Bitdefender GravityZone EDR Reviews

We deploy GravityZone endpoint protection from the admin to every in-office machine, every utility machine, and then to each work-from-home machine that that attorney or paralegal uses when COVID-19 gets bad. There is a weekly centralized review. There is also response to alerts.

The solution is basically a firewall, antivirus, and anti-malware. It's got a heuristic module. It takes a lot of the same core technology that you see in GravityZone, however, with a decidedly more consumer-friendly face. 

In an office building, there may be other firms on the same floor. In a couple of instances,  an attorney was trying to get a PDF uploaded to the court, or at least that's what he thought he was trying to do. It wouldn't work on his machine so he took it over to his partner's machine. It was a small firm, three attorneys. It wouldn't work on that one. So he took it to his partner's paralegal, and it wouldn't work on that one.

He brought it over to a paralegal from one of my clients, and it immediately detected it as malware and blocked it. That was a vanilla out-of-the-box scan from GravityZone. What's notable about this is the malware was pretty serious and it ended up ransomwaring both of those other firms even though they notified their IT people who went in and attempted remediation. They didn't catch it. We like that because this isn't just defending against network-based attacks, it's successfully defending against everything else.

The solution has better UI and better UX tools.

The standard policies are pretty good, right out of the box. We seldom have to tweak them. We have never had to make, and I'm speaking across probably 14 law firms in 2020, we've never had to attenuate for a specific device case like a scanner or a particular piece of software. On three occasions it did block some software paralegals were trying to install, which turned out to be malicious. 

We like the dashboard, the console, the reporting. It's very easy to deploy.

We're pretty strong on GravityZone. We have had zero penetrations across our entire client base.

We don't deal with very large organizations. We stay as far away from active directory and combined network typologies, as much as we possibly can. The way I explain it is we don't build our houses out of straw, we don't build our houses out of wood. Each user machine that piggybacks builds a stone house. 

We've cloud migrated everybody, however, it did not happen generically. We've used Google Enterprise or Box Enterprise, so good stuff. AES-256 at rest and AES-128 in transit. We only do scans on GravityZone covered machines via our contemporary APIs. We close every hole we can find. With people who still have servers, whether they're physical or virtual or cloud, and they're still active directory, and they're still 100% Microsoft shops, I've heard them complain. However, I don't care as it doesn't affect any of my clients.

For many, the problems come mostly when they start tweaking or short-cutting - particularly for patch management. A lot of admins will tend to bundle work that we don't think should be bundled, however, they tend to due to the fact that they're underfunded and undermanned. They've got to get all the patches up. They've got to get all the updates done. Therefore, they tend to tweak group policies associated with the active directory. Some of those customizations can create potential security holes.

GravityZone is the only one with the heuristic model, the simulator. We've seen where a thing may pass the script desk, it may pass the node and snippet test, however, it fails the heuristic test. That's where it launches a virtual machine in the high memory and lets the thing do whatever it's going to do, and then looks for where it goes. Of course, a lot of these things then go to the approval area as that's what the admin intended. However, then they get into a bit of a problem with GravityZone as it doesn't want them to do that. GravityZone works fine if you follow best practices in the other areas of your deployments. If you're kind of cheating or cutting corners, GravityZone isn't going to be mean to you, however, it may give you grief. 

I've used the solution as a consumer on behalf of clients. I've been dealing with the solution for four or five years at this point.

The solution is extremely stable. Nothing that I work with is as stable as this product. For example, aside from its default group policies and actions being robust and its very adroit awareness of 'allowable' (you can't get a Kyocera auto-update if you don't have a Kyocera), we log less than one issue per year per client for Gravity Zone.

The technical support is amazing. It's pretty much instantaneous. We've very satisfied with the level of service we are provided.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward.

We create a package depending on the level of sophistication of the user. The average law firm will have three packages. A low-end package, attorney, because attorneys are actually the least significant player in a law firm. They're the least informed. They're the least aware technologically. Then there are the standard paralegals and then advanced technical paralegals. We want to give more power to the advanced technical paralegals. Prior to COVID, we would typically create two or three distribution points, but with all the work from home, we quickly observed it was unnecessary.

For example, let's say you've got 22 users in an office. You can create two or three distribution points in your configuration of the GravityZone download package. Then, those three distribution points, which are serverless and have no central authority, will capture the updates and distribute those to the other machines. That worked fine pre COVID. Post COVID, with everybody at home, fully 40% of the workforce at home, that creates an unnecessary burden. That's why we've suspended that. 

