ReadyAPI Reviews

ReadyAPI is predominantly used for functional testing of the APIs. Our company has a lot of micro strategy concepts, and we are building a lot of APIs. The focus is on more validations around the APIs for faster or quicker testing rather than the frontend. 

When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. 

We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing.

It doesn't have connectors to the NoSQL database. This is one of the things where they do not have a very solid strategy today. Other solutions have an in-built mechanism where I can directly and easily connect. An API is more around a user submitting a request on the frontend. It then hits the backend, puts the data, and responds back. If I am hitting MongoDB or NoSQL databases, I do not have ready-made inbuilt solutions in ReadyAPI that can easily help me in automating it faster. In our organization, we deal with NoSQL databases, and therefore, we need Groovy. We just cannot have a connector from ReadyAPI to do that. I have to write Groovy scripts. If you have themes that are predominantly using MongoDB, it leads to more maintenance and support activity because we are introducing more code into our commission.

In terms of additional features, it can have cloud support. This is one of the things where we are getting into cloud support. We'll see how it works, but it is one of the doubts that we still have.

I have been using this solution for almost four years now.

It's pretty good. I haven't seen any issue or ReadyAPI crash in the last four years.

It is scalable. For example, if I'm running a UI test case, it can take me a minimum of 1 or 2 minutes or 45 seconds to 2 to 3 hours, depending upon the complexity of the workflow. If I want to test the same in API and I have defined my framework and everything, I could do it in 30 seconds or 40 seconds.

Technical support is pretty helpful. They are pretty responsive. They come back to you to find out if you want some training on ReadyAPI. If you want to schedule, they will schedule one. They will also help your team to grow or scale up.

When I came in, we were only using SmartBear. Before that, maybe there were normal functional automation testing tools, where you can define your API frameworks and do API testing. With such tools, you write more code for defining the API framework, which already comes inbuilt with ReadyAPI.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. Its deployment is pretty simple as well. It doesn't take too long to deploy it.

The cost of a license is probably around $1,000 to $2,000. Accounting is done by my leadership. I am more into implementations and making sure all things and processes are taken care of and the frameworks are maintained and managed. 

I would say go for it. It is a really great tool. It is a game-changer because you can automate faster and quicker. It also doesn't take much time for any person to pick up the tool. It is pretty lightweight. Any person who has a little bit of technical background or 1% JavaScript knowledge can quickly use it and write code in Groovy.

I would rate ReadyAPI an eight out of ten.

We are service providers, so a customer will come to us and ask us to build a service. We'll build it, and then we'll use ReadyAPI to test the services before we publish it.

The solution got us more into automated testing, as far as web services go, so now we're able to mass-test.

The two most valuable features we use are the functional test and the security test.

I would say if anything needs to be improved, maybe it's some aspects of the user interface.

The solution is made up of multiple tools, and the one additional feature we'd like to have is load testing.

I've been using this solution for about six years now. 

I think the solution is pretty stable. I haven't had any crashing issues. It's actually been pretty solid lately. When we started using it, it wasn't very solid at all, but that was many years ago.

It is a scalable solution. There are currently about six users in our organization. 

I would rate the technical support as a five out of five. They're phenomenal. 

Positive

The complexity depends on your skill level. For somebody who doesn't know a whole lot about web services and how they're structured, it's kind of complex to set up.

The deployment was done in-house. I manage updates when the solution pushes them out; other than that, it's pretty easy. 

We definitely see an ROI with this solution. 

We use fixed licenses, and the last time I checked, I want to say it's around $680 per seat per year.

My advice is that based on the flexibility of the application, the ease of use, and the price, it's definitely worth it. There's no other product out there comparable to the price we found.

I would rate this solution as a ten out of ten. 

My use cases are mainly for the functional tests of APIs. I have the desktop installation, and I'm using the latest version.

Testing API with this tool is very effective. Testers can very quickly get productive with ReadyAPI.

The great thing about ReadyAPI is that it has a wide variety of functions. You can test any API that you come across. You are not limited to one type of API. It supports many API types.

It is very straightforward and easy to design the tests. Also, when we need it, we can extend it with scripting. So, it is easy to use for simple testing, and it is also capable enough for complex testing on large projects.

The licensing is sometimes a barrier for our customers. You need to have separate licenses for functional tests, load testing and virtual (mock) services.

