. It is a very stable solution. 

I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten for Cynet. It is very scalable. We have around five end users using this solution. 

We do plan to increase the further usage of the solution. 

The customer service and support are not very good. 

Neutral

I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with one being difficult and ten being easy to set up. 

The deployment takes around an hour. 

The deployment is agent-based. You need to install agent servers, sensors, and your candidate.

You would need an IT specialist for the deployment. 

Cynet is cheaper than others, so I would rate the pricing model a two out of ten, where one is the low price, and ten is the high price. 

Cynet is a really good tool, especially for the reports and its ability to outperform other security tools. I would recommend this solution for medium and enterprise businesses. 

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

It is like an antivirus. Cynet agent is installed on our PCs, and we are using its latest version.

If some unusual activity happens on the network, such as I open administrator sessions in a short duration of an hour on many computers in the lab, it sends me an alert about my network saying that one user opened three, four, or five sessions in one hour. Similarly, if I try to play with the disk size on a computer, it will send me an alert, and it will also stop the operation.

Sometimes, it is necessary for me to make important changes to a hard drive of a computer, and because Cynet does not allow me to do that, I have to go to the console and remove the computer from the security group just for Cynet. After that, I have to wait for 10 or 15 minutes for that to take effect. I would like to be able to disable Cynet locally. I shouldn’t have to go to the console to find the PC and then take it out of the group and then add it again to the group. I should locally be able to disable Cynet on a computer with a password or something like that, but it is currently not possible.

I have been using this solution for about two years.

It is stable. A user can't see anything. It all happens in the background. It is not really heavy on a system. It is discrete, and a user can't feel it and uninstall it. It is pretty nice, and we like it.

It is scalable. It is used on all computers. We have about 150 PCs.

We used Symantec previously. I like Cynet more. It demands fewer resources. It is not resource-intensive.

It was easy. Most of the agents were installed automatically, but on some of the computers, the agents were installed manually. I had to configure group policies, and in the console, I had to put all the agents in a group.

I take care of its maintenance. It is really simple. When I put the new computer in a domain, it installs by itself and assigns a Group Policy Object (GPO).

I'm not dealing directly with Cynet in terms of administration. There is a security company between me and Cynet. They do cloud administration. I just add the agents in the right groups on the console, but the alerts are sent to me by this intermediate company. It is very simple for me. They just send me alerts on this computer saying that something is wrong with this service and if I can check it. I don't manage it, and we're paying for managing it.

We have definitely seen an ROI because we have very sensitive information, and we never had any viruses. It will be almost two years in autumn, and we never had any viruses.

It costs 18,000 per year, but we have the whole package with not only Cynet but also the Perception Point for emails. There are also some small security courses for our users.

It is an excellent product. I would rate it an eight out of ten.

I like that you can implement it in the managed service portfolio.

Automation could be improved, and orchestration could be added to the features.

Easier collaboration, that is, integration, with other tools would be nice as well. 

I've worked with Cynet for a year now.

It's both on-premises and on the cloud.

Technical support staff were very responsive and very helpful.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward, but you should get assistance from educated staff.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Cynet at nine.

Cynet's most valuable features are laptop and server performance, internal network monitoring, and external firewall lock management.

Cynet could improve when a reverse proxy is being used to connect to the servers. There could be an easier configuration because it is not plug-and-play. 

If I compare Cynet with Trend Micro, DDI, and DDA. Cynet does not have a deep investigation in the network. I would like to see DDI and DDA into Cynet.

I used Cynet within the last 12 months.

The stability of Cynet is very good. However, there have been some bugs but in the updates, they improve the issues.

The scalability of Cynet is good.

Technical support is offered 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The support we have received has been very good. They have English and Hebrew support.

I rate the support of Cynet a five out of ten.

I have used other solutions, such as SentinelOne, which is not a bad solution but it has too many bugs. They provide good competition against Cynet. 

The MDR internet response, in Israel, does not have any support in Hebrew. They only have support for Poland, Romania, and England.

The initial installation of Cynet is very easy because we did not do it. It's the same installation on endpoints, such as laptops, and servers, or in virtual machines.

I would rate the implementation difficulty of Cynet a three out of five.

