We needed a solution to monitor two customer servers and a desktop server for threats, particularly during development. Therefore, we chose Huntress Managed EDR.
Managing Director at Fluent2 Ltd
Easy to use, scalable, and cost effective
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable aspect of Huntress Managed EDR is its personalized approach."
- "Huntress Managed EDR eliminates the need to outsource expensive security tools or analysts, avoiding the high costs associated with external solutions."
- "The integration with Autotask could be improved."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
Huntress Managed EDR is easy to use.
We like that Huntress Managed EDR is focused on the SMB market.
Since implementing Huntress Managed EDR, we have not had any threat issues.
One of the main features we appreciate about Huntress is the human element involved in triaging and determining the severity of a problem before forwarding an alert. We value this managed service approach that provides an additional layer of support and analysis.
Huntress Managed EDR eliminates the need to outsource expensive security tools or analysts, avoiding the high costs associated with external solutions. This comprehensive product provides the necessary capabilities in-house, saving us from the financial burden of outsourcing.
Huntress has allowed us to discontinue the use of Webroot and utilize the free, built-in Windows Defender antivirus system, which they manage as part of their product feature set. We now use Huntress EDR combined with Huntress Managed Windows Defender.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable aspect of Huntress Managed EDR is its personalized approach. As a dedicated company focused solely on this service, Huntress prioritizes individual relationships and provides attentive support, unlike larger corporations with diverse product portfolios. This fosters a sense of trust and partnership, ensuring clients receive direct and committed assistance.
The support Huntress provides is valuable.
What needs improvement?
The integration with Autotask could be improved. Currently, it doesn't classify the "installed product" or "configuration item," as they are called in Autotask, preventing automated handling. Additionally, updates could flow more seamlessly to Autotask. Overall, a more enhanced integration would be beneficial.
Buyer's Guide
Huntress Managed EDR
June 2025

Learn what your peers think about Huntress Managed EDR. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Huntress Managed EDR for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of Huntress Managed EDR nine out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability of Huntress Managed EDR ten out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support provides that personal service and proactiveness.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The deployment is straightforward because it's rolled out via our Datto RMM system. Huntress Managed EDR takes five seconds to roll out per device.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Huntress Managed EDR offers a fair pricing model. While the initial cost was low and has since increased, it has stabilized at a reasonable rate. The introduction of Managed Defender allowed us to transition clients from Webroot to Huntress without a significant price difference. The savings from utilizing the included Windows Defender offset the cost of Huntress Managed EDR, making it an affordable solution overall.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Huntress Managed EDR nine out of ten.
Our management system has an automated routine that automatically reinstalls Huntress if it's ever uninstalled, eliminating overhead. Occasionally, an agent might get stuck at a specific version, requiring manual remediation. This might involve a minimal time commitment of approximately an hour per month to check for updates and ensure all versions and statuses are current.
As a Managed Service Provider, we deploy Huntress Managed EDR to all our customers, covering approximately 1,400 endpoints. Our team of ten technicians utilizes the platform to serve our clientele, which predominantly consists of hotels in the hospitality industry.
While alternative solutions might be preferable in certain situations, I would generally recommend Huntress Managed EDR.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor. The reviewer's company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: MSP
Last updated: Jan 23, 2025
Flag as inappropriate
Help Desk Engineer at Panurgy
It is affordable, powerful, and saves costs
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable aspect of Huntress is its ability to isolate legacy systems from the network, preventing the spread of threats."
- "Ultimately, the clarity of their alerts is paramount for effective threat communication and could benefit from clearer remediation steps."
What is our primary use case?
Huntress is one of our security layers. We also use Webroot for antivirus and SentinelOne. Huntress is particularly valuable because when we first implemented it, we discovered several potential issues with our PCs that we were able to address quickly. More recently, it has allowed us to be notified immediately if something bad is happening.
We implemented Huntress to improve our security posture.
How has it helped my organization?
Last weekend, we experienced a potential breach prevented by Huntress' automated response. It involved the general manager at a car dealership who was unaware of an ongoing penetration test. This caused confusion until we contacted someone knowledgeable about the situation, allowing us to restore normalcy. This incident highlights the potential for serious consequences had the breach not been prevented.
