Adobe Experience Manager vs SharePoint vs Workplace by Facebook comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adobe Logo
1,284 views|828 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
7,722 views|6,293 comparisons
77% willing to recommend
Meta Logo
648 views|536 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe Experience Manager, SharePoint, and Workplace by Facebook based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Adobe Experience Manager is a content management system, and we use it to create and manage a website.""I like the native applications such as Adobe Target, Adobe Analytics, and Adobe Experience Platform. Because of these, it's very easy to connect and obtain reports on how my website is doing, how many have visited it, how frequently, etc. The multiple publisher concept is one of the best parts of this solution.""Adobe Experience Manager is quite a powerful product that you can use to design files and export them.""It is easy to learn. You don't need to be an advanced Java developer.""If you want to use content in a mobile application and you want the content in some other application, you can simply expose it from the CMS to different clients or different systems. It's easy. On top of that, the technology underlying AEM is open-source and is very powerful like Apache Sling and JCR.""Easy to work with the solution.""I've used several CMS tools, but Adobe Experience Manager is feature-rich, especially for web security and content management. It's more efficient to manage content on Adobe Experience Manager, and you can do a lot with it, such as updating content at any time, and on any platform, even from mobile or tablet. Adobe Experience Manager is still getting updated daily, and it's the best CMS tool in the market for me. I like that you can manage assets in Adobe Experience Manager. I also like that the solution has an analytics dashboard that shows you where the traffic comes from, how many clicks come from a specific location, the number of clicks and impressions, etc. Adobe Experience Manager can be accessed by other teams, for example, the digital media department of my company, so the solution can be used and updated per each team's requirement. Adobe Experience Manager is more than just a web developer tool, as it also allows visibility tracking and has other uses. I also like that the GUI for Adobe Experience Manager is straightforward and catchy. It has separate folders and icons, so using Adobe Experience Manager isn't tough. The solution is straightforward to use and handle."

More Adobe Experience Manager Pros →

"Helps with document collaboration and workflow.""The search feature is valuable.""It improved transparency around work products.""The ability to have version control and co-editing is vital to our workflows.""Its most valuable feature is the document library.""We can now share to team members by MS Teams and assign planners to follow and update statuses in a single platform.""It has improve our organization by speeding up document sharing.""The workflow feature is valuable because it enables us to cascade responsibilities."

More SharePoint Pros →

"The product was easy to use.""Storage is the best thing about the solution.""The solution is used as a knowledge platform for sharing knowledge and information that everybody can easily access.""A full-featured collaboration tool that is as easy to use as Facebook."

More Workplace by Facebook Pros →

Cons
"In comparison to other CMS products, Adobe Experience Manager is missing some capabilities such as proper versioning or a better versioning system and backend connectivity. If something is deleted in AEM, the user cannot recover it. You have to call technical support, and they will need to recover the whole instance. So, it's really difficult. For example, if you delete a page, you cannot recover it. There should be an option to recover it. In AEM, you have to go to the previous state of the instance itself or the virtual machine, and you have to restore everything, which is not good.""Adobe Experience Manager's pricing could be improved.""I haven't seen any areas for improvement in Adobe Experience Manager as it's a full-fledged CMS tool, and Adobe is already working on enhancements for the solution. Adobe is working to make Adobe Experience Manager more valuable and easier to use for any user, even non-technical ones, through multiple components and templates. Day by day, Adobe provides the latest update to Adobe Experience Manager, and if my team needs any particular change, it just needs to be reported to the Adobe team. As Adobe Experience Manager has a broad scope and a lot of use cases and features, it's a solution that requires some time and effort from you in terms of learning, especially if you're implementing it for different clients, which could be an area for improvement.""Tool-wise, the Adobe Experience Manager support team is not very responsive when the user face issues in AEM as a Cloud Service.""The solution's pricing and stability could be improved.""The latest trend is to render everything in the client-side framework. For example, SPA or single page application. This is a feature that needs improvement. The cloud deployment pipeline needs to be improved as well.""Programming model could be improved, it's a monolithic solution."

