We performed a comparison between CylancePROTECT and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"You can manage all the threats and everything from a centralized dashboard."
"CylancePROTECT is very stable - we've had no issues with performance and no errors or bugs."
"Specifically for a Windows domain environment, the product can be customized and pushed via GPO or SCCM without issue."
"The deployment of updates is easy."
"The solution is pretty easy to scale."
"I like the AI and mathematical components that they use."
"Endpoints are protected in real-time without the need of a centralized server."
"A user can continue to add endpoints and the solution will continue to perform well."
"The seamless deployment is very valuable."
"It is scalable and stable and the initial setup is the easiest part of using the product."
"The threat scanning is excellent. It uses predictive technology and I can utilize attack data to help us fine-tune our systems and network infrastructure. This protects us against current and future attacks."
"It's very stable and reliable."
"The features we have found most valuable have been containment as well as the ability to triage agent activities."
"Provides good mobile device protection."
"It's a stable solution with good performance."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its dashboard."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"The solution is not stable."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"It should have better support for Windows and Mac."
"The process of whitelisting a script that you want to be able to run can be a little bit difficult, or awkward."
"Having worked with SentinelOne, Cylance is good, however, it probably needs to add a feature similar to SentinelOne's rollback functionality. With this feature, if you get infected, with a click, you can go back to the pre-infection state. If Cylance could add this functionality to their offering as well, that would be ideal."
"CylancePROTECT's dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"Additionally, their channel management has been lacking, with a notable disregard for small and medium-sized businesses, focusing primarily on large enterprises and very large MSPs."
"I'd like them to do software distribution too, but they said that that's architecturally not at the product line."
"I would like to see them fix the alerting system so that the endpoint reporting is a bit more streamlined."
"We would like to see secure integration and multi-factor authentication to be able to access the administration dashboard."
"The Linux support is very poor. I use base detection. Currently, they are providing malware protection and logon track features in Windows and Mac. These features aren't available in Linux. It will be helpful to extend these capabilities to Linux. We would also like assets grouping and device lock protection features, which are included in their roadmap."
"The solution needs to work on memory consumption. It is too high."
"The performance could be better. I noticed that it slows down a bit."
"A policy-editing console should be added."
"Looking at the current ePolicy orchestrator, and the transition of most vendors to the cloud, they need to do an improvement with the current dashboard or the overall aesthetic of their GUI."
"The integration and display of the dashboards have to be done better."
"Sometimes, one might face issues with the scalability of the product. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing. The price should be improved, it's high."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
CylancePROTECT is ranked 27th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 39 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 18th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 48 reviews. CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "It integrates well with other solutions, but the vendor needs more of a local presence and faster response". CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Open EDR. See our CylancePROTECT vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.