We have the vendor do the implementation of the solution.

There is an extra cost if you want the support of Cynet.

I rate Cynet an eight out of ten.

The solution is primarily used for classical continuous monitoring of what's happening on the endpoint and identifying unknown threats and new threats. It provides us with a level of security.

The solution is very stable. We are very satisfied with the level of performance we get.

The scalability is quite good.

We have found the installation process to be simple. 

I'd like it to lean more towards an ad-based antivirus engine. We'd like something that makes it easier to manage specific points. 

I've used the solution for years at this point.

The stability of the product is great. There are no bugs or glitches. it doesn't crash or freeze. it's reliable. 

We have found the product to be scalable. It's not an issue if you want to expand it.

We have more than 100 clients on the solution currently.

In terms of technical support, it is very good. We also have a prepared channel with them as we have the biggest signage salary in Italy. Usually, when we ask something, they're very quick and they give us a complete answer.

The initial setup is easy. However, it depends on what we find in the customer environment. Usually, they can't use automatic tools and need to do many things manually.

We have a team of 25 that can handle deployment and maintenance tasks. There are more than ten people on the delivery team.

The bill we manage usually renews after three years. 

I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been pleased with its capabilities. 

I'd recommend the solution to other users and companies. We've been please with its capabilities. 

My company is using Cynet for endpoint protection. 

Before Cynet, we didn't have a good centralized solution. We had disparate solutions from different manufacturers, so we needed a system that would keep everybody on the same platform. 

It's transparent, so it's not something where every user has to press a button to download or do the thing. It is centralized, in fact. Personally, I use Malwarebytes and other tools, which are fine for home use. Cynet is also relatively silent in terms of operation, except when it's required to act. Another advantage is the way it segregates the data. We had the opportunity to test their deception feature, and it works.

Cynet gives a few false positives. It would also be nice if Cynet added the ability to put comments on each device. I would love to be able to say, "This is a computer in the conference room. This is a computer at the Mac desk." That way, when you have an alarm, you don't have to go to a separate registry to see which device has an alert. We have offices worldwide, so sometimes having an alert inside one building is fine, but sometimes we don't know if it's coming into our office in Morocco or the US.

The inability to add contact information inside the Cynet is also an issue because it makes things more complicated. I would like to have a simple feature to enter a contact name and number for the person taking care of that unit or that server. Then I would know who has access to that server registry and so on. But, on the other hand, I understand why they have not done that because they don't want to ask for private information on who is using what and what phone number.

I can see both sides. I trust Cynet, so I don't have a problem sharing that information. However, some customers may have an issue. At the end of the day, it would be a field that the customer can choose to fill or not. So if there were one feature that I would like to improve, this would be at the top of the list.

I'd like to be able to personalize the device labels so I can say, "This is the IT desk in our Montreal office. This is the IT desk in Saint-Laurent. Patrick is a salesman in Toronto who has had his computer attacked." When it's giving a warning, it isn't always providing notice to the user because it lets us decide whether it's a threat or not. So when it solves a problem automatically, I don't have to call.

But some users are sensitive. And at the very least, we need to advise them that one of their files has been encrypted because the security software thought it might be a threat. So I think it's a valid request there, which will not take a long time. I mean, Cynet is already maintaining a database of the unit. So it's just setting a field that the IT can decide to use or not use. So it's a simple implementation of a modification as they had.

Another disadvantage I have found so far is the platform has to be based on a desktop PC or server. It does not deploy on a mobile unit, like a cell phone or something like this. But for our primary requirements, it is doing the job.

I haven't been using Cynet for very long, only about five months.

So far, Cynet has been stable. There have been few errors.

I am not concerned about scalability for the moment because we are already deploying the solution countrywide to telecom companies and offering it to 250,000 telecom resellers. We will probably respond to some RFPs in the United States as well. When we initially approached Cynet. It was at the request of a major Canadian law enforcement agency. We also provide security for various government ministers.

