Adobe Workfront vs Microsoft Project Server vs Sciforma comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adobe Logo
2,470 views|1,031 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
2,226 views|1,085 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Sciforma Logo
256 views|215 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe Workfront, Microsoft Project Server, and Sciforma based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Broadcom, ServiceNow and others in Project Portfolio Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Project Portfolio Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The tool is very user-friendly.""I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application.""The intake feature is the most valuable in Workfront.""Monitoring the progress of projects and tasks is very effective.""Workfront is innovative and these were plenty of features that I found valuable while working at Logitech. Workfront had this feature of Project Schedule Templatization. This saves time and effort and even leads to the standardization of processes that are well-assorted. The Intelligent Graphical Interfaces of Workfront allow one to look at a specific type of resource and a specific phase for a specific family of products. You can get quite granular with the data and even zoom in or out of the timeline. It also categorizes projects according to classes and portfolios so that over time, you can more easily understand what are the various metrics involved in producing a specific portfolio Another important feature is Workfront allowing you to validate milestones and investigate the project. This also helped me to understand which projects are performing well and whether it was beneficial to invest in the same. The IT and the app configuration is quite secure and it is one of the benefits. One more valuable feature is the integration of communication systems inside Workfront. This helps you differentiate between normal business emails and project-specific conversations. This is also known as ‘queues’ and I absolutely find this feature extremely powerful.""The solution is stable.""Feature-wise, I would say that its overall ability to be infinitely customizable is valuable...My experience with the support team has been amazing.""I also like Workfront's integration. The solution integrates natively with other systems. It's easy to connect Workfront to any product that has a customer service database, such as a CRM or service ticket management solution."

More Adobe Workfront Pros →

"The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends, especially when managing multiple projects.""The scheduling feature is the most useful.""This is a scalable solution. It is easy to set up and to add clusters to your environment.""Microsoft Project Server helps organizations in collaboration.""The solution is stable.""I like the way you can build the schedule by the Don't Start Before or Don't Start After values. You can use it to build your schedule based on how you change your dates. This is how it actually builds the schedule.""The solution's ease of use is its most valuable aspect.""I found the portfolio management valuable."

More Microsoft Project Server Pros →

"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team.""The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma.""I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."

More Sciforma Pros →

Cons
"I would say that the stability, honestly, has gone down since the Adobe acquisition, and the quality when they roll out their updates.""Sometimes there are glitches when we are reviewing an interactive proof.""The solution's visualization feature could be user-friendly.""We were having some difficulties creating different kinds of reports and dashboards.""Our product and graphic designers are working with various Adobe products, but Workfront has a no-frills interface. It's a useful tool with everything we need, but it could be a little more attractive and present information in a polished way. It's a web interface, so it's accessible, but the appearance could be a little slicker.""Workfront's reporting capabilities must be improved.""The interface can also be customized to fit and accept many tools for better performance and customer service improvement.""I have used the product and instantiated it, almost seven years back. The process was fairly complex, however, I don't know if they have changed the same now. But this is something I think, if not addressed can be improved. Another area that needs a little attention, is the change of implementation lead. Back when we had Workfront instantiated, we often had our timeline delayed due to the change in the implementation lead. Now Workfront is under Adobe and, in case, this issue, isn't fixed it should be given due attention. Also, Workfront is a universal tool, which can pose a difficulty for small businesses and companies, who don't have the required time, effort, and knowledge to configure it periodically."

More Adobe Workfront Cons →

"The solution's desktop version is not compatible with the MacBook.""When we started using this solution from scratch, we got lost. Microsoft should provide some templates for configurations for certain use cases.""This solution could improve by adding integration with Primavera schedules to allow the reading and management of them.""We need to be able to compare milestones, calls, and other variables regarding the projects we are working on. I have to contract developers to make reports, which is where things get complicated. They need to develop personal and custom fields for us.""The cost could be lower.""The deployment aspect of the product is a bit tedious.""It has to be more user-friendly. For instance, there should be some assistance, like when you go to certain sites, people pop up and say, "Can we help you? What are you looking for?" It's not interactive enough.""The price of the product must be improved."

