Cisco Enterprise Routers Reviews

We are using Cisco Enterprise Routers for network switching for an education institute.

The solution has been highly secure.

I have been using Cisco Enterprise Routers for approximately five years.

The solution is highly stable.

The solution is scalable.

We have approximately 700 people using this solution in my organization.

We have received high-level support from Cisco, it has been great. 

We have previously used other solutions than Cisco but we are getting rid of them.

The installation can be difficult, Cisco equipment is professional-grade and it requires someone with the skills and knowledge to do it.

The installation could be made easier and better documentation is needed.

We are on a three-year license and since we use the solution in an educational institute it is priced reasonably.

I would recommend Cisco Enterprise Routers to others. Cisco provides the best network devices.

I rate Cisco Enterprise Routers a ten out of ten.

We are using Cisco Enterprise Routers as a network gateway, PBX, and firewall.

Cisco Enterprise Routers are easy to use and configure through the CLI.

The solution is not easy to manage for people that do not have the experience.

I have been using Cisco Enterprise Routers for approximately 15 years.

The solution is stable and reliable.

The support from Cisco has been satisfactory.

The installation can be difficult and skilled individuals, such as technicians, are required.

Cisco policy is to limit the features and performance through their license.

I have evaluated other solutions.

I would not recommend this solution.

I rate Cisco Enterprise Routers an eight out of ten.

I use the solution to manage the centralization of our networks as well for an internet connection.

The main features I have found most valuable are the feature management and the stability of the solution. There are no problems with the performance of these routers.

An area of improvement would be the way the licenses are managed because, at the moment, you pay for a license for each router as opposed to paying a once-off cost.

I have been using the solution for about 20 years.

The stability of the solution is better than most other solutions.

The technical support for the solution was good.

The solution is easy to manage and took only two weeks to deploy.

Our client primarily uses the solution for a Computer Base Test Center.

The durability of the solution is excellent.

They offer a variety of very good features.

The pricing of the solution needs improvement.

The solution is usually stable. It could be based on design, but on a particular router that I received, I noticed it started overheating at one point, so it kept shutting down. This may be because of where I purchased the router, however.

The initial setup of the solution is quite easy if you are a technical person. If you are not a technical person it can take a while. A technical person should be able to deploy it in 25-45 minutes.

We use the enterprise version of the solution. I deploy it for our clients.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

Our primary use for this solution is MPLS and Internet routing.

I am a network architect and this is one of the solutions that I have worked with.

We are required to build an MPLS network in our company, and this solution has been very useful.

The most valuable features of this solution are MPLS, BGP, and VRF.

The support for SD-WAN technology is not mature yet.

I would like to see the setup time reduced.

We have no issues with respect to stability. It is ok.

Scalability is ok.

I have not recently been in contact with technical support because it is the operational team that would deal with opening tickets. However, when I dealt with them several years ago, I was satisfied most of the time.

The setup of enterprise routers is primarily hardware and it takes a long time to set up.

Our in-house team performed the deployment.

The price of this solution is high.

In one or two years, once SD-WAN is more mature, we may switch from our traditional routers and protocols to be completely integrated with SD-WAN.

My advice for anybody who is implementing this solution is to consider the routing that is needed because it can change the way you set up and deploy. There are differences between MPLS, internet routing, and office connectivity. SD-WAN will also be something to look into.

This is a good solution, but it's not perfect.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

This is the Enterprise Class solution for Routing, all technologies needs for now and for the future are supported. Everything is well documented in Cisco DOC site, with a lot of deployment scenarios as well in others sites around the web. Technically it is incontestable.

Solved most communications needs and trouble scenarios.

I cannot see any, maybe more new technologies that we unknown.

For eight years and counting.

A lot, but the majority is due to vendor incompatibility with others and errors in deployment.

None.

It dependent of the scenario and technical use and needs.

Very good.

Very Good.

Yes, it depends of the customer's budget and management directions.

Very easy in all the ways.

In-house one.

It is can be very expensive and licensing complex.

Yes, Juniper and Brocade solutions.

The primary uses are routing, voice gateways, and voice-over IP. We have approximately 600 users in our organization.

Cisco Routers are fast. They have very good performance. The management of these routers are easier than any other routers. There are a lot of features.

I would like the routers to have the same support and duration of support as the switches.

I have been using Cisco Enterprise Routers for 10 years.

The routers are stable.

Cisco routers are scalable.

It is easy to install. One router will less than one day to configure and install. 

I can implement the router by myself, however, sometimes I request more experienced support for the setup.

The routers require a one-time license fee as they are perpetual.

I would rate Cisco Enterprise Routers a 9 out of 10.

We use the solution for our DataCom Network and various others.

The solution is flexible.

I have been using the solution for over ten years.

The product is stable.

I have found it to be scalable with our three million users.

We have Cisco agents that do the deployment of the solution and the install can take a maximum of a few days. We have a team of 20 for maintenance. 

I have found the price to be expensive for the solution. Other products are coming to the market that are not as expensive, Cisco should reduce their price to be more comparable.

I would recommend this product to others.

I rate Cisco Enterprise Routers an eight of ten.