We performed a comparison between ServiceNow Security Operations and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Incident Response solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ease of use is great."
"The product has a very simple UI."
"It gives you the ability to bring data into the system. The workflows are out of the box, and it gives you the ability to auto-assign the incidents based on criteria and vulnerabilities."
"Integration to other security tools allows for a consolidated view of all vulnerabilities, incidents, etc. for all sorts of leverage in a single platform to assess governance risk and compliance as well as an enhanced, enriched intelligence."
"It's stable."
"The solution is available over the cloud and is easy to manage."
"The most valuable aspect of working with ServiceNow is its meaningful and feature-rich product."
"The "follow" feature is really good. If the user is not responding, there's an option to "follow". Just click on the button, and it will automatically trigger an email to the end user."
"It is stable and easy to set up."
"The solution is very useful and easy to handle. You don't need much intervention with this product."
"CB Defense is more powerful, and you can take more actions than others. Its security features and signatures are constantly updated, so it is more effective than other security solutions."
"What I like the most about it is the dynamic grouping, where you get to group endpoints based on setup criteria. That's pretty cool. I like the simplified policy management and simplified white-listing process."
"It is a very complete platform."
"It has the best live response feature."
"The initial setup was fairly easy."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is one of the best EDR tools in the market."
"The solution needs to make customization easier. You cannot do much customization immediately. It requires an extensive workload. If the customization process was user-friendly, it would be much better."
"There are limitations for the third-parties that are providing the inputs. They should increase the robustness of the solution."
"An area for improvement I observed in ServiceNow Security Operations is the need to maintain correct CMDB data because if you're unable to do this, you can't perfectly maintain the vulnerability data. CMDB data in ServiceNow Security Operations needs to be accurate. As I've been working on ServiceNow Security Operations for only seven months, I still need more time to try all its modules before I can give recommendations regarding additional features I'd like to see in the solution."
"The product is called SecOps, but it is not security operations in terms of SIEM solutions."
"It's very slow. When you click a button or update a field, it takes forever to actually react."
"The threat intelligence module needs a better dashboard."
"In future releases, I would like to add a follow-up and reminder feature. For the tickets in our queue, we could set reminders. This would help us prioritize older tickets before moving on to new ones."
"Process framework and best practices for ease of integration between IT and security teams via incident, problem, and change."
"It is difficult to extract reports for ongoing scans"
"Integration is difficult, but CB Defense is more powerful than others. It is difficult to implement but easy to pick up many detections."
"This product should be cheaper."
"In the past, we've seen some stability issues in the latest version releases. We tend to hang back one version just to make sure issues are fully resolved to avoid user disruption."
"The pricing could be more reasonable."
"This solution could have greater granular control on how certain applications work."
"There are many different controls that are needed to be put into place for upgrading that makes it difficult. Having to re-engineer your IT infrastructure to match their software, as opposed to having it integrate and work independently causes difficulties. When there is an update to any software everyone has to be involved."
"Adding an application and a device control feature would be a great help for this solution."
More ServiceNow Security Operations Pricing and Cost Advice →
ServiceNow Security Operations is ranked 3rd in Security Incident Response with 14 reviews while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is ranked 1st in Security Incident Response with 61 reviews. ServiceNow Security Operations is rated 8.0, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ServiceNow Security Operations writes "Mature with nice UI and customizable workflows". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint writes "Centralization via the cloud allows us to protect and control people working from home". ServiceNow Security Operations is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Resilient and Fortinet FortiSOAR, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Symantec Endpoint Security. See our ServiceNow Security Operations vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint report.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
