Microsoft Entra ID Reviews

We use Microsoft Entra ID for authentication purposes and are planning to implement additional modules like Mobile Device Management. Our current use is mainly for integrating third-party applications for distributed applications to centralize authentication.

The major feature we utilize is the ability to perform third-party validations. This functionality allows our distributed applications to be integrated with a single authentication system using Microsoft Entra ID. Previously, each application had standalone authentications, but with Microsoft Entra ID, we have consolidated them. After implementing Microsoft Entra ID, secure access to apps has become seamless.

There are a couple of main concerns. Microsoft plans to move away from SMS authentication for Multi-Factor Authentication and only implement application-based authenticator, which will be challenging for retail outlets reliant on Microsoft Active Directory. Additionally, the pricing for Microsoft services is rising. Furthermore, there is a tool to measure resource usage in Power BI, but it is not functioning properly, making it difficult to understand resource consumption.

We have been using Microsoft Entra ID for three and a half years. Initially, it was Azure Active Directory before transitioning to Microsoft Entra ID, and we've mostly used it over the last three years.

The solution is stable without any latency issues. However, in the last two quarters, we experienced three Power BI outages.

There are no current issues with scalability.

Support could be better at times. There was an incident where I couldn’t get help with deleting an unused subscription and another where Power BI support took weeks without providing a solution. Overall, the support incidents mentioned involved delays and inefficiencies.

We have been with Microsoft from the start and have not explored other solutions.

The initial setup for Microsoft Entra ID was straightforward.

The setup was done in-house. I personally handled it without needing a full team.

We did not perform a detailed ROI analysis, but using Microsoft Entra ID has saved about fifteen percent of resources since one person used to manage login details, a task now simplified by the integration.

Microsoft's pricing is increasing significantly. The Office suite has undergone multiple licensing changes, driving up costs, and this also applies to Microsoft Entra ID.

We have been with Microsoft since the beginning and did not evaluate alternative solutions.

One additional feedback is that Microsoft plans to discontinue SMS functionality for Multi-Factor Authentication, which poses a challenge for retailers without mobile application authentication. This requires having an authenticator for Windows, so retail operations dependent on Microsoft Entra will not encounter authentication issues. Furthermore, the overall rating I would give this solution is seven due to issues with support. The MFA upcoming changes must be addressed before they cause further complications.

Hybrid Cloud

Microsoft Azure

We are using Microsoft Entra ID for single sign-on with our hybrid domain environment and for identity management with multi-factor authentication using Microsoft Authenticator. We plan to migrate our whole user base over to Microsoft Authenticator with MFA capabilities, possibly with certificate-based authentication.

We're still testing Entra and having implemented it on the application side. We'll soon start using application proxies to get into our line-of-sight businesses on-prem. 

We follow a least privileged access model, and Entra ID has helped us to avoid overextending access from the administrative side. And we plan also to implement it with devices. Our administrators are more careful when auditing access and ensuring everyone has access. 

We haven't implemented permission identity management, but we plan to use it. Entitlement management and dynamic grouping of Microsoft 365 groups are features I enjoy. From an administrative perspective, we can now manage users from a single pane of glass, which enhances efficiency. MFA will improve the user experience and increase organizational efficiency.

The implementation of other third-party MFA such as Okta or Duo could be improved, even though Duo is integratable. The response from actual support tickets is a bit laggy, and I would like them to be more responsive.

We have been using Microsoft Entra ID for about two years.

Entra's stability is great and consistently meets our expectations.

The scalability is excellent. We can scale Entra up and down as needed efficiently.

Our consultants are excellent and provide consistent help, but there is room for improvement in the responsiveness of actual support tickets.

Positive

We previously used on-prem Active Directory as our solution.

The initial setup was straightforward.

We did it all in house without any additional team.

We go through a reseller, CDW, who walked us step-by-step through the process. The pricing, setup cost, and licensing have been fairly straightforward.

