We use it everywhere. We power all of our public cloud with it, and we also power all of our customers' private clouds with it.
CTO & Co-Founder at Servers Australia
Best stability, good price, and useful Stretched Cluster feature
Pros and Cons
- "Stretched Cluster is one of the big features that we use across multiple data centers."
- "I am looking for more of a software-defined storage platform that uses different protocols, such as iSCSI, NFS, and CIS, and maybe also has an object as part of that. They should 100% make it more of a storage-based product where it is not linked just to VMware, and it also has NFS and iSCSI built-in at a scalable level. They should turn it more into a dedicated storage-as-a-service platform instead of just being built into the VMware kernel. Their level one and level two support is not at all good, and it should be improved."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
Stretched Cluster is one of the big features that we use across multiple data centers.
What needs improvement?
I am looking for more of a software-defined storage platform that uses different protocols, such as iSCSI, NFS, and CIS, and maybe also has an object as part of that. They should 100% make it more of a storage-based product where it is not linked just to VMware, and it also has NFS and iSCSI built-in at a scalable level. They should turn it more into a dedicated storage-as-a-service platform instead of just being built into the VMware kernel.
Their level one and level two support is not at all good, and it should be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for four years.
Buyer's Guide
VMware vSAN
August 2025

Learn what your peers think about VMware vSAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2025.
866,561 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This is the best product that we've ever used.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is surely scalable for 64 nodes. We can run petabytes of data if we want.
Our clients are small to medium companies.
How are customer service and support?
VMware's level one and level two support is not at all good. Their support is good only when you get to level three.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is cheap. It is $0.02 a gig.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise others to just make sure that latency is brought into the equation because being HCI, network latency determines everything.
I would rate VMware vSAN an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. partner
Chief Enterprise Architect at Alinma Bank
Functional dashboard, scalable, but more volume views needed
Pros and Cons
- "This solution has a dashboard that you can log into and control if you need too while the VM is getting created."
- "The solution could be improved by having more filtered and multiple view volumes instead of a single view."
What is our primary use case?
The primary use of the solution is the virtualization and storage process in a simple platform.
The solution is not independent, it is interlaced with other solution such as vSphere and NSX. If you work with one you will be working with others. vSphere is connected to NSX and the NSX will connect to the vSAN. vSphere connects for storage purpose. When the virtualization process is happening, the storage area network would be vSAN. It resembles a managed service from VMware, where all the data and everything will be put into the vSAN.
What is most valuable?
This solution has a dashboard that you can log into and control if you need too while the VM is getting created.
What needs improvement?
The solution could be improved by having more filtered and multiple view volumes instead of a single view.
In the next release, I would like to see a more user-friendly dashboard with the potential to display issues. It should be capable of detecting the issues faster. For example, if something is wrong with your LAN, controller, or storage volumes.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used the solution for ten years.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable. We have more than 50 administrators and approximately 200 operators using the solution.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical team is provided by VMware and has workers in all different areas. For example, there will be people working in the storage control part or in the technical area.
How was the initial setup?
It was quite easy to install and took a couple of hours.
What about the implementation team?
I did the installation by myself.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution requires a license. The payment is on a yearly basis and It is not overly expensive.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated Microsoft Hyper-V which has a similar storage area network. However, it can not be used together with NSX and vSpere like this solution.
What other advice do I have?
I will continue using and recommend this solution.
I rate VMware vSAN a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
VMware vSAN
August 2025

Learn what your peers think about VMware vSAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2025.
866,561 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Assistant Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Ease of integration is key in addition to a very good VCG notification feature
Pros and Cons
- "Very good VCG notification feature."
- "Reporting currently depends on third party applications and that could be improved."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case is to host our hyperconverged solutions. I'm a project manager and team leader and we are implementers of this solution. We carry out everything from implementation to rollout. We are customers of VMware vSAN.
What is most valuable?
The VCG notification feature is key for me.
What needs improvement?
We faced some latency issues but it's been a little better lately. I'd like to see a single dashboard product and an improvement in reporting which currently depends on third party applications.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using this solution for almost seven years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's relatively stable now although we had some issues in the past.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable, we have around 5,000 users. I think there are about 15 people in the company who deal with monitoring, management, and implementation.
How are customer service and technical support?