Huntress is easy to use. The portal is transparent, and the manual or automatic remediation recommendations are well-defined.
It is a valuable addition to the SMB market. It is affordable and powerful.
Since we started using Huntress, things have become more automated. One valuable feature they recently introduced is a test mode, which allows us to gauge our response to a simulated emergency without triggering an actual alert.
Huntress' 24/7 monitoring is helpful. While it will alert us at all times, the alerts are usually important. The only low priority item is password alerting. When Huntress finds files that might have clear text passwords, it's not a high risk, but it's still good to inform the client about potential security issues.
The auto-remediation capabilities are excellent because they allow for a set it and forget it approach, or users can simply revisit the portal to verify that everything is as expected.
Huntress has helped reduce the need for expensive security tools and the hiring of security analysts. This can lead to savings equivalent to the cost of two security analysts, which is approximately $200,000 per year.
Huntress has improved our security. It generally doesn't interfere with our other tools, as sometimes our antivirus or some of the other tools tend to flag legitimate activities.
We have integrated Huntress with Webroot and SentinelOne. They each play a role in the security posture.
We noticed an improvement in our security within a few weeks. Of course, there were many things to handle, especially when rolling it out at a new location. We tend to clean up a little bit initially, which increases our workload slightly. But once we get through that initial phase, everything runs smoothly.
Huntress has saved us 20 percent in resources.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable aspect of Huntress is its ability to isolate legacy systems from the network, preventing the spread of threats. The automated remediation feature also provides significant value.
What needs improvement?
Huntress excels at explaining threats when they are presented in clear language. However, the sheer volume of threats and occasional ambiguity in remediation steps can make comprehensive tracking challenging. Ultimately, the clarity of their alerts is paramount for effective threat communication and could benefit from clearer remediation steps.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Huntress for four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of Huntress nine out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability of Huntress eight out of ten.
How was the initial setup?
The initial deployment was done using a script, taking one day. We integrate it with ConnectWise to push scripts out to PCs and monitor the deployment to ensure continuous operation and services running. We receive alerts for this, making it maintenance-heavy but ultimately worthwhile.
Our deployment strategy was straightforward: set up the company, then implement and activate the scripts. I'm not heavily involved in deployments, but I've written a few scripts. When issues arise, like when our tool ThreatLocker halts a deployment, I step in to troubleshoot and resolve the problem.
What was our ROI?
Any prevention or early detection of an attack, like catching a cold before it spreads, will lead to significant savings in time, investment, and reputation. If we, as the Managed Service Provider, experience an exploit, it will negatively impact our reputation. Therefore, safeguarding our reputation is the best form of seeing a return on investment.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Huntress nine out of ten. The services tend to stop, so we have a small script that restarts them. I don't know if there's a way they can make their service more resilient. That would reduce our maintenance burden.
We have 20 people that use Huntress in our organization.
We use Huntress on almost 25,000 devices.
Huntress requires minimal maintenance.
I would recommend Huntress to others. It lets you know about real-world attacks happening in near real-time. A couple of years ago, I remember Huntress alerted us about a laptop stolen at an airport, and we were able to isolate that laptop. It was eventually returned to the company, and they just had to call us to let us know. You can also turn off isolation, so it's not just a security feature, but it's almost like having LoJack for your laptop.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: MSP
Buyer's Guide
Huntress Managed EDR
June 2025

Learn what your peers think about Huntress Managed EDR. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
President at Abbas Networking Services
Has a manned security operation center, not AI-driven
Pros and Cons
- "The solution's most valuable feature is that it has a manned security operation center, not AI-driven."
- "Huntress should have a more user-friendly interface because it takes some understanding to work our way through the interfaces."
What is our primary use case?
We're a managed service provider, and we install Huntress on our clients' computers to keep them safe.
What is most valuable?
The solution's most valuable feature is that it has a manned security operation center, not AI-driven.
It is quite easy to use Huntress.
I think Huntress is a very solid solution. It is a top-of-the-tier, cutting-edge tool that can find things others can't.
