We performed a comparison between ABBYY Vantage and IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Abbyy is really good in terms of reading OCR."
"The OTR (Optical Text Recognition) is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"Vantage is flexible and customizable. It's a low-code/no-code tool, so you don't need to get into detailed coding. You can also use AI to accomplish medium-complex tasks."
"Compared to other tools, ABBYY Vantage is better because it's very user-friendly."
"Verification station is a really good feature. It allows part-owners to be able to take a look at what comes out of the tool after a document, such as an invoice, is run through ABBYY. It also allows them to update it if there are any mistakes. So, it kind of gives them a little more control over what goes through the system and lessens the errors."
"Verification Station is valuable."
"The whole idea of designing your own templates is pretty much the bread and butter of the product, but that's really the best part because you can design flexible templates."
"We have found the solution to be stable so far."
"We can connect with different database types, and they have included a different package for a terminal connection to, for example, AS400. When it comes to UI development, it's not using the drivers or anything. It's not a selector-based development like UiPath."
"The solution is scalability."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"The feature I found most valuable is the TCO."
"I like the integration with Watson and the possibility to have an intelligent reading of all the customers' documents."
"It is a good tool for automation."
"It's integrated with all the other products within the Salesforce ecosystem."
"IBM Robotic Process Automation has greatly improved the organization by improving the speed of performance, as the speed of the robot is estimated to be 20 times faster than the human being."
"The generic models have a lot of areas to improve. In our experience, we are not able to get good results in the generic models. From a developer's point of view, there could be more improvement if the source code is available on a broader scope"
"It's important to incorporate image detection for signatures or other handwriting elements."
"We would like the workflow building within this solution to be more transparent, which would allow us to model the process."
"The solution needs more web or cloud-based development."
"Programming interfaces should include intelligence or documentation."
"Since we are using a trial version, we don't have administration access to create a tenant to integrate my OCR series with Postman."
"They can have more advanced workflows. They can have some custom status in their workflow. It was there, but they can introduce more cases such as triggering an email or interacting with other systems with APIs. They can be included as stages in their workflow rather than doing it all by scripting."
"They should improve the RESTful API side of this solution. Currently, fully RESTful API is not available in the on-prem version, which is really a problem, and we have to work around this limitation. The cloud version already has a fully RESTful API, but the on-prem version doesn't have a fully RESTful API, which is a big mistake. It is easy to solve, but they aren't solving it quicker. They are taking a long time. Nowadays, most people don't go to the interface. They like to use RESTful API."
"Stability could be better."
"We would like more focus on understanding AI and how it can be used to manage exception handling."
"I would like to have more flexibility in connecting the platform with third-party systems."
"IBM Robotic Process Automation should be more stable."
"Needs better integration with artificial intelligence or with machine-learning."
"We would like a decreased need for customer support."
"IBM’s support should improve response time."
"IBM should provide specific solutions for specific problems, like templates for invoicing processes, or general templates for creating efficient processes."
More IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Pricing and Cost Advice →
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 7th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 46 reviews while IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is ranked 6th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 23 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "Genius-level AI with very easy setup and implementation processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) writes "User-friendly interface and good stability". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath Document Understanding, UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, HyperScience and OpenText Intelligent Capture, whereas IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA) and Blue Prism. See our ABBYY Vantage vs. IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.