The support could also be improved to handle requests more quickly.

I've been using SoapUI, a free version of this product, for 10 years. For one year, I have been using ReadyAPI as I have switched to the paid version.

It is very good. I can't remember any instability issues. It is usually very stable.

It is a desktop application, so technical scalability is not applicable. 

The product is very good, but the support could work more smoothly. Sometimes, the response time and the type of response are different from what I would expect.

Their knowledge base and documentation are very good and of high level.

Positive

I also work with other solutions, such as Postman. Postman's functionality for API testing isn't that comprehensive as in ReadyAPI. On the other hand, Postman is pretty strong in API design and API sharing (publishing).

For a company that uses REST APIs only, Postman could be a good option. Postman's focus is a bit different than ReadyAPI's. ReadyAPI is a testing and API virtualization tool, whereas Postman is also suitable for API design and marketing because you can easily share your API with others. However, it can be used for testing as well. So, there is a testing overlap with ReadyAPI, but in that area, ReadyAPI is much stronger. 

On the other hand, Postman has very friendly and affordable licensing.

It is straightforward. We can set up the application and start testing straight away. It takes about 15 minutes to deploy the desktop application.

It does not need any other maintenance. It just needs upgrades, and the upgrades are automatic.

Each user needs to be licensed, and the product has different licenses. It starts at 750 euros for a single user per year. 

This basic cost is for functional testing only, and then there are additional licenses for load testing and virtual services. You are limited if you want to use these areas with the functional test license. If you have all three licenses, then you have complete functionality of ReadyAPI.

Insomnia, Postman.

It is good to explore the ReadyAPI functionality first and compare the benefits with its price. 

ReadyAPI can become a great tool for your organization for the long run and different types of APIs. 

You should consider the API styles you have, such as SOAP, REST, or GraphQL, and check out how it is supported in ReadyAPI and how much benefit ReadyAPI will bring to you.

We mainly use this solution for testing APIs, and we also use it for load testing. SmartBear has a free version as well, which is called SoapAPI, but it does not include all of the features we wanted, so we got the paid version. The pro version has many benefits, including the load testing and more features for the API testing as well. Since we are mainly focused on backend testing, we thought it would be useful for us to have this license.

We had been using Postman, but Postman only has a couple of solutions to automate the API tests, and with ReadyAPI we can do both the API testing and the load testing. I haven't seen any other tool that offers both types of tests in a single tool. This is very helpful for us, and it's one of the main reasons why we chose this service.

We have an older version of ReadyAPI and it's not supporting our whole tests, so we have had to migrate some or we've had difficulties running them because they're very old script. Better compatibility or more support for the older versions would be helpful. 

Also, I've been seeing the same UI for many years, since I was using the free version, and the paid version looks the same. I think the UI could be a little bit better.

I have had experience with this solution for about five years.

The solution is stable almost all of the time. I'm not exactly sure if any other users are getting hang or not, but I have never faced an issue with hanging.

The scalability of the solution is good. I think about 150 testers in our organization use ReadyAPI. About 250 to 300 of our developers use the free version, SoapUI, to do basic API testing.

I think the support is good, but it's not immediate because we have many layers. If I have a question, I take it to a person in my organization, and then they contact tech support. It doesn't take too long, maybe one or two days, but I usually go to the SmartBear community online and look for an answer there. 

I used Postman to test the APIs, but with Postman it's just the basic testing, like unit testing. To do an intensive level of regression testing or load testing, Postman doesn't help much. It is still good to use for the manual part, but for automation, I feel like ReadyAPI is better.

This tool is very easy to set up and install because you can download ReadyAPI and you just need the product key. It was done in a matter of minutes.

We have an employee who deals directly with the access keys and maintenance. I think I have been on this specific project for about a year and a half, and I have only seen a maintenance window two times, and they typically don't last long or they do it in the off-times so they don't really affect my work.

I would say they should know exactly what they're looking for because if they're looking for API testing, this is a perfect tool. If they want to automate the process, then go ahead and use ReadyAPI. It is the best tool that I have ever seen for API testing. However, if you're just using it for manual API testing, I would say get the trial version or use Postman. We also use JMeter for performance or load testing, but ReadyAPI gives both API and load testing. If you want to do both, this is a good tool.

