We performed a comparison between PeopleFluent Talent Management, PeopleSoft, and PeopleStrong based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Talent Management."This solution is extremely flexible and the automation capabilities are great."
"The most valuable feature for us is the integration between the HR Payroll and Financials modules"
"Very stable in terms of performance and scalability."
"PeopleSoft is scalable."
"The most valuable feature of PeopleSoft is the functionality that allows the ability to find all the data about employees that are needed."
"A valuable feature is HCM."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is having the sources so that you're able to adapt the product to your needs. That was a big benefit."
"It's great for helping users deal with their supply chain."
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."
"The mobile responsiveness is strong."
"PeopleStrong Alt is flexible because it allows customization and the user's experience is very good."
"The product has valuable flexibility for customization, user interface, and search capabilities."
"The hiring process is good. It will create a process-oriented procedure in terms of hiring, promotion, the movement of people, and other related HR tasks."
"Some of the most valuable features are the onboarding experience of new employees, the employee service portal, and the entire performance management system."
"The UI and UX are fantastic."
"It has the capability of reporting. We, as a business team, found it good. In fact, we migrated to PeopleStrong essentially because of its reporting feature."
"The integration capabilities could be improved."
"Having applications which provide more enhanced features and user-friendly elements."
"The biggest disadvantage with things like PeopleSoft is that they do continuous support and fixes and upgrades. You get to choose when you want to implement that upgrade. However, in order to keep up, you have to upgrade."
"PeopleSoft should be more flexible with the configuration. There should be less coding and more configuration."
"PeopleSoft could improve by being more user-friendly. It's somewhat awkward to navigate."
"The product was too complicated when it came to navigating through multiple places and the search filters weren't great."
"My developers want to use more HTML instead of the specialized tool, PeopleTools because, they say, it's better from a user perspective."
"In my opinion, it needs more performance, maybe something technical related, because it's very slow for us and even small activities take a while."
"The UI and user experience are not great, and it's not as feature-rich as today's systems. Furthermore, our implementation does not include all the components we need, like payroll or some other functions."
"They could improve talent management capabilities."
"Sometimes, we feel that we should have an API-based integration aspect."
"The global scalability and support could improve."
"They could include a sort of collaborative platform where employees are able to work together with a chat mechanism like WhatsApp and video chat."
"They had challenges getting the performance management system up and integrated with our systems."
"The solution's workflow can improve by adding more customization at the organizational level."
"It would be helpful if you could work offline because sometimes, we have problems with internet connectivity."
More PeopleFluent Talent Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points