We're using the UI you configure for whether the users are on a Win 64 machine or a Mac, and sometimes Linux. We build the package, send the package, install the package. When we put GravityZone on a machine we're building for deployment. It's all very quick and smooth.

When we're putting GravityZone on a work from home, typically it's a home laptop that has got a lot of stuff on it that isn't necessary. GravityZone installs in three phases. Phase one is a scan, a comprehensive scan. Phase two looks for offending software that is incompatible, such as McAfee. In home deployments, we very often watch it go through and have to unroot junkware. Sometimes that will take intervention on our part.

Although I can't speak to exact costs, in our experience, not only is it much more effective,  it also never costs more, and sometimes costs less than competitors.

The solution is targeted for the consumer community, however, I've seen it deployed a lot this year from all the work from home attorneys and paralegals and such.

I would advise those seriously considering the solution to go for the three-year contract as it'll save you money. If you're changing protection more often than every three years, then you're not really paying attention.

I would rate the solution ten out of ten.

We have problems with Word, we have problems with Google, we have problems with Google Drive, we have some problems with the Box API, we have lots of problems with all IFTTT. However, we never really have problems with GravityZone.

Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution. It includes antivirus, protection against Trojans, ransomware, malware, and web threats on local machines. It provides firewall and network protection for endpoint devices.

We want to have total protection for every endpoint.

It's hard to pick just one valuable feature as almost all of the main features are very useful. However, the ability to manage it centrally and have detailed control over settings, exceptions and other configurations is extremely beneficial.

The areas of Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Extended Detection and Response (XDR) could benefit from improvement in terms of how problems are reported and displayed. The way the problems are presented and the information provided could be improved.

I have been using Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra for approximately two years.

We had some small issues with the stability but it was not major issue.

The stability of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra is a nine out of ten.

We have approximately 15 people using this solution, we do not have a large company.

We have some clients with 150 endpoints and others with 30 using the solution.

The scalability of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra is a ten out of ten.

I rate the support from Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra a seven out of ten.

Neutral

I have used other solutions that are at the same level as Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra.

The initial setup of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra is not overly difficult, but if you enter details in the configuration it can become more difficult.

The deployment process was relatively straightforward. We set up the account, connected to the local internet, and synchronized our users. We utilized the Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra server to automatically deploy the solution to all synchronized users. It was a simple process. The whole process two days to complete including configuration.

I rate the initial setup of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra an eight out of ten.

We deploy the solution for our customers and we typically use one person for the deployment.

Using only one technical staff to maintain the solution results in a good return on investment and is not difficult to manage.

I rate the ROI of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra an eight out of ten.

The solution is affordable.

There are different versions of the solution, such as Ultra and Elite. The separate versions come with different functionality and modules.

I rate the price of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra a seven out of ten.

The maintenance mainly involves reviewing logs and notifications generated by the GravityZone console. This includes checking for issues such as viruses or suspicious activity. Depending on the organization's changes, some configuration settings may need to be adjusted. While it's not a difficult task, it does require some time to maintain the system properly.

If you have approximately 300 to 400 endpoints the maintenance can be done by one person.

The company offers excellent training for partners and clients, which makes it much easier to deploy the solution. The initial training on the solution is crucial.

I rate Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra a nine out of ten.

When we are trying to eliminate the virus from the endpoint, and we are making some policies to block a USB port, we use this solution. We can enable an anti-phishing policy on it. If someone reaches a website that is not good, we directly get a notification. 

We can see if there are patches or if the applications are good or not.

The best thing I have found is that we have a centralized dashboard. 

The feature which I like is the anti-phishing feature. We get notified directly if someone might click on a phishing link.

The initial setup is easy.

It is easily integrated with our controller. However, it's not directly integrated with it. When we took our system endpoints in our anti-directory, we did not see them in our different antivirus directory. Once we install the agent in it, it'll show that. It would be good if they directly integrate with our anti-directory, so whenever the endpoints come into our domain, we can directly install the agent through the web portal into the endpoint.

If we could directly push the agent to the script, it'll be very good. We don't have to handle it manually.

A new user might have issues with the initial setup. It's easier to handle if a person is knowledgeable.

It would be ideal if they offered application patches.

I've used the solution for four to five years. 

Every person in the company uses the solution right now. There are at least 250 people on the solution. It's used on both Windows and Mac OS.

