CrossBrowserTesting Reviews

We have a bunch of JavaScript libraries which are used on thousands of websites for showing advertisements. 

When I had just joined the company, there were no tests at all and the deploying process was very unpredictable. Therefore, we decided to cover the libraries by unit and integration tests.

During first test stages of implementation, CrossBrowserTesting's live testing was helpful because my company is more about the server's programming and we do not have real devices for the manual testing of the UI. Then, when I started to work on testing automation, I was very excited about how easy it is to run tests on different browsers. It was just a matter of configuration.

At the moment, all our deploys depend on results of automation. If the tests are failing, then we know that something is wrong at the early stages of development. Live testing helps us to debug problems across all browsers.

A problem that we are facing quite often is related to the network connection. Tests can fail if the remote CrossBrowserTesting's VM has connection problems. This happens mostly with browsers of Internet Explorer family which work on Windows OS. I would like CrossBrowserTesting's engineers to deal with this issue.

We are using this feature to run our application in all the updated browsers popularly used.       

It has increased the speed of our regression testing.                                      

• Cross browser testing
• Live test
• Video recording of the script running in a cloud server.

There should be more detailed training on CrossBrowserTesting.                                

We develop web and mobile applications and need to test our applications across different browsers and different devices across all operating systems.

Due to serious testing needs across platforms and devices; we found CrossBrowserTesting a useful tool as it has the capability for functional testing, UI testing, automated testing just on few clicks.

We have saved the cost to buy in house devices.

Real device sessions instead of simulators

Screenshot test across the web and mobile devices at once which returns images

Shareable reports

Selection of the required device, Platform, and browsers.

Automated testing could be improved.

Test management feature where tests could be scripted.

Data-driven testing could be added.

Very few issues

Excellent Product

We used Telerik Test studio for CrossBrowserTesting but found CrossBrowserTesting miles better instead.

It has already paid cost back

Buying a license is cheaper than procurement of in house devices and there is no maintenance cost either.

Yes, we compared with Test Studio

Agile Support

Test script feature

Graphical Test Reports

Dashboard Widgets