We had a very good team early on so we were not dependent on Microsoft or VMware to help mitigate issues.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used Nutanix and I was very happy using Prism. We ended up with vSAN following a bidding process.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup took around 15 months. It was reasonably simple but there were some issues. We migrated around 150 VMs with applications on them.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We have a deal with them so we don't pay for individual licenses, it's a complete solution with an overall license.
What other advice do I have?
There are many similar solutions on the market. With VMware you get ease of integration because any new product they bring to the market has VMware.
I rate this solution an eight out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Senior Manager IT Services at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
A stable solution with integrated storage and a single pane of glass for management and operational control
Pros and Cons
- "It has a single pane of glass for management and operational control, which is the most valuable feature. The integrated storage is also valuable."
- "Its integration with a hybrid cloud can be improved. Its scalability can also be improved so that it can be integrated with more than 32 nodes. The maximum number of nodes is okay, but our use cases could probably do with more nodes, probably up to 64. In terms of new features, it should probably have the basic support for high-speed networking spaces."
What is most valuable?
It has a single pane of glass for management and operational control, which is the most valuable feature. The integrated storage is also valuable.
What needs improvement?
Its integration with a hybrid cloud can be improved. Its scalability can also be improved so that it can be integrated with more than 32 nodes. The maximum number of nodes is okay, but our use cases could probably do with more nodes, probably up to 64.
In terms of new features, it should probably have the basic support for high-speed networking spaces.
For how long have I used the solution?
My experience with it has been for about 12 months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It has good stability. It is better than the non-hyper-converged one that we had previously.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Its scalability can be improved so that it can be integrated with more than 32 nodes.
How are customer service and technical support?
Their support is good. If you are a big enough user, you get enough support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
This is the first one that we used.
How was the initial setup?
For us, it was fairly straightforward. You need to have knowledge of vCenter. The deployment took about two to three days in total.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is expensive, but you get what you pay for.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution, but you have to be careful about the license cost. It can get quite expensive.
I would rate VMware vSAN a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Sr. Manager-Data Center and Virtualization at Omgea Exim Ltd
Flexible, reliable, and has easy to scale-out architecture with good security
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features are secure IOPs and LAN security."
- "The price can be reduced. Small businesses cannot afford this solution."
What is our primary use case?
We are service providers. We offer pre-billed services anywhere from three-year or five-year contracts for our customers. We provide the maintenance of the solution during that time, and on the backend, we provide L1 and L2 support.
The primary use case of this solution is for third party storage, and to leverage the local hard disk. This avoids the cost of expensive storage, sandboxes, and SAN switches.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features are secure IOPs and LAN security.
Also, we can provide VMware with IOPs assurity from the vSAN policy, vSAN cluster, which is an expensive solution from the storage.
It has the iSCSI feature.
What needs improvement?
The price can be reduced. Small businesses cannot afford this solution.
There are limitations with Kubernetes and vSAN.
In the next release, I would like to have a hybrid flash available with this product.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with this solution for more than three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a very stable product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is very easy to scale. It's out of the box. You can add to it at any time.
You can add any OEM or any hardware with no problem. There is no hardware lockin. For example, if you are working with HP hardware, you can store in DELL, or you can add a fifth node from Huawei.
It's a scale-out architecture.
Our customers are medium and enterprise companies. Small companies cannot afford the services.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very simple.
It is less than five minutes to deploy.
What about the implementation team?
We are service providers for our clients. We have a dedicated team in our organization that deploys the products, maintains, and provides support for our customers.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price is expensive. This solution is not an option for SBM customers because of the price.
There are limitations because of nodes. There is a minimum purchase requirement of three or four nodes along with two processors, which also increases the price.
The price will go from a small storage box to a higher storage box.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
When comparing, other vendors have their own hardware with vSAN. They have hardware with HCI, for example, Hyperflex is a hardware that is OEM locked. If a customer purchased three nodes, with Hyperflex, the next time they will have to buy from Cisco.
It's the same with HPE; if customers purchase three or four nodes from HPE, the next ones can only be purchased from HPE.
VMware vSAN has the flexibility to buy from anywhere. There is no lock key. They can purchase from any customers and any OEM.
What other advice do I have?
VMware vSAN is a very good product and I would recommend it for other customers.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
Founder at a construction company with 11-50 employees
Easy to set up, fairly stable, and cost-effective
Pros and Cons
- "It uncoupled the idea of proprietary technology and component capabilities. It is basically a proprietary technology for a cost-effective infrastructure."
