Sophos UTM Reviews

Regarding the use cases, the solution was deployed for a production client, which was a hardware production company.

The features that I have found most valuable in Sophos UTM are its scalability and feasibility, as well as the quality of its customer service, followed by the ease of maintenance and configuration of the product itself.

Palo Alto has a different market because of their dashboard, overall looks, and other features. They are costly, but their services are quite good. And they offer a different platform compared to their competitors. Their device operates differently from others. While Palo Alto and Sophos have similar features, they operate on different platforms, providing a superior user experience compared to existing devices. In short, the UI and UX are the areas of improvement in Sophos UTM and similar solutions compared to Palo Alto.

I have experience with Sophos UTM for nearly two years. Recently, I deployed two Sophos solutions, one with HA and one on a primary device. The deployment process for one of the companies was done last month.

It is a stable product.

It is a scalable product. So it is easy to scale it up.

The solution's customer service is good. I rate the solution's technical support a nine out of ten.

The initial setup is quite easy because they have all the information on their website. Customer service is available anytime, especially when you set to start the device's configuration.

Since I was just a part of the initial configuration after deployment, I don't know the steps in the deployment process.

Both the technical and cost aspects are feasible since it is possible to obtain and use the device as a PnP solution. Considering cost and technical aspects, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Even if I compare Sophos UTM with other solutions, I don't think any pros or cons stick out since our clients are okay with the solution, and there has been no complaint regarding Sophos UTM.

My advice to others planning to use the solution is that it is quite easy. You can simply refer to the solution's blog or YouTube videos and install the solution. It's also quite easy to configure it. So, if you purchase it by yourself, you can configure it and use it on your particular network.

I love working with Palo Alto. So, I would like to give it a ten out of ten. Also, Palo Alto has a different market. So, I would always give a nine out of ten for other solutions. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for firewalls. 

The firewall in general is very good. It is comparable to other firewalls. 

Since any environment needs a firewall, it's been helpful in its ability to be highly granular in its configurations. 

Sophos is a security-focused company, which I like. I like that all Sophos products can essentially talk to each other. For example, if a computer has the Sophos antivirus, and it detects something, it actually talks to the Sophos firewall and says, "Hey, I think something is going wrong on this computer." Then, the firewall goes, "You know what? I'm going to shut it down for a while. I'm going to close off all incoming and outgoing connections from that unit until an IT admin comes in and tells me to release it."

It's very scalable.

The solution is stable. 

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. 

I don't really have any notes for improvements. I don't need additional features. 

I've been using the solution for three or more years. 

The solution's stability is excellent, and it is reliable. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution is very scalable and easily expands. 

I'm also familiar with Meraki. Sophos, however, has the ability to talk to other Sophos products. 

Meraki would be all isolated, meaning you have a different antivirus. It'll try to block and scan and do its thing, however, the firewall will always allow the connection to go through. Nothing is stopping it from isolating it. From a Sophos perspective, every single thing talks to each other, whether it's Sophos Central, Sophos email security, Sophos antivirus, or Sophos firewall.

They all talk to each other and look at how attackers come in because attackers don't just, poof, appear on a computer. There's a route it needs to take and different layers of protection it has to go through. If all of your layers, your roads, and everything is all Sophos, they all jive, and that's great.

The ease of setup is dependent on the level of technical expertise. If you are a qualified tech, all firewalls should be pretty simple to deploy, depending on the environment. It's simple enough to implement in general. 

We have witnessed a positive ROI while using the solution. 

Price-wise, you get the bang for your buck. You get a huge value set. Ask for HA, high availability, since a lot of Sophos resellers sell two firewalls, the second one being free. Then, you only pay for one license. If your first firewall fails, the license migrates to the second one.

We are using a variety of different versions of the solution right now. 

It's really, really cool to look into Sophos. I highly recommend it. From an infrastructure, stability, and security perspective in terms of configuring in a granular way, Sophos does it all. It's a really good product and something to look into. 

It's also a lot cheaper than Meraki. It does way more than Meraki. Dollar to dollar, Sophos will likely beat Meraki. For example, with Meraki, you're going to be paying two or three times more for nothing spectacular, nothing different. You just get a portal. It's okay. With Sophos, you do have to know what you're doing, however, any network admin should be able to figure it out. It's not like an ancient hieroglyphic language. It's quite straightforward.

I'd rate it nine out of ten. 

This is a next-generation firewall. I use it for mail security for clients. 

The mail security is very good. 

It's quite stable.

The solution can scale. 

The sanctions make it difficult for us in Iran to take full advantage of this product, like many others. 

It needs a better user interface. The one they have is not so good. 

I've used the solution for a while. 

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

It is very scalable. The solution is very easy to expand as needed. That's not a problem.

We have 500 or 600 clients on the solution. 

I do not use technical support. Having never dealt with them, I cannot speak to the level of service they provide. 

For sharing and mail security, the solution is very good. I'd recommend it to other users. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. If they offered a better user interface, I would rate them higher. 