We started to see the benefits of Huntress immediately after deploying it. I had been using another security vendor. For the first couple of days after deploying Huntress, we had numerous alerts about problems on people's systems, and we were able to address them.
The fact that the solution is fully managed by Huntress 24/7 has definitely reduced the amount of noise alerts we get. When something actually gets to us, it is definitely actionable.
Huntress' ability to automatically remediate low-severity threats has worked very well in our instances. I feel it has increased our security posture. It's just one component of our security stack, but it has definitely elevated our security stack.
The solution has reduced our overall costs by combining security tools into its platform, which is very important to us.
Huntress has significantly elevated our organization's overall security posture.
We combined Huntress with Microsoft Defender and Webroot DNS, and it works quite well.
Huntress is far superior to other solutions when it comes to providing proactive protection against threats. SentinelOne lets viruses through, while Huntress does not. The Norton product has a really high processor load. It's archaic how they design their product. However, operating the Norton or Symantec tool takes up a lot of processor resources.
The way the Huntress SOC team works with us is far superior compared to the SOC teams of those other solutions. They are very responsive and respond within minutes, while others take days.
What needs improvement?
Huntress should have a more user-friendly interface because it takes some understanding to work our way through the interfaces. When you log in to the portal, there are many different categories to investigate. It would be good if the solution had a central alerts page to go to first rather than checking into all the categories to see if something needed to be addressed.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Huntress for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We haven’t faced any issues with the solution’s stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product is easy to deploy and doesn't really have any limitations related to scalability that I know of.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support team provides very speedy answers and always gets right to the point. They understand the problem and direct you to the right areas.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used Webroot SecureAnywhere and found that Huntress picked up things that Webroot allowed.
How was the initial setup?
The solution's initial setup was not especially difficult, but it was also not easy. One person deployed the solution within three days.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution's pricing is fair. I like that Huntress monitors for units that are no longer checking in and automatically removes them so that you don't get billed. Huntress is 5% to 10% more expensive than other tools we've evaluated.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Huntress, we evaluated three other tools, including Norton Security and SentinelOne. The other tools did not pass our virus tests. When we created virtual environments and attacked them with viruses, both tools let the viruses get through.
What other advice do I have?
We have an API that we build into our managed service platform, which we just install from the script. Huntress does not necessarily require any maintenance. You have actionable items that will occur in the use of the product, but it's a set-it-and-forget-it installation.
New users should ensure that their use case fits into the Huntress model. We investigated and found that our MM was compatible with Huntress, and it was a pretty smooth integration. I don't know whether all our MMs are as adept, but ours worked well.
Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: MSP
CTO at Accent Consulting
The ability to automatically remediate low-severity threats helps reduce our workload
Pros and Cons
- "What stands out most is their human element: when faced with an unknown threat, real people, not just automated processes, are investigating it, and they're people we trust."
- "I rate Huntress Managed EDR a ten out of ten."
- "Huntress has a cyber education platform, but it lacks all the languages we need."
- "Huntress has a cyber education platform, but it lacks all the languages we need. Since we support customers in different countries, expanding the language options for their training would be beneficial."
What is our primary use case?
We're a managed service provider, so we resell Huntress Managed EDR to our customers. We use the EDR and the MDR products, which provide endpoint and 365 protection.
How has it helped my organization?
Huntress Managed EDR is remarkably user-friendly. It excels at identifying threats and provides transparent, actionable information about the following steps to take when a threat is detected.
We use Huntress in both the SMB and enterprise markets. I don't differentiate between them, as it works great for both.
We saw the benefits of Huntress Managed EDR immediately.
The Huntress team's consistent monitoring is excellent for triaging and managing alerts, which benefits our workloads. They are also a great team to work with.
Huntress's ability to automatically remediate low-severity threats helps reduce our workload.
The way Huntress's SOC team collaborates with us is significantly better than other solutions.
What is most valuable?
There are a few key aspects of Huntress that we appreciate. What stands out most is their human element: when faced with an unknown threat, real people, not just automated processes, are investigating it, and they're people we trust. Their security team is excellent; they proactively contacted vulnerable partners during the Exchange vulnerability a couple of years ago, urging them to apply fixes. They also adapt to customer needs, continuously developing new products and features, such as their upcoming SIEM product, and expanding upon their existing platform. Ultimately, while their software and product are great, what we value most is their company culture - they are incredibly easy to work with.