- "They can package it in a way that is specific to the hardware infrastructure and the hardware platform. It should stay fairly up to date with the drivers and the manufacturer issues. The problem with uncoupling the proprietary technology and component capabilities is that by uncoupling them, you run into some concerns or challenges over the poor performance model. These concerns really come when you start talking about high performance, high bandwidth, and high availability types of environments. While vSAN is a leader, in a critical view, it is not about being cost-effective. It is more about the immediate impact of money loss to the business in critical applications where we want to maintain a continuous operational 59 model. It is, however, good for QA/QC tasks. I don't necessarily know how it works in regards to VDI or virtual desktop infrastructure."
What is our primary use case?
We use it for commoditization and cost-effectiveness. We use it only to be able to spin up instances for monitoring and to do some application testing for other contracts. We are using the latest version.
What is most valuable?
It uncoupled the idea of proprietary technology and component capabilities. It is basically a proprietary technology for a cost-effective infrastructure.
What needs improvement?
They can package it in a way that is specific to the hardware infrastructure and the hardware platform. It should stay fairly up to date with the drivers and the manufacturer issues.
The problem with uncoupling the proprietary technology and component capabilities is that by uncoupling them, you run into some concerns or challenges over the poor performance model. These concerns really come when you start talking about high performance, high bandwidth, and high availability types of environments. While vSAN is a leader, in a critical view, it is not about being cost-effective. It is more about the immediate impact of money loss to the business in critical applications where we want to maintain a continuous operational 59 model. It is, however, good for QA/QC tasks. I don't necessarily know how it works in regards to VDI or virtual desktop infrastructure.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using VMware vSAN for one and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is fairly good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I wouldn't really be able to comment on that because we don't really have enough of an environment to understand what the cost of scale would look like. Our customers are small to medium enterprises.
How are customer service and technical support?
They are pretty good. I would rate them a seven out of ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We didn't use any solution previously. We just had monolithic storage. We just wanted to test this solution out.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is fairly straightforward. You just need to do a level of due diligence before you do the installation. You can run into issues depending upon the compatibility with drivers.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is fairly cost-effective for entry to mid-level performance based on the underlying hardware components.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise doing your homework and making sure that it scales according to your expectations, performance, and ownership cost.
DataCore is a company that competes against them. DataCore is more focused, whereas VMware is wide. DataCore is a little bit better in terms of due diligence and information. vSAN is one of the many products based on the VMware industry, whereas DataCore is very focused and very niche. They've been doing virtualization since 1986.
I would rate VMware vSAN an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Trainer/Consultant at Koenig Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Easy to configure, deploy, and manage
Pros and Cons
- "The deduplication and compression are excellent."
- "There's a lot that can be done to segregate. That may be available now in vSAN 7, I suppose, however, the deduplication and compression can be segregated."
What is our primary use case?
We don't have any specific use cases, however, we do have a variety of workloads running on vSAN.
How has it helped my organization?
It's a massive shift now to have it in the portfolio and to have a complete software-defined data center.
What is most valuable?
The policies the solution has been very good. We use them a lot.
The deduplication and compression are excellent.
There are a couple of features which we are using right now that we really like.
It's the kind of solution that is very easy to use, which may be its most valuable aspect for our organization.
The initial setup is straightforward.
The solution overall is very easy to manage and configure.
What needs improvement?
There's a lot that can be done to segregate. That may be available now in vSAN 7, I suppose, however, the deduplication and compression can be segregated.
Increasing the classifiers to maybe more than 64 could be done in future releases.
The file service is something that can be integrated.
Something more could be done to integrate from a monitoring perspective right in the console itself so that we have deeper monitoring capabilities.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for about three years, however, I suspect it's been even longer than that.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We haven't had any issues I can recall in terms of stability. It's pretty reliable. It doesn't crash or freeze. There aren't bugs or glitches.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
In our organization's case, we started with a number of nodes and I scaled it up from there. I didn't find any issues expanding the product. Scalability was not a problem.
This is a pretty recent deployment. While I've been working with the solution for three or four years, it's new to the company for the most part.
We plan to increase usage in the coming year. New workloads will get deployed and we'll begin to expand it more.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support has been very good. They're quite knowledgable and responsive. We're satisfied with the level of support we get.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
My organization didn't previously use a different hyper-converged solution. This product is their first in this particular area.
How was the initial setup?
There's no complexity in the original setup of the solution. The implementation is very straightforward.