More Microsoft Project Server Cons →

"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved.""The report developer needs a bit of streamlining.""For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."

More Sciforma Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing of Workfront is completely license based."
  • "Adobe purchased Workfront in the past year, and they're putting work into developing the platform, so I expect the price to rise. It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable for the value it provides. It isn't Monday.com where you pick a license with a set price, and you've got a project manager."
  • "We are partners with Adobe, so we get the licensing at a cheaper rate."
  • "Speaking about pricing, I wouldn't recommend it to a smaller company because I do think the price point is higher than other solutions that can work."
  • "The pricing is a barrier to implementation. It is expensive compared to other competitors. Speaking about licensing, they have a private manager license for $1000, which you can use for administration as well. Then they offer a worker license for $500, and then a reviewer or contributor license which is free."
  • More Adobe Workfront Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I think they need more flexibility with licensing, because there are preconceived ideas that don't allow as much flexibility with the various licenses."
  • "The licensing was procured before my involvement."
  • "It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter."
  • "It is on the expensive side."
  • "There is a licensing cost."
  • "There is an annual license required for this solution."
  • "I cannot comment on the price as I was not responsible for purchasing the solution."
  • "I'm not quite sure about the licensing costs. We're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of about 80,000 to 90,000 a year for our current on-prem because we handle our own licensing. As far as Project Online is concerned, we're still trying to get a good handle on that. It looks like it is going to be in a neighborhood of about 120,000 to 150,000 a year, but we're getting a lot more capability out of it."
  • More Microsoft Project Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I rate the pricing a four out of ten because Sciforma's rates are good."
  • "The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."
  • More Sciforma Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating… more »
    Top Answer:It is definitely on the expensive side compared to other alternatives like Jira.
    Top Answer:There are a few improvements needed in Adobe Workfront. Previously, while I was working with the tool, we worked on it… more »
    Top Answer:The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is very expensive. It is a part of my enterprise database. I am paying a subscription for it. It doesn't… more »
    Top Answer:Microsoft is going to integrate the Co-Pilot features into Microsoft Project. The AI feature is an additional feature… more »
    Top Answer:The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma.
    Top Answer:The solution's pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.
    Top Answer:The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,470
    Comparisons
    1,031
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    964
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    2,226
    Comparisons
    1,085
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    356
    Rating
    7.6
    Views
    256
    Comparisons
    215
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    552
    Rating
    9.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AtTask, Workfront DAM
    MS Project Server
    One2team
    Learn More
    Overview

    AtTask is a cloud-based Enterprise Work Management solution that helps marketing, IT, and other enterprise teams conquer the chaos of excessive email, redundant status meetings, and disconnected tools. Unlike other tools, AtTask Enterprise Work Cloud is a centralized, easy-to-adopt solution for managing and collaborating on all types of work through the entire work lifecycle, which improves team productivity and executive visibility. AtTask is trusted by thousands of global enterprises, like Adobe, Cisco, HBO, House of Blues, REI, Trek, Schneider Electric, and ATB Financial. To learn more, visit www.AtTask.com or follow us on Twitter @AtTask.

    Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately.
    Sciforma is a leading provider of Project & Portfolio Management Software. With more than 30 years of experience, Sciforma is tailored to meet any industries' needs. Sciforma is an enterprise-wide solutions created to meet strategic, functional and executional needs. Adaptability and scalability are the perfect adjectives to describe Sciforma, which is available SaaS, Hosted and On-Site.
    Sample Customers
    Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse
    Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations
    1&1, ABB, abbvie, Accor, Acoss, Actia, ALD Automotive, Airbus, Artelia, ascom
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Manufacturing Company20%
    University7%
    Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization66%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Healthcare Company3%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Construction Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise59%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business6%
    Midsize Enterprise69%
    Large Enterprise24%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Project Portfolio Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Broadcom, ServiceNow and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: April 2024.
    769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.