JD Edwards World Reviews

With the World version, we use the finance module, distribution module, and the manufacturing module.

I think JDE ERP is very flexible and very convenient for the users. I think EnterpriseOne is more convenient for users to do the inquiry and do the data entry. The UI is better than JDE World. JDE products, including the World version, is very flexible. It's a good product for clients.

I have more than 18 years of JDE experience in JDE EnterpriseOne and World versions. I think JDE is good but compared to SAP and Oracle EPS, we can see which area needs to have some improvement for JDE. 

I have been using JD Edwards Worlds for three to four years. 

JDE World is more stable than JDE EnterpriseOne. For JDE EnterpriseOne, the Integrity part will generate some errors. Since they have low Integrity, we get some duplicate records in the accumulator table. This is an issue.

For this type of issue, that will cause maybe the losses, it is about a single step or a single web program. 

A main difference between EnterpriseOne and World is the user interface, they are different. JDE is totally web-based system already. But for the JDE World, I think they need to use a CS program to access the server and then do the operations.

There is some type of difference between JDE EnterpriseOne and JDE World version. The table is not the same. Most of them are the same, but some tables are different.

The server is also a difference. For the JDE World version, they normally use the IBM X400 servers. But for JDE EnterpriseOne, they can build on the Intel servers. 

I would rate JDE World and eight out of ten. 

I would like to see performance monitoring improve. Since I have experience with SAP, I know they have some program to monitor the performance, they can know what the current CPU is and what the program status is. But in JDE, I don't know whether they have enough programs to do the monitoring for the performance.

I would recommend EnterpriseOne over World. I have done a comparison between JDE, SAP, and EPS, I think JDE is the best amongst these three ERPs. I'm in China and JDE has very few customers here. I think the root cause is the cost strategy. Their sales strategy is wrong.

A global system with a local presence and intercontinental communication. It provides us with a common language, product, and customer base.

Common system = common processes = common goals.

Collecting data in standard formats for processing in a data warehouse.

• Sales order processing
• Purchase order processing
• Financial systems processing in all major modules

• Update interface capabilities and data maintenance tools to modern standards.
• Provide a way to allow XML files to download.

We are using JD Edwards World as our core backbone for our retail business in distribution and accounting.

The most valuable feature of JD Edwards World is its ease of use and unique functions.

There are a lot of new technologies coming out and JD Edwards World could improve by having better integration with other databases. The integration with the databases and applications should be in real-time, such as with Oracle.

I have been using JD Edwards World for approximately 12 years.

JD Edwards World is a stable solution.

I have found JD Edwards World to be scalable.

The solution would be best suited for medium-sized companies because the cost would be expensive for small businesses.

We have not contacted the support. We have our own internal support team. However, because of the legacy nature of the solution, we have had some challenges with finding the resources.

The implementation of JD Edwards World was done by partners.

The price of JD Edwards World is reasonable. Since it is a legacy solution the price has been reduced.

I am satisfied with the solution overall, and I would recommend it to others.

I rate JD Edwards World a seven out of ten.