Microsoft Power Apps Reviews

I had to upload a form, an invoice, specifically, and then using an Azure function, I had to get that form from the Dataverse database and feed it to an Azure form recognizer and write the data back to the Azure Power App.

I like that you can quickly click together a user interface. For all no-code platforms that let you create a front end, you can click together something very quick. 

My problem with solutions like Power Apps and Betty Block blocks and probably with every no-code platform out there is that, as soon as you want to do something custom, something that's not provided by the environment you're using, it gets really tough. You have to work around the constraints of the platform. No-code platforms have constraints. I'm a developer myself, so I tend to not use no-code. I tend to code a lot. 

The notion people have is that no code equals no knowledge, and that's simply not true. Even though you don't have to write codes, you still have to know what you're doing.

I had some trouble interfacing with the Dataverse database. If I could, I'd make the couplings with other software easier. The integration with other software could be better. Any developer who had to work with an application made in Power Apps would find that useful.

There are limited use cases. 

I've used the solution within the last 12 months. 

The solution is a lot more stable than Betty Blocks. I haven't had any crashes or lost data or anything. That said,  haven't used it thoroughly. While I say it's pretty stable, I can't say how it performs under heavy use or big projects.

I've never had to reach out to technical support in the past. 

I've also used Betty Blocks. With Power Apps, you can quickly click together a user interface, that's also the case with Betty Blocks. However, both being no-code have constraints. For example, Betty Blocks was using jQuery one, and at the time we had jQuery three. I wanted to use a front-end framework. That was just not possible since it would mess up the Betty Blocks designer. And that's also the case with Microsoft Power Apps.

The ease or difficulty of the initial setup varies. For me, it wasn't that hard. However, I already had an Azure subscription and a Microsoft account. If you don't have any of that, it's not that easy - especially if you're not very technically inclined. It can be a daunting task.

I'd rate the ease of setup six out of ten. 

The deployment is fast and takes almost no time at all. I developed the application, and I pushed the publish button, and it was published.

I handled the initial setup myself. I did not need outside assistance. 

The license for the solution comes with my professional license, so I'm not sure actually if you pay by the user. For me, it was free to develop with a professional license, which is about 70 euros a month. That said, if you get a lot of users using it, it's not included. I don't know how much that would cost.

Whether it is worth the cost or not depends on the use case. 

We initially chose the solution as it was a customer specification. They wanted to use a Microsoft Power App.

I'm an end-user. 

I have been using the latest version of the solution. However, I don't even know if you can switch between versions.

If you want a complex system with lots of custom work done, then it is not ideal, as you are going to have to face the limitations of the platform. If what you want is a simple tool where you just need to upload some files, or you need to store some data to make a custom CRM application, then it's very easy to use.

It's certainly not a replacement for actual development work, and it's not a replacement for developers.

I would recommend the solution to others. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. In terms of no-code, it's pretty good, especially when you use it with a Logic App, which is part of the Power platform. When I compare it to Orbis or Betty Blocks, it's just a really good product. It has a small learning curve, however, it should be really easy for people who have no previous experience.

We use this solution to provide a cloud-based platform for our clients to develop, connect, and store data from across the full Microsoft suite.

We particularly like the workflow connectors in the forms, for information introduction purposes.

Our customers appreciate the fact that the licensing for this solution is also connected with Office 365, making it a it's less expensive overall system.

It is also very user-friendly in terms of learning curves; it can be picked up very quickly by new users and provides good interoperability between Teams, Outlook, and other solutions from Office.

We would like to see some improvement in the cost of the solution when an organization has a more complex network structure. The advanced connectors are very expensive, which discourages our customers from implementing it.

We would also like to see a more robust library of uses for different system roles to be built into this solution, such as for authorizations.

We have been working with this solution for nearly three years.

The stability of this solution is okay, and really depends on the clients architecture and infrastructure.

When the solution is properly designed at the implementation stage, the scalability is incredible, and the only limiting factor is the cost involved with scaling.

The initial setup for this solution is very easy.

We would recommend this solution to organizations of all sizes. However, the level of investment needed may mean that it is better suited to medium to large organizations.

We would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Power Apps is a tool to create forms and solutions for collecting information from the floor. We have 10 or 15 users at the moment, but we expect to add more.

Power Apps helps our company manage projects, like improvement projects, for example. We can track each project and have a single point from which we can see all the project details.

You can easily connect Power Apps with other databases, like Excel, SharePoint, SQL, etc.

We use GoCanvas to make forms. It's easier to make forms in GoCanvas, but Power Apps is cheaper because it is bundled with our Office 365 license. if I want to create a form in Power Apps, I need some knowledge, but GoCanvas is intuitive.

I've been using Power Apps for one or two years.

I rate Power Apps nine out of 10 for stability.

It should be easy to scale up Power Apps. I don't know because I was only working with one connection through SharePoint.

I taught myself to use Power Apps. When I needed a solution, I found a lot of examples on the web.