I've never personally contacted technical support.

The setup all depends on the user's knowledge. If a user is new, it'll be difficult. If they're used to it, it'll be easier. In my case, I have had some practice with it, so it will not be difficult for me. I would rate the seven out of ten in terms of ease of setup.

It doesn't take too much time to install the product.

We handled the initial setup ourselves in-house. We directly take the agent and install it on the portal directly. After that, the agent does all the work.

We're customers and end-users. 

We are using the normal version, not plus.

While anyone can use the solution, users should first go with their use cases. You have to see if the software is applicable to your environment or not. You have to know how you are going to protect your endpoints from the outside. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's good for protection and has good features. 

The features that are most useful are the simplicity of deploying the package and the cryptosystem for managing all the situations on the computer.

At the moment, I do not have enough experience with the solution to know what needs to be improved. The cryptosystem could be improved a bit.

The solution is very stable.

The solution is easy to scale.

I have contacted technical support in the past. I was very stuck when we started a project in terms of the configuration. Their response was quick and came with good technical support.

Before using Bitdefender, we were using Sophos. It's a very similar system to other firewall appliances. It was a full appliance with everything on it, and we decided to not switch but split all the systems from Sophos to different appliances for better security and improvement of the company.

The initial setup was easy. You just need to read some of the communication and hit it to deploy and it permits on the system. We deployed it to more than 150 users. They are all end users. We have only a few admins.

Before choosing the platform we evaluated other technologies like Palo Alto Traps. It was a bit different. We chose our solution because it was very simple to use, to deploy, and it was really good for our needs.

At the moment everything is good for me. It's really simple to use it.

I would rate this solution nine out of 10.

I think the most valuable component of the tool is that the EDR capabilities are integrated already with Bitdefender based on the licensing a user opts for when purchasing the product. The tool's graphical user interface is common and very friendly, making it an overall user-friendly product. With the tool's features, you can easily identify how to work with it.

The improvement of the product is required since I am in the cybersecurity industry, where there are a lot of antivirus solutions that offer just a few advantages or have some disadvantages compared to other products. I want Bitdefender GravityZone EDR to offer better antivirus technology and additional features, especially in areas like DLP.

The product fails to provide guides to its users. In future releases of the product, I want the tool to offer some guides and hands-on training that can guide users who want to learn more about the product without the vendor's help. A guide for the product can help you learn about the tool at your own pace and show you the options you can use in the solution.

I have been using Bitdefender GravityZone EDR for more than two years. I operate as a distributor of different solutions in our company.

When it comes to Bitdefender GravityZone EDR's technical team, the support provided is from Europe, but there is no delay in the support provided to users when it comes to those operating in different time zones across the globe.

I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.

Positive

In the past, I tested Trellix, Sophos, and WatchGuard, which I also used a little bit. Based on my experience with other tools, I can say that Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is user-friendly. The tool is very easy to understand and learn.

Price-wise, Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is a bit expensive in the Philippines. In the Philippines, users usually want products at a lower price, including cybersecurity products and all the products that are available in the market.

Looking for a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone EDR and WatchGuard, I visited PeerSpot's website to see if I could get some information or comparisons, along with each product's advantages, disadvantages, pros, and cons.

Though I haven't used the solution to its maximum capacity, I can say that the product offers a good set of features.

I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

I use Bitdefender GravityZone EDR in my company to see if something abnormal is happening on PCs. When a hacker or anyone else is trying to do something on a PC or if they jump from one PC to another area in the IT infrastructure, and the antivirus or the endpoint protection tools cannot detect such activities, then EDR tools can be useful in such scenarios.

When there is a brute force attack or lateral movements within the network, EDR tools can detect it. EDR is very helpful for security operations in SOC. If anything abnormal is happening on a network or in the PC itself, then EDR becomes useful for protection.

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use and simple, meaning it's not much complicated. The customer is able to read the results and values easily provided by the solution compared to the products from other vendors. Whatever information I am sharing is based on our company's customer feedback.

The features in Bitdefender GravityZone EDR are what our company's customers are happy with and actually want. I don't see my company's customers requesting more from Bitdefender GravityZone EDR since they get what they want from the product.

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR doesn't have an official office in Saudi Arabia, which is important if the vendor wants to gain or be closer to their customers. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR needs to have a legal team with technical support, a sales manager to cover the region, a pre-sales representative, a technical account manager, a channel manager, and a good team in Saudi Arabia.

