Bizagi vs IBM Case Foundation vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bizagi Logo
6,336 views|5,562 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
497 views|401 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
979 views|768 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bizagi, IBM Case Foundation, and OpenText 360 for SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Its cost is the most valuable. It is not as expensive. It is also easy to make different types of processes for the users.""The documentation capabilities are very good. Very structured documents and process versions are valuable features, and being able to communicate that to our customers is also a very good feature. It has a good balance between the effort and the result. So, you don't need to be too detailed. You can document while you are modeling, which is a very good feature.""The most valuable feature is that it is compatible with Visual Studio and .NET, and we can program it. Its speed is very good, and it is also stable and easy to deploy.""Business process modelling and simulation.""The amount of control that this solution provides is great.""The most valuable feature is the organizational modeling capability.""This is a free solution that allows us to create quality visualizations for our company.""I like the integration part, and I also like how they use the database, such as the data when they implement all the data side, and how you can easily integrate it with their widgets."

More Bizagi Pros →

"The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features.""Case Foundation provides a strong security boost.""A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting.""It's very easy.""It provides us the capability of producing b​​usiness processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository.""The content management is great.""The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well.""It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events."

More IBM Case Foundation Pros →

"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search.""The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great.""This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository.""We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes.""The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good.""OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents.""It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches.""The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pros →

Cons
"The solution was very limited.""I would like to see more in terms of analytics and better reporting.""The open source version lacks the option to publish.""Also, the tool sometimes feels not so mature when we find random deploy errors from testing to production environment.""They should improve the migration process between major versions, from version 9 to 10, we had to redo our implementation.""I don't know if it's a problem with my operating system or a Bizagi problem, but many times I see that when I try to connect different activities, they show up as not connected.""The product used to have a simulation feature, which I had used quite often. However, it's since been discontinued. It might have originally been a paid feature. It would be nice if they could bring it back and offer it for free.""Bizagi allows for automation, but it's very complicated."

More Bizagi Cons →

"We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic.""The cloud version could use more stability.""There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's document management offerings.""​The place of improvement is merging or combining all of the workflow functionality into one seamless tool. Now, there are multiple installations that are different. Case Foundation, before you can put Case Manager and you've got IBM BPM, and the roadmap is there to merge them altogether. But that's the struggle at the moment, it's having multiple installations and disparate workflow applications.​""The interface needs to be more user-friendly.""Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly.""There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer""IBM needs to update the user interfaces of all its products to make them more intuitive and accessible to beginners. Compared to Microsoft products, IBM solutions are less user-friendly. IBM programs are hard to master. It's a problem in my region because it's hard to find IT staff who can work with IBM."

More IBM Case Foundation Cons →

"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved.""Integration is an area where the solution lacks.""If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option.""Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier.""OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format.""They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all.""I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit.""The user interface could definitely be improved."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is good value for money."
  • "For the prices, we didn't try a negotiations about licensing or pricing, but if i can say a word about this, I find Bizagi prices to be well thought out."
  • "The modeler itself is free. For the whole BPM suite, there are other options that may be better."
  • "It is on par with other BPM tools, but not as expensive as Pega nor Appian."
  • "If they can freeze the pricing in a contract, I advise them to do so."
  • "I think that its price is reasonable."
  • "This solution would be expensive for a company that has a lot of users."
  • "The Bizagi modeler can be downloaded free of charge."
  • More Bizagi Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."
  • "This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license."
  • "IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."
  • "The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either."
  • More IBM Case Foundation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."
  • "On-premises version is expensive"
  • "SharePoint uses a subscription model."
  • "There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."
  • "OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."
  • "The solution has a very complex pricing model."
  • "Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."
  • "It has a reasonable price."
  • More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I have been using Bizagi with a major project for a state government agency for about four years now. It is pretty… more »
    Top Answer:The natural notation is the best feature of Bizagi because it makes it compatible with other products.
    Top Answer: A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in… more »
    Top Answer:The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either. I would rate it five out… more »
    Top Answer:There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader… more »
    Top Answer:The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams.
    Top Answer:OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers subscription-based licensing. It has a reasonable price. I rate the pricing a seven… more »
    Top Answer:The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use. They could enhance the integration with Power BI and… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    6,336
    Comparisons
    5,562
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    785
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    497
    Comparisons
    401
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    441
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    979
    Comparisons
    768
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    505
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager
    Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
    Learn More
    Overview

    Bizagi’s industry-leading low-code process automation platform connects people, applications, robots, and information. As the most business-friendly and flexible solution on the market, Bizagi enables true collaboration between business and IT, delivering faster adoption and success. Fuelled by a community of 1 million users, Bizagi powers over 1,000 organizations worldwide including Adidas, BAE Systems, and Old Mutual. For more information visit www.bizagi.com

    IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.
    With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.
    Sample Customers
    adidas, Audi, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Post DHL & many more - 500+ customer globally.
    Suncorp Group Limited
    iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government14%
    Retailer8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Educational Organization8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Government16%
    Insurance Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Government12%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise34%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: April 2024.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.