Microsoft Power Apps Reviews

Right now, our primary use case is very easy to explain. I push applications for applications and supply applications on mobiles because a lot of my customers need to have to access certain data from an iPad or iPhone.

Microsoft PowerApps has made our organization faster and more secure. 

What I find the most valuable is the simplicity to create PowerApps and link them to a list and then bring the list from SharePoint, and sharing the data in SharePoint with other people who do not need to have access to a mobile. 

Creating a PowerApp is very easy. All I do is link and share the result with my colleagues. Deployment is very fast. It takes about a month or so. 

I would like to have more options for changing the layout because customizing something as simple as colors is very hard. The environment is low-code/no-code, so changing something small is hard because you need to find tips for doing that online. It takes quite a few clicks to find a solution sometimes. 

Greater customization overall would be good. 

I would like for them to make it easier to link to a list. It would be great to see not only empty boxes but also those with the first data of your actual list when you create pages. 

More widgets would be better as well. 

The end-user experience would benefit from being more fun. 

I started using Microsoft PowerApps six months ago. 

I have not had any real problems with performance. Any stability issues with PowerApps come from network quality and are not related to the solution's performance. 

Right now, I can't say much about the solution's scalability. At the moment, we are using it for a few users, but I think we plan on increasing our scope in about two years. This would be about 1,700 people in France on the Continental retail side. 

I mostly use the Microsoft website for issues I run into so I have not had any interaction with the PowerApps support team. We also have a very strong IT team within our organization. 

Overall, I give Microsoft PowerApps an eight out of ten. 

Before going with Microsoft PowerApps, we evaluated Mendix and WINDEV. But these are not Microsoft products and we have a big contract with Microsoft. 

I do not have any advice for future users because the solution is holding up well for me. 

We had a new requirement from a business in the clinical domain and the business wanted to identify risk at a study or site level. We created an application using PowerApps, which works well as we usually interact with the SQL Server on Azure.

I did some POC for another application. We’re expecting we'll get it in a new project in the near future. It is a really good tool. We can run programming knowledge, we can learn the PowerApps and we can interact with applications.

It is user-friendly. Anyone can easily learn and work on this tool.

The solution is easy to implement.

It’s a stable product.

Not much coding is required.

I don’t have much hands-on experience with PowerApps. I’d need more time with it. As of now, I can’t think of an area for improvement.

We did a POC with the solution. We’ve used it for the last 12 months.

It’s very stable. It’s reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn’t crash or freeze.

I cannot speak to how scalable it would be. However, it may work best with a lesser amount of data.

We might have about 100 people on the solution.

I don’t have any experience using any other tool.

It’s straightforward to set up the solution. It’s not overly difficult or complex.

We did the integration ourselves. We didn’t need the help of any consultants or integrators.

I don’t have any details in relation to the pricing or licensing.

The tool was suggested to us, and we decided to try it. We did not evaluate other options.

I’m not sure of the exact version number. However, we are using the latest version.

I’d recommend the solution to others.

I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. There may be other tools that are easier to work with. However, I’m not sure. In general, it works well, and we have been happy with it.

We use Microsoft PowerApps for internal business solutions that eliminate the need for Excel workbooks.

To keep track of which accounts our project managers were working on so that we could charge time back to those other lines of business.

The UI functionality is the most valuable aspect of this solution.

If the price was reduced and the quality of the user interfaces was improved it would be beneficial.

I have been using Microsoft PowerApps since 2019.

Microsoft PowerApps is a stable solution.

The scalability of Microsoft PowerApps is limited.

We have a few thousand users in our organization. They are completely different. Most are individual contributor roles, but who uses what for what varies greatly.

It is being used extensively, and I'm sure there are plans to expand its use even further.

I would rate technical support a five out of five.

I also have experience with OutSystems.

I would rate OutSystems a five out of five, and I would highly recommend them.

The initial setup was straightforward. I would rate it a five out of five.

Deployment took about a month once it was at my level and I fully understood it.

My implementation strategy was to meet with various business owners to identify a solution for them, then build and deploy that solution for them.

I did not work with a third-party integrator, consultant, or reseller. I completed the deployment by myself.

I had some help from YouTube and Google.

I'm not familiar with the maintenance aspect. I know there is a reference center and a few others from our IT department. I would guess that there is a team of a  few hundred people to maintain this solution.

There has been a return on investments. I would rate the ROI a five out of five.

Whatever the cost of licensing is, it is in the millions.

I would rate the licensing costs a one out of five.

My recommendation is to first investigate OutSystems.

I would rate Microsoft PowerApps a seven out of ten.

