ReadyAPI Reviews

Our primary use case of this solution is to test services to have an understanding of what the request to the service should be and the response. We also use it for performance tests.

It has the ability to combine it with different CI/CD tools. You can see tests locally and then you can upload them through a type of digital environment and then they will be implemented, executed, built and deployed. That it is really convenient.

The performance in some cases needs improvement. Sometimes it requires too many resources.

It is stable. Even if crashes happen, it is very seldom. 

Scalability is actually another really useful and convenient function of this software. It has the ability to pass tests on different machines. You need to have a kind of server on a machine. Then you can instal clients from the other machines and then the application does tests on different machines. It's really convenient as well.

It's used on a daily basis. 

Their support can be a bit slow. 

The initial setup was quite easy, it wasn't a problem at all. It took around half an hour to set up. 

The main advantage is that it could be integrated into different CI/CD tools. That is something that is really valuable and helpful.

I would rate it an eight out of ten. 

In the next release, they should make the ability to extend different functions a bit easier. We extend some functionalities and it's possible to extend the functionalities because you have the ability to add many interesting pieces by yourself to that API but it's not so easy. It would really help if they improved that.

The primary use of this solution is to perform code testing. We can set up the environment, the representations, and the code coverage.

We have this solution deployed on a Windows station, on-premises.

With this solution, we have achieved a fifty-percent gain when it comes to writing test cases.

The most valuable feature of this solution is SoapUI Pro. It is very friendly to use with the API.

ReadyAPI is not just a web service launcher, but a tool that can analyze results, for example from a dashboard, for tests that take a long time. You can see if there is a degradation in the service of the management system.

You will not find the coverage provided by ReadyAPI in other tools.

The dashboards are very good and consolidate all of the tests that you are performing with the client.

This solution is focused on web services, but it should be expanded to a complete test manager. For example, in the test suite, you can include a UI test, but this is with another tool. It is not fully integrated.

ReadyAPI is not fully integrated with all system ecosystem tests. If ReadyAPI had more integration with all of the big tools on the market then this would be very useful.

For what we have been doing, this solution has been ninety percent stable.

We are deploying it on a heavy client, and it depends on the infrastructure of our users. We did not deploy it on a virtual desktop. While it is very stable, it is not one hundred percent in our configuration.

We have between twenty-five and thirty people who use this solution.

Technical support for this solution is very good.

The only problem is that we are in France, and the support is in the US, so there is a difference in time that we have to accommodate for. That said, while they are on-site, they are very reactive.

Most of the time, we have to wait one day for support.

The deployment of this solution was very quick and simple.

This is a cheap solution when you consider the money that will be saved in testing.

Third-parties have been developing integration with this solution. For example, JIRA has been integrated.

My advice for anybody who is considering this solution is to consider that they will save a lot of money, and there will be a reduction in errors from the use of external data or wrong parameters. The quality of their code will be better, so do not hesitate to buy this kind of solution.

 I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I am a test manager, and we have testers who are experts with these tools. We primarily use this solution for API testing and integration. We have an on-premises deployment.

The training for this solution is very good. The integration with Jenkins is good.

The interface is ok and they have the ability to re-load tests so that you can reuse them.

Overall, the process is simple.

I would like to see a better dashboard for monitoring in the next release of this solution.

The reporting needs to be improved.

Some versions of the software have had bugs, but in general, it is quite stable.

Scaling this solution is quite easy. I had some problems migrating to the cloud, with Java, but overall it is easy.

We have about twenty users for this solution, although it depends on the project. Some projects have fewer users.

We have not needed to contact technical support.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

I use ReadyAPI for API and data-driven testing. You can run your APIs through a loop.

ReadyAPI is a QA testing tool. We were able to catch many bugs because we could inject various scenarios running through our data-driven testing. This improves the quality of our products.

ReadyAPI could improve by having dynamic validation information.

I have been using ReadyAPI for approximately eight years.

ReadyAPI is stable.

The scalability of ReadyAPI is good. However, every one of the 20 QA team members uses it independently.

The support from ReadyAPI is very good.

I rate the support from ReadyAPI a four out of five.

Positive

The initial setup of ReadyAPI is straightforward.

The IT team members can install the solution themself.

We have received a return on investment using ReadyAPI.

Our IT team does the maintenance of the solution.

I would recommend others try out the solution to see if it fits their needs.

I rate ReadyAPI a nine out of ten.