I would rate this solution as a seven out of ten because we haven't integrated it yet with any deployment tools, so I don't know how difficult that process will be. 

Our primary use case for this solution is for testing APIs, which is very basic. Additionally, we use it for tier-driven automation. For example, if we want a file-based operation for test automation, we can use ReadyAPI as a Groovy scripting tool. So we have some external jars and use Groovy code to invoke mainframe environments, retrieve the data from the mainframe environments into our file, and read the file data. We deploy this solution on the customer's device.

We have found the flexibility of ReadyAPI very valuable. For example, messaging queue frameworks like JMS are required when playing with the APIs because we usually work on data migration projects. It gives us leverage to use utility and things we cannot do with other tools. Additionally, it provides DB connectivity and a good coding standard, but it's not a typical coding base. So understanding coding is necessary, and you must also know the tool's capabilities. Hence, it is a blend of both being a professional, tool-based, and language-driven person.

Additionally, no UI is involved when designing a solution for a customer. So we can do the automation using ReadyAPI, DV, file creation or file deletion. Every operation can be done because it provides Groovy's coding platform, which is nothing like Java. If you have a working Java code, remove the class and other steps, like the primary method, and you can easily create the Groovy code, which is the same code written in Java. Then, the pending status can be updated and available. This allows for easy integration with various databases, even MongoDB and code databases can easily be integrated. With the test management tools and JIRA, it is effortless to integrate. Additionally, it is open and easily configurable with the database tools. Hence, it's one of my first choices whenever we do API testing.

The product could be improved by including an inherent feature for UI automation. This will allow us to require mobile UI automation testing.

We have been using this solution for five years and are currently using version 3.40.

The solution is stable. Initially, there was a huge problem, but currently, we're only facing a challenge with integrating test cases with databases because it hangs for a minute.

The solution is scalable. Approximately 50 people use this solution in our company.

We have had a good experience with customer service and support. I rate them an eight out of ten.

The initial setup is straightforward. You only need a license file from the customer, then download EXE and install the ReadyAPI. If the software support center is not providing us with the EXE., we usually download it from the internet. The customers provide a paid license file, or a license variety, in the model they are configuring. The setup takes approximately five to ten minutes.

We have seen a return on investment because our organization is large and we can easily afford it.

The licensing fee is charged annually, and we currently charge 10,000 Swedish Krona per user.

We chose this solution because it is a good test case. In addition, it allows us to speed up manual processes through automation.

I rate this solution an eight out of ten. I recommend this solution to new users because it is the best solution you can get across the globe for API, test automation, and API penetration testing. My primary advice to new users will be to understand the risks and the fundamentals of API testing.

I'm using the solution for API testing. My developer developed their APIs in Postman, so ReadyAPI has this integration factor, and from there, I exported my APIs and imported them into ReadyAPI. Every API I convert into a functional test. 

The conversion of the testing and the conversion of those APIs into a functional test is a great aspect of the solution. 

It's priced well. When I compared it with the Tosca, Eggplant, or other tools that offer API testing open source, this came out on top. 

This is a scriptless, codeless tool. 

It's easy to implement.

This is a stable product.

In general, they just need to be better. They have performance testing also. However, it's not that great. It's costly when it comes to a small company, and the features are not that smooth. While the application testing is fine, the API performance testing needs work.

Maintaining your scripts does take work. 

I've been using the solution for one year.

It's stable and reliable. We haven't had issues with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is pretty good. 

Right now, I'm the only person using the solution. I'm not sure how scalable it is.

I purchased the license from a vendor based in India, and when I have any issues, I reach out to them directly. I create an incident ticket, and they help resolve the issue. Usually, it takes two or three working days to sort a problem out. It's a bit delayed. However, it's not bad.

Neutral

The solution is simple to implement and very straightforward. 

You have a license manager that you have to install in your license server or machine, and then you just have to install the instance of ReadyAPI.

The pricing was well within our budget. It's reasonable and not too expensive. 

We pay $3,000 annually for a floating license. actually. That allows another person from my company to use it as well. It's a cloud-based license. 

I'm an end-user.

I'd advise new users that this is not a free tool. If you don't have a budget, you can go try Postman. However, if you have $4,000 or $5,000 a year, ReadyAPI is one of the best tools to use. It is easy to learn, and it is easy to work with. The features are very good.

