Windows Server Reviews

We use Windows Server as a business operating system.

The solution is easy to use and it supports multiple applications compared to other basic systems that are currently in a production environment. Many people prefer the Windows environment because they are used to it from previous experiences.

The solution could improve by having more integration and some of the new features that are being released in Windows 11.

We have been using the solution within the past 12 months.

Windows Server is highly stable.

The solution is scalable.

We have 100 users using this solution in my organization.

The technical support from Microsoft has been good.

The installation is easy and it takes approximately 10 minutes.

I did the implementation of the solution.

There is a license required for Windows Server and Microsoft the cost is based on the number of ports that you have on the production server.

I would recommend this solution for enterprise use.

I rate Windows Server a ten out of ten.

The solution can be used for remote access through the remote desktop.

The main feature of the solution is it has a graphical interface.

I have been using the solution for approximately five years.

The stability is not very good because you have to restart the system to keep the stability.

The solution is scalable.

The installation is very easy and the installation takes approximately 20 minutes.

I can do the implementation of the solution myself.

The price of the solution could be reduced and there is a license required.

I would recommend Windows Server if they are not able to use Linux.

I rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.

We use the solution for managing data base applications for client monitoring.

The solution could be more secure.

My company has been using Windows Server for ten years.

I feel the solution to be stable. 

The scalability is commensurate with what we are willing to pay for. 

We have not had experience with technical support. As we are in Indonesia, the fact that our application must follow the operating system can be problematic. 

We have an IT team which handles installation. I take care of the business aspects when it comes to customer relations. 

I do not recall how long installation took. 

We feel Windows Server to be very powerful and are not aware of solutions which can act as its replacement. 

We are an IT company and make both internal and external use of the solution, which we do as an integrator. 

We have a remote client boarder and they claim that replication is difficult. 

There are 1,500 users making use of the solution in my company. 

I would rate Windows Server as a six or six-point-five out of ten. 

We use this solution to run several personal applications and enterprise applications.

The performance is good.

Windows Server could be more user-friendly.

I have been using Windows Server for more than 10 years.

We have used several different versions starting from 2008 to 2020.

It is a stable solution.

Window Server is a scalable solution.

All of the users in our organization are using Windows Server.

We have no issues with the technical support.

There is no improvement needed with the Microsoft technical support.

I have not used any other solutions.

I was not involved in the installation of the Windows Server.

We need one or two team members to deploy and maintain this solution.

With my experience, I would definitely recommend this solution.

From a performance perspective, I would rate Windows Server a nine out of ten.

Because I have only used Windows Server, I can't give you a comparison with other solutions such as Linus or Unix.

We use it to deploy any product.

It is stable, scalable, flexible, and easy to use.

The integration and monitoring could be improved.

I've been using it for a couple of months.

It is stable.

It is scalable.

The initial setup was easy and took about half an hour.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Windows Server at eight.

We are using the solution as a web server.

The most valuable feature is the performance.

The solution could improve by increasing security.

I have been using this solution for a few years.

Microsoft Server is a reliable solution.

There are a few people using this solution in my organization.

The technical support from Microsoft is good.

The installation is easy and it took me approximately 30 minutes.

I did the implementation myself.

I would recommend this solution.

I rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.

We use this solution for many purposes, such as managing user accounts in Active Directory, storage, hosting applications, and remote server access.

The most valuable features of this solution are its performance, flexibility, and functionality.

I have been using Windows Server for approximately 16 years.

The solution is stable.

There are five people using the solution in my organization.

I am currently still using Windows 10.

The installation is straightforward and it took 45 minutes.

I did the implementation myself and we have one engineer that does the maintenance of the solution.

The price of the solution is expensive, and there are many price options available, such as monthly or perpetual licenses.

I would recommend this solution.

I rate Windows Server a ten out of ten.

I am using this solution for a databases server running Azure.

The solution is not easy to use and could be simplified. Additionally, the solution could have better integration.

I have been using this solution within the last 12 months.

The solution is stable.

The scalability has been fine for what we have been using it for. However, we have not fully utilized scalability.

We have approximately 100 users using this solution in my organization.

The installation is easy.

You do not need a vendor or consultant to do the implementation.

I would recommend this solution.

I rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.