So I've spoken often to the personnel at high-level Canadian public safety agencies. We've gotten some good feedback about Cynet from them. I cannot go into detail, but we provide a specialized solution for public safety and can deploy Cynet in that unit. So we got a great reference from them. Not a lot of software companies can get a recommendation from a national law enforcement agency. But, of course, it was only an informal recommendation, not an official endorsement. They tried different solutions. I'm sure they are not exclusively using Cynet, or they may not be using it anymore. I have no idea. 

We have a team that specializes in public safety. The director of this Canadian law enforcement agency can give a special designation to our team that grants us access to privileged information in a case where the investigation is ongoing. I would not say our team is made up of cybersecurity experts, but we provide cybersecurity and cybersecurity video solutions. That's not cybersecurity. We offer live video services over any IP network. So we have some specialized solutions. We developed a platform. And for telecom, we deploy platforms that are big enough to serve a quarter-million users per year for some companies or resellers.

On top of that, we provide about 400 million SIM cards every year. Some of the SIM cards that we manufacture have some interesting features, especially for public safety. For example, the SIM card, not the phone, will recognize the user's video. So the SIM card access or the biometric will verify if the person is an authorized user. If they are an authorized user, they will gain access to secure applications inside the phone. That's why we have some issues with mobility because we sell a lot of SIMs in the mobility field.

Support is one of the reasons we chose Cynet. We were looking for a solution that would help us get our cybersecurity certification in Canada, and there are a lot of solutions on the market. To get a certificate, we have to have a contingency plan for when we are attacked, and our internal experts can't deal with it. So we have to know what to do and who we'll call when this happens. A subscription to Cynet ensures that a CSO-certified actor will intervene in an emergency. So Cynet has an excellent solution from a technical standpoint, but they also have a great support system that extends to the attack itself.

The complexity of Cynet's installation is average. There might not be an easier way to deploy the solution because we are incredibly paranoid, so we don't have a centralized way to install the software. Technically, we have to install it unit by unit on PC, so that's slow. You have to go there. And sometimes, it's behaving erratically when you set it up. So if I restart the installation three times on my PC, I may get three different questions at the setup time. So it could be improved.

Once you have done this and everything works, it's one of the easiest installs. Each instance takes about a minute to install when it works. So you install the software, and after that, it automatically updates itself. It does everything by itself. And it does not ask you difficult questions. It only asks you to install it in administrative mode, which is a pretty common request for security software. The only issue is that, from time to time, you technically have a USB key trying to install the software, and it's trying to scan every user's PC around there. And every time it scans, it cannot access the other computer because we have security sync. So you need to restart two or three times. Eventually, it goes through and works nicely. So if it resolved that glitch, it would be the easiest software in the world to install.

One criticism is that the online documentation does not detail too much. Maybe I was just unable to find what I was looking for, or Cynet isn't trying to give too much information to anybody other than those doing the deployment. But aside from the hangups you encounter from time to time, it's an easy software to deploy.

I rate Cynet eight out of 10. It's decent. It could be improved, but it's a complete solution for us, and they provide excellent technical support, which is a critical requirement for us. I can offer one piece of advice to Cynet that no one else will give them. Our company is based in Canada, but it sells to telecom providers worldwide. We have customers in Western Africa and North Africa where there is a potential market for Cynet. The only problem is that Cynet is known as an Israeli solution. Personally, I have no issues with the high-quality Israeli product, but some of our customers are sensitive in those markets. Suppose we had a separate version that is white label or branded for another market. In that case, we probably could sell a lot of Cynet software there because we have a unique connection with the telecom providers. 

We are already on their list of certified solutions, and we provide about 400 million telecom security solutions in that market. So this is where we are and again. We are happy with the Cynet. We probably could sell a lot — I'm talking tens or even hundreds of thousands of seats — but some of our customers are extremely sensitive. On the one hand, they appreciate the Israeli solution, but on the other, they have to respond to public pressure. 

The solution is typically installed on endpoints. It offers many use cases. This is the great thing about this solution. We're focused on helping large enterprise systems or larger enterprise organizations that have a small support staff - and small support staff is the common denominator across both of these organizations out here now. Large or small, Cynet provides a lot of capabilities that reduce the need for full-time employees, if you don't have the bandwidth for them.

