Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management Reviews

We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices.

Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune needs to improve stability. We had issues with patching. 

I have been using the solution for two years. 

I rate Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune's stability an eight out of ten. 

The tool is scalable. 

The solution's deployment is straightforward and can be done in a week. We have a team of 10 engineers who work on the deployment. 

A consultancy helped us with the solution's implementation. 

The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes. 

I rate Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune an eight out of ten. You must be mindful of your infrastructure and ensure the tool meets your requirements. 

MobileIron UEM will be used to manage mobile devices. We will be able to manage a wide range of endpoints from the MobileIron console, similar to VMware Workspace ONE.

The user interface is user-friendly.

I don't believe I have, given the scope of this, because I haven't explored them thoroughly. So I don't think I have a problem with them right now.

For a new user, the initial setup could be simplified.

We had an issue with the integration of an add-on, but it has been resolved.

They are using a MobileIron as the base mobile device management solution, and we have added some additional solutions to that, such as Advanced Neurons. The integration between the MobileIron and Advanced Neurons isn't completely in sync, and we're still working on that.

I have been testing MobileIron UEM for two to three weeks.

We are working with the latest version.

MobileIron is still with Ivanti. We are still working on the proof of concept with them, and I believe the tenant is still with them. I'm not sure who the host is.

MobileIron UEM is a stable solution.

MobileIron UEM is a scalable solution.

We are only going to deploy it to 200 plus, users at first. That will increase in the future, depending on how our business grows.

When it comes to technical support, the person who is fixing it is the one who leads the POC. The same engineer who is assisting us with the proof of concept is also the one who is repairing it. I believe technical support is quite responsive because he is the one who is resolving the issues.

We are working on the proof of concept for both MobileIron and Workspace ONE.

We are only testing MobileIron and Workspace ONE. After that, we will decide which device to use.

Workspace ONE by VMware Similarly, we will use MobileIron as a mobile device management tool, allowing us to manage our endpoints remotely. So far, we have not had any issues with VMware, and we have resolved some, if not all, of the issues.

I have been testing with VMware Workspace ONE for the same amount of time as MobileIron UEM, three weeks.  We are using the latest version, and it is deployed on a public cloud. The cloud provider is VMware.

I have also been working with Google Chrome. Google Workspace is an email production tool provided by Google.

We don't have a firewall because we're in the cloud right now. We have no on-premises network and all of our systems are hosted in the cloud.

Perhaps because it is my first time, it is quite complex, but there are engineers guiding us, but it is quite complex on my end.

We had assistance from a MobileIron team member. We will investigate their features and see what capabilities they have while conducting a proof of concept. That is our proof of concept's goal.

We don't have the cost until we have completed the proof of concept.

They need to research other platforms or solutions to determine which solution best meets their needs. In particular, I don't think I have any recommendations for MobileIron because my experience with it has been limited. I lack extensive experience with MobileIron.

I'm a potential customer.

I would rate MobileIron UEM an eight out of ten.

I use this solution in order to manage mobile devices.

The solution is good. It's effective in what it is able to achieve and it's easy to use.

The control on offer is the most valuable aspect of the solution. 

The product is stable. 

We've found the scalability to be good.

We haven't really found anything lacking in terms of features.

The support on offer could be better. 

We would like the initial setup to be simpler. 

I've been using the solution for at least the past 12 months or so.

The solution is pretty stable. We haven't had issues with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution can scale well. If a company needs to expand, it's not a problem. We have a lot of people using the solution currently. Likely there are hundreds of users on it. 

We'd like for the product to offer better support so that if we need help we can feel confident we'd get it. They are just not as efficient or effective as we would like them to be.

We did not previously use a different solution. 

It was not an easy initial setup for us. It was a bit difficult and not really straightforward. 

I don't deal with the costs of the pricing. I'm not sure how much it is for the company. 

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. 

I'd rate the solution a seven out of ten. It's okay. There are a few areas where it could improve. 

I worked for a construction company and up until the last couple of months was the company mobile manager. We used MobileIron as security for the MobileIron networks in the company. I have retired now.

We get great customer service from the company. 

It would have been helpful to have had some language support. The company is in the construction industry in Sweden and we had a lot of different people working with us and not everyone is an English speaker. I also found the UI to be quite complicated to work with, so it takes quite a bit of time to train any new staff and to get them to understand how the solution works. The design could be upgraded because when younger people come on board and they've had a couple of years working with different tools, it feels like a return to the Ice Age for them. 

I used this solution for five years.

The solution is stable. 

The solution is quite scalable. 

We have very good technical support. When we had big issues, the support was fantastic, I have nothing to complain about. It was important for us to have that level of security from the company.  With this kind of software, you really need to have a close connection with the support organization.

Neutral

The initial setup of MobileIron is not too complicated. 

In all the years I used this product, we never needed to implement the disaster recovery plan, so the solution works well. On the one hand, MobileIron provides great service support but on the other hand, there's no language support and the interface needs upgrading. 

Taking everything into consideration, I rate the solution seven out of 10. 