I use it for internal purposes and also to advise our customers. 

Everything that includes PowerApps is very interesting, especially the late editions in direction and mixed reality.  

The way you create applications and the nature of language processing are great. The ideas feature that has been added lately has been wonderful. All these types of additions are really cool.

It's a stable product. 

It uses a lot of AI, which is helpful, especially during the setup process.

The pricing is reasonable.

Technical support is good. 

I'm looking forward to further improvements of what you can do with mixed reality capabilities.

I would like to see more improvement, for example, in direct collaboration. There is something currently, however, it's still on a preview mode. I'd like to see more. 

What I'd also like to see is to be able to use, for example, another tool for sketching mock-ups or the design of the applications and being able to transport the sketches directly into, let's say, a PowerApps container so I can design the app somewhere else, and then I can transport everything in PowerApps designer, and I can get started with inserting logic in the mock-ups that I have already designed somewhere else. This is something that I'd really like to see in PowerApps.

The experience could be a bit better improved and be consistent throughout all parts that form components. For example, the same experience we have in PowerApps is something that should also be in other PowerApps platform products.

In general, the environments in the workspaces are a bit faster than in the cloud.

I've been sung the solution for two to three years. 

It's a stable product.

We have 200 to 300 people using the solution currently.

Technical support depends on what channels you communicate through, however, largely, we are satisfied.

Positive

This is the first general code solution I'm using.

The initial setup is AI-infused. If you start working on an application, AI works for you in the background and tries to provision everything you need. I would like it to be a bit faster. Sometimes the designer just breaks and you get an error notification. 

I've seen ROI and I would rate ROI at three and a half out of five, however, I would like for Microsoft to think of ways where we as partners are better supported to have a higher return on investment.

The cost is fair, based on everything you get. I'd rate it at a four out of five as I see that the customers raise constraints. They sort of say it's a bit expensive. I don't know how expensive the other platforms are, however, from what I heard, it's a fair price for PowerApps considering what it comes with.

We did not evaluate other options. We are a Microsoft gold partner and for us, the journey was set as we were using Dynamics 365 CRM systems, which basically had PowerApps. It was pretty clear from the outset that we were going in the direction of PowerApps.

I'm a team lead for the PowerApps platform in general and PowerApps is the product of the platform. I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. 

I'd advise others to start with a short hands-on evaluation so that you understand what it looks like when you create on the platform. That will give you a feeling about the components. You get a feeling about what the platform offers and can build slowly up from there. The best way would be perhaps to seek support in the beginning, for example, from partners. If you decide that PowerApps is the way, then consider governance from the beginning on.

There's always room for improvement, however, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Our use case for the product revolves around financial applications, including account services, a service portal, asset transfers, and additions for the organization. It involves multi-level approval processes for stakeholder identification and managing entries in the DLP lecture.

The platform's most valuable feature includes the gallery for displaying data for managing approval flows, which is useful for our multi-level approval processes. Additionally, the 360 payments feature is valuable for its default hierarchical approach.

One area for improvement in the platform is enhancing the user experience, especially for less tech-savvy users, by simplifying complex features and controls. Additionally, adding more functional options and features could further improve its usability.

I have been working with Microsoft Power Apps for the past six months.

The platform has been a stable product for us. Despite occasional updates and transitions, it has consistently met our needs and requirements.

I would rate the scalability of the product as seven. While it generally scales well, occasional issues arise.

The response time of the support services has been satisfactory for our business requirements.

Positive

Compared with competitors like PegaDM, the platform, and Power Automate offer a more versatile platform that is particularly suitable for workflow applications like ours.

The platform's pricing is reasonable compared to competitors like Apigee. It offers good value for the quality of the product.

Data integration with the platform has been relatively easy for us. We have integrated data from external systems without facing any significant challenges.

I rate the platform as an eight overall. It meets our requirements well and has proven to be a valuable tool for our organization.

We are using Microsoft Power Apps for data collection and processing for small intergroup business applications for our internal needs. 

Overall the solution is reliable.

The scalability of the solution could improve.

I have been using Microsoft Power Apps for approximately two years.

The stability of the solution has been good in our usage.

I rate the stability of Microsoft Power Apps a seven out of ten.

We have approximately 1,000 people using the solution. There are some applications that we will increase the usage of. However, this depends on the use case.

The scalability of the solution depends on the use case of the application being used.

We have a dedicated support team at Microsoft Power Apps for our needs.

I previously used IBM Lotus.

The initial setup of Microsoft Power Apps is straightforward. The implementation depends on the complexity of the application being deployed. It can range from one week to one month. I have not implemented an application that has taken longer than half a year.