Setting up Power Apps is easy because it's a cloud solution. The deployment required one or two people and took one or two months. 

We deployed Power Apps in-house.

We get a return.

I rate Power Apps seven out of 10 for affordability.

I rate Power Apps eight out of 10. My advice to new users is to start a simple solution to get more user-friendly apps to the people.

Right now, our primary use case is very easy to explain. I push applications for applications and supply applications on mobiles because a lot of my customers need to have to access certain data from an iPad or iPhone.

Microsoft PowerApps has made our organization faster and more secure. 

What I find the most valuable is the simplicity to create PowerApps and link them to a list and then bring the list from SharePoint, and sharing the data in SharePoint with other people who do not need to have access to a mobile. 

Creating a PowerApp is very easy. All I do is link and share the result with my colleagues. Deployment is very fast. It takes about a month or so. 

I would like to have more options for changing the layout because customizing something as simple as colors is very hard. The environment is low-code/no-code, so changing something small is hard because you need to find tips for doing that online. It takes quite a few clicks to find a solution sometimes. 

Greater customization overall would be good. 

I would like for them to make it easier to link to a list. It would be great to see not only empty boxes but also those with the first data of your actual list when you create pages. 

More widgets would be better as well. 

The end-user experience would benefit from being more fun. 

I started using Microsoft PowerApps six months ago. 

I have not had any real problems with performance. Any stability issues with PowerApps come from network quality and are not related to the solution's performance. 

Right now, I can't say much about the solution's scalability. At the moment, we are using it for a few users, but I think we plan on increasing our scope in about two years. This would be about 1,700 people in France on the Continental retail side. 

I mostly use the Microsoft website for issues I run into so I have not had any interaction with the PowerApps support team. We also have a very strong IT team within our organization. 

Overall, I give Microsoft PowerApps an eight out of ten. 

Before going with Microsoft PowerApps, we evaluated Mendix and WINDEV. But these are not Microsoft products and we have a big contract with Microsoft. 

I do not have any advice for future users because the solution is holding up well for me. 

We use Microsoft PowerApps for internal business solutions that eliminate the need for Excel workbooks.

To keep track of which accounts our project managers were working on so that we could charge time back to those other lines of business.

The UI functionality is the most valuable aspect of this solution.

If the price was reduced and the quality of the user interfaces was improved it would be beneficial.

I have been using Microsoft PowerApps since 2019.

Microsoft PowerApps is a stable solution.

The scalability of Microsoft PowerApps is limited.

We have a few thousand users in our organization. They are completely different. Most are individual contributor roles, but who uses what for what varies greatly.

It is being used extensively, and I'm sure there are plans to expand its use even further.

I would rate technical support a five out of five.

I also have experience with OutSystems.

I would rate OutSystems a five out of five, and I would highly recommend them.

The initial setup was straightforward. I would rate it a five out of five.

Deployment took about a month once it was at my level and I fully understood it.

My implementation strategy was to meet with various business owners to identify a solution for them, then build and deploy that solution for them.

I did not work with a third-party integrator, consultant, or reseller. I completed the deployment by myself.

I had some help from YouTube and Google.

I'm not familiar with the maintenance aspect. I know there is a reference center and a few others from our IT department. I would guess that there is a team of a  few hundred people to maintain this solution.

There has been a return on investments. I would rate the ROI a five out of five.

Whatever the cost of licensing is, it is in the millions.

I would rate the licensing costs a one out of five.

My recommendation is to first investigate OutSystems.

I would rate Microsoft PowerApps a seven out of ten.

Microsoft Power Automate is primarily used to update some legacy systems for our client, as well as government compliance systems and web-based reporting systems that don't have APIs. Microsoft PowerApps has the same use case. It's the front end and is the part that is interacting with the client and interacting with the collected data.

We really like Microsoft PowerApps. When compared with Microsoft Power Automate, it is a bit more mature, and we're able to build things pretty rapidly.

It's a different paradigm to build around, and it's a different programming paradigm. It's more like Excel in that you build formulas and pieces, but we've been able to build some fairly sophisticated business logic inside of it. As a result, we believe that is much more mature. I'd say that's around an eight, eight and a half, out of ten.

I believe, Microsoft PowerApps is still in its early stages. I believe it is far more mature and integrated. I would say the programming language, because the drag and drop, low code, no code, its nice to get started, but you really want to be able to work as a programmer with an IDE and real code, and we've been able to start to do that a little bit and integrate a lot of JavaScript with RPA, with Power Apps I haven't been able to do that. I believe there is a way to do it by putting the data into Git. I just haven't used it yet, and haven't needed to.

As it's a cloud-based app, the development environment has some really nice parts and some that are a little clunky, but overall, I'd say it's a good product.

We have been using Microsoft PowerApps a bit longer than we have been using Microsoft Power Automate.

We haven't fully launched a product yet, but I will say that development is quick and we can make changes quickly. I can't speak to the app's scalability just yet.