Hybrid Cloud

We are using Microsoft Entra ID for multiple purposes, such as managing all authentications and changing passwords online. Previously, we relied on an on-premise network, which required us to be on-site to change passwords. With Microsoft Entra ID, we can synchronize it from anywhere on the network. We have an Azure AD Premium license and utilize features like conditional access policies to control identities. We use it primarily for managing identities inside the organization.

The best feature of Microsoft Entra ID is that it provides more granular control over user identities. The conditional access policy feature is particularly valuable, and it's something we use frequently. Microsoft Entra ID helps us manage identities according to security standards, and it allows us to implement least privilege access effectively. The logging and monitoring capabilities give us insights into activities, offering a single pane of visibility to detect anomalies, ensuring enhanced security.

In terms of improvement, we face issues with latency and responsiveness. Changes take some time to reflect across all users, sometimes up to twenty-four hours, which can be challenging when we need to implement drastic changes. Additionally, Microsoft's documentation can be insufficient. Some technical configuration details are missing, requiring us to consult external sources like forums or communities. They need to improve their documentation to ensure all necessary technical information is covered.

We have been using Microsoft Entra ID for six to seven years. Before that, we had an on-premises Active Directory environment, and then we transitioned to a hybrid setup with Azure connect. This has been our setup for around six to seven years.

Microsoft Entra ID is stable. It functions as it is designed, but improvements regarding the responsiveness of the solution are needed. Sometimes, rolling back changes takes longer than expected, affecting our operations.

Microsoft Entra ID is scalable. It integrates well with third-party tools.

I have experienced mixed results with technical support. Sometimes the support is excellent and technical issues are resolved quickly. However, there are times when complex tickets are assigned to non-technical personnel, which prolongs resolution times. After a delay, we might find out that an issue is out of scope for a particular agent, causing further delays.

We previously used on-premises Active Directory and switched to Microsoft Entra ID to reduce infrastructure. We have a hybrid environment now but maintain some local infrastructure for testing purposes.

The initial setup of Microsoft Entra ID is not straightforward; it sits between easy and tough. Implementing features requires vigilance and certainty before making changes due to its complexity. Microsoft's documentation misses some technical details, creating a need to refer to external resources for certain configurations.

Our deployment was done in-house. We did not use an integrator, reseller, or managed service provider.

Microsoft Entra ID provides visibility for security, such as tracking identity movements. By not relying on an on-premises solution, our infrastructure management is simplified, which aids in disaster recovery planning. We also integrate security features like risky users policies that enhance our security architecture. This contributes to a good ROI.

I rate Microsoft Entra ID at eight to 8.5 out of 10 overall. The solution is mature, with a big community and a strong reputation in the market. It's recommended due to its features and community support, though implementation challenges and documentation issues require attention. Community support and Microsoft's reputation are valuable, but the latency and documentation need improvement.

Hybrid Cloud

Microsoft Azure

Entra ID serves as our primary identity security tool. 

Entra ID enables us to implement security easily and effectively. It has built-in integration with all the Microsoft tools, like SharePoint, Outlook, Teams, etc., the condition access we discussed earlier. It's our primary identity security tool. We can't live without Entra ID. 

Using Entra ID has improved our security. Our security score is close to 80 percent, which is a critical metric because that includes everything under the hood. We have continuously improved in the last two or three years. We have implemented many improvements since the pandemic, so the number of incidents has decreased a bit, and automation has been throttled up.

Conditional access and Privileged Identity Management (PIM) are the most valuable features from a security perspective. 

Rule management and permissions need improvements. I have had discussions with product managers about these challenges and sent emails regarding them. Additionally, improvements are needed in the Identity Governance and Administration (IGA) side of things.

I have been working with Entra ID for around six years.

I rate Entra ID 10 out of 10 for stability. I have not encountered any issues.

I rate Entra ID's scalability 10 out of 10. It's great.

Customer service has been very good. I have raised sophisticated queries and received responses within a day.