I mainly use Sophos UTM to provide network security.

Sophos UTM's best feature is synchronized security.

Sophos UTM's internet security could be better.

I've been using Sophos UTM for three years.

I would rate Sophos UTM's stability eight out of ten.

Sophos UTM is easy to scale.

Sophos's technical support is very good and easy to connect to.

The initial setup was simple.

Sophos UTM is moderately priced, but it could be improved.

I evaluated Fortinet, but Sophos UTM is easier to manage and more efficiently priced.

I would rate Sophos UTM eight out of ten.

We use it as an internet firewall, and as our web application firewall.

I don't believe it has improved our organization; I don't actually like the product because of the features it is missing.

I would like this solution to support ICAP. Also, they no longer support on-premises management, and are forcing clients to use centralized management via the cloud, which I don't agree with.

We have been using this solution for seven years.

We don't find this to be fully stable; we have had to restart the firewall on a few occasions.

The customer support is not very good. They are quite slow, and there are delays in response to an issue being raised.

Negative

The initial setup was easy.

The implementation was carried out in-house, and the deployment took around eight hours to complete.

There was an up-front charge of around $70,000, to purchase the hub and license.  Beyond the initial cost, licenses are charged for annually, but they are good value for the service we receive.

I would only recommend this product to small businesses. I would rate this solution as a seven out of ten.

Sophos UTM gives good visibility and prevention against ransomware attacks because they focus on unknown threats, so it's successful in protecting customers.

Sophos UTM's best feature is SIM in the cloud, which combines the gateway solution and endpoint solution to send telemetry data to the cloud and provides full contact visibility regarding security.

Sophos UTM's firewall is a bit weak, and some of its features lack depth compared to other products like F5.

I've been using Sophos UTM for about eight years.

Sophos UTM is quite stable.

Sophos UTM is quite simple to scale.

Sophos' technical support is good.

The initial setup takes around seven to nine days.

I would rate our ROI from Sophos UTM as three to four out of five.

Sophos UTM's pricing is on the cheaper side.

I would advise starting with the basic firewall before adding other features. I would give Sophos UTM a rating of seven out of ten.

We use this product for network security and implement using a Sophos SD-RED device. 

The solution is easy to handle and configure. 

The product also offers remote deployment capability with a Sophos SD-RED device. 

The reporting could be a lot better and technical support could be improved.

We have been using this solution for two years.

The solution is stable. 

The solution is relatively scalable, we have over 500 users in our company and use three people for maintenance. 

In our experience it has been hard to get to customer support, even premium support doesn't offer much availability.  

The initial setup is quite simple. 

The price is comparable to other products of this kind. 

We considered implementing a SonicWall product, but went with Sophos UTM because it is easier to handle and configure.  

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten. 

We are satisfied with Sophos UTM and will continue implementing it for the foreseeable future. 

I mainly use UTM for app filters.

Sophos UTM's most valuable features are profiling and its simple configuration.

There's an issue that when we deploy UTM on fiber, it automatically upgrades to the latest version without giving an option to stay on the current one.

I've been working with Sophos UTM for over four years.

UTM is stable.

UTM is scalable.

Sophos' technical support is good.

The initial setup is simple.

I would rate Sophos UTM as seven out of ten.

Sophos UTM provides security for our network here and access through a VPN connection for our remote users. It also offers the flexibility to create different tools for accessibility.

I would like to see Sophos UTM add support for all the new threat-detection technologies and the ability to respond to novel security threats that come along every day.

I'm in the process of switching every UTM device in all branches to Sophos, so I need visibility into each branch to see the activity. I need alerts for any threat that enters the network. If there is unauthorized access or some specific action that can threaten my network, I want to be notified.

We've been using Sophos UTM for the last three years.

Sophos UTM is stable so far. 

I haven't had the need to scale up Sophos UTM so far, but I believe it's scalable.

We have excellent technical support. The company that supports us is highly experienced with Sophos.

We previously had Cyberoam. After Sophos acquired Cyberoam, we purchased new Sophos hardware devices.

Sophos UTM is priced in the middle range. Okay. It's a good value and a far better price than many competing solutions.

I rate Sophos UTM seven out of 10.

We use Sophos UTM for multi-site VPN, quarantine, sandboxing, and IPF. It blocks malware and other unauthorized apps. 

I've been using Sophos UTM for more than four years.

Sophos UTM is stable and ready for customization. 

Sophos UTM is scalable. We have around 100 users, including engineers, managers, and computer scientists. We plan to increase our usage in the future. 

Sophos customer support could use some improvement. 

We were using something else, but we switched to Sophos because it's politically neutral. 

Installing Sophos UTM is straightforward. The deployment itself doesn't take long, but you have to spend some time planning and waiting for the hardware to be delivered. 

Sophos UTM should be more open-source and reduce its license cost. 

I rate Sophos UTM 10 out of 10. If you're considering Sophos UTM, I would say go for it.