Cynet has its alerts out right away to warn clients of dangers. This happened, for example, when there was a big problem with Microsoft. They issued alerts right away so that I could know what's going on and have time to alert my customers. 

The ability to work with small teams and provide value is its most valuable aspect. They provide so many different value propositions. There are a lot of different things that users can take advantage of. 

The support is phenomenal. The global coverage also is great. You have total peace of mind.

The initial setup is very fast and very easy.

The stability has been good.

=========================================================

I have been asked to expound on my comment.

In this one solution, your endpoint protection not only includes nextgen anti-virus, but the inclusion of User and Enity Behavioral Analysis and Deception tactics IN THE SAME SOLUTION with automated remediation are just 4 value propositions for any size team responsible for information security policy enforcement.

I haven't had the solution for that long. So far, I haven't run into issues. I've been very happy with it.

It's my understanding that they're coming out with different additional features that cover different endpoints. These things all take time, so I'm ecstatic with what they have out right now, for what it's able to provide protection. That said, we actually have protection prevention solutions also, however, with Cynet, we augment these. We're the inside, they're the outside. They're outside on the global scale, watching what attackers are doing, and we're inside trying to plug up cybersecurity holes and known vulnerabilities in applications within our customer's IT ecosystems. So far, it's working well.

They have some things in the pipeline, we understand, and they're going to be able to support Android and all these other devices soon. The key is the devices - which is an aspect that is lacking right now. Every company has that problem, not just Cynet.

That said, you can't really say, "I wish they'd do this" or "I wish they'd do that." No, they need to keep doing what they're doing and helping me fend off these attacks. It's not about what else they could do, as we don't know what the attackers have planned until they strike.

I've been using the solution for three months at this point. 

So far, the solution is very stable. From the reviews and information we've seen, everyone is happy with its capabilities. And, it gives us insights into other solutions as well. We get to know what to expect. 

The scalability is great. We were able to onboard 5,000 devices in an hour. It's highly scalable and can scale fast. I haven't personally experienced any limitations.

Technical support is excellent. I'd rate them at a ten out of ten. I have no reason not to. They are helpful and responsive and we are quite satisfied with the level of service we get. 

We did not previously use another solution. 

The initial setup is phenomenal. We did 5,000 devices in one hour. Everything was up and registered within 24, however, technically after eight hours, you're done. It's up and working right away.

Each implementation, of course, is different. Your customers have their own unique situations. You have to cater to your customer. That's what we do. We tailor it to our customers' needs after providing some kind of a cybersecurity assessment and a cybersecurity score. Then we design for them what their risks are and how Cynet and our company can help mitigate those challenges. Each client is customized. No two customers are alike.

While clients have seen an ROI, I do not have exact data points that I can share. 

We are happy with the licensing. We're able to give out customers a solution at a price point that's very attractive to them and to us. That's without question, compared to some of these prices that we are understanding that some of these competitors are charging. That information is out there too. Software.com, for example, talks about that. 

There are no extra costs above the actual licensing fees.

We did evaluate other solutions first. 

You can't get the protection you used to get from antivirus and signature-based solutions. That doesn't work. Now we have to look inside the actual utilities or solutions that are being used in an attack. Most of them are the normal Windows functions that come with every Windows installation. However, you're seeing these solutions that can go and check all the applications you have running on your network to see what kind of known vulnerabilities they have, and we can alert you and mitigate them. 

Cynet does the same thing from the outside when it detects a problem. Not only does it detect it, but it also mitigates it, and then it tells you exactly what happened before you even need to worry about it. We're ecstatic over here with Cynet. It was the right choice.

If potential users are curious about Cynet and other solutions, the MITRE report gives out all the information you need. Solutions such as VMware and Carbon Black simply don't compare to Cynet.

We are resellers of Cynet. We deploy the solution in various manners.

We're learning something new every day. That's why every solution, every organization has to have customized plans, policies, procedures, et cetera, for cybersecurity. It has to be customized. You can't just roll out, stamp it and everybody does the same thing. YOu won't be safe. 

My advice for every organization around cybersecurity is just to make sure you understand your requirements. There's a lot of solutions out there. Cynet may not be the one based on your requirements. You need to do the research.