In general, I would recommend this tool to others. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We were using ReadyAPI for performance testing and creating mocks but there were some issues in terms of scaling, so we are no longer using this solution.

The most valuable feature of ReadyAPI is that it is user-friendly.

We stopped using this solution because of issues with scalability. Performance and memory management both need to be improved because other solutions use less memory for the same amount of data.

I think that there was an open-source version, with a lower cost, then this would be a recipe to get into bigger markets.

I used ReadyAPI for about one year.

I think that this is a stable product.

ReadyAPI is not as scalable as other solutions, such as Karate. More resources, especially in terms of memory, are required for the same amount of data.

The scale does not only refer to the number of users. It concerns the applications and how often they make calls to different servers or mocks. 

The initial setup was pretty straightforward.

The implementation was done by my team.

It took about a week to deploy because it involved more than just an installation. There was connectivity to configure and it had to be integrated with existing testing frameworks.

We migrated back to Karate about six months ago. It is more scalable and has more plugin features. There is also the point of cost because ReadyAPI requires licensing and Karate is open-source.

I would recommend this solution to people who need official support. For companies who have experts in open-source technology, they can avoid using ReadyAPI. I think that it would come down to the specific client, or project.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We are it using it with the license on individual machines.

We have a bulk of APIs for our different products. Previously, we used to do  Postman, and for automation, we used to do C-Sharp code. However, we came to ReadyAPI as it is a tool that can give some exposure to the person who does not have much core coding or programming knowledge. 

We like the basic features. We can add additional features. It is a hybrid kind of tool. Over here, can add our own code, and we can write the assertion with the script. As a programmer, it is a good tool. We can utilize it dynamically if you have programming skills.

It's great for those that don't have as much exposure to programming. 

Currently, we are hosting. We have repositories under the Git site, and we are checking our code there. We are executing it with the AWS cloud. The integration with GitHub is not there. They have given us some options. However, it is not workable. We have to check in or pull our code with Visual Studio right now. We have to use Visual Studio to manage that integration, actually.

The UI should be flexible. Currently, the UI isn't. If you want to minimize/maximize it and if you want to use it on a hub screen, you can't use it. It is not that user-friendly. 

Cloud integration should be there as modern work is in the cloud.

We've been using the solution for the last two years. 

It is a great tool and has great exposure for future API automation. The only thing that is missing is the integration with the different cloud services so that we can manage that project in the cloud and check in and check out the code. Currently, that core functionality is missing. 

It is a scalable solution. However, it is not so flexible. If multiple team members are working together, they have to frequently pull and push the code to sync with the single team and take the latest code, which other team members develop. For better functionality, we have to go every time to Visual Studio.

Multiple teams are using the solution right now. On my team, we have seven to eight people using it. I'm unaware of how many people are using it from the client side. Users are a mix of automation testers and manual functional testers. 

I do not personally contact technical support. Another team member handled that aspect. We used to communicate with SmartBear, and if there were any critical issues, we would reach out. However, I don't handle that aspect. From what I understand, support is helpful. 

Previously, we used to code the API automation in C-Sharp. That could be handled by the core programming person. I'm a core programming guy, so I can manage that code and write the new scripts for the automation. However, we found that we could utilize this tool so that a person with basic knowledge and not core programming knowledge could also contribute to this tool with the API automation. That is the basic module.

This tool is giving exposure to resources with little programming knowledge. They can also start contributing to this, and certainly, they can learn the programming part of that tool as well. However, in terms of the UI part, through the UI, we can automate the API. It depends on our logic, and how we want to utilize the different assertions and different checks. If you have programming knowledge, you can also use that tool with the programming part. The idea, however, was to make it more useable for everybody.

The initial setup of ReadyAPI was considered to be easy. It's quite straightforward. We have to download the .EXE and install it and register with the license. That's it. 

It will take not more than five minutes if you follow the instructions.

I'm not sure of the exact cost. 

We are a customer and end-user. 

If you are going to use this product, you should have a basic knowledge of APIs and how APIs work. This is an API automation tool specific to automating the APIs. If you have previous exposure to an open-source tool, like Postman, then you can easily get started with this tool. However, you must go through basic training if you don't know APIs and never work on APIs.

I'd rate it six out of ten. It gives us core value, however, the UI isn't great.