I have been using Bitdefender GravityZone EDR for four years. My company has a partnership with Bitdefender GravityZone EDR.

I haven't heard of much downtime when it comes to the product.

It is a scalable solution.

My company's clients prefer Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, consisting of mall, medium, and enterprise-sized businesses.

The technical support of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is the same as Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra since both products belong to the same vendor.

My company did work with an EDR solution provided by a vendor named CyberArk, and we even did the proof of concept for one of our customers with the same product, but they were not happy with it. As some of the requirements were too much to handle for Cybereason, my company decided to switch to Bitdefender GravityZone EDR. Cybereason's user interface is very well designed. According to my customers, Cybereason's user interface is way too well designed, but it's over the top, making it not so easy to use. My customer found Bitdefender GravityZone EDR easy to use, simple, and easy to learn, especially for junior-level employees.

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

The product's installation deployment phase

The solution is deployed on the cloud and on an on-premises model.

The solution can be deployed in 15 to 20 minutes for small and medium-sized businesses, while it may take a bit more time for enterprise-sized companies.

Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra is a product that requires one license, and people who prefer Bitdefender GravityZone EDR are those who want a bit different solution. The deployment part of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is the same as Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra.

I see a general improvement in the security in my organization from the use of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR.

I rate the product's price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high.

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is a competitively priced product.

The user or the admin of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR should always be in touch with the technologies because you don't know when some incidents occur, and you may fail to recognize them. With Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, you have to always keep a watch over it as it is an EDR solution through the security operations center since EDR tools are more for detection than prevention.

Based on the availability of the product in my region, I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

I work in IT, so I'm an end user and an implementer of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra for other end users. I'm using the software as an antivirus.

What I like best about Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra is its antivirus feature.

The product has many good reviews, and I like how straightforward it is to implement. It's also easy to access and use.

It is also valuable that Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra has many features, such as VPN, web filtering, and email filtering.

What would make Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra better is if Bitdefender employed more firewall policies and added even more features to the product.

I've been using Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra for three months.

Stability-wise, Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra is okay.

Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra is a scalable product.

I have yet to use Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra support.

It's super easy to set up Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra. The process takes two to three minutes.

The software was easy to set up because my company is an official partner of Bitdefender. I buy Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra for the end user, and then I set up an account for the end user on the Bitdefender site, download the trial, and then put in the license key, and that's it.

The pricing for Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra is not that high. It's okay for the service it gives, so I would download it on my personal computer and buy it for myself as a customer.

Apart from the standard licensing fees, there could be extra costs based on the features. Pricing for small businesses and enterprises differs, but another department is responsible for the financial side, so I don't know much about it.

I remembered wanting to sell the Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra family pack but couldn't get the pricing.

I've been working on some projects to find the best solution for different companies to implement suitable firewalls and routers based on various characteristics—for example, applicability, pricing, and functionality. I've been looking into it and saw that a specific product could be better when implemented for a particular industry. For example, it's not worth buying a Palo Alto firewall for a mid-range business when I can integrate Bitdefender or Fortinet.

I'm working with Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra.

I would recommend Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra to others because of its price and features; plus, it's a simple solution, though that's still dependent on your devices and what you want to use it for. The product is okay for personal and mid-range business use, but I'm not sure how it is with large enterprises and government institutions.

I would rate Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra as eight out of ten, but it's not because I have a bad opinion of it. It's because I haven't used it for a long time, and every company has room for improvement, so I'm giving the software the benefit of the doubt.

The solution is basically for endpoint security and, of course, at the server level.

It's a very stable solution.

The product can scale. 

There was a bit of a problem deploying. However, that was resolved. As it is now, we are at the stage of deploying it to the end-users.

Myself, I’ve been using the solution for three months.

The solution is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn’t crash or freeze. It’s reliable.

The solution can scale well. It’s expandable.

We have approximately 700 users on the solution.

We did struggle with the initial setup.

We deployed the solution on and off. However, the deployment took about three days in total. There were some gaps in between going back and forth with things.

We have about 20 technical people on staff that are able to handle deployment and maintenance.

Someone else handles the licensing. I can’t speak to the exact pricing.

I'm just also getting acquainted with it as this is a new deployment.

I don't work with it directly myself. However, it is used in my company. I’m an end-user.

This solution is so new that it’s hard for me to recommend it just yet. Once I settle with it, then I'd be in a position to offer more insights into how it works.

I’d rate the solution a seven out of ten.