What needs improvement?
Huntress has a cyber education platform, but it lacks all the languages we need. Since we support customers in different countries, expanding the language options for their training would be beneficial.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Huntress Managed EDR for approximately four to five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Huntress Managed EDR is stable. We have not experienced any issues with lagging, crashing, or downtime.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have never encountered any issues with Huntress being scalable.
How are customer service and support?
Our team on the security side has contacted Huntress support, and they have been pleased.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used SentinelOne before switching to Huntress. The main reasons for switching were the lower cost and that Huntress is fully managed.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of Huntress Managed EDR was easy.
What about the implementation team?
The deployment typically requires only one person.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Huntress has a favourable pricing structure, and I appreciate the cost-effectiveness compared to previous solutions.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
What other advice do I have?
I rate Huntress Managed EDR a ten out of ten.
We use other security products in conjunction with Huntress Managed EDR.
Occasional maintenance is required for agents that lose connection and to manage unidentified threats.
Huntress is one of our favourite products. It's easy to deploy for new users; they simply push out the agent. The ability to filter low-severity threats and automate their remediation can save valuable time.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Last updated: Dec 22, 2024
Flag as inappropriateSenior Systems Engineer at NetSmart, Inc.
Provides responsive support and efficient threat resolution
Pros and Cons
- "Their SOC is super responsive and does a great job of catching incidences and being on top of any issues that arise."
- "Their SOC is super responsive and does a great job of catching incidences and being on top of any issues that arise."
- "We are still getting many false positives."
- "The ITDR product is coming along great, however, we are still getting many false positives."
What is our primary use case?
We are using it as an MDR, EDR, antivirus product. We are also utilizing their Microsoft 365 ITDR, which is the new name, and their security awareness training platform. The only product they offer that we do not use currently is their SIM tool. It is on our radar and our roadmap, but we are not using it.
What is most valuable?
Their SOC is super responsive and does a great job of catching incidences and being on top of any issues that arise. They have an automated remediation tool that works well for both ITDR and EDR. It allows approval of remediations, performs all the necessary steps, verifies them, and resolves issues efficiently.
What needs improvement?
The ITDR product is coming along great, however, we are still getting many false positives. A lot of user accounts get locked out over nonissues, and while they are easy to resolve, someone still needs to take action. It is time spent by a technician.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using it for a little over two and a half years, coming up on three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have never had a problem that was Huntress's fault.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is pretty scalable. I am currently running a little over twenty-five hundred endpoints without any problems or concerns about managing that number of computers.
How are customer service and support?
If I contact support, it is almost immediate. They respond quickly and work with me until the problem is fully resolved. They are thorough and ensure the problem is addressed without pushing responsibilities onto me unnecessarily.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, we used SentinelOne, Webroot, and BlackPoint. I switched since I have tested SentinelOne multiple times and could bypass it. BlackPoint generates many false positives, taking more time to manage than Huntress.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup process was smooth. We were provided with an engineer who wrote a script based on our current structure and remote management software. This script allowed easy deployment, and Huntress's support ensured everything went smoothly.
What about the implementation team?
We were given an engineer who sat down with us, understood our current setup, wrote a script for deployment, and did all the backend work necessary for a smooth deployment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is piecemeal, per agent on EDR, MDR, and per user on ITDR. It can get expensive for small to medium businesses if large license quantities are not purchased. However, given Huntress's success rate, I am willing to pay for a product that performs well.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The alternatives I have used include SentinelOne, Webroot, and BlackPoint.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Huntress an eight out of ten. I prefer using it over other security tools because it has been reliable and efficient in catching incidents and isolating threats quickly.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor. The reviewer's company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
Last updated: Feb 7, 2025
Flag as inappropriateService Delivery Manager at Netirio
Helped us to reduce the need for expensive security tools
Pros and Cons
- "Huntress helped us to reduce the need for expensive security tools or expensive security analysts. That's very important, especially with us being a a smaller business. Not having to purchase larger software has been great."