I've only used it through an RPA. We either did it for many years, or we did it by hand with JavaScript. We would use some tools to actually grab for web-based things, not desktop-based. We wrote tools that would allow us to take control of the website and then modify it on the fly while automating these processes.

We did it all with secure JavaScript, which is a lot of work and custom code, and it's difficult to maintain, so having a tool like an RPA tool, where we can take that business logic, put it in there, and then somebody who knows the stuff can come around after us and go, okay, I see what they did there, would be great.

We believe we have exploited the tool and pushed it to its limits, and we are still learning about its strengths and weaknesses. It definitely has room for improvement, but when I give it a seven, I mean it's functional. I can get the job done, but it's far from ideal.

When I say Java, what I mean is that when we were doing automation, we were primarily working on web automation. My phone is dying, so that's why I cut off.

We would write a lot of JavaScript code to automate, automate, and update these external websites that didn't have APIs, that we would read from. We are now reading from spreadsheets and updating data for them, then retrieving data from the results, and this simplified things significantly.

We wanted to see what people were doing with UiPath. I'm not really using it yet. I've looked into it a little bit, but it just hasn't been a driver for this project yet.

I am just using the product. I evaluated a problem and a solution set for a client, and I just evaluated these tools and said, despite their youth, these tools look like they are good. We looked at UiPath, but the price tag was expensive for a nonprofit, so money was an issue. We had a very limited budget from a grant, so we had to work with a toolset that wasn't on par with the Fortune 500. So far, we're pleased with the solution, and it's working. There are days when it is frustrating, but I've been doing this for 40 years and there are always challenges with tools. We do not have a relationship with Microsoft.

I would rate Microsoft PowerApps an eight out of ten.

Our use case for the product revolves around financial applications, including account services, a service portal, asset transfers, and additions for the organization. It involves multi-level approval processes for stakeholder identification and managing entries in the DLP lecture.

The platform's most valuable feature includes the gallery for displaying data for managing approval flows, which is useful for our multi-level approval processes. Additionally, the 360 payments feature is valuable for its default hierarchical approach.

One area for improvement in the platform is enhancing the user experience, especially for less tech-savvy users, by simplifying complex features and controls. Additionally, adding more functional options and features could further improve its usability.

I have been working with Microsoft Power Apps for the past six months.

The platform has been a stable product for us. Despite occasional updates and transitions, it has consistently met our needs and requirements.

I would rate the scalability of the product as seven. While it generally scales well, occasional issues arise.

The response time of the support services has been satisfactory for our business requirements.

Positive

Compared with competitors like PegaDM, the platform, and Power Automate offer a more versatile platform that is particularly suitable for workflow applications like ours.

The platform's pricing is reasonable compared to competitors like Apigee. It offers good value for the quality of the product.

Data integration with the platform has been relatively easy for us. We have integrated data from external systems without facing any significant challenges.

I rate the platform as an eight overall. It meets our requirements well and has proven to be a valuable tool for our organization.

Power Automate is like process automation.

Any task which you do on a recurring basis or a daily basis, you can simply automate. For example, if you have a use case where every day when you go home you need to book a cab. What I can do is I can automate that task through Power Apps at a scheduled time every day. If I'm leaving at about four o'clock in the evening, by 3:30 I can run that Power task and book a cab every day.

With Microsoft, the main benefit that we get is it's easy for a layman to understand it. That's the advantage of it, it's user-friendly. 

The way it integrates with the other applications is very good. The experience is seamless; there are no hurdles. Connectors are easily available, which can help you connect with some third-party apps if required. 

The initial setup is easy.

It is stable and reliable. 

We can scale it. 

They probably need to improve intelligent document processing. In terms of reading the documents, whether it's a Word document, an Excel, a PDF, an HTML, or a webpage. Identifying the key things with its own intelligence is something that Power Automate and Power Apps need to improve.

I've used the solution for close to a year now.

It is quite stable.  It gives you that assurance since it is from Microsoft. The stability, the reliability is definitely there.

It is scalable. We have a lot of ground for it to scale it up, and add more and more apps or users can be added as per our business requirements.

It's being used widely by many people, in fact. However, it's hard to pinpoint the exact number of people who benefit from it. Anyone can quickly learn how to use it as well. 

I'm aware of UiPath and Automation Anywhere which take a longer time to implement. 

It's very easy to set up. You should have all the licenses available. It's quick and easy to implement, and you can get your hands on it immediately. It doesn't take too much time to get up and running. In contrast, its contemporaries like UiPath and Automation Anywhere are not so quick and easy to implement.

The cost depends on which bundle you get from Microsoft. For example, if you go with the standard Office 365 with the other packages around it, it's good enough. However, if you go for anything specific, you'll have to think about it and customize your requirements. If you go for 365, your cost would be less. If you go for Dynamics 365 with Azure, then it's a complete package that will be expensive.

We are Microsoft partners. 

My advice for those people in tersted int eh product would be to try it if they are looking at implementing something very quickly with minimum cost and minimal training. If these are their objectives, then Microsoft Power Platform is a very viable solution.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.