We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) and Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM).
"It's normally able to meet 100% expectations of our customers."
"The ability to (somewhat) manage full Windows 10 computers including EXE-based or MSI-based application deployments using Azure Active Directory as Identity."
"While I don't think you can ever have full visibility and control, Intune certainly allows us to see the applications being used and tells us if things like Windows patches aren't applied to machines. It does a good job. That visibility makes life a little easier."
"A valuable feature is user enrollment, where users can enroll their devices in their organizations themselves."
"The mobile application management, MAM, is the most useful aspect of the solution."
"The most valuable features are the ones that make sure that the deployment is of a standard operating system and the Zero Touch deployment, which is very useful. This allows users to have an out of box experience."
"We can securely manage both company-owned devices and personal devices enrolled in our BYOD program."
"Easy to use."
"The most valuable features include remote inventory analysis, security features like geofencing, and software distribution."
"It’s helped us manage our endpoints."
"The cloud dashboard's analytics data is particularly valuable, giving me insights into user activities and making it easy to track and manage devices."
"The stability of the solution is very good. It's reliable. We don't have crashes or experience freezing. There aren't bugs or glitches."
"It's a very easy solution for the most part, it's very easy to implement and very easy to administer."
"Meraki Systems Manager's most valuable features are password management, device tracking, remote resetting and wiping, device management, inventory management, and easy policy deployment."
"The solution is easy to use and support."
"The UI is easy to learn."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management offers on-premises deployment."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to assign a package to a user on a system If you have your software packages set up via SCCM. It automates the process, which is very convenient, especially since most of our people are remote. Additionally, the overall functionality is good."
"Intune has limited integration with non-Microsoft solutions."
"The reporting is subpar. That's the only issue we have with Intune. We use another solution for that purpose."
"It would really be helpful to have the option to manage server operating systems as well, like Windows Server, at least. That way, we could scrap the use of SCCM, which requires a lot of on-premises infrastructure."
"Intune doesn't provide much control over Windows servers. It's something we struggle with."
"Intune's reporting and logging could be improved. When troubleshooting, it's difficult to collect the logs and determine what's happening. If I want to filter out the compliant devices, I can see it from the logs, but I would like the option to drill down further."
"We only have major classifications for iOS and Android, but there are different brands that have different cycles of updates. If they can fine-tune it to make it more brand-specific, that would be even better."
"There is room for improvement in integrating additional features such as Purview and SharePoint activities into Intune."
"There are some issues using the solution with macOS and iOS, and it offers limited granular control with them. Intune works better on Windows and Android."
"The price could be better."
"It would be beneficial to have better integration with other OS."
"It doesn't seem to be able to establish some VPN tunnels with other devices in a particular way that such as an ASA can do for us."
"Integration with other tools, such as, ConnectWise Automate."
"The tool's pricing needs to be more flexible like Cisco's."
"I've participated in numerous product launches primarily focused on HP and Dell. Consequently, there should be a vested interest in local gatherings to showcase product advantages and performance. Particularly in Singapore, it only has so limited integrators to engage in IP product sales. There's room for improvement through dedicated workshops and training. The European and Western markets differ significantly from the context here. The physical location holds more importance. Thus, they should have a survey to evaluate demand, supply, and sales points, tailoring strategies accordingly."
"The solution can be expensive."
"One area for improvement in Cisco Meraki Systems Manager is the ability for more advanced users to make detailed and non-standard changes."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management could improve the user interface, it is not very intuitive."
"In terms of integration, there is still room for improvement in Matrix42."
More Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is ranked 6th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 26 reviews while Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is ranked 12th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 2 reviews. Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is rated 8.4, while Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) writes "Easy to use and excels in generating reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management writes "It is a complete and competitive solution with excellent OEM support". Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, IBM MaaS360 and SOTI MobiControl, whereas Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is most compared with Ivanti Neurons for MDM and ManageEngine Endpoint Central.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