Positive

I have never used a different solution and have always worked with Entra ID.

I have not personally deployed Microsoft Entra ID. However, I have integrated the solution, and we have worked with integrators to set it up.

The biggest return on investment is the seamless integration with all Microsoft apps and services. If you choose something new and integrate it, it can take a lot of time.

I rate Entra ID eight out of 10. 

Hybrid Cloud

Other

We've been using Entra ID in a hybrid scenario. We have an on-premise Active Directory that replicates to the cloud.

Scalability has been the biggest benefit. Moving more to a cloud footprint and leveraging Azure resources provides increased scalability and security. Entra helps us drill down into who can access our secure apps using resource groups, etc. We haven't had a security incident in the past two years, so we've been secure since going hybrid with Entra.  

The most valuable feature is the ability to establish resource groups and set permissions through RBAC across these groups.

The device-bound passkeys have helped us implement phishing-resistant authentication. We moved everybody to the authenticator app through Microsoft Entra and integrated that with our Azure applications.

We're more secure than we've been in the past. Our security score was poor when we implemented Entra ID. It was about 30 percent. We increased it significantly using recommendations from Microsoft about the authenticator app and other identity measures.

The transition from on-prem Active Directory to the Azure Cloud was difficult because there aren't group policy objectives. This is handled differently in the Azure cloud environment.

I've been using Entra ID for a little over two years.

We haven't had any issues since moving to the platform. It has been one hundred percent reliable without outages.

The scalability is perfect, allowing us to easily move more functions to the cloud.

I've never had to reach out to Microsoft support, which I consider a positive aspect. From what I've heard from colleagues, they'd rate Microsoft's technical support around an eight.

Positive

We previously used strictly on-premise Active Directory.

It was rough because we didn't have much experience in cloud space. It was pretty seamless after a couple of days of researching and powering through it.

We used Insight for the implementation. Their cloud engineers were amazing and helped us through many challenges.

The biggest return on investment is peace of mind, knowing I won't receive phone calls in the night.

The licensing model was straightforward initially. However, it has become more complex. It's not bad. The price has gone up a bit, but it's still affordable. 

We evaluated Amazon Web Services but chose Entra due to seamless integration, primarily because we are a Microsoft shop.

I'd rate Microsoft Entra ID as a 10 out of 10.

Hybrid Cloud

Microsoft Azure

We have a hybrid environment where we sync our users from on-premises to Microsoft Entra ID. The main purpose is to utilize Microsoft applications and services, like Microsoft 365 applications. We also use different integrations with Microsoft Entra ID for other cloud-based apps like Salesforce, enabling Single Sign-On integration.

One of the best features is that if users are synced with Microsoft Entra ID, you can integrate different enterprise-level apps like Salesforce, Oracle, and CyberArk. There are hundreds of apps you can integrate. Enabling Single Sign-On using Microsoft Entra users with these other cloud apps is a significant advantage. Single Sign-On is highly valuable.

Microsoft could enhance features regarding user retention for inactive accounts on Microsoft Entra ID. Another improvement needed is in the report customization for enterprise application configurations, making them more graphical and suitable for management presentation. Additionally, the freedom for Group Policies needs enhancement in Microsoft services like Intune.

I have been using Microsoft Entra ID for 6 years, and it is now going to be 7 years.

Microsoft Entra ID is a stable solution. We have been using it for the last 7 years, and it continues to improve with feedback from customers. It is a very stable solution.

It is a scalable solution. We previously had 300 users and now have 1,000 users. The number of licenses has increased, and Microsoft Entra ID has helped manage various Microsoft services under one platform.

Microsoft's technical support can be rated as 7 for front-end support and 8 for tier-two or advanced level support. Sometimes, level-one support lacks the immediate information needed, causing delays in receiving appropriate support.

Neutral

We were using Microsoft's on-premises Active Directory and a different Endpoint Protection. Now, we use Microsoft's Endpoint Protection due to licensing benefits. We also switched from another system to Microsoft Dynamics. These changes have helped reduce both capitalized and operational costs.