We have a team that does the implementation of the solution, such as a delivery manager.

Our enterprise contract with Microsoft Power Apps includes the application feature platform in our subscription package, so we are not incurring any extra expenses. All of our other subscriptions are also part of our license agreement.

I would recommend this platform to others if they have a dedicated internal team with the appropriate experience.

I rate Microsoft Power Apps seven out of ten.

I had to upload a form, an invoice, specifically, and then using an Azure function, I had to get that form from the Dataverse database and feed it to an Azure form recognizer and write the data back to the Azure Power App.

I like that you can quickly click together a user interface. For all no-code platforms that let you create a front end, you can click together something very quick. 

My problem with solutions like Power Apps and Betty Block blocks and probably with every no-code platform out there is that, as soon as you want to do something custom, something that's not provided by the environment you're using, it gets really tough. You have to work around the constraints of the platform. No-code platforms have constraints. I'm a developer myself, so I tend to not use no-code. I tend to code a lot. 

The notion people have is that no code equals no knowledge, and that's simply not true. Even though you don't have to write codes, you still have to know what you're doing.

I had some trouble interfacing with the Dataverse database. If I could, I'd make the couplings with other software easier. The integration with other software could be better. Any developer who had to work with an application made in Power Apps would find that useful.

There are limited use cases. 

I've used the solution within the last 12 months. 

The solution is a lot more stable than Betty Blocks. I haven't had any crashes or lost data or anything. That said,  haven't used it thoroughly. While I say it's pretty stable, I can't say how it performs under heavy use or big projects.

I've never had to reach out to technical support in the past. 

I've also used Betty Blocks. With Power Apps, you can quickly click together a user interface, that's also the case with Betty Blocks. However, both being no-code have constraints. For example, Betty Blocks was using jQuery one, and at the time we had jQuery three. I wanted to use a front-end framework. That was just not possible since it would mess up the Betty Blocks designer. And that's also the case with Microsoft Power Apps.

The ease or difficulty of the initial setup varies. For me, it wasn't that hard. However, I already had an Azure subscription and a Microsoft account. If you don't have any of that, it's not that easy - especially if you're not very technically inclined. It can be a daunting task.

I'd rate the ease of setup six out of ten. 

The deployment is fast and takes almost no time at all. I developed the application, and I pushed the publish button, and it was published.

I handled the initial setup myself. I did not need outside assistance. 

The license for the solution comes with my professional license, so I'm not sure actually if you pay by the user. For me, it was free to develop with a professional license, which is about 70 euros a month. That said, if you get a lot of users using it, it's not included. I don't know how much that would cost.

Whether it is worth the cost or not depends on the use case. 

We initially chose the solution as it was a customer specification. They wanted to use a Microsoft Power App.

I'm an end-user. 

I have been using the latest version of the solution. However, I don't even know if you can switch between versions.

If you want a complex system with lots of custom work done, then it is not ideal, as you are going to have to face the limitations of the platform. If what you want is a simple tool where you just need to upload some files, or you need to store some data to make a custom CRM application, then it's very easy to use.

It's certainly not a replacement for actual development work, and it's not a replacement for developers.

I would recommend the solution to others. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. In terms of no-code, it's pretty good, especially when you use it with a Logic App, which is part of the Power platform. When I compare it to Orbis or Betty Blocks, it's just a really good product. It has a small learning curve, however, it should be really easy for people who have no previous experience.

We use this solution to provide a cloud-based platform for our clients to develop, connect, and store data from across the full Microsoft suite.

We particularly like the workflow connectors in the forms, for information introduction purposes.

Our customers appreciate the fact that the licensing for this solution is also connected with Office 365, making it a it's less expensive overall system.

It is also very user-friendly in terms of learning curves; it can be picked up very quickly by new users and provides good interoperability between Teams, Outlook, and other solutions from Office.

We would like to see some improvement in the cost of the solution when an organization has a more complex network structure. The advanced connectors are very expensive, which discourages our customers from implementing it.

We would also like to see a more robust library of uses for different system roles to be built into this solution, such as for authorizations.

We have been working with this solution for nearly three years.

The stability of this solution is okay, and really depends on the clients architecture and infrastructure.

When the solution is properly designed at the implementation stage, the scalability is incredible, and the only limiting factor is the cost involved with scaling.

The initial setup for this solution is very easy.

We would recommend this solution to organizations of all sizes. However, the level of investment needed may mean that it is better suited to medium to large organizations.

We would rate this solution an eight out of ten.