More Adobe Experience Manager Cons →

"Search can be improved a lot because we are always trying to compare it with Google Search. Beyond that, it would be helpful to tag the documents.""SharePoint Online could improve the user interface and when modifying any of the user interfaces can be challenging. Additionally, there are challenges with the detail in the analytics user interface and the overall customization could improve.""Allow more functionalities for the on-premise version. Do not force the move of content to a non-private cloud.""Document management and the ability to easily integrate single sign-on (SSO) are areas for improvement in SharePoint.""The product must provide more automation.""The solution lacks collaboration features.""The initial setup was very complex.""Processing data from multiple site collections is not easy as they reside in different databases."

More SharePoint Cons →

"The implementation could be made easier.""The product should allow users to assign tasks and automate processes.""There needs to be a restriction on who can download content.""The conferencing feature does not work well with multiple parties or locations."

More Workplace by Facebook Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There's a free trial for one month for Adobe Experience Manager, which you can use for learning purposes, then, after the trial period, you'll need to purchase the license. Adobe offers a few plans for Adobe Experience Manager, but I'm unaware of how much my company is paying."
  • "It's a costly solution. I would rate the price at two out of five on a scale from one to five, where one is the most expensive and five is the most competitive."
  • "Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee to use the solution, which is highly-priced."
  • More Adobe Experience Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products. This leads to always paying for a project you will never use fully or always be adding to."
  • "Licensing can be by server or by seat."
  • "It is very expensive.​"
  • "The data classification and search elements are cheap."
  • "The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."
  • "We have purchased add-ons to handle multiple site collections, form creation, and design."
  • "The cost is expensive, but worthwhile."
  • "The pricing works for us."
  • More SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The regular package costs us $4 per user per month."
  • "The solution seemed expensive to me."
  • More Workplace by Facebook Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a round-up of a couple of the more well known platforms and compare their products to Drupal. In this roundup we will be comparing Jive, Sharepoint and Drupal Commons. Drupal Commons is a popular distribution created by Acquia to compete with some of these other proprietary platforms. There are many other options out there, commercial and otherwise, to compare with Drupal but I want to focus on Jive and Sharepoint for a couple of reasons. I chose Jive because it is one of the leading competitors in this space in respect to market share. Next, I chose Sharepoint because I have some history with Sharepoint. This experience dates back to when I built www.adhe.edu with Sharepoint 2007 a few years ago. I subsequently wrote this blog entry about my experience shortly after joining Mediacurrent. This roundup will also act as a refresher for those who read my original “Drupal vs. Sharepoint” blog. Yammer, which was recently bought by Microsoft and is the tool we currently use for office communication will also get some mentions throughout this article. As I went through and tested each of these tools I used three main criteria in my evaluation Cost Ability to Customize Overall features… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is easy to learn. You don't need to be an advanced Java developer.
    Top Answer:Area of improvement for Cloud Service: For the last four years, I've been working on AEM as a Cloud Service. I feel the… more »
    Top Answer:It's a powerful content management system – there's really no competitor in the market right now. The main use case is… more »
    Top Answer:Alfresco scores are high on all features of an ECM solution and tools.   Back office processing, rated as 3.36 good.… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is competitive. That's why almost all the companies are using SharePoint. I rate the pricing a ten out of… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is used as a knowledge platform for sharing knowledge and information that everybody can easily access.
    Top Answer:There needs to be a restriction on who can download content. You don't want people to download organization documents… more »
    Top Answer:We use the solution for collaboration and information sharing.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,284
    Comparisons
    828
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    635
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    7,722
    Comparisons
    6,293
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    526
    Rating
    8.1
    Views
    648
    Comparisons
    536
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    389
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Adobe Day CQ5, Ektron Social Marketing, Episerver Content Cloud
    SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
    Facebook Workplace, Facebook at Work
    Learn More
    Overview

    Adobe Communique 5 (Adobe CQ5), currently manifested as Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), is a web-based content management system which is developed to help businesses in offering high-end digital experience to their customers. 

    SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

    Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

    Facebook Workplace is a dedicated and secure space for companies to connect, communicate and collaborate. Organizations of all sizes can use familiar Facebook features such as News Feed, groups, messages and events to get things done.

    Sample Customers
    Metra
    Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
    Royal Bank of Scotland, UST Global, DNB Bank, Smart, IJM Corporation, Telenor Group, Mobilink, Landmark Group, Yes Bank, BrightTALK, Kenshoo, Godrej Consumer Products
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization40%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    University8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Insurance Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise46%
    Large Enterprise44%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.