Batch operations. Running our insurance systems.
It is wonderful. It's been everything we expected it to be.
Batch operations. Running our insurance systems.
It is wonderful. It's been everything we expected it to be.
Reliability is a big one. When I go home at night I sleep well because I trust that the product will perform its design.
It has allowed us to automate many of the functions of our operations staff.
For instance, we had production control staff spending two hours a day entering date parms into our daily business processes. And now, CA Workload Automation does it for us.
I am looking forward to more of their dashboard features. I think it would be very valuable for us to have dashboard features that could be delivered to our customers in the form of a URL, and they could refresh that URL whenever they wanted to get up to date performance metrics out of our systems.
There have been a couple hiccups along the way, but then I call support and we always iron out any stability issues. It is a 24 x 7 operation product and it's highly stable.
We're currently crossing over into another insurance underwriting software product, and I see no problems with it being able to scale into this new product area.
I love those guys at tech support. In fact, I recently had a call where someone was concerned that I was upset, so they even had someone else call me to discuss with me how I felt about my call. I was not upset, but I appreciated their follow-through.
They are highly knowledgeable. They seem to be product experts.
Our old solution was losing its ability to scale. As our organization was changing, we needed a product that could change with us, and CA Workload Automation seems to be the right tool.
We chose this product for its scalability and its reliability, and the fact that it can run our business solutions on multiple platforms, in concert with one another. It can run an object on our Windows systems or our Unix systems, and then send messages to the other system when they are complete.
It was complex, but we also hired Automic business support staff to come and assist, and they helped us get through all the complexities, very easily.
We evaluated other products, but it was several years ago.
When selecting a vendor it really centers around the product reliability for us, and we saw that in this product.
I actually sat by several people today, here at the CA World conference, that were saying they were here just to evaluate this product. I mostly told them some of my personal success stories and shared with them, that it has been a wonderful tool for automating our business needs, and that they should really consider this product.
It's a cross-platform scheduler. Any kind of automation that we actually do is over different platforms.
Automation in general. You need to do less manually.
Scheduling in general. Running anything in crontab, you need to put a lot of logic into it to make it work. With this product, you don't have to worry about it. You have the schedule object where you put all the dates or holidays in it, and it does it for you.
I would like to see two-factor authentication, since you see a lot of companies in the news for security breaches. That is a really big thing for us.
Stability is great. We generally have no outages.
We're actually going to be upgrading to version 12, so we're looking forward to it.
This is probably something you don't want to hear, but support seems to be getting worse over the years. For some reason the technical knowledge is missing. Occasionally, you actually have to get all the way to Austria to actually get a resolution, which is where the product is originally from.
I wasn't involved in the initial setup but I do the upgrades. They're straightforward.
We've been using the product for 12, 13 years, so it's been a while.
My most important criterion when selecting a vendor is stability. in general. We want to make sure our customers who use the system never have any downtime.
Give it a try. Test it out. Set up a system, play around with it. It's very easy to work with. The learning curve is not that steep.
Scheduling, mainframe, workload.
It has performed great.
Its stability and reliability, that it's been there for 20 years and 30 years, and it's always been the number one scheduler.
We can handle large workloads, and put a lot of jobs into scheduling very quickly, and we can control a lot of workload through CA 7.
We're looking at distributed AutoSys to integrate with CA 7. And iDASH is another product that we're looking, at and we need the two to be able to talk to each other and be able to view the dependencies across the platforms.
If they can integrate the distributive side with the mainframe side, and a better view to both sides of that, that would be good.
Stability is awesome.
Scalibility is great.
Technical support is very good. We reach the right representatives.
I wasn't involved in the initial setup. They were already a CA 7 customer when I joined. I have been involved in some of the upgrades. They can be a little complex. It's just a big complex product that takes a lot of evaluation.
When we are researching different products or vendors we do a pretty thorough evaluation of all the products. They have to meet our objectives of reducing the risk and cost. Those are the two most important: risk, cost.
I would recommend CA 7.
Enterprise job scheduling.
It has helped to simplify cross-dependency between MVS and Open systems jobs.
Also adding new agents is easy, scheduling is easier and faster.
We have couple of hundred thousand jobs scheduled monthly via ESP so it is critical.
Reduce the number of operational files. This would make the job of a system programmer supporting ESP easier. In the present design, there are too many operational files to maintain.
No issues with stability.
No issues with scalability.
I would rate them nine and a half out of 10. CA technical support is doing a great job.
We had to choose an alternate scheduling tool.
It is relatively simple.
Great tool, excellent technical support, stable product.
SME for Cross Platform Agent installation and configuration. We have taken over ownership from the Unix Ops Team for installing, configuring, and administering the Systems Agents. I have also installed and stood up the Web Client. Currently, rolling it out to the general population of our company.
Scheduling workload across multiple platforms from a single point of contact and integration with ERP/ETL type platforms and products, such as Oracle and SEQUEL.
Sunset CA-7 and stop leading people on with it.
ESP, Dseries, and now Automic are CA's strategic vision. Not much engineering being done with CA-7 any longer. As a "batch scheduler", it is and always has been a workhorse. As we all know, batch scheduling is antiquated. Workload Automation is the future and changing the product name to CA Workload Automation, CA-7 Edition does not make it a modern WLA Platform.
We use it as an IT process automation solution.
We automate recurring processes, keeping track of IT processes controlled worldwide.
We often have to implement complicated processes. Automic Automation Engine provides us the ability to map logic using a scripting language. We have an advantage where practically all automation problems can easily be implemented within the Automation Engine.
We see improvement possibilities in the processing provision of predefined evaluations or individual objects, or in the Self Service portal, which can be used by any user to monitor objects or start objects.
We have had no issues.
We have had no issues.
Technical support is always very helpful, though we do not use it often.
All our problems have been resolved so far. Tips have also been provided on how we can handle a problem.
We had scheduled jobs on a mainframe system. By replacing the mainframe with a Unix system, we also changed the scheduler.
The setup of the system was relatively easy.
We had good local support from Automic.
Everyone has to decide for themselves which licensing model is best suited to their environment.
We evaluated between different scheduling systems. We finally decided on the Automic solution.
Consult onsite support for the first implementation. Errors made at the beginning can only be corrected with great effort afterwards.
Our challenge is having a centralized schedule on a single pain with 180,000 jobs each day. We are looking to move to iDASH with predictive analytics. We don’t have many SLA’s. We're looking to do better with predictive analytics and we want to further integrate.
We were using a lot of homegrown stuff. This solution provides us with more details on jobs failing. It also gives us restorability. For the last 10 years, it's become more complex, but it's also bridged our platforms and gave us the ability to recover.
I'd like to see automation pushed even further, giving us greater looks into other systems. I'd like more enhanced process automation and have it manage a few more platforms without relying on another orchestration platform.
We've used it for 10 years.
We've had no issues with deploying it.
It's stable. It’s so busy finding maintenance windows, and we are currently going through exercises.
We can leverage multiple servers with ease.
Technical support is knowledgeable and I don’t have a whole lot of complaints. We don’t get the run around.
We had already had some other CA technologies, so it was a good fit and we knew what we were dealing with.
Initial setup and upgrades were straightforward.
Understand your needs, don’t complicate it, and understand what you are looking for. You don’t want to create an automated mess.
We use CA Workload Automation AE r11.3.6 to automate enterprise-wide scheduling and file transfers using an FTP plugin.
It has improved my organization by automating IT applications. The solution is used to invoke scripts and batches across multiple systems and the dependency is managed.
Administering with the command line: The feature creates similar jobs in bulk using the command line.