The setup process was relatively straightforward due to Entra Connect, which syncs on-prem users to Microsoft Entra. However, managing Group Policies in Microsoft services is still somewhat complex.

We engaged integrators, resellers, and Managed Service Providers for various projects. These service providers supported our deployment.

I cannot provide a specific figure, but moving our CRM and ERP to the cloud has reduced the need for on-premises management, saving on both capitalized and operational costs. This transition has allowed us to reallocate budget to more productive activities.

Licensing with Microsoft 365 often comes bundled, which simplifies license management. This unification reduces the need for separate licenses for Office applications like Word, Excel, and PowerPoint.

Before choosing Microsoft Entra ID, we evaluated other security and identity solutions, including Microsoft's on-premises Active Directory and different Endpoint Protection systems.

I would rate the solution as 9. It is a very good solution for unified management. I rate the overall solution a 9 out of 10.

Hybrid Cloud

Other

The primary use case for Microsoft Entra ID is authentication, allowing internal employees and guest users to log into our system.

Microsoft Entra ID has simplified central management, including administration and an overview of all logins and user profiles. It simplifies logins, not only for internal users but also for guests. We don't need to manage a lot of party sign-on. It has dramatically decreased phishing and other hacking attempts. 

It has improved our approach to defending against nation-state attacks and token theft by allowing us to enable MFA and other out-of-the-box capabilities easily. We've also reduced complaints and changed user behavior. It takes them some time to get used to it, but we educate them on how to use the built-in security features.   

The most valuable feature for us is the B2C functionality of Microsoft Entra ID, which is essential due to our need for external and internal users to log into our system.

Currently, Microsoft Entra ID meets our needs. I could not think of any areas for improvement or additional features for the next release.

I have used Entra ID for three to four years.

The stability of Microsoft Entra ID is satisfactory.

Microsoft Entra ID is scalable.

I rate Microsoft support eight out of 10. Internally, we have a feedback system for our customer service. While it may not be perfect, there are noticeably fewer customer complaints.

Positive

We did not use a different solution before Microsoft Entra ID. Since we are deeply embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem, it was the natural choice.

The initial setup was not difficult. 

We did not use an integrator, reseller, or consultant for deployment.

I am confident that we have seen a return on investment, but I have not calculated it. Microsoft Entra ID reduces risks and the need to do things manually.

Microsoft's pricing and licensing are difficult to understand. We engage with Microsoft partners regularly, but Microsoft's frequent rebranding complicates the process for us in the industry.

Microsoft Entra ID was a straightforward choice due to our integration within the Microsoft ecosystem.

I would rate Microsoft Entra ID eight out of 10. We are generally satisfied, although understanding the solution fully can be challenging. Once we have the knowledge, implementation becomes easy, but initially, it can be time-consuming.

Public Cloud

Other

The primary use case is for single sign-on, service provisioning, and security features, including multi-factor authentication.

We have been integrating network services and authentication services such as PIN Identity and Entra ID, which helps in providing a consolidated security solution.

The main valuable feature is the integration into a single console, which includes authentication service and endpoint security. This consolidation of security features in one place is extremely beneficial.

The cost is one area that needs improvement. Also, there is a need for better transformation support from on-premises Active Directory policies to the cloud, as Entra ID doesn't cover this sufficiently yet. The flexibility of the security policies could also be improved.

I have been working with EntraID, previously known as Azure ID, for about three or four years.

The stability of the solution is good with a rating of eight out of ten.

Entra ID is pretty scalable with a rating of eight out of ten.

Sometimes there is a late reply, but overall, it's good. I would rate Microsoft technical support as a seven out of ten.

Neutral

Customers often consider alternatives like Okta or PingID if Entra ID does not suit their requirements.

The initial setup of Entra ID is simple.

We work as integrators, focusing on integrating network services and authentication services like Entra ID.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.