This product has many use cases including device management, Windows patching, deploying applications, copying files to multiple systems, and USB blocking.

This product helps us to create a streamlined process and it is working as expected.

The most valuable features are device management and support for upgrading applications. If I want to upgrade a version of an application, for example, Google Chrome, then I can create a task and push a Google Chrome update.

The reporting is an area that can be improved, which is why we are looking for a replacement. The reports have to show the compliance level of the patching, which Ivanti does not provide.

We need reports that are both good and presentable.

I have been working with Ivanti Patch for Windows for more than three years.

This is a stable product.

Ivanti scales according to the number of licenses. We have not had an issue scaling.

We have more than 800 users who are supported by our IT team of approximately 10 people.

Technical support is through the vendor and it is fine. We have not faced any issues with them.

The initial setup is complex. If I want to send a report then it is very complex. The reports are not easy to understand and not presentable. There are many manual steps that are required.

I was not with the company when Ivanti was deployed. It was done with help through the OEM.

When a patch is released then we need to update it. Otherwise, there is no maintenance required.

We are looking for a product to replace Ivanti and are evaluating different solutions with similar functionality. Right now, I am in the process of evaluating ManageEngine to compare both of the products.

My advice for anybody who is considering this product is that it is good enough for many situations but if you require a dashboard or reports to show your compliance level, then it is not there. In that case, you have to think about other options.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

I like the product's Peer to Peer patching feature. 

The product's support and configuration need to improve. It needs to be more scalable. 

The tool is stable. 

The tool's setup is easy. 

The solution is expensive compared to other products. 

I would rate the product an eight out of ten. 

MobileIron UEM can be deployed on-premise or in the cloud.

I am using MobileIron UEM for a secure mobile device connected to a data center.

The most valuable features of MobileIron UEM are tunneling and enterprise integration.

MobileIron UEM could improve the monitoring of devices.

I have been using MobileIron UEM for approximately four years.

MobileIron UEM is stable. We have some issues sometimes with conductivity but that is the internet connection, such as WiFi.

The scalability of MobileIron UEM is good for on-premise and cloud deployments. MobileIron UEM has given the customer the ability to manage how many devices they have. If they have more than 10,000 devices, they need to upgrade the server. For example, they might need to upgrade the CPU or memory, et cetera.

We have approximately 5,000 to 10,000 users using this solution.

I have used the support from MobileIron UEM.

I rate the support from MobileIron UEM a three out of five.

I have not used another similar solution.

MobileIron UEM is easy to deploy and the initial setup is simple.

We did the implementation of MobileIron UEM in-house.

We have three people for the maintenance of the solution.

The price of MobileIron UEM is very good.

I rate the price for MobileIron UEM a five out of five.

I rate MobileIron UEM an eight out of ten.

Ivanti Patch's most valuable features are the patch module and the package distribution.

Ivanti Patch could be improved with better integration with other cloud solutions.

I've been using Ivanti Patch for over six years.

Ivanti Patch's stability is pretty good.

Ivanti Patch is pretty scalable.

The initial setup was straightforward.

Ivanti Patch is far better than other solutions, and I would give it a rating of eight out of ten.

Centrally manage every Mobilephone of the company.

We know who can access our internal Datas from a mobilephone. The Deployment of a new Device ist done in few Minutes.

The most valuable feature is that everything is in one place, which makes it easy to manage. It allows us to make sure that a mobile device is in place, and whether everything is okay with it, or not.

The interface is complicated and not very easy to use. We find it very difficult to understand.

A "single click" Deployment ist now possible. It took some time to implement everything. But the time safe now is huge.

We began using MobileIron UEM approximately three years ago.

This is a stable product.

It is certainly scalable. We have two or three people who use it regularly, but there are approximately 200 users who benefit from it.

We do not contact MDM directly for technical support. Rather, we have a partner in Switzerland to contact. What I can say about the partner is that contacting them is not as easy as it should be. It's very complicated and they take a lot of time to implement something or to give an answer.

Positive

Prior to this solution, we weren't using similar.

I was not present for the initial setup and deployment. 

Update: We now implemented all new. Impossible without external help.

They are up-to-date. But they have to much to do, so it's difficult to catch them.

There is no real ROI, but we like to have a consolidated solution.

My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive.

We are currently in the process of researching inTune as an alternative to MobileIron. Intune, is part of Microsoft 365. We are now deciding whether it's worth it to permanently change to MobileIron. Ultimately, we have to look at the cost and determine what product we should use.

Update: inTune is not an alternative at the moment

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

We use RiskSense for vulnerability management, and we have many integrations. 

The solution is deployed on cloud.

We use this solution daily. There are more than 200 people using this solution in my organization.

Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it.

They could add more widgets, similar to Rapid7 and InsightVM. I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has.

I've been using this solution for about one year.

It's stable.

It's quite scalable.

They have an excellent support team. I would rate them 5 out of 5.

They're helpful and resolve tickets quickly.

I would rate this solution 9 out of 10.