The clients are surprised at the coverage and the peace of mind they get where they don't have to worry about certain things. The teams that we are working with are starting to learn new stuff from working with Cynet - including the new ways that the average attackers are trying to attack. There's skill transferring. There's learning potential. It's been very helpful to teams that are struggling with having in-house talent well versed in these matters.

I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten. I'm only three months in with it, however, the value proposition of Cynet can't be matched.

The dashboard is beautiful, overall easy of use, and the UBA and NBA features are valued. Additionally, the ransomware upgrade provided us with 100% protection.

Compliance reports need to improve. However, I think they might be releasing this in an upcoming update. More report customization is also needed. 

I have been using the solution for approximately two years.

The adoption of Cynet came because it is easy to use. If you look at all other products such as McAfee and Symantec, they have different threat protections which are on the market. McAfee, requires almost three to four servers, to have a similar setup running as this solution. Integration is quite complex when it comes to other solutions. You have four to five components in your network which interact with each other. If one of the servers fails, the interaction would fail, and the threat would not be stopped. With Cynet it works better because it is on a micro-attack framework. If you understand how a system can be affected by a normal virus, worm, or related threat, you would understand.

The solution is stable.

It is scalable, there are 40 people using the product. We have also provided approximately 8000 licenses to our customers. Our customers range in size from small to enterprise companies.

The technical support is good even though their support is from outside of India.

We have used McAfee, Symantec, and Trend Micro in the past.

The setup is simple.

The implementation is not complex and you do not have to do complex integration. Get an agent and load it on to a system and you are protected.

The price should not be less than $100 which is quite reasonable for this solution because you are getting multiple components. It is not a single piece of software. You get the UBA, NBA, threat detection, memory scanners, etc. They have added a few more related features as well. In other products, if you want to find out the threat, you need to access the port. The dashboard is very beautiful because it provides everything on a centralized console. 

In the near future, they are doing a lot of upgrades and you will find an altogether separate product.

I rate Cynet a seven out of ten.

Our primary use cases with Cynet are to secure our workstations, to react to some kinds of threats from malware and hostile environments, and to maintain proper activity of our users' functionality.

Generally, we create the security path which provides the security monitoring of the different points in our infrastructure and our processes. At the end of this path are the workstations, and Cynet is the last point at which we can see proper activity and it helps us check this. In some cases, it is at the end of the path and in other cases at the beginning. We monitor situations like when somebody is receiving emails and uploads some files on the workstation and executes these files. Cynet helps us check this, to see these threats on the workstation, and react in a proper way. In some cases, it help people who council the communication with other host teams in our network. We use it for the reaction and remediation of the end practice.

The feature that I have found most valuable is that the configuration and the usage of the product are not so complicated. For people responsible for using this infrastructure for the first line of workstation monitoring, it's quite easy to use.

In terms of what could be improved, I would say the usability of this product for new threats. Meaning, not everything which is new is properly seen by the product and not all the required actions are taken. We don't have information for everything which should be generated by this product. I am referring to the functionality and accuracy of the product. 

We know that this product is probably not on the higher end of available products because the price of the product is lower than some competitors. We are sure that the functionality is also limited. But in some cases, the information is different. Ours generated from some hostile activity on the workstation is not enough information about the incident provided. The visibility and the explanation of an incident which happens on a workstation should be extended.

I have been using Cynet for less than three years.

In terms of stability, if we configure the functionality of the product, there are no breakdowns or anything like that. So the stability is quite good.

I don't think that I can determine the scalability because we had it installed for a dedicated number of endpoints and it has been the same for the whole three years. Generally, it's enough for us and we don't require a bigger scalability to extend it for the next part of the stations.

We have a contract with the support and it's quite good.

Cynet is quite easy to use, including the initial configuration installation. Its ease of use is one of the pros of this product.

The cost is rather reasonable.

On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Cynet a six.

To raise the score, it requires better accuracy in covering all required or all available current threats.

Maybe there is more information related to this which generates that information.

My general advice, which is not connected directly to Cynet, is that the products which somebody would want to use depends on their requirements. There are different requirements for installing such types of products and everyone should conduct many tests before their final decision. They should compare the different products and based on this should make the final decision.