Deployment was pretty quick. Just testing it out and finally rolling it out we managed to do in a couple of days. I would say within a week we were able to be up and running.
What about the implementation team?
My company was involved directly with a reseller. The other nitty-gritty elements were something that I took care of it.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I was not directly involved from a pricing perspective. I suppose it was competitive and that's why the company went ahead and with vSAN, therefore I assume the pricing is okay.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did look at other options. We ended up choosing vSAN mostly due to the price. However, we also liked how easy it was to set up, configure, and manage compared to other options.
What other advice do I have?
We're a partner with VMware.
Overall, I would rate them eight out of ten. They still have room for improvement. However, overall, we've been pleased with the results. It's easy to use, manage, and monitor.
The solution is best suited for small to medium-sized organizations.
If the solution is ideal for a company depends on the workloads and what they're trying to do right now. If a company would like to make a choice between the All-Flash or the Hybrid, I would definitely go for All-Flash. It may be a bit expensive as compared to Hybrid, however, definitely from a feature perspective and a performance perspective, All-Flash is the way to go.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. partner
Infrastructure Support Engineer at Sidmach
Provides centralized management capability and has a straightforward setup process
Pros and Cons
- "The product is highly scalable and significantly supports our organization's needs."
- "We have encountered some challenges related to administrative tasks and licensing issues for the product."
What is our primary use case?
I use VMware vSAN for storage management, particularly for managing our data center and virtual machines (VMs). It significantly reduces downtime, especially during maintenance, allowing seamless machine movement.
What is most valuable?
The platform's most valuable features are centralized management capability and vMotion. These features provide a central management point and allow seamless VM movement during maintenance.
What needs improvement?
We have encountered some challenges related to administrative tasks and licensing issues for the product.
I suggest improvements in processing speed, user-friendliness, and resource utilization for the next release. Additionally, making the system more user-friendly and easier to manage would be beneficial.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with VMware vSAN for approximately four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate the product stability a six and a half. We encountered issues related to hardware and vulnerability patches.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product is highly scalable and significantly supports our organization's needs. Our company has approximately seven to eight users who manage and work with VMware vSAN. We plan to increase the usage in the future.
I rate the scalability an eight out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support team takes time to respond to queries.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have had experience with Hyper-V. We decided to switch to VMware vSAN due to its advantages in management, scalability, and overall performance compared to other solutions like Hyper-V.
How was the initial setup?
I rate the initial setup process an eight out of ten, as it is relatively straightforward. The deployment typically takes up to 30 minutes.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is relatively expensive compared to similar products.
What other advice do I have?
The product has simplified our storage management by reducing downtime during maintenance and allowing for seamless VM migration without disrupting ongoing work.
It was most beneficial during our migration phase when we transitioned from a third-party storage solution to VMware vSAN. The seamless process helped resolve the challenges we faced with the previous solution.
Integrating VMware vSAN into our existing vSphere environment has been smooth. It works seamlessly with our existing hardware platforms, such as those from HP and IBM, thereby increasing operational efficiency and reducing hardware costs.
I recommend it to others and rate it an eight.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free VMware vSAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: August 2025
Product Categories
HCIPopular Comparisons
VxRail
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI)
StarWind Virtual SAN
Dell PowerFlex
HPE SimpliVity
Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure
DataCore SANsymphony
HPE Alletra dHCI
StorMagic SvSAN
HPE Hyper Converged
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes
Scale Computing Platform
Azure Stack HCI
Huawei FusionCube Hyper-Converged Infrastructure
Lenovo ThinkAgile VX Series
Buyer's Guide
Download our free VMware vSAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- I am looking to compare Nutanix and VMware vSAN. Which one is better in terms of functionality and management?
- Nutanix and vSAN: Which is best for cloud services?
- What Is The Biggest Difference Between vSAN And VxRail?
- Do you think VMware’s HCI solution is a good alternative to AWS?
- What Is The Biggest Difference Between Nutanix And VMware vSAN?
- Which is your recommended HCI solution in 2022: Nutanix Acropolis AOS, VMware vSAN or anything else?
- What is the biggest difference between HPE SimpliVity and VMware vSAN?
- Which would you choose - Nutanix Acropolis AOS or VMware vSAN?
- Which solution performs better: Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure or VMware vSAN?
- How does HPE Simplivity compare with VMware vSAN?
What challenges did you have with Kubernetes and vSAN? Disclaimer: I work for the competition. Thanks!