- "The integration with our RMM could be better."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution as our antivirus.
How has it helped my organization?
We were looking for a more lightweight solution for an antivirus. We've had some in the past that have been really hard to either install, uninstall, and work with. Huntress integrated right in with Microsoft Defender, and it worked perfectly.
What is most valuable?
The automatic remediation is the most valuable feature for us. It works great. If our team can't look at an issue exactly at the moment, it's just good to know that there's Huntress that can come in and be able to remediate most, if not all, issues. If there's something that needs a further look at, we can automate the alerts. It's proven to be a lot more efficient than other antiviruses we've worked with in the past.
It's easy to use Huntress overall. I haven't had too many issues. I haven't really had to contact or support with anything. So far, so good.
Huntress is a solution tailored specifically for the small and medium business market. It sits on top of Windows Defender, so you do not have to have either expertise or other software. It works well as a standalone client.
Removal, specifically, has been very, very nice. Others have been clunky when it comes to removing files or the application itself. Huntress has the uninstall option straight from the admin portal. That's been a great great feature.
We've witnessed the benefits of Huntress both immediately after we deployed it, and after some time. The ease of use was noticed immediately. But then, eventually, when it comes to either losing a client or having someone who's left having to remove it from their machine, just having the ability to uninstall very seamlessly becomes very useful.
The solution is fully managed by Huntress 24/7. It's reduced our workload in terms of triaging or managing alerts. It's very much reduced the attention to detail that we've needed to have, especially since it's such a reputable company. We feel confident in having them remediate some issues so that we don't have to be looking at them all the time.
Huntress helped us to reduce the need for expensive security tools or expensive security analysts. That's very important, especially with us being a smaller business. Not having to purchase larger software has been great.
I don't know if our organizational security has drastically improved. However, it has done what it needs to do. We haven't lost security; we've maybe become more secure with it. That said, just having that presence of mind, knowing that we do have a very sophisticated team and product behind us, has been wonderful.
What needs improvement?
The integration with our RMM could be better. That's been one of the tougher things. Having more availability to integrate with RMM is what we need right now. Even though we can create a script, it doesn't always work as seamlessly as it should.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for about a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability has been great. We've had no issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I haven't had the chance to scale. However, there seem to be no issues with scaling up or down.
How are customer service and support?
The availability of SOC-team support is great. They are friendly and offer good advice. It's not as big of a company as other solutions, yet the support team seems to be on top of things.
In terms of ongoing support, there has only been one or two times when we wanted some further clarity on a remediation that had been completed. That was about it. The ease of communication is great. You aren't on hold and you aren't passed around to different people. Their support is pretty state-of-the-art.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have previously used SentinelOne and Sophos. We switched over to Huntress completely and no longer use them. We primarily switched based on pricing.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was really easy. It just sits on top of Windows Defender, so it was very easy. After that, just configuring the the different profiles and policies that we wanted to apply had to be done, and that was a very easy process. The deployment itself took about a week.
In terms of maintenance, so far, it auto-updates.
What about the implementation team?
Might have had a third party assist in the implementation.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cost-effectiveness of Huntress, compared to other solutions, is much greater. The pricing is good. It's where it should be.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did shop around a bit. However, with the price, it was a pretty easy decision.
What other advice do I have?
I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.
New users should mostly ensure that they know that this product is going to stand on top of Windows Defender and integrate with it. If someone is utilizing Windows Defender, they just need to ensure that they know that this product has to operate with Windows Defender to get its full capability.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: MSP
Founder / Director at CX consulting
Great for SMBs and has excellent customer support
Pros and Cons
- "Users usually note improvements in a matter of days. In others, it is immediately. It varies according to the environment."
- "It would be ideal if they could create some incentives to help more partners get clients to onboard it."
What is our primary use case?
We're a Huntress partner. It's being used by certain clients as an alternative to mainstream EDRs.
How has it helped my organization?
The feature that I like about Huntress, which I have not seen with any other solution, is the proactive incident checking. The team flags certain potential malicious incidents. The ease of use regarding implementation has also been great.
Overall, Huntress ensures a better cyber security posture. It provides a good baseline for security. Having the peace of mind that you have a decent set of guys or a team behind you is excellent.
What is most valuable?
The solution's simplicity, ease of implementation, and thoroughness are all valuable aspects. It doesn't put a heavy load on endpoints.
Huntress has good support.
It's a solid solution. For SMEs, it is an extremely good solution to have.
It has behavioral-based algorithms. Having that peace of mind that you actually have a group of experienced SOC analysts who are there watching is helpful. I don't have to be there to attend to the potential incidents straightaway 24/7. It takes a strain off of the partner company. As a user, you can actually go and rest and have a fairly peaceful weekend. If something happens, you have a good, solid team behind you that will attend to any potential threats that pop up over the weekend or any given day.
Of all the different solutions I work with, Huntress is one of the easiest.
As a partner, Huntress is useful for the SMB market. It integrates with Microsoft Defender and it really makes things so much easier. It offers a single glass pane, and you can see exactly what's happening.
We had one incident, where a user was trying to click on a potential malicious link. However, the processes were fairly quickly identified, and everything was killed literally within a couple of seconds. That incident was very effectively stopped.
The fact that the solution is fully managed by Huntress 24/7 frees up quite a lot of time from a technical point of view. We don't have to, first of all, employ a local resource. The potential local resources that were available, they can now just look at maybe assisting with some of the alerts. With Huntress, now they have time available to perform other tasks. Also, we're now a bit more proactive than reactive. We're likely saving 50% to 60% of our time.
We make use of Huntress' ability to automatically remediate low-severity threats. That automatic automated remediation has positively affected workloads and security. With any type of automation, you free up time. You also know that once there's an incident, certain steps have already been taken. The technician will be able to see if some of the mundane tasks have already been performed, and that way, they don't have to waste time redoing those.
Using Huntress helped reduce the need for expensive security tools or hiring expensive security analysts for our clients.
Huntress affected the overall security of our clients. It provides a good layer of security. Security is a layered approach.
Users usually note improvements in a matter of days. In others, it is immediate. It varies according to the environment.
Huntress utilizes AI in a very clever way, especially on the behavioral-based level. Typical attacks don't always utilize the old traditional signature-based attacks. They utilize it quite effectively.
What needs improvement?
The pricing could always be lower, however, it already is good value for money.
It would be ideal if they could create some incentives to help more partners get clients to onboard it.
They should grow their market and spend a bit more time and effort on South Africa.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable. Aside from some occasional general maintenance, it's great. I'd rate it ten out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have clients that range from three users to up to 65.
I'd rate scalability eight out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
They offer very good support. It's a simple email away. The responses are great. In a nutshell, you know you have a company that backs you as a partner. They are proactive.
Support is superb. I can't complain. It's effective. It's quick. The turnaround time on submitting complaints is very, very quick. If I report something today, maybe by tomorrow someone will revert.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I've worked with various solutions, including SentinelOne and Acronis.
From a deployment point of view and from a configuration setup point of view, Huntress is just easier. It's simplistic. The rate of false positives for reporting is much less, in my experience. It's just a much easier product to use.
How was the initial setup?
The deployment is pretty straightforward. It's literally a couple of minutes per client. The integrations make it simple.
We've got seven people dedicated to working with the solution.
There isn't really any maintenance. Once it's set up and configured, the agents ensure that it is updated on a regular basis. If they do not update, for some reason or other, you are warned about it.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It's reasonably priced. The pricing is very competitive.
From the point of view where small businesses cannot afford a full stack, Huntress provides a basic solution where your threats are taken care of with the awareness training that's attached. If you are looking for something very basic to put in place, it's very good value for money.
I'd rate the pricing six out of ten. However, there are a whole lot of other factors that you need to look at when you purchase a solution. You need to look at not just the product. You need to look at the team behind the product. You need to look at effectiveness. You need to look at after-sales support, et cetera. In general, they are fairly inexpensive and very competitive. Even if they would bump up their prices a little bit, they are a decent solution to look at.
They are worth the investment.
What other advice do I have?
I'd recommend the solution to others. From value for money to ease of implementation to minimal false positives, it's great. You get peace of mind that you know that you've got someone that actually looks after you.
I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
MSP Systems Engineer at A. B. M. Co., Inc.
It is easy to use, provides excellent value, and performance
Pros and Cons
- "The features of Huntress that I found helpful are the one-click remediation piece and the ability for me to reach out to their customer service reps and get this under control when there is a threat."
- "To enhance the platform, I suggest adding a feature to forward Huntress's recommended response directly to the client, ensuring their clear understanding of the gathered information."
What is our primary use case?
We use Huntress to safeguard our endpoints as an additional security layer complementing our traditional antivirus solution. If the primary antivirus fails to identify a threat, Huntress is a crucial backup that fulfills our security requirements.
How has it helped my organization?
The Huntress interface is relatively easy to use. I had little to no training and had not used Huntress enough to navigate its website or fully understand its use case. It was simple to use.
Huntress is great for small and medium business markets. The value is excellent as well. It is a cost-effective solution, and the integration pieces that we're using with it are phenomenal.
I saw the true potential of Huntress a month after we implemented it.
Huntress's 24/7 monitoring has been invaluable for triaging and managing alerts. The platform handles most of the monitoring, allowing us to focus on understanding the alerts, their nature, functionality, and the detected threats. This approach has significantly improved our efficiency in this area.
Huntress's ability to automatically remediate low-severity threats has streamlined our workflow process, making it faster to respond.
Huntress has helped us reduce the need for expensive security tools or to hire costly security analysts. We're not big enough to have a large SOC team, so this has helped us until we can reach that level of growth.
Huntress helps protect our endpoints when traditional antivirus is not enough. So, we will rely heavily on it when our traditional antivirus software does not catch the threat.
What is most valuable?
The features of Huntress that I found helpful are the one-click remediation piece and the ability for me to reach out to their customer service reps and get this under control when there is a threat. I see it as a great way to isolate and remediate on the fly quickly. We did have a use case for that recently that worked out well.
What needs improvement?
I requested Huntress customer support to implement a feature enabling me to email myself generated reports or alerts, which I could then forward to our client. While this specific feature was unavailable, Huntress customer service successfully assisted us in obtaining the necessary email information. To enhance the platform, I suggest adding a feature to forward Huntress's recommended response directly to the client, ensuring their clear understanding of the gathered information.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Huntress for one and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Huntress offers super reliable and rock-solid performance. We have not encountered any troubleshooting issues or problems with the software; it works as expected.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The cloud-based nature of Huntress management allows for exceptional scalability. We can easily add licenses or agents as needed, and we haven't encountered any scaling limitations thus far.
How are customer service and support?
I contacted Huntress technical support once about a ransomware attack, and they responded promptly and effectively. We contained the attack within an hour.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The Huntress pricing is an excellent value for what the product provides. It's a managed EDR solution with fair features, and I think it's great.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have considered other solutions. The other EDR solution we considered was SentinelOne. We did look at SentinelOne, but we did not make a choice.
I did not choose Huntress. When I started a year and a half ago, Huntress was already implemented. However, with Huntress already implemented, it made it very clear that, given what we had recently worked on with one of our clients, Huntress was our best choice.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Huntress ten out of ten.
We have experienced no maintenance requirements with Huntress, as our RMM solution automates most processes. Consequently, we do not need to address deployment, maintenance, or troubleshooting issues related to Huntress; it functions seamlessly.
New users need to be prepared for incident responses from Huntress. If they do not have an incident response plan, they need to create one first so they can handle and remediate quickly for their clients.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor. The reviewer's company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: MSP Reseller

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Huntress Managed EDR Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: June 2025
Popular Comparisons
CrowdStrike Falcon
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Fortinet FortiEDR
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
Microsoft Defender XDR
IBM Security QRadar
Elastic Security
HP Wolf Security
Intercept X Endpoint
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
Cisco Secure Endpoint
CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR
Rapid7 InsightIDR
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Huntress Managed EDR Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- How do you estimate ROI of a Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solution?
- When evaluating Managed Detection and Response (MDR), what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Which solution do you prefer: Optiv Managed Security Services or eSentire?
- Why is Managed Detection and Response (MDR) important for companies?