Slack Reviews

We are using Slack for web conferencing. It is primarily for external communication with one of our suppliers.

The most valuable feature is the screen sharing, which works well.

This solution is freely available to almost everyone.

The tracking, integration tool, and voice calls are all good.

The user interface is intuitive for me.

There should be better integration between Slack and Office 365.

It should be easier to work collaboratively on files.

I would like the text in chat to be more customizable.

I have been using Slack for a couple of months.

We have not experienced any problems with stability. We use it maybe once a week to contact one of our suppliers.

As a user, I have not had problems with scalability. I am part of a small group that makes use of slack but that doesn't mean that it isn't widely used in the company.

I have not been in contact with technical support.

We are using multiple web conferencing tools including Mircosoft Teams, Skype, and Slack.

I would say that the user interface in Slack is more intuitive than in Teams. One advantage to teams is that it is fully integrated into Office 365. I would say that collaborative working on files is better in teams. In our situation, the focus of Teams is internal, rather than with external partners.

Overall, this is a good product and I can recommend it. It's easy to use and so far, it has been reliable.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for basic communication such as chatting. 

Slack helps me to read bulk messages. 

The tool has stability issues that need to be improved. We are not native English speakers and Slack needs to integrate grammar checks. 

I have been working with the product for five to six years. 

I would rate the product's scalability an eight out of ten. My company has 5000 users on Slack. 

I haven't encountered any outages and hence never contacted the support. 

Slack's setup is simple. 

I would rate Slack a nine out of ten. 

The solution makes it easy to create groups, share documents, and communicate. 

Slack feels clustered and hence it should improve its design and UI. 

I have been working with the solution for six months. 

Slack is stable. 

I would rate the solution's scalability an eight out of ten. My company has 30 users for Slack and we plan to increase the usage in the future. 

Slack's setup is easy and takes only a few minutes to complete. 

I would rate the tool's pricing a four out of ten. 

I would rate Slack an eight out of ten. I recommend the solution since it covers all the basic needs. 

We use Slack for communication, file sharing, meetings, text messages, etc. Slack has been so helpful for us.

Slack has made communication much easier in our company. I can text someone in the company or send a message. I can also have an audio call with a couple of team members on the go without needing to start setting up calls on Zoom or Google Meet, or Microsoft Teams. I can have that voice or video call right away on Slack.

The huddle feature that allows you to get on a call with a colleague is one of the best features of Slack. You can call someone on the go with the huddle feature and save the time of having to set up Zoom calls or Google Meet.

Slack should add a feature to schedule meetings. Users should get notifications or prompts regarding the meeting time so they can attend that meeting.

Sometimes, when Slack is down, there is a delay in messages being delivered. Such delays also need to be improved in Slack.

I have been using Slack for the past five years.

I rate Slack a six out of ten for stability.

I rate Slack a seven out of ten for scalability.

Slack’s initial setup was not difficult.

I use the latest version of Slack. Slack is deployed on-cloud in our organization.

I highly recommend Slack for teams that want to communicate and collaborate. Slack can integrate with other apps like Google Calendar and Loom for voice and video recording. I recommend Slack for teams that want to scale and collaborate.

Overall, I rate Slack a seven out of ten.

We use the product in the office for communication. It's our main channel for any communication.

Slack provides very fast communication. The communication is sent directly to me, so I do not miss out on anything. The product provides various channels to communicate. A channel is like a team, where all communication regarding a team is sent. The product gives the flexibility of having many channels. Communication is isolated and sent to the right person at the right time. Slack has a voice messaging feature.

The product crashes when I use it on the desktop. The product must improve user experience. It would be quite interesting if Slack works with Microsoft Teams.

I have been using the solution for six years.

The product crashes sometimes. I've never understood what the problem is. It happens intermittently. I don't know what really makes it crash, but it happens once in a very long time.

The solution is scalable. We are a huge team. We’re about 40 people. All of us use it seamlessly. It achieves our objective as a small team.

In 2006, we used IP Messenger. It worked the same way but could be used only in the office. We didn't have any visibility of the communication outside the office. It did not have channels. It had many drawbacks, and Slack solved a lot of those problems.

The solution is quite easy to set up. Anyone can easily set up the product, whether senior employees, junior employees, or professionals.

I use Slack on my desktop. I have it on my phone too. All communications reach me as soon as they are sent, whether I’m in the office or outside. I don't look at the product for improvement. I appreciate what the product is doing. I'm not an administrator. I am a typical user. I joined the Slack channel because I was invited. I have access to Slack as a user, not as an administrator. I used IP Messenger as a software developer for a medium-sized organization in Kenya. We could share files. We could send text messages and all of it. We couldn’t use IP Messenger outside the office. It did not have channels. 

For people who need constant communication and don’t want to rely on emails, Slack is the right tool for them. We can work on the mobile phone to communicate on the go. As long as we have internet connectivity, it is secure. We can create as many channels as we like and collaborate. We can also do voice calls and send voice notes. Overall, I rate the product a seven out of ten.

We use the solution for communication within our internal teams and with external organizations.

The solution is intuitive, easy to use, and has many essential features. Also, the notifications features for its mobile version work the best. In addition, we can set it up as per our preferences, which is helpful and advanced.

The solution's capabilities to provide security features for corporations could be better. Along with it, the mobile version's calls and sharing video features could be faster.

We have been using the solution for more than four years.

The solution's stability for the mobile version could be better as it freezes sometimes. At the same time, it works fine for the desktop version.

The solution is scalable. We have 150 users in our organization.

It is a good collaboration tool. It makes communication within our organization easier. Our Administrators can also lock down the channels for exchanging messages and use them as an announcement tool.

I rate it an eight out of ten.

We use Slack for Team communication and also for channel alignment functionality. We also use the solution for monitoring. Meaning that we integrate it with other workloads that we have in the cloud, so that we can monitor. 

The most valuable feature is that we can easily integrate different workloads and the alerts are reliable. Also because it allows us to use it as a monitoring tool sometimes. 

The solution should have less frequent updates. 

I have experience with Slack. 

It is a stable solution. I rate the stability a ten out of ten. 

It is a scalable solution. A few thousand users are using the solution presently. 

I did not have the need to contact the technical support team. 

I would recommend this solution because it has reliability of all the functionalities, the channel functionality, the visibility of the channel. And as I mentioned before, the use cases that we have with  reliable alerts and monitoring of different workloads. So for me, the solution is very easy to use from that perspective. 

I rate the solution a ten out of ten. 

Slack is our main source of collaboration and we use it for all internal messages.

The way groups are created on slack could be improved. Once you create a group of people, you can't add additional people unless you convert it to a channel.

I have used Slack for one year. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. 

The initial setup is straightforward. 

Slack is a really easy collaboration tool to use and many companies are adopting this popular tool. 

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.