GoToMeeting Reviews

Screenshare is the most valuable feature as well as the number of meeting participants possible in a meeting. It also has good quality. 

The sound quality is good but the video quality needs improvement. 

I started using GoToMeeting one year ago. 

It is stable. 

Scalability is good. There are around fifty users in our company. We are a smaller company of 100 people, we don't have plans to increase usage. 

We haven't contacted their support. 

We also used Skype and Webex. GoToMeeting is available on many platforms which is a good advantage. 

I would rate it an eight out of ten. To make it a ten it should be able to have more participants. 

The advice I would give to someone considering this solution is to be sure that you have good network quality. 

I use this solution for having meetings with people that need to dial in from the outside.

The most valuable feature is the dial-in capability.

Manageability needs to be improved.

I have been using GoToMeeting for seven to eight years.

I haven't experienced any problems in terms of stability.

Scalability has not been a problem.

It is difficult to reach the people at GoToMeeting, even if you're trying to reach somebody in sales. I find this strange because they have an amazing product, but you would expect to have trouble reaching a company when it is the opposite.

I have used Zoom with one of my clients and I also use Microsoft Teams.

If Microsoft Teams had dial-in capability then I would use it instead, rather than paying extra for GoToMeeting.

I purchased ten licenses for GoToMeeting. It is a little expensive although now, with the competition from Zoom and other products, they have lowered their prices and it is better.

Overall, this solution is very good. Only the management and pricing are in need of improvement.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

GoToMeeting is not so great. It is not always consistent in its performance. Sometimes it works well and if you're on a mobile device it works but sometimes it doesn't work. Even if it has a good broadband connection, it doesn't always work properly. 

It has been good, but it is not consistent.

When managing a conference, it is simple and easy. If I want somebody to share a screen, it is simple.

The way the whole screen is set up is good.

Even for somebody who does not have a lot of experience, they can easily use it.

It is not so stable. 

They're trying to bring in too many things and make it look really complex. For the common, simple new user, it's not that easy to use, like Zoom.

I use Zoom, mainly for other meetings. I feel that Zoom is a better product. It works much better on mobile than desktops or laptops.

I would rate it a seven out of ten. 

I would recommend Zoom over GoToMeeting. 

In addition to the features it already has, I think GoToMeeting should also have additional features that are not present at the moment. 

I have been using GoToMeeting for two years. 

We have had issues with stability.

It hasn't been required to contact their technical support. The issues we had weren't related to the features, rather it would hang and we would reset it and it would work. 

I find BlueJeans very similar to Skype and it does similar things that Google does. You can add more team members there so BlueJeans is a proven solution. It's a good tool. It's not a replacement to GoToMeeting, but equally handy when it comes to some things.

GoToMeeting is very handy. It's good software. I would definitely recommend it.

I would rate GoToMeeting an eight out of ten. Not a ten because there are still some features it should still have. 

As a sales organization, we get involved with customer conferences, product demonstrations, and support calls with our customers where we need to take control of their PC. We also use it for internal conferencing between teams.

We did a cost comparison and it seemed to be the cheapest. Whether that's still the case now or not, I don't know. It's cost-effective. 

There are always things to improve. But I haven't had any issues that I needed to report to them.

The newer user interface takes a bit longer to get used to.

We have been using GoToMeeting for two years. 

We have used Webex and Zoom. Although now Zoom has got a security problem, so I don't think many people are going to be using that in the future.

I'd recommend it. I have no issues with the performance and no issues with the way it works. It is a better option from a security perspective with what's going on with Zoom. I would definitely recommend it.

I would rate it an eight out of ten. There's always room for improvement. 

I use it for organizing meetings with my customers and partners around the world. My intention is to organize webinars and training.

The key advantage of GoToMeeting is the ability to use it without installing anything.

The enrolment for a non-IT user should be easier. It should be simplified for non-IT users.

The software is stable but I think the performance is not the best on the market. I was in a meeting yesterday and it kept on freezing. I don't think it was due to the software. It was more due to the infrastructure of GoToMeeting. We missed some parts of the discussion during the meeting.

It's scalable. I've been to big meetings and it's quite scalable.

I haven't been in touch with technical support yet. 

The initial setup was straightforward. It only took a few minutes to deploy. 

My advice to someone implementing this solution is to have a good camera and microphone.

I would recommend Zoom as opposed to GoToMeeting. Zoom has a new feature that offers the ability to change the background. You can hide what's behind your chair. It's useful to have the ability to change the background of your video. Zoom has the ability to change your background to whatever you want, even the view, and in GoToMeeting, you don't have that option at all.

It seems trivial but during meetings, some of my technicians don't want to turn on the camera because they don't want what's behind them to show.

I would rate GoToMeeting an eight out of ten. 

Enables spontaneous meetings across geographies.

• Ease of setup and login by attendees
• Quality of screen sharing is adequate
• Facilitates sharing visually, and not just via audio

Poor error recovery, too sensitive to transmission errors. Needs better codecs and more robust system software that can handle network glitches.

There are stability issues.

No scalability issues.

Fair.

FreeConferenceCall.com

The setup was simple.

Negotiate for discounts.

WebEx and Skype for Business.

I give it a seven out of 10. Poor error correction, too sensitive to noise. System goes down frequently as a result, and attendees have to redial.

Try Zoom, it is more stable.

GoToMeeting took a very short time to install and it worked without a hitch. I was able to participate in an online webinar and to view the webcast.

I don't have any cons.

The solution is very simple and dependable.