Zimbra Collaboration Reviews

Zimbra Collaboration is a plain mailing solution across our organization and with our partners.

The most valuable feature of Zimbra Collaboration is email functionality.

Zimbra Collaboration does not have a solution roadmap as aggressive as the new collaboration mail solutions. Additionally, they can have a better interface and integration with single sign-on.

I have been using Zimbra Collaboration for approximately seven years.

Zimbra Collaboration is a stable solution.

There were 5,000 users using Zimbra Collaboration.

The scalability of Zimbra Collaboration is good.

I have contacted support for some incidents.

I have not used another similar solution to Zimbra Collaboration.

The initial installation of Zimbra Collaboration was straightforward.

The deployment of Zimbra Collaboration was done in-house. The solution does not require any maintenance.

There is an annual standard licensing fee to use Zimbra Collaboration and there is no other cost.

I rate Zimbra Collaboration an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for emails.

The configuration is simple.

The product must be more customizable.

I have been using the solution for two years.

The tool is stable. I rate the stability a five out of ten.

There are 10 to 20 users in our organization.

The initial setup was moderately difficult. I rate the ease of setup a five out of ten. The deployment took a few days. We have five domains. It was not easy for all the domains. The guides are very good and easy to read.

We use the free version.

We also use Nextcloud and Seafile.

Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

I use the product for the main server.

Network NG Modules are valuable to us. They are very high modules. The solution has features that can help administrators and users to manage the server. It is the best tool.

The only problem I face with the product is spam. I do not have any other big problems. The antispam and antivirus features are hard to understand on mobile devices. The solution should improve the features to provide more clarity to the users.

I am using the solution currently.

The product is stable. I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

I rate the solution’s scalability a nine out of ten. It is very scalable.

The initial setup is easy for system administrators.

The deployment took one hour.

The solution is not expensive compared to other products. It is cheap.

I know others who use the solution in their organization. I would recommend the tool to others. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We typically use the solution for our email and collaboration. It’s nothing much. It’s just the basic functionality that we are leveraging.

The subscription base in terms of their support, unlike before, now has a community addition. Now, everything is free.

It's just easy to use and straightforward. For an SMB, it is a recommendable email solution.

The product is easy to set up.

It’s a stable solution.

It does have a few bugs. However, they are small and can be worked around.

The performance could be better in terms of handling multiple domains.

I’ve used the solution for three to five years at this point. I’ve used it for a while now. It’s been a long time.

The stability has been great. There are some bugs that can be fixed with minor workarounds. It doesn’t crash or freeze. It’s reliable. I like the performance, however, of course, it could be better.

We have about 150 users on the solution currently.

We do not really plan to increase usage as we are trying to reduce it due to the pandemic. We really need to trim it down, actually.

We haven’t needed support, although in the community version, there is a community you can reach to for help. The community has been responsive so far.

The solution is easy to set up. It’s not overly complicated.

The installation process only takes an hour. It’s pretty fast.

Deployment and maintenance only require two people. There’s an engineer and a systems admin.

We have an integrator that assists us.

There is now a community addition that is free to use.

We are using an older version of the solution.

I’d rate the solution eight out of ten.

I would recommend the solution to others, especially if they happen to be an SMB.

We are mostly using Zimbra Collaboration for email purposes. It is also a collaborative tool. We also use it for sharing some documents and for meetings. 

Zimbra Collaboration is light to manage. It works on the Linux operating system, which is far better to manage than Microsoft Windows. Microsoft Exchange works only on the Windows server. We prefer working on the Linux server for security reasons and ease of management.

Zimbra Collaboration also has some integrated tools for security. It some modules to fight malware. These modules are not very powerful but are still doing a great job. Microsoft Exchange doesn't have a basic module. You have to purchase a security solution and add it to the solution. 

The cost of Zimbra Collaboration is one more reason for liking it. It is also very simple to migrate from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution.

Zimbra must improve its solution to make it easy so that the users don't have to use webmail to connect to their accounts and log in to webmail every time. This is something that is lacking in Zimbra Collaboration. They should provide a better way to easily connect email applications on the desktop to the Zimbra server.

They should also try to have more functionality for storage management, like Microsoft Exchange. Currently, the management of the email data must be done manually in Zimbra Collaboration, which we are finding very difficult. They should provide a way to save emails so that you can have more space on the server and storage. Because of the lack of this functionality, we are planning to migrate to Microsoft Exchange. Microsoft Exchange provides a better way to manage storage than Zimbra Collaboration. You cannot have a mail solution without storage management because emails will always increase. 

Zimbra Collaboration also needs tools for management. More back-office tools are required to manage the whole mailbox and space. You don't only manage emails but also the documents attached to the emails. Therefore, you require tools to select and decide what do you want to save or how do you want to free up space in your infrastructure.

I have been using Zimbra Collaboration for almost six years.

Zimbra doesn't have good technical support. They are not always available for help, so we have to troubleshoot as much possible by ourselves. It is not easy to find help when we have any incidents.

We have a local partner who is an expert in Zimbra. They really help us by trying their best and doing what they can do. Zimbra support is not always available, so we work only with local support.

Because Zimbra doesn't provide good support, it was difficult for our administration team to handle this solution in the beginning. They had to learn it on their own. The initial setup, however, wasn't really difficult. It was simple.

The teams in charge installed it in a short time with the help of a partner.

Zimbra Collaboration is less expensive than Microsoft Exchange. Zimbra works for small companies because it is not expensive. 

Zimbra Collaboration has more security tools than Microsoft Exchange. If you are choosing between Zimbra Collaboration and Microsoft Exchange, you have to take into account the cost of security tools with Microsoft Exchange. When you purchase Microsoft Exchange, you will also have to purchase tools for security, which adds to the cost. 

The migration from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution is very simple and easy. Migration from Microsoft Exchange to another email solution is very difficult. Microsoft doesn't allow migration that easily. In fact, you have to pay for tools to do that. You have to buy some expensive tools to migrate.

I would recommend this solution, but it depends on the size of the company and the cost. The number of emails that you use impacts the cost of the solution. 

For a small company, Zimbra Collaboration is good because it is simple, inexpensive, and not very difficult to deploy. For a big company, Microsoft Exchange is good because you have to manage the data, storage, and user emails, and you need a tool that can easily do it for you. Microsoft Exchange provides tools to manage the space and the server. You can create your own policy for emails. For example, you can save emails that are two years old somewhere else. Zimbra Collaboration currently does not have such functionality, and it is something very inconvenient because the emails keep on increasing, and the storage is not unlimited. Therefore, you have to find a way to manage the storage to save all emails and have free space for the new ones. This functionality is really powerful in Microsoft Exchange. That's why for a big company with 1,000 or more users, it's good to have Microsoft Exchange. It, however, also depends on your budget.

I would rate Zimbra Collaboration a seven out of ten. In spite of the lower cost of Zimbra Collaboration as compared to Microsoft Exchange, our management is planning to migrate to Microsoft Exchange because of the issue with storage management.

While I believe that Zimbra nine is the latest update, I am working with eight. 

The solution employs open source software. 

I implement the solution so that our end user customers may have mailing features, one-on-one chat facilities and unified communication. Within one's email are contained his calendaring facilities. 

One of the most valuable features involves the solution's automatic backup, which I find to be pretty simple and straightforward, and obviates the need for additional software. The web client features have good graphics and are pretty useful. 

It would be great if a group chat feature were created to allow for a team environment. The current chatting facility only allows for one-to-one chats. 

I have been using Zimbra Collaboration for nearly two years.

The product is very stable. One need only implement it, at which point it does not require further contemplation. Only basic maintenance is required. 

The solution is easy to scale. It boasts scalability features such as those allowing an additional server to be added for horizontal scaling.We have encountered no issues in this regard. 

We have not required much technical support, as the implementation we do primarily concerns the community edition with which we started. We feel the technical support to be good. They supply good email support. We do not require this at the moment. 

Nearly two years back, I was working with Microsoft Exchange. 

The advantage of Microsoft Exchange over Zimbra Collaboration is that it is very heavy and has much more features, but its management requires a person to have a greater level of skill. Microsoft is also a more mature solution. 

When it comes to the licensing of Zimbra Collaboration, my license covers the servers and I find its terms to be much simpler than those of Microsoft Exchange. Microsoft has multiple requirements, such as one concerning the need for the best OS licenses. There are multiple products needed to get Microsoft Exchange to work, but there is also a standalone option available. The licensing of Zimbra Collaboration is better than that of Microsoft Exchange and it's more affordable. 

The initial setup is simple. As the implementation is pretty simple, a small organization can initially make use of the community edition and move on from there. 

The management of the solution is simple. Save for mailbox related issues, the maintenance of the solution is minimal. Issues are limited to comparatively minor ones and mainly would arise at the SMTP end. 

When it comes to the licensing of Zimbra Collaboration, my license covers the servers and I find its terms to be much simpler than those of Microsoft Exchange. Microsoft has multiple requirements, such as one concerning the need for the best OS licenses. There are multiple products needed to get Microsoft Exchange to work, but there is also a standalone option available. The licensing of Zimbra Collaboration is better than that of Microsoft Exchange and it's more affordable. 

The product is on the client side, so our company provides implementation and support services. 

The solution is best suited for medium enterprises, although my organization supports mainly government organizations which range from medium to large. 

I rate Zimbra Collaboration as an eight out of ten. 

Our primary use case is for email purposes.

I would like to see a Microsoft schedule function added. In addition, some additional appearance and convenience features would be nice.

The most valuable feature of Zimbra Collaboration is the cost.

I have been working with Zimbra Collaboration for the past three or four years.

In general, the overall stability is good.

The initial setup was straightforward and not difficult.

Zimbra Collaboration has a better price than Microsoft.

When you compare it to Microsoft the only major difference is the scheduling and advanced scheduling feature

I would rate Zimbra Collaboration and eight out of ten.

I like that I can easily manage all accounts from the management console. This allows real time control of each account. With the CLI, I can also control and manage all server functions or any mailbox, for free.

Premium features, such as auto discovery and archiving, mobile management and HSM, make life much easier. Once implemented, they don't break when you perform OS updates.

When my clients moved from POP3 to IMAP and ActiveSync, they were able to port the complete mailbox. Additionally, Zimbra allows them to centrally manage and store all their emails.

The following areas could be improved:

• Backup
• Autodiscover
• Antispam
• Mobile

I think being able to purchase individual packages would be better than having all the features included in one big package.

I’ve been using Zimbra for more than 4 years.

We had a couple of issues with stability, but nothing that I couldn't work around or fix myself. Zimbra is a powerful product, but since VMware bought it, changes and bug fixes have been very slow in coming.

The main format for technical support is forum-based with tickets. This is not appropriate for big enterprises.

I have used Microsoft Exchange and PostFix. The main reason for switching to a Zimbra deployment is the cost in time.

The first time I performed a setup it was harder than expected. I only had basic Linux skills and Zimbra installation wasn't as straightforward as it is now.

As I mentioned before regarding free products, we expect the end user to figure out how to make it work. When we pay, then we can complain.

I recommend Zimbra for small and medium-sized businesses. Even larger enterprises could benefit from it. If they have a good system administrator and are willing to learn, they could reduce costs and